# ADR-013: Family composition — the reactive boundary, the sweep lease, and the feature-graph resolution

## Status

Accepted (2026-10-11)

## Context

While this crate paused mid-pre-decomposition (ADR-012 was its last
round), the sibling **alkstore** shipped v0.1.0: one reactive
coordination contract (`Store` — notify/listen, named TTL locks,
durable queues, streams with per-consumer offsets, outbox,
leader-elected scheduler) behind engine crates (`-mem`, `-sqlite`,
`-postgres`), contract-pinned by a factory-driven suite. Its
consumer-inventory — built from the paused consumers' written
documents under this crate's own deferral discipline — grades three
needs of *this crate's specced machinery*:

- the fleet sweeper lock → named locks, **pinned**;
- maintenance cadence (sweep scheduling, pin-renewal workers) →
  scheduler/queues, **documented** — against ADR-005's "embedder owns
  cadence";
- fleet invalidation ("sweep/manifest changed" among fleet instances)
  → notify, **documented**.

The first consumers (alkgit, alkfs) will deploy both crates together;
composition facts are therefore inter-crate decisions that must be
decided on evidence in hand, not parked on deployments that cannot
pre-exist this crate (the Schrödinger's-code rule; the OQ register's
OQ-09/OQ-10 precedents). The audit round that produced this ADR also
found one live circular hedge in the register: OQ-11 parked the
pg-only kv feature graph on "a named deployment requirement arriving
from outside this crate" — a deciding fact *this tree already
contains* (REQ-2's consolidation posture, which ADR-009 shipped as
"a fleet node can consolidate on postgres-only"), the same
shape-shifter OQ-09/OQ-10 were rejected for, and the last one in the
register.

Additionally, the alkcall failure mode ("published doc surface
promising unimplemented behavior, surviving versions") motivates
stating this crate's publish discipline before anything ships.

## Decision

### 1. The reactive boundary: no sibling dependency in-core; reactivity is deployment-layer composition

**The core crate gains no alkstore dependency and no reactive
machinery.** No in-crate notify, no in-crate scheduler, no queues,
no invalidation hooks on any facade method. ADR-001's substrate
posture extends by the same reasoning to the reactive substrate:
the store layer ships bytes-and-addresses, and everything that makes
bytes *reactive* is composition above the facade.

- **ADR-005's "embedder owns cadence" stands, with the substrate
  named.** An embedder wanting interval sweeps, pin-renewal workers
  (the TTL/3 cadence, ADR-008), or maintenance dispatch composes them
  above the facade — typically with the sibling substrate's
  scheduler/queues. The punt was always a placement decision, not a
  missing mechanism; the sibling's existence changes nothing here.
- **Sweep outcomes are data (ADR-012 §1) — with a pinned consumer.**
  The report is what the embedder's reactive wiring consumes:
  `SweepReport` → sibling-notify/stream events (downstream cache
  invalidation), report cadence → the embedder's scheduler. No
  in-crate hook exists for any of it; this crate never references
  the sibling's types, channels, or names.
- The engine-driver dependency posture is likewise untouched: no
  alkstore engine crate enters this crate's feature graph (see §4's
  graph, which names only storage engines).

### 2. The sweep lease: semantics pinned, provider shipped

The fleet sweep single-flighter (ADR-008 §2's advisory lock, whose
state home is the engine-state seam's sweep-lock clause — ADR-010 §2,
ADR-012 §5) is hereby pinned as a **named exclusive sweep lease**:

- at most one sweep in flight per pool;
- acquisition is an atomic test-and-set at the fleet host;
- holdership ends at explicit release, owner-process death, or the
  underlying engine session's loss;
- contention is the `GcAbortCause::SweeperLock` report abort with
  nothing deleted (ADR-012 §1 — report data, never an error).

These are exactly pg advisory-lock semantics — the shipped provider
(ADR-008's mechanism, unchanged; a lease whose life is the sweep's
own) — and exactly what a named TTL lock provides when its lease
spans the sweep run. Pinning the *semantics* is what makes the
provider substitutable without a contract change: if the family ever
wants the in-crate provider swapped (e.g. onto the sibling's lock),
that is the ADR-007-shaped substitution door — a new ADR with its own
evidence, not an open question.

A deployment may *additionally* serialize its maintenance above this
crate: an embedder holding a named lease on the sibling substrate
before invoking `sweep()` composes one discipline over its own
scheduled tasks (sweeps, expiry reaping, renewal workers). This is
composition above the facade — it changes no contract and is not
required for fleet correctness, because the in-crate advisory clause
is this crate's own guarantee regardless.

### 3. Co-tenancy and the no-cross-store-atomicity ruling (the downstream-facing composition contract)

A fleet pg instance hosts, as co-tenants: this crate's CAS rows and
GC state (its pool; `gc_pins` / `gc_window` — ADR-012 §4); the
sibling substrate's reactive machinery; consumer business tables
(refs, manifests, path trees — outside this crate per ADR-004); and
the consumer liveness tables this crate's fleet arbitration
consults as named table references (ADR-012 §6.6). **No crate owns
another's tables; co-tenancy is a named deployment statement** — the
posture decisions/007 and ADR-008 §2 already assumed, now citable so
downstream ADRs (alkgit's refs, alkfs's tree) reference it rather
than re-derive it.

- **Cross-store atomicity is unachievable by construction** — each
  crate owns its own transaction scope, and no seam bridges them.
  The family posture downstream is the outbox/compensation pattern
  (alkstore's `outbox`/`notify_tx` are its substrate), and this
  crate's load-bearing properties for that pattern are already
  guaranteed and stay so: **puts are idempotent under CAS**
  (delete-then-recover is a byte-identical re-put, ADR-005),
  **deletes are windowed and re-arbitrated before execution**
  (ADR-005; ADR-012 §6.7), and **sweep outcomes are data** (ADR-012
  §1). Nothing downstream may rely on cross-store-atomic anything;
  nothing here relies on it either.
- **Fleet liveness registration's two forms are the
  downstream-facing seam:** the fleet form — a named liveness table
  co-tenant on the fleet host (ADR-012 §6.6) — and the single-node
  form — the in-process callback (ADR-005). Every downstream crate
  plans against both. The requirement to keep a consumer's liveness
  protection expressible on the fleet host is a *composition
  constraint* on downstream schema placement: a consumer whose
  liveness lives on a non-co-tenant engine participates in fleet GC
  via pins (put-path) only, and its sweep-time liveness is expressed
  by materializing rows per ADR-008 §2's materialization rule.

### 4. OQ-11 resolved: engine features pull driver clusters independently — including sqlite

**Features gate engines; tiers are constructor composition, not
features.** The ADR-010 §1 discipline ("engine features pull the
driver cluster independently" — pg-lo does not imply postgres)
extends to every engine:

| Engine | Feature | Default | Pulls |
|---|---|---|---|
| kv `sqlite` | `sqlite` | **on** | `rusqlite` |
| kv `postgres` | `postgres` | off | `tokio-postgres` + `deadpool-postgres` |
| kv `mem` | `mem` | off | nothing |
| large `local` | *(ungated)* | always present | nothing |
| large `pg-lo` | `pg-lo` | off | the shared pg driver cluster |

- The base `kv` feature — which existed because sqlite was the kv
  tier's only shippable driver carrier and so pulled `rusqlite` under
  the tier's name — is retired, as is the `large` tier feature
  (nothing was ever behind it; `local` is ungated because it pulls
  nothing). ADR-011 §3's `feature fs` → `feature large` rename line
  is superseded by this table; ADR-003's "tiers default-on" wording
  now reads as constructor-presence, not feature claims.
- **A pg-pure build (`sqlite` off — kv=postgres, and `large`=pg-lo if
  wanted) is a supported configuration this crate does not default
  to.** This resolves OQ-11 on evidence in hand: REQ-2 (operator
  authority, 2026-10-03) is the deployment requirement the parked row
  awaited — its consolidation posture (ADR-009's postgres-only fleet
  node) is the pg-pure node, and parking the feature graph on it was
  circular (a deployment requirement whose name the tree already
  carries is not an absent fact). Mechanism unchanged from the
  precedent: engine features pull their own drivers, so sqlite's
  absence is one feature toggle, never a graph surgery.
- **Default builds are unchanged**: `sqlite` default-on keeps the
  batteries-included default (the lean-base principle constrains
  default builds, which still pull only tokio/thiserror/parking_lot
  plus the default engine's driver).

### 5. Publish guard (stated pre-code, on the alkcall lesson)

The crate publishes only after its facade exists and passes the
invariants' test gate. From first publish, its semver is the contract
version — every published surface is implemented, every contract
change cites its ADR — the discipline the sibling substrate pinned in
its contract-versioning ADR. No published doc surface ever carries a
"planned/not-implemented" promise.

## Consequences

**Positive**

- The composition contract exists as a named ADR: alkgit/alkfs cite
  §3 for schema co-tenancy, the two-form liveness seam, and the
  no-cross-store-atomicity posture, instead of re-deriving or
  guessing.
- The register's one live circular hedge (OQ-11) is resolved on
  in-tree evidence, pre-consumer, where the fix is cheapest — the
  alkcall-shaped outcome this round exists to avoid.
- A new fleet node's dependency tree is honest: pg-pure nodes do not
  compile rusqlite; nothing reactive is dead code in the core.
- The sweep lease's semantics and provider are single-valued; a
  provider swap later is a mechanism ADR, not a contract break.

**Negative**

- One more ADR's worth of surface for every reader of the fleet GC
  story (§2 changes no signatures; it pins names for semantics the
  mechanisms already had).
- The feature graph must be implemented as specced in §4's table — an
  implementation-facing edit arriving with the engine tasks rather
  than inside one of them.

**Neutral**

- No tier, engine, constructor mode, facade signature, error variant,
  or ops payload changes. `fleet: true` validation (ADR-012 §3) and
  the composite fleet-validity predicate are untouched.
- The sibling substrate relationship is documentary here —
  requirements-level facts and boundary rules — with the eventual
  dependency edge (if any, e.g. an ops-layer convenience) requiring
  its own ADR through the substitution door.

## References

- ADR-001 (the substrate posture §1 extends to the reactive
  substrate), ADR-003/007 (the substitution door §2 applies), ADR-005
  (cadence ownership; delete-then-recover as the idempotency
  backstop), ADR-006 (the deferred-cost pattern this ADR's OQ-11
  resolution follows), ADR-008 (the fleet sweep lock §2 pins and the
  liveness materialization rule §3 reuses), ADR-010/012 (the
  engine-state seam, GC-state host, outcomes-as-data, the composite
  predicate), ADR-011 (vocabulary; the constructor tables §4
  supersedes in feature shape)
- [requirements.md](../requirements.md) — REQ-2 (the fact OQ-11 parked
  on), REQ-5 (the composition requirement §3 serves)
- [overview.md](../overview.md) (dependency posture, amended §4;
  non-goals, extended §1); [backends-and-dispatch.md](../backends-and-dispatch.md)
  (engine/features table, amended §4); [store-api.md](../store-api.md)
  (sweep semantics, §2's lease wording); [gc-and-namespaces.md](../gc-and-namespaces.md)
  (sweeper locking); [open-questions.md](../open-questions.md) (OQ-11
  resolved)
- alkstore — `/workspace/@alkdev/alkstore`: its consumer-inventory
  (`docs/research/consumer-inventory.md`, the graded fleet rows),
  ADR-016 (deployment honesty), ADR-017 (contract versioning — §5's
  cited discipline); the sibling's payload model (JSON-only) is its
  own non-goal boundary, matching this crate's object-storage
  boundary here
- The alkcall hedge precedent (published-doc-surface drift) — the
  failure mode §5 guards, on the operator's record