The gate read the landed ops implementation against the pinned text line by line (ops-surface.md; ADR-001/006/008/010 §4/012 §2/013 §1/§4; OQ-09; POC #3 A3; ADR-014; alkcall 0.9 ADR-016/017/021/046/047/049) and found it conformant on every check: the machinery ridden end to end (the JSON plane's OperationSpec + JSON Schema + typed error schemas; the channel_open marker, establishment, and Sub/Pub kinds incl. amendment-4's marked-pub surface; AccessControl at op entry), the ACL mapping closed-by-default verified by test, delete internal-authority-only, the pin-token contract exact against ADR-010 §4/ADR-012 §2 (the token is the pin; the renewal form's three answers; the validity domain; the custody split; no in-crate renewal worker), the no-side-door enumeration re-verified against the code, and the fanout seam against the A3 text with the producer-side design point recorded. The operator's task-hash log matched git log. Findings fixed inline: - W7-1: the fleet TTL row's no-leaked-renewal assertion raced an in-flight renewal write at the guard's drop (pre-existing wave-6 harness race — reproduces with ops compiled out). Freezing is now asserted across two settled reads beyond the expiry horizon, with the never-moves-backwards guard; leak detection unchanged. - W7-2: stale "wave 7" forward references rewritten to landed readings (ops.rs's fanout wiring note, store.rs's two re-routing notes, pg_lo.rs's orphan-recovery note, gc.rs's convert/pin_count clause — now reading the confirm verb as the ops build's consumer). - W7-3: task-text hygiene — ops-fetch/ops-e2e-flows acceptance boxes checked (work verified and Summarized), ops-put's leftover placeholder lines removed, the audit's fleet/gc access correctly labeled the facade's crate-internal pin/fleet access. No wave-8 amendments; the fuzzing target inventory proceeds per plan. Verification: cargo test 73/19/3 (default); --features ops 112/19/3; --all-features 271/125/4 live against the harness server; --no-default-features --features postgres and postgres,pg-lo green (pure builds, no ops); clippy --all-targets -D warnings green on default/ops/all-features/pg-pure; cargo fmt --check green; cargo doc --no-deps zero warnings (default and ops; all-features at the recorded pre-existing 35-warning private-link baseline). Wave 8 (fuzzing) decomposition is unblocked.
18 KiB
id, name, status, depends_on, scope, risk, impact, level, tags
| id | name | status | depends_on | scope | risk | impact | level | tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| review-wave-7 | Wave 7 review gate — the ops-vs-alkcall conformance gate | completed |
|
narrow | low | phase | review |
|
Description
The wave-7 review gate (docs/plans/implementation.md §Review gates: "ops-vs-alkcall conformance (the machinery ridden, not re-invented); ACL mapping vs OQ-09's closed-by-default; the pin token contract vs ADR-010 §4/ADR-012 §2; no backend side-door"), before wave 8 decomposes. The gate reads the implementation against the pinned ADR text line by line (the wave-1..6 gates' method) — the documents, not memory.
Gate checks:
- ops-vs-alkcall conformance — the machinery ridden, not
re-invented: the JSON control plane rides
OperationSpec+ JSON Schema validation + typed error schemas (alkcall ADR-016); the binary data plane rides thechannel_openmarker + establishment (alkcall ADR-047/049) with the Sub/Sink handler kinds (ADR-021/ 046); ACL is alkcall'sAccessControlat op entry (ADR-011) under the ADR-017 privilege model; producer/consumer vocabulary throughout; no parallel framing, validation, or authorization invented anywhere in the module. - ACL mapping vs OQ-09's closed-by-default: namespace-as-resource
(
resource_type: "blob-namespace", theresource_id_pathselecting the payload'snamespacefield); the read action on fetch/stat/have, the write action on put; unlisted namespaces deny by default (no ACL entry ⇒ no read, no write — verified by test, not by reading the code); delete not namespace-gated at all — internal authority context only (alkcall ADR-017: internal switches context, never skips ACL). - The pin token contract vs ADR-010 §4/ADR-012 §2: the token is
the pin (no second pin state); the
blobs/putresponse{token, digest}with both fields always present; the have renewal form (one digest + token; verify-mapping → the crate- internalpin_renew; expired/foreign →present: false, no renewal); the token's validity domain = the minting node (foreign tokens refusedpresent: false, not an error); the mapping's process lifetime (outlives the handler); the guard-custody split (fleet: the guard drops at response completion — the row's expiry is the liveness signal; non-fleet: the registry holds the guard — nothing expires); the TTL/3 renewal cadence is embedder composition (ADR-013 §1) — no in-crate renewal worker. - No backend side-door (ADR-001 §4): the ops module's store
access enumerated — the public facade plus the crate-internal
renewal seam only; no
Backendtouch, no engine types, no ops-internal path around the store facade; the e2e audit's enumeration re-verified against the code. - The fanout seam vs POC #3 finding A3: one reader, store arm +
subscriber arms; late joiners degrade to a verified post-commit
get(identical bytes under CAS); the slow-subscriber drop-and-late-join policy is ops-layer; the producer-side design point consistent with the A3 text. - The base crate stays lean: the
opsfeature default-off; the alkcall + serde + CSPRNG deps ride the gate; the default build's dependency tree unchanged (convention 8; ADR-013 §4's table). - Code-smell / hygiene sweep (the gate's standing hygiene block):
cargo doc --no-depszero warnings (the PGLO-1 class — public-module doc links resolving to crate-internal items — de-link rather than export).- The
#![allow(dead_code)]scope notes match their remaining scope — the ops module's notes audited;pin_check's wave-6 "deliberately unconsumed" note updated to its landed state. - Stale forward references updated — every "wave 7" note in the module docs reads the landed state.
- Family conventions: no inline comments in code (doc comments
on public API fine), thiserror, tokio-only async, no
unwrap/expectoutside tests, naming, one-module-per-file re-export shape, no blocking I/O on the async path. - Task-description correctness: each wave-7 task's Summary matches what actually landed (the gate reads the diffs against the task texts, not the Notes' claims alone).
- Gates green:
cargo test(default),cargo test --features ops,cargo test --all-features(the fleet rows live at acceptance), the pure builds (cargo check --no-default-features --features postgres/--features "postgres,pg-lo"),cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warningsacross the feature variants (default, ops, all-features, the pg-pure builds),cargo fmt --check,cargo doc --no-deps. (The engine-less builds —--no-default-featuresalone, with or withoutops— have never compiled, identical E0004s independent of the feature; a zero-engine store is not a supported configuration — ADR-014 §4's verified non-finding. Not a gate row.) - No stub ships from this crate (ADR-014 §4): nothing in
src/or the landed tests contains a stub-shapednot_implementedsurface or asserts stub behavior; every registered op is capable of serving (put was held unregistered, not stubbed, until the ADR-014 §3 gate cleared — alkcall 0.9.0, 2026-10-14 — whereupon the put task registered it).
Findings are fixed inline where cheap, or recorded as wave-8 amendments where they shape the next decomposition (the fuzzing wave's target inventory reads this wave's surfaces — a payload-shape finding lands beside it). The gate's completion is what unblocks wave 8's decomposition.
Acceptance Criteria
- Every gate check above read and verified against the cited ADR text (not from memory of it)
- Named design points each decided, recorded, and consistent with the specs
- Findings fixed inline or recorded as wave-8 amendments with owners
- All gates re-run green after any fixes — including
cargo doc --no-depsexplicitly (the PGLO-1 class) - Wave 8 decomposition unblocked (recorded in this task's Summary)
References
- docs/plans/implementation.md (§Wave 7, §Review gates — the ops-vs-alkcall conformance gate)
- docs/architecture/ops-surface.md (the op family, the ACL mapping, the hand-over contract)
- docs/architecture/decisions/001-substrate-posture-and-ops-placement.md §2/§3/§4
- docs/architecture/decisions/006-verification-posture-and-transfer-encoding.md
- docs/architecture/decisions/008-trait-size-probe-fleet-gc-and-large-engines.md §2/§3
- docs/architecture/decisions/010-backend-io-seams-and-fleet-state-home.md §4
- docs/architecture/decisions/012-pre-decomposition-consistency-rulings.md §2
- docs/architecture/decisions/013-family-composition-reactive-boundary-and-feature-graph.md §1/§4
- docs/architecture/open-questions.md OQ-09
- docs/research/poc-largeblob-findings.md finding A3
- tasks/review-wave-6.md (the gate method; the W6-3 note this gate audits closed)
- tasks/ops-foundation.md, tasks/ops-call-harness.md, tasks/ops-json-ops.md, tasks/ops-fetch.md, tasks/ops-put.md, tasks/ops-e2e-flows.md (the wave's tasks)
Notes
Gate completed 2026-10-14, the wave-1..6 method: every gate check read against the pinned text (ops-surface.md; ADR-001 §2/§3/§4, ADR-006, ADR-008 §2/§3, ADR-010 §4, ADR-012 §2/§6, ADR-013 §1/§4, OQ-09, POC #3 finding A3, ADR-014; alkcall 0.9.0's ADR-016/017/021/ 046/047/049 and
registry/spec.rs), then verified against the landed diffs. The operator's task-hash log matchedgit logexactly: ops-foundation6feaa2a, ops-call-harnessbc6da37, ops-json-ops5144b6a, ops-fetchd927da2, ops-putbe54f08, ops-e2e-flowsc88d921(with the ADR-014 docs + alkcall-0.9 bump commits between the fetch and put tasks).Gate checks, each verdict:
- ops-vs-alkcall conformance — the machinery ridden, not re-invented — conformant. The JSON plane is
OperationSpec+ JSON Schema (input/output schemas per op,INVALID_INPUTfires at the registry before any handler) + typedErrorDefinitions (ADR-016's shape); the data plane is thechannel_openmarker (channels/blobs/sub/channels/blobs/pubonalk/blobs— the standard name-derives-ALPN shape, no explicitchannel_open_alpn) with the awaited establishment and theSub/Pubhandler kinds (ADR-021/046/047/049; put rides amendment 4's marked-pub machinery throughregister_pub_openable, ack-in-result). ACL isAccessControl+resource_id_pathat op entry under ADR-017's model; producer/consumer vocabulary; no framing, validation, or authorization re-implemented anywhere in the module (the handlers' post-schema ingress is ingress, not validation). No stub ships:not_implemented/todo!/unimplemented!absent fromsrc/and the landed tests; put was held unregistered until the ADR-014 §3 gate (alkcall 0.9.0) cleared, whereupon the put task registered it.- ACL mapping vs OQ-09 — conformant, verified by test (the harness's closed-by-default rows + the ACL matrix e2e): namespace = resource (
resource_type: "blob-namespace",resource_id_path: "$.namespace"), the read action on stat/have/fetch, the write action on put; an unlisted namespace denies read AND write on the wire with a grant present elsewhere; ungranted identities denied at the call-plane gate. delete:Visibility::Internal,AccessControl::default()with no resource mapping (not namespace-gated), external discovery NOT_FOUND (ADR-017's visibility discipline), the internal path proven through composition under the declared composition authority.- The pin token contract vs ADR-010 §4/ADR-012 §2 — conformant: the token is the pin (no second pin state);
{token, digest}with both fields required by the response schema; the have renewal form (arity enforced at the schema'sif/thenand the handler'sINVALID_RENEWAL_FORM; the verify-the-mapping-then-renew probe — registry lookup, one-token-one-row digest check, the store core'sops_pin_checkclassification, the never-resurrectops_pin_renew; expired/foreign/mismatched/unknown allpresent: false, never an error); the validity domain = the minting node (per-process registry; the foreign-token refusal is symmetric, fleet-tested both directions); the mapping's process lifetime; the guard-custody split (fleet: mapping only, the guard's drop at response completion is the handler's act, row-expiry the liveness signal — live-tested with thegc_pinsinstrument,pin_count 0at response; non-fleet: the registry holds the guard, nothing expires, conversion at the embedder's confirm); the TTL/3 cadence nowhere in-crate (no renewal worker exists — the e2e tests play the embedder's cadence role explicitly per ADR-013 §1).- No backend side-door (ADR-001 §4) — conformant, re-verified against the code: the harness's structural audit enumerates every non-test store access and asserts the set equals the public facade verbs plus the facade's crate-internal pin/fleet access (
gc,fleet— the ADR-010 §4 "crosses the seam by construction" access,pub(crate)) plus exactly the crate-internal renewal seam (ops_pin_check/ops_pin_renew, the W6-3 named consumer, store core-owned, zero public-API widening); forbidden-name assertions coverBackendand every engine type/crate path. The audit's task-text wording labeledfleet/gc"public facade verbs" — corrected inline (W7-3 below; the enumeration itself was accurate).- The fanout seam vs POC #3 finding A3 — conformant: one read of the put's stream (the tee hands each chunk once per arm), the store arm + bounded subscriber arms, the late-joiner degrade to the verified get (
subscribe → None, channel end, tap-time-set with no prefix), the drop-and-late-join policy ops-layer (per-broadcastStall/Drop), and the producer-side design point decided and recorded against the A3 text (fetches never produce read-side broadcasts — the put's stream reader is the canonical producer).- The base crate stays lean — conformant:
opsdefault-off pulling alkcall/serde/serde_json/getrandom;cargo tree(default features) contains none of them.- Hygiene sweep — findings fixed inline (below): the fleet TTL row's racy stop assertion (W7-1), the stale forward references (W7-2), the task-text hygiene (W7-3).
cargo doc --no-depszero warnings on the default and ops builds; the all-features doc build sits at the pre-existing private-link baseline (35 warnings, the recorded PGLO-1 residue — count identical before and after this gate's edits). The#![allow(dead_code)]scope notes audited and updated to their landed consumers: gc.rs'spin_checkclause reads its wave-7 state (W6-3's note closed), theconvert/pin_countclause now reads the confirm verb as the ops build's non-test consumer, pg_lo.rs's orphan-recovery note reads the landed ops module (which consumes none of it), ops.rs's fanout section reads its landed producer/consumer wiring, store.rs's two "wave 7's wiring" notes read landed. Family conventions hold: no unwrap/expect outside tests, thiserror, tokio-only async, the one-module re-export shape, no blocking I/O on the async path (the fanout registry's arms are cloned out under the lock and driven outside it).- Gates green (post-fixes; tests live against pglo-poc :15432 unless noted):
cargo test73/19/3 ok (default);cargo test --features ops112/19/3 ok;cargo test --all-features271/125/4 ok live;cargo test --no-default-features --features postgres(pg-pure, no ops) green;--no-default-features --features "postgres,pg-lo"140 lib green; the pure-build checks green; clippy--all-targets -- -D warningsgreen on default, ops, and all-features; fmt green; doc counts above. The engine-less builds remain the recorded non-finding (not a gate row).Findings fixed inline:
- W7-1 — the fleet TTL row's no-leaked-renewal assertion raced an in-flight write (fixed).
fleet_ttl_the_pin_guards _ ttl_third_renewal_moves_the_rows_expiryasserted strict expiry equality across a single post-drop read; a renewal write in flight at the guard's drop (legal — the test's own doc comment admits one tick there) landed after the read and moved the row once, flaking under load. Pre-existing wave-6 test-harness race, not machinery or a wave-7 regression: it reproduces with ops compiled out (--no-default-features --features postgres) and it failed for two earlier wave-7 tasks likewise; no leaked duty exists (the expiry freezes after the one movement). Fixed test-side: the row's freeze is now asserted across two settled reads taken beyond the expiry horizon, with the expiry-never-moves-backwards guard for the one in-flight landing — leaked-duties detection is unchanged (a leak keeps moving the row through both reads). Suite re-run green across the shapes recorded above.- W7-2 — stale forward references (fixed). ops.rs's fanout section ("the producer wiring lands with ops-put"), store.rs's two "wave 7's wiring" notes, pg_lo.rs's "the ops/maintenance surface is wave 7+" note, and gc.rs's muddled "the conversion's in-sweep consumer being wave 7's liveness edit flow" trailing clause all rewrote to landed readings.
- W7-3 — task-text hygiene (fixed). ops-fetch and ops-e2e-flows carried unchecked acceptance boxes whose work was verified and Summarized; ops-put's Notes/Summary carried unfilled placeholder lines above filled content; the audit's
fleet/gcaccess mislabeled "public facade verbs" — all corrected.Wave-8 amendments: none. No payload-shape finding surfaced: the fuzzing wave's target inventory proceeds per plan (key encoding + the ops JSON specs + the binary channel framing).
Summary
Completed 2026-10-14 (wave 7's review gate). The gate read the landed ops implementation against the pinned text line by line and found it conformant on every check: the alkcall machinery ridden end to end (OperationSpec + JSON Schema + typed error schemas; the channel_open marker, establishment, and Sub/Pub machinery incl. alkcall 0.9's amendment-4 marked-pub surface;
AccessControlat op entry), the ACL mapping closed-by-default verified by test, delete internal-authority-only and not namespace-gated, the pin-token contract vs ADR-010 §4/ADR-012 §2 exact (the token is the pin; the renewal form's three answers; the validity domain; the custody split; no in-crate renewal worker), the no-side-door enumeration re-verified against the code (the facade + the pin/fleet access + exactly the renewal seam), and the fanout seam against the A3 text with the producer-side design point recorded. Three findings fixed inline: the pre-existing fleet-TTL race assertion (settled across two reads; flake confirmed pre-wave-7 and with ops compiled out), the stale "wave 7" forward references across five module docs, and the task-text hygiene (unchecked-but-done boxes, leftover placeholders, the audit's fleet/gc wording). No wave-8 amendments — no payload-shape finding. All gates re-run green after the fixes (test suites live against the harness server, the clippy variants, the pg-pure checks, fmt, andcargo doc --no-depszero-warnings on the default and ops builds at the recorded all-features baseline). The operator's task-hash log matchedgit log. Wave 8 (fuzzing) decomposition is unblocked.