# ADR-051: In-Tree Channel Relay (`ChannelRelay`) and the Hub-Leg Assembly

## Status

Accepted (2026-09-17) — amends ADR-042 (the relay contract's
implementation home moves into alkcall; the translate-not-forward
contract is unchanged). Sequenced after review 008 remediation Units 1
and 2 (both landed, alkcall 0.8.0): the relay's establisher projects
the spoke reply's extra fields via `Establishment` reply fields
(ADR-049 amendment 3), and the spoke's flavor-form open ops arrive
reconstructed WITH the `channel_open` marker through discovery
(ADR-047 amendment 3). All three implementation units are landed:
Unit 3a (the `ChannelRelay` component, §1–§4, §6) in
`src/channels/relay.rs`, Unit 3b (the hub-leg install template, §5) in
`src/channels/hub_leg.rs`, and Unit 3c (the review's gate-2 e2e
harness, gates 6/7) in `src/channels/gate2_tests.rs` — alkcall 0.8.0.

## Context

Review 008's remediation plan (Unit 3) pinned the in-tree relay as the
implementation of the review's U-1 gate 2 — the hub-relay round trip
that proves flavor-form marked ops survive discovery into a genuine
relay. The as-filed ADR-042 §"Scope note" put the relay implementation
in `alknet-hub`/downstream; the consumers that now exist (alktunnels'
graduation, alkhttp's fallback hub, alknodes, and the hub/spoke family
behind them) all need the same shape, so the implementation moves into
alkcall as a reusable export.

The consumer family the relay must serve is the hub/spoke composition:
spokes connect to a hub and expose services; the hub re-exposes those
services to other spokes (and consumers) based on ACL. Both a hub and
a spoke can be a relay depending on the setup. A canonical example:
spoke A exposes `channels/tunnel/direct`; the hub imports it via
`from_call`, gates it with its own ACL, and re-exposes it on its
consumer-leg channel-0 registries; spoke B opens through the hub and
the hub relays the channel to spoke A. The hub performs no port
binding and no protocol work on the data plane — the property that
makes the hub-acl-relay role cheap (alktunnels' no-bind posture, the
same property ADR-042 §What the hub runs pins: "the hub never runs a
handler for `alk/tty`, `alk/ssh`, or `alk/tunnel`").

Two implementation surfaces were evaluated for the data plane; the
decision records why the wrapper-composition shape wins over
byte-forward-with-rewrite.

## Decision

### 1. The relay is the wrapper composition — translate-not-forward, implemented with the existing open-op machinery

ADR-042's two-layer contract is implemented as composition of pieces
this crate already has:

- **Layer 1 (call-protocol translate)** is the ADR-049 establisher:
  the hub's consumer-leg open op resolves through the full open-op
  wrapper (registry ACL → per-identity cap → allocation), then the
  establisher calls the producer leg's open op, adopts the returned
  spoke channel id into the producer-leg `ChannelManager`, and returns
  `Establishment::new(plan)` whose plan carries the spoke-leg streams.
  The hub allocates its own consumer-leg `channel_id`; the spoke
  allocated its own producer-leg id; the two ids never appear in each
  other's namespaces.
- **Layer 2 (byte-forward)** is the ADR-050 `OpenHandler`:
  `pump_bidi(consumer_leg_bistream, spoke_recv, spoke_send)` — the
  pump's generic bounds already match the relay's two legs. The relay
  never parses chunk framing on either leg; the mux/demux on each leg
  absorbs the 8-byte header (ADR-034) and the channel-id namespaces
  are per-connection, so no header rewrite exists. Awaited inline per
  the R-02 lifetime contract; on completion both legs tear down (the
  wrapper's handler-exit teardown covers the consumer leg; the pump's
  send/recv drops EOF the spoke leg).

**The relay map dissolves.** ADR-042 §`channel_id` mapping pinned a
`HashMap<channel_id, channel_id>` per (browser, spoke) pair maintained
by the hub. The implementation needs no map: each leg's `ChannelManager`
already holds its own id → routing state, and the per-channel pump
closure binds both legs' streams. The mapping is implicit-per-channel.
This is a two-way-door implementation detail within ADR-042's contract
(the ADR itself marked the mapping strategy two-way).

**`channel/close` and `channel/control` need no translation surface.**
Consumer-side close → wrapper teardown → pump abort → send-half drop →
EOF chunk → spoke handler exits → spoke's own wrapper decrements its
ledger. Close propagates through the EOF cascade with correct ledger
accounting on both legs; the hub never sees a `channel/close` to
translate. Control stays per-leg (`channel/control` is not implemented
upstream, OQ-39 — a hub wanting cross-leg control translation composes
it downstream). This supersedes the ADR-042 §mapping bullet's
close-translation sentence as an implementation matter: the mapping
entry the sentence's removal depended on does not exist.

### 2. What the relay holds on the producer leg: `CallConnection` + `ChannelManager`

The relay's producer-leg surface is `Arc<CallConnection>` (for the
translate hop's open call) plus the producer-leg `ChannelManager` (for
`adopt_channel` and teardown visibility) — not a `ChannelClient`.

Rationale: `ChannelClient`'s calling surface detaches on
`take_call_connection` (the hub needs the connection for `from_call`
import AND for the relay's establisher AND possibly its own ops —
three claimants), while `Arc<CallConnection>` is `Clone` and the
client's manager accessor yields the same `ChannelManager` the relay
needs. A hub that dials the spoke with `ChannelClient::from_connection`
and then tears the client down after import keeps the relay alive on
the `Arc`s. The establisher builds its forwarded payload directly
(`build_forwarded_payload` semantics — the hub as caller, the consumer
as `forwarded_for`, ADR-026 §3) rather than through
`call_open_op`, which carries no payload variant.

The spoke reply's `channel_id` is stripped before projection (the
consumer-leg reply carries the hub-allocated id, not the spoke's);
the spoke reply's other fields ride through `with_reply_fields` —
`bound` flows end-to-end with per-hop truthfulness (a hub re-producing
a listen resource binds its own listener and contributes its own
`bound`; alktunnels ADR-008 §Hub re-produce).

### 3. Reason-code mapping (spoke `CallError` → `EstablishmentError`)

The spoke's open can fail with the full call-error vocabulary; the
establisher maps it into `EstablishmentError` by class:

| Spoke failure | `EstablishmentError` variant | Wire reason |
|---|---|---|
| `channel:open_failed` with a typed reason | the same class — `DialFailed` for `dial_failed`/`timeout`, `UnknownResource` for `unknown_resource`, `ResourceShortage` for `resource_shortage`, `HandlerError` for `handler_error` | the mapped reason |
| `channel:open_failed` reason `timeout` | `DialFailed` (the spoke establishment exceeded the spoke bound — from the consumer's side it is unreachable-target-shaped) | `dial_failed`, spoke message preserved |
| `NOT_FOUND` (spoke predates the op) | `HandlerError` carrying the code | `handler_error` |
| `FORBIDDEN` (hub lacks the spoke grant) | `HandlerError` carrying the code | `handler_error` |
| other `CallError` | `HandlerError` carrying the code | `handler_error` |

The spoke's original code and message are preserved in the mapped
variant's `message` (never discarded — a consumer debugging a
FORBIDDEN-through-relay must see the spoke's grant failure, not a bare
`handler_error`). The `timeout` mapping is the one non-1:1 case: the
consumer-visible reason is `dial_failed` because establishment
timeouts are wrapper-generated (ADR-049 §3) and not an establisher
vocabulary word; the spoke's message carries the truth.

### 4. The registration seam: two phases, fork-registry registration

Openable ops register on a **per-connection fork of the hub's base
registry** installed as the consumer leg's dispatch registry (the
ADR-047 §4 amendment mechanism). Discovery of the producer leg's ops
happens once (hub startup or reconnect); registration happens per
consumer-leg connection inside the `install_channel_zero` hook. The
one-call signature the review sketched cannot exist without adapter
changes — the two phases are the API:

1. **Discover/stash** — `from_call` against the producer leg returns
   the imported `HandlerRegistration` bundles. Marked specs (rebuilt
   WITH the `channel_open` marker, ADR-047 amendment 3) are separated
   from plain bundles by the marker. The stash is a `Clone`able
   template: `HandlerRegistration` and `HandlerKind` are `Clone`, and
   `OperationRegistry::fork` deep-copies registrations, so one
   discovered set serves any number of consumer legs.
2. **Register per connection** — the hub-leg install hook forks the
   base registry, registers the generic channel ops
   (`ChannelOperations::register_on`), registers the stashed plain
   bundles as-is (the existing forwarding handlers), and registers
   each stashed marked spec via the relay's
   `register_relay_openable` (the fork is the `consumer_registry`
   argument), then dispatches channel 0 over the fork.

Per-consumer ACL differentiation is a composition consequence, not a
mechanism: the fork is per consumer leg, so a hub re-exposing
different op subsets to different consumers filters the stash per
fork. The imported spec's own `access_control` remains the gate for
the re-exposed op; the hub composes additional ACL at its assembly
layer.

### 5. The hub-leg install hook is an in-tree export (the call-half support)

Every existing test hand-rolls the hub-side install hook
(`make_install_channel_zero`-shaped); the hub/spoke family all need
the same composition. The relay lands with a documented hub-leg
template — fork, generic ops, bootstrap discovery, stashed bundles
(plain + relay), per-call identity resolution (`ServingConfig`-shaped),
single-stream dispatch loop — as an in-tree composition (unit-scoped:
Unit 3b). This is composition of existing pieces, not a new protocol
surface; its exact API shape is a two-way-door implementation detail.
The spoke side needs nothing new: a spoke serving ops through a hub is
the existing connect-side serving shape (`from_connection_with_serving`)
plus the producer-leg registration it already does.

**ACL layering note (pinned, because it surprises):** the spoke's
`AccessControl` sees only the hub's identity — the end consumer's
identity rides `forwarded_for` as metadata and is never consulted by
any `AccessControl::check` (ADR-024/ADR-026). "The hub re-exposes
based on ACL" therefore means: the hub-side gate is the imported
spec's ACL (+ hub policy) on the consumer leg; the spoke-side grant
goes to the hub identity, which needs scopes on every spoke op it
relays. The end consumer never authenticates to the spoke directly.

**Loud-install coverage note (review 009 C-1):** the template's four
install-failure arms all end the install task before the dispatch
loop (channel 0 never dispatches — never a silent stub). Two arms are
unit-test-pinned: the relay-openable registration failure (the
Pub-typed marked spec gate) and the plain-bundle registration failure
(an un-compilable schema — the registry's fail-closed rule). The
other two arms — generic channel-ops registration and bootstrap
discovery install — are best-effort-loud: both register
crate-internal specs whose schemas compile by construction, so
failure is not reachable through any public path and an injectable
failure seam would test the seam, not the arm. This note is the
contract: if a future change makes either arm reachable, it gets the
same pin.

### 6. Bounds: rejected shapes and residual notes

- **Pub-typed open ops** — ~~rejected loudly~~ **translated** (ADR-047
  amendment 4 §4.7 — the put-forwarding translation: the hub allocates
  its connect-side id, opens the spoke op in the background,
  pumps the consumer bytes → spoke, and mirrors the spoke's single
  response with its reserved key stripped; `PubTypedOpen` is removed).
  The rejection remains for the genuinely-unsupported shapes: unmarked
  specs (`UnmarkedSpec`) only.
- **Compounding establishment bounds** — each hop's establisher is
  bounded independently (ADR-049 §2); an N-hop chain adds N bounds.
  The consumer's dispatch deadline (`min(deadline, 10s)` per hop)
  bounds each hop, not the chain. No fix — noted for capacity
  planning.
- **Mid-establishment consumer disconnect** — the one teardown window
  with a delay, with two reclaim signals pinned by the Unit 3c gate
  (`gate2_mid_establishment_disconnect_reclaims_without_leak`): (a)
  the consumer leg's just-allocated channel reclaims at the leg's own
  transport EOF (`clear_all` + ledger decrement) — the hub has not
  adopted, so the producer leg stays clean; (b) the spoke's channel —
  the spoke allocates before its establisher replies — is the honest
  residual: it cannot be reclaimed by the hub (no adoption exists),
  so it lingers until a spoke-side teardown signal (the spoke↔hub leg
  ending, or the spoke's own establishment bound). The gate bounds
  the window deterministically by severing the spoke leg and asserts
  the spoke-side reclaim + ledger decrement. A channel never outlives
  its leg lifetimes; never a leak past the connection's lifetime.
- **Adopted-entry teardown on every plan path** — the hub's
  producer-leg entry (the `adopt_channel` state) is owned by the
  relay's `RelayPlan` via a `Drop` guard, so it reclaims whenever the
  plan dies: the normal pump completion, the pump handler's
  early-return arms (plan absent, downcast failure, `try_unwrap`
  failure, `accept_bi` failure), and the wrapper's establishment
  bound expiring after the adopt (the plan dropped before the pump
  ever spawns). Dropping the plan's send half also EOFs the spoke
  side through the mux pump's implicit-EOF sentinel (REQ-CH-01), so
  the spoke handler reclaims through the same cascade the normal
  path   uses. This closes the adopt-then-timeout window the landing
  review surfaced (the §6 window above is the *pre-adopt* window;
  this is the *post-adopt* one, now closed by construction). The
  one remaining cancellation point *inside* `adopt_channel`'s own
  await is the same pre-existing client-side window
  (`ChannelClient::open_channel`'s adopt has it too) — bounded by
  the leg's transport-EOF `clear_all`, not by the plan.
- **Multi-hop relays** — a chain of relays composes (each hop is a
  hub leg pair), with the compounding-bound note above. No special
  machinery.

## Consequences

**Positive:**

- The relay is O(1) new machinery: an establisher closure, a
  `pump_bidi` handler, and a registration entry point. No parallel
  auth path (the consumer leg's full wrapper machinery applies), no
  new wire surface (the relay speaks only already-stable ops), no
  data-plane parsing (ADR-034's one-way door stays closed).
- `from_call` gains a real in-tree consumer for the marker-branching
  seam Gap C named (ADR-047 §Gap C): downstream crates compose
  `ChannelRelay` instead of re-deriving the hub shape.
- U-1's gate 2 (the review's silent-failure scenario — flavor-form ops
  relaying as plain forwarding stubs) becomes a permanent e2e gate.
**Negative:**

- New pub API (`ChannelRelay`, the registration entry point, the
  hub-leg template) — minor bump, one release with the review's other
  units, review-007 precedent.
- The two-phase discover/stash-then-register shape is more assembly
  code for a trivial hub than a one-call import would be. The fork
  mechanism forces it; the stash being `Clone` keeps the per-connection
  work cheap.
- The hub holds `Arc<CallConnection>` + `ChannelManager` per spoke leg
  for the connection's lifetime — per-leg state, bounded by the spoke
  count.

## Door type

**Two-way (implementation shape) within a one-way posture.** The
translate-not-forward contract (ADR-042) and the ACL layering are
unchanged one-way decisions; the in-tree export, the implicit-mapping
implementation, and the two-phase registration shape are revisable
implementation details — downstream crates compose the export, not the
internals. The rejection posture for Pub-typed marked ops is loud (an
assembly error), so a future implementation of the Pub path is
additive.

## Verification gates (implementation units)

Unit 3a (the relay component):

1. `register_relay_openable` on a forked consumer-leg registry
   resolves the open op end-to-end; the establisher populates
   `forwarded_for` from the consumer's per-call identity (ADR-026 §3)
   and strips the spoke reply's `channel_id`.
2. A spoke `channel:open_failed` maps to the consumer-leg
   `channel:open_failed` with the mapped reason (the §3 table) and the
   spoke's message preserved; the consumer leg tears down (ledger
   decremented); no spoke channel leaks.
3. `bound` (Unit 1's reply projection) survives the relay to the
   consumer reply.
4. Pub-typed marked specs are rejected at registration.

Unit 3b (the hub-leg template):

5. The template composes fork + generic ops + bootstrap discovery +
   plain bundles + relay openables + serving identity and dispatches
   channel 0; `services/list` on the consumer leg shows the
   re-exposed ops.

Unit 3c (the gate-2 e2e):

6. The review's full harness: consumer → hub (forked channel-0
   registry + relay) → producer, opening `channels/tunnel/direct` end
   to end: the open resolves with the hub-allocated `channel_id`, the
   establisher-contributed `bound` field survives to the consumer
   reply, data flows both directions (the hub never parses it), and
   hub-side disconnect / spoke-side close tears down both legs
   (including the mid-establishment window from §6).
7. A companion `channels/tty/sub` relay run pins no regression on
   standard shapes.

## References

- ADR-042 (amended by this ADR — the implementation home; the
  contract unchanged; the relay map and close-translation bullets
  superseded by the implicit-per-channel shape)
- ADR-047 amendment 3 (flavor-form ops reconstruct WITH the marker —
  the discovery input this relay consumes), §Gap C (the
  marker-branching seam), §4 amendment (the fork mechanism Unit 3b
  composes)
- ADR-049 amendments 2/3 (the plan payload the relay's establisher
  carries; the reply projection `bound` rides through)
- ADR-026 §3 (forwarded_for on the translate hop), ADR-050
  (`pump_bidi` — the byte-forward hop), ADR-040/041 (the caps the
  consumer leg keeps enforcing)
- alktunnels ADR-007/008 (the first consumers: the direct op's relay
  and the listen `bound` field's per-hop truthfulness)
- Review 008 remediation plan Units 1–3 (the sequencing this ADR
  lands inside)