Focused design-mismatch review found via alkhttp's WS data-channel
drill-down (alkhttp review 003 WS-24/WS-25). The channel machinery is
done and proven; the gaps are the dispatch-resolution mechanism and
the connect-side serving half — both upstream of any transport.
Findings:
- F-01 [major]: top-level dispatch consults only the dispatcher's
base registry — ops registered per the ADR-047 §4 amendment's
overlay mechanism resolve NOT_FOUND on the wire; the only proven
shape (per-session registry as the dispatcher's base) differs from
the ADR's wording
- F-02 [major]: no Clone/fork surface on OperationRegistry or
HandlerRegistration — every inner payload type IS Clone-able
(verified type-by-type, incl. jsonschema::Validator and
Capabilities), so the fork is a small addition
- F-03 [minor]: fork must carry handlers + validators, not just specs
- F-04 [major]: connect-side channel-0 read pump resolves responses
only; inbound call.requested frames are silently dropped — no
serving half on the single-stream shape (ADR-022/AGENTS §8
bidirectionality unreachable from the connect side)
- F-05 [major]: no wire mechanism announces client-side ops; the
six call.* kinds are closed. Resolution candidate: bootstrap op
(op/register) served per-session, handler writes into the
connection-local overlay; discovery rides services/list-peers
- F-06 [minor]: per-session fork must carry bootstrap discovery ops
for per-session openables to be discoverable
Includes a non-findings section (e2e reference shape,
register_openable completeness, channel-id split, envelope-kind
closure, wasm-cleanliness) and a 4-unit plan: ADR decisions (Unit 1)
-> fork surface (Unit 2) -> client serving + bootstrap op (Unit 3)
-> alkhttp wiring downstream (Unit 4, tracked in alkhttp review 003).
Verification: cargo test (565), clippy --all-targets -D warnings,
fmt, doc --no-deps — all clean at c16b069. No source changes.
glm-5.3-flash
c0dbf82518