Files
alkgit/docs/architecture/open-questions.md
T
glm-5.3-flash 8f73da5d12 docs(architecture): phase 1 bootstrap — specs, 9 ADRs, OQ tracker
Architecture documentation structure per sdd_process phase 1:

- README index (doc table, ADR table, lifecycle), overview with crate
  map, dependency rules, and security invariants
- Component specs: storage, transport, http, ssh, alkgitd (all draft)
- ADRs 001-009: crate decomposition, front-door-blind core, V2-first
  protocol, pack pipeline (data::output generation / data::input
  ingestion), session substrate types, http adapter composition
  (proposed, OQ-01), ACL-before-advertisement, registry-resolved repo
  identity, bounded-resources budgets
- open-questions.md: OQ-01..08 with two deferred(scope), one
  deferred(unclear), door-type definitions, blocker tracker tasks in
  tasks/architecture/
- v1 ssh-door decision recorded: russh terminates wire SSH in alkgitd;
  alkcall channels stay the internal substrate (OQ-03 partially
  resolved)

Two review rounds (fresh-context subagent): 4 critical + 17 warnings
fixed in round one; zero critical + 4 warnings + 5 suggestions fixed in
round two. All ADR/OQ cross-references verified resolving.
2026-09-21 03:55:33 +00:00

8.4 KiB

status, last_updated
status last_updated
draft 2026-09-21

Open Questions

All unresolved architecture questions, centrally tracked. Status values: open (needs resolution now), partially resolved (decision made but a narrower question remains — named in the entry), resolved (decision made, ADR recorded), deferred(scope) (waiting on external information — blocked-on condition stated), deferred(unclear) (pieces exist, shape needs investigation). See docs/sdd_process.md for the deferral protocol (blocker tasks in tasks/architecture/).

Door type classifies reversal cost: one-way decisions are expensive/impossible to reverse once published (wire formats, public API shapes); two-way decisions can be revisited while nothing is published. Door type does not change urgency — all decisions here need resolution when their impacts say so; it records how careful the resolution must be.

Deferred / Blocked summary

OQ Status Blocked on / investigation
OQ-04 deferred(unclear) receive-pack walkthrough (capabilities, shallow, thin-pack, CAS timing) + push POC
OQ-06 deferred(scope) concrete metadata-scale requirements (feeders: OQ-07, OQ-08 outputs)
OQ-05 deferred(scope) ecosystem need for sha256

Theme: composition / crate shapes

OQ-01: HTTP adapter home and composability (alkhttp git feature vs alkgit-owned factory)

  • Origin: [overview.md], [http.md], user session question
  • Status: partially resolved — ADR-006 written Proposed with Option A (alkgit-owned router factory) as the recommendation and the alkhttp-side sugar as a recorded escape hatch. Needs user review.
  • Door type: two-way (adapter shape can change before anything is published)
  • Priority: high
  • Impacts: blocks finalizing http.md and ADR-006; small effect on downstream ergonomics.
  • Resolution path: user reviews ADR-006; accept → ADR becomes Accepted; or choose Option B (alkhttp feature) → ADR reworked.
  • Cross-references: ADR-001, ADR-006, http.md

OQ-03: Downstream embedding surface (what "embeds core + transport" means concretely)

  • Origin: [overview.md], [transport.md], [ssh.md], vision §ALPN as a service
  • Status: partially resolved — v1 ssh-door decision made: alkgitd terminates SSH via russh for stock git clients (ssh.md); what remains deferred is whether a pure-alkcall-channels ssh variant and a russh-flavored adapter are exported for embedders.
  • Door type: two-way
  • Priority: medium
  • Impacts: blocks nothing in v1 (alkgitd is the only consumer); shapes the crates' public API freeze before publish.
  • Blocked on: a concrete downstream embedder use case (e.g. a real gitea-like app or test harness wanting to serve git) — until one exists, the embedding seam is designed by example (alkgitd) only. Tracker task: tasks/architecture/oq-03-embedder.md.
  • Cross-references: ADR-001, ADR-002, transport.md §public API, ssh.md §russh

Theme: transport / protocol

OQ-02: V2 multi-round negotiation (ack/NAK logic, wait-for-done retirement)

  • Origin: [transport.md], poc2-findings §"does NOT settle"
  • Status: open
  • Priority: medium (full-closure-on-done works; multi-round is an efficiency feature, not correctness)
  • Impacts: fetch efficiency on repos with large shared history; capability advertisement text (fetch= value).
  • Resolution path: design the ack loop (rounds budget per ADR-009) when transport implementation begins; POC-2's generator is negotiation-agnostic already.
  • Cross-references: ADR-003, ADR-004, ADR-009, transport.md §fetch

OQ-04: receive-pack (push) — validation gap

  • Origin: [transport.md], poc3-findings §"does NOT settle"
  • Status: deferred(unclear)
  • Door type: two-way
  • Priority: high
  • Impacts: blocks receive-pack implementation tasks; push is the always-authenticated half of the wire surface.
  • Investigation: the pieces are decided (POC-2: pack ingestion via gix-pack::data::input with streaming-input (ADR-004); gix-ref transaction CAS; fsck via gix-fsck; POC-3: request bodies stream). The shape to work through: the full push state machine — (a) the receive-pack capability advertisement set (report-status/report-status-v2, delete-refs, push-options, atomic, side-band-64k, object-format) under the honest-advertisement invariant (ADR-003); (b) request-line parsing (<old> <new> <ref> + shallow lines policy — expected resolution: reject shallow on push for v1, mirroring fetch's decline-by-omission in ADR-003, so depth semantics stay symmetric; confirm against real git push behavior); (c) thin-pack acceptance on push (client packs may be thin; accepting implies base-object availability requirements); (d) pack ingestion mid-stream; (e) CAS validation timing (before vs after pack index); (f) status report (unpack ok|ng + per-ref lines); (g) the receive-pack version/framing surface over http (which framing git push uses against us; ADR-003's V2 decision covers fetch only). Method: walkthrough against real git push captures, then a small POC if the ingestion composition is not obvious from POC-2's findings. Tracker task: tasks/architecture/oq-04-receive-pack.md.
  • Cross-references: ADR-003, ADR-004, ADR-009, transport.md §receive-pack, storage.md §ref transactions, http.md

OQ-05: sha256 support policy

  • Origin: [transport.md], git-protocol.md §"Open items"
  • Status: deferred(scope)
  • Door type: two-way
  • Priority: low
  • Impacts: none for v1 (sha1 pinned); feature-flag passthrough compiles but is untested end-to-end.
  • Blocked on: ecosystem need (a real client/repo requiring sha256) or upstream gix sha256 maturity; POC-2 left the pipeline hash-generic but untested. Tracker task: tasks/architecture/oq-05-sha256.md.
  • Cross-references: ADR-003, ADR-004

Theme: identity / auth

OQ-08: Identity sources per front door (v1 auth mechanics)

  • Origin: [overview.md], [http.md], [ssh.md], [alkgitd.md]
  • Status: open
  • Priority: high
  • Impacts: blocks http.md and ssh.md auth sections finalizing; blocks the identity-extractor callback design in ADR-006's seam; blocks alkgitd config schema and the OQ-07 admin op shapes.
  • Resolution path: decide per door — http (bearer token? basic? via alkvault-stored credentials), ssh (russh-terminated public-key auth → alkgit identity mapping per ssh.md), and which identities exist in v1's registry — including whether identity records live in the same metadata store as repo records (OQ-06's field list may grow for this).
  • Cross-references: ADR-006, ADR-007, OQ-06 (metadata backing where identity records live), http.md §auth, ssh.md §identity, alkgitd.md, OQ-07

Theme: storage / metadata

OQ-06: Registry/metadata backing store

  • Origin: [storage.md], ADR-008
  • Status: deferred(scope)
  • Door type: two-way (backing choice is swappable behind the core trait)
  • Priority: high for v1 config story, but choice deferrable because the trait boundary is what matters
  • Impacts: blocks storage.md's registry section finalizing and alkgitd's config schema; does NOT block core/transport work (they code against the trait).
  • Blocked on: concrete metadata-scale requirements (how many repos, what metadata fields beyond id/root/visibility/ACL scope, whether alkcall-hub integration lands in v1). A config-file or embedded-store decision without those inputs would be a guess. Tracker task: tasks/architecture/oq-06-metadata-backing.md.
  • Cross-references: ADR-008, storage.md §registry, alkgitd.md §config, OQ-08 (whose identity-records question may extend this store's field list)

OQ-07: Admin API operation set (v1 scope)

  • Origin: [overview.md], [alkgitd.md], alk-stack.md §"The gitea lesson"
  • Status: open
  • Priority: medium
  • Impacts: blocks the admin-ops inventory (repo create/delete, visibility set, ACL grant/revoke, user/identity management — if v1 has users at all, which is OQ-08 territory). Deliberately small: everything is Visibility::Internal alkcall ops over the admin surface.
  • Resolution path: one dedicated session once OQ-08's identity model exists (the ops' shapes depend on what identities/credentials mean).
  • Cross-references: ADR-007, OQ-08, alkgitd.md §admin API