docs: port architecture specs and ADRs from alknet-http; write new alkhttp ADRs 067-070

Phase 1 (SDD) — architecture documentation:

Ported specs (adapted for alkcall, producer/consumer terms, 6-endpoint
gateway, channels-over-WS, Sub/Pub operation types):
- overview.md, http-server.md, http-adapters.md, http-mcp.md
- README.md index (rewritten for alkhttp)

New ADRs:
- 067: WebSocket carries the channels protocol (8-byte chunk demux,
  channel 0 = alk/call, upgrade path /alk/channels)
- 068: gateway /publish endpoint for Pub operations (NDJSON body)
- 069: WebTransport out of scope in alkhttp (alknet concern)
- 070: from_wss consumer adapter (wss feature, tokio-tungstenite)

Ported ADRs (25, same numbers, port notes + amendments where the
extraction changed facts): 001-004, 010, 014, 015, 017, 022, 023, 027,
034, 036, 037, 039, 041, 042, 044, 045, 046, 047, 048, 049, 051, 066.

websocket.md rewritten for the channels session; open-questions.md
seeded (OQ-01 WS byte-stream adapter, OQ-02 /publish framing,
OQ-03 from_wss reconnect, OQ-04 browser client ownership).

Verified: cargo test, clippy -D warnings, fmt, doc --no-deps.
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-27 14:19:24 +00:00
parent 28c521b2f3
commit 320ea87b08
42 changed files with 11275 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
# ADR-039: HTTP Server and Client Host Colocated in alkhttp
*Ported from alknet ADR-039 (HTTP Server and Client Host Colocated in alknet-http); re-targeted to alkhttp.*
## Status
Proposed
## Context
alkhttp has two roles: an HTTP server (the `HttpAdapter`
`ProtocolHandler` for `h2`/`http/1.1`, built on `axum`/`hyper`)
and an HTTP client host (the `from_openapi`/`from_mcp` forwarding
handlers, built on `reqwest`). The question is whether these two
directions live in one crate (alkhttp) or are split into two
crates (an HTTP-server crate + an HTTP-client crate).
ADR-003 lists the HTTP crate as a single crate with dependency
`alkcall, axum` and justifies the per-handler-crate decomposition
with "each handler is self-contained — it receives a byte stream and
manages its own protocol." That rationale covers the server side (the
`HttpAdapter` is self-contained), but it does not address the
within-crate dual-role question: should the inbound HTTP server and
the outbound HTTP client (the adapter forwarding handlers) be
colocated, or split?
This is a load-bearing choice. Once published, downstream consumers
build import paths against the crate boundary; the shared `reqwest::Client`
and the no-env-vars invariant boundary (ADR-014) are scoped by it; the
`to_openapi`/`to_mcp` projections are pure-registry-consumers that
*describe* the server surface but live where the adapter types do.
Splitting later would be a rewrite of every consumer's import paths,
not a cheap revert. It needs an ADR.
## Decision
**One crate — alkhttp houses both the HTTP server and the HTTP
client host (the adapter forwarding handlers and the `to_*` projections).**
The two directions share the HTTP dependencies and HTTP-specific
concerns that make splitting them counterproductive:
- **Shared HTTP dependencies.** Both `axum` (server) and `reqwest`
(client) pull in `hyper`, `http`, `http-body`, `rustls`/TLS stack
types, and the HTTP header/status code types. A split into two crates
would either duplicate these dependencies across both crates or
force a third shared-types crate, neither of which is an improvement.
- **Shared HTTP-specific concerns.** Both directions care about HTTP
headers, status codes, content types, SSE framing, streaming vs
non-streaming bodies, and TLS trust stores. The `from_openapi`
forwarding handler's error mapping (HTTP status → `HTTP_<status>`
error codes, ADR-023) and the `to_openapi` projection's error mapping
(`ErrorDefinition.http_status` → HTTP response status) are *the same
mapping* read in two directions — splitting them would put the two
halves in different crates.
- **The `to_*` projections describe the server surface.** `to_openapi`
generates an OpenAPI doc whose paths mirror the gateway HTTP routes
the `HttpAdapter` serves (ADR-036's mapping, superseded by ADR-047 —
see [ADR-047](047-remove-direct-call-http-surface.md)).
`to_mcp` exposes the
same operations as MCP tools. These projections consume the
`OperationRegistry` and produce specs; they live with the adapter
types (in alkhttp, per the adapter location map — see
the alkcall crate docs, client-and-adapters)
because they share the operation-spec→HTTP mapping logic with the
server's request dispatch.
- **The no-env-vars invariant boundary is crate-scoped.** The
`from_openapi`/`from_mcp` forwarding handlers are the credential
injection point (ADR-014). The invariant — "no handler reads outbound
credentials from any source other than `OperationContext.capabilities`"
— is verified against the handler implementations in this crate. A
split would put the invariant verification boundary across two crates.
### What this does NOT change
- ADR-003's rule "no handler crate depends on another handler crate"
applies to peer handler crates (alkhttp does not depend on
`alknet-ssh`). The alkhttp → `alkcall` edge is the
protocol-foundation exception (ADR-003 Amendment 1). This ADR is
about the *internal* structure of alkhttp, not its dependency
edges.
- The adapter location map (the `OperationAdapter` trait in
`alkcall`; the HTTP-backed adapter implementations in
alkhttp) is unchanged. This ADR records *why* the HTTP-backed
adapters live in the same crate as the HTTP server, not whether they
live in alkhttp vs `alkcall`.
## Consequences
**Positive:**
- One crate, one set of HTTP dependencies, one HTTP-specific concern
surface. No duplicated `hyper`/`http` types across two crates, no
shared-types crate needed.
- The `to_*` projections live with the server whose surface they
describe, and with the adapter types they consume. The operation-spec
→ HTTP mapping logic is in one place.
- The no-env-vars invariant verification boundary is one crate. The
`from_openapi`/`from_mcp` handlers and the credential injection
logic they share are co-located.
- A downstream consumer wires one crate (alkhttp) into the
`HandlerRegistry` and gets the full HTTP surface — server + adapters +
projections. No two-crate wiring.
**Negative:**
- A deployment that only needs the HTTP server (no `from_openapi`/`from_
mcp` forwarding) still compiles the `reqwest` dependency. Mitigated:
the `mcp` feature is already gated (ADR-037); the `from_openapi`
forwarding is always available but the `reqwest` client is only
constructed if a `from_openapi`/`from_mcp` adapter is registered at
assembly time. The dependency is compiled, the client is lazy.
- A deployment that only needs the HTTP client (e.g., an agent crate
that only uses `from_openapi` forwarding, no inbound HTTP) still
compiles `axum`/`hyper`. This is the rarer case — the agent crate
(alknet-agent) consumes `alkcall` directly for tool dispatch
and uses `from_openapi` via alkhttp's adapter, but doesn't
serve inbound HTTP itself. In practice, the agent deployment wires
alkhttp for the adapters and the CLI wires it for the server;
the compile cost is paid once per workspace, not once per deployment.
- The crate is larger than a single-direction crate would be. This is
the cost of colocating shared concerns; the alternative (two crates
+ a shared types crate) is more crates, not less code.
## Assumptions
1. **The shared-HTTP-dependencies argument holds.** `axum` and
`reqwest` both pull in `hyper` and the `http` crate's types; the
shared types (headers, status codes, method, URI) are the same. If
a future version of `axum` or `reqwest` diverges its HTTP types
(e.g., `axum` moves to a different HTTP implementation), this
argument weakens. As of `axum` 0.7+ and `reqwest` 0.12+, both are
built on `hyper` 1.x and share `http` types.
2. **The `to_*` projections share enough mapping logic with the server
to justify colocation.** The operation-spec → HTTP path/method/
error-status mapping is the same in both directions. If the
projections turn out to be pure registry-consumers with no
HTTP-mapping logic (just spec serialization), the colocation
argument is weaker — but the current design (ADR-036, ADR-023)
has them sharing the mapping.
## References
- [ADR-003](003-crate-decomposition.md) — crate decomposition (this
ADR addresses the within-alkhttp dual-role question, not the
dependency edge; Amendment 1 covers the `alkcall` edge)
- [ADR-014](014-secret-material-flow-and-capability-injection.md) —
the no-env-vars invariant whose verification boundary is crate-scoped
- [ADR-017](017-call-protocol-client-and-adapter-contract.md) — the
adapter contract; `to_*` are projections
- [ADR-023](023-operation-error-schemas.md) — the error mapping shared
between `from_openapi` (status → code) and `to_openapi` (code →
status)
- [ADR-036](036-http-to-call-operation-mapping.md) — the HTTP path =
operation path mapping shared between server dispatch and `to_openapi`
- [ADR-037](037-mcp-stdio-transport-exclusion.md) — the `mcp` feature
gate
- `overview.md` — the crate overview (the inline rationale
for this decision is replaced by a pointer to this ADR)
## Port notes
- Renames: alknet-http → alkhttp; alknet-call → alkcall; the
hypothetical split-crate names (`alknet-http-server` +
`alknet-http-client`) genericized ("an HTTP-server crate + an
HTTP-client crate").
- The Context line "for `h2`/`http/1.1`/`h3`" was corrected to
"for `h2`/`http/1.1`" — h3 is out of scope in alkhttp (ADR-069);
alkhttp serves HTTP/1.1 + HTTP/2 on the standard ALPNs.
- The `to_openapi` route description "whose paths mirror the
`/{service}/{op}` HTTP routes the `HttpAdapter` serves (ADR-036)"
was corrected: the direct-call `/{service}/{op}` surface was removed
by ADR-047, so the doc now says the paths mirror the gateway routes,
with ADR-036's mapping noted as superseded by ADR-047 (linked as
`decisions/047-remove-direct-call-http-surface.md`, ported by another
agent under the same number).
- ADR-014/017/023/036/037 are being ported with the same numbers by
other agents and are linked as `decisions/NNN-<slug>.md` (alknet
slugs). The mono-repo link `../crates/call/client-and-adapters.md`
became a textual "alkcall crate docs" reference;
`crates/http/overview.md` → `overview.md` in `docs/architecture/`.