Phase 1 (SDD) — architecture documentation: Ported specs (adapted for alkcall, producer/consumer terms, 6-endpoint gateway, channels-over-WS, Sub/Pub operation types): - overview.md, http-server.md, http-adapters.md, http-mcp.md - README.md index (rewritten for alkhttp) New ADRs: - 067: WebSocket carries the channels protocol (8-byte chunk demux, channel 0 = alk/call, upgrade path /alk/channels) - 068: gateway /publish endpoint for Pub operations (NDJSON body) - 069: WebTransport out of scope in alkhttp (alknet concern) - 070: from_wss consumer adapter (wss feature, tokio-tungstenite) Ported ADRs (25, same numbers, port notes + amendments where the extraction changed facts): 001-004, 010, 014, 015, 017, 022, 023, 027, 034, 036, 037, 039, 041, 042, 044, 045, 046, 047, 048, 049, 051, 066. websocket.md rewritten for the channels session; open-questions.md seeded (OQ-01 WS byte-stream adapter, OQ-02 /publish framing, OQ-03 from_wss reconnect, OQ-04 browser client ownership). Verified: cargo test, clippy -D warnings, fmt, doc --no-deps.
18 KiB
ADR-027: TLS Identity Redesign — ACME Integration + RawKey Decoupling
Ported from alknet ADR-027 (TLS Identity Redesign — ACME Integration + RawKey Decoupling); re-targeted to alkhttp.
Status
Accepted (§5 amended by alknet ADR-083 — the acme-tls/1 guard moves from
dispatch_quinn to the shared dispatch method, since ACME challenges
arrive over TCP+TLS, not QUIC; the rationale holds, only the location
changes)
Context
Port note (scope): This ADR is ported because it is the decision of record for the browser-facing TLS constraint this crate inherits: browsers require X.509 — they cannot present or verify RFC 7250 raw Ed25519 keys, so the browser-reachable surface of alkhttp (
http/1.1,h2, and the WebSocket upgrade path) must be served from an X.509 identity (CA-issued via ACME, or operator-provided). The TLS machinery itself —TlsIdentity,TlsSetup, ACME provisioning, the rustls server config — is not implemented in this crate; alkhttp is transport-coupling-free by design (alknet ADR-027's alknet-internal sections describe the alknet endpoint layer, which remains an alknet concern; see §Port notes at the end of this file). The clauses below that matter to alkhttp are the browser constraint and the identity modes it implies; the alknet-internal provisioning mechanics are retained for provenance and marked as alknet concerns.
OQ-12 marked "resolved" identified two TLS identity use cases: RFC 7250 raw Ed25519 keys (default, P2P) and X.509 certs (domain-hosted, browsers). ACME auto-provisioning was described as "additive — it will be adapted when domain-hosted nodes need it." That deferral created two architectural issues that surface now that ACME is a concrete target.
Issue 1: TlsIdentity cannot represent ACME (alknet concern)
TlsIdentity is #[derive(Debug, Clone)] and lives in StaticConfig —
a static, synchronous config value. ACME requires:
- A long-lived async state machine (
AcmeStateevent loop, spawned for the endpoint's lifetime) that handles ordering, challenge response, cert renewal, and cache I/O. - TLS-ALPN-01 challenge handling:
acme-tls/1must be in the server'salpn_protocols, and aResolvesServerCertAcmemust serve challenge certs during the TLS handshake. - Config fields: domains, cache directory, ACME directory URL, contact email.
AcmeState is not Clone. It cannot be a TlsIdentity variant. The
current build_rustls_server_config(&TlsIdentity) -> ServerConfig is
synchronous — there's no room for spawning an async state machine or
holding a runtime resolver handle. The reverse-proxy project solved this
with a two-phase construction: static config → TlsMode (runtime
objects) → ServerConfig. alknet needs the same split.
(This issue, and the two-phase construction that resolves it, live in the alknet endpoint layer — not in alkhttp, which owns no TLS config.)
Issue 2: RawKey is coupled to the iroh feature (alknet concern)
TlsIdentity::RawKey(iroh::SecretKey) is gated #[cfg(feature = "iroh")].
The RawKeyCertResolver and Ed25519SigningKey impls are gated
#[cfg(all(feature = "quinn", feature = "iroh"))]. This means a
quinn-only build (the default feature set) cannot use RFC 7250 raw-key
identity — the very mode described as "default for most alknet nodes."
The coupling is artificial. iroh::SecretKey is a thin newtype over
ed25519_dalek::SigningKey (pub struct SecretKey(SigningKey)). The
alknet code uses exactly three APIs: .public().as_bytes(), .sign(msg),
and .clone(). None of these are iroh-specific. The raw-key TLS path
needs Ed25519 signing + SPKI encoding — both available from
ed25519-dalek + rustls without iroh.
The iroh transport (build_iroh_endpoint) does need iroh::SecretKey
for iroh::Endpoint::builder().secret_key(...). If TlsIdentity::RawKey
no longer carries an iroh::SecretKey, the iroh transport must convert
from the new key type — trivial since iroh::SecretKey::from_bytes(&[u8; 32]) accepts raw Ed25519 key bytes.
(This issue is entirely within the alknet transport/config layer; alkhttp
has no TlsIdentity and no iroh dependency.)
ACME challenge handling with quinn (QUIC, not TCP) (alknet concern)
Research confirmed how TLS-ALPN-01 works with quinn:
- The
ResolvesServerCertAcmeresolver intercepts the challenge at the cert resolution step, during the TLS handshake, before the handshake result is surfaced to the application. - When an ACME CA connects with ALPN
[acme-tls/1], rustls calls the resolver, which returns the challenge cert. The handshake completes. The CA inspects the cert's SAN and validates the challenge — no application-layer data exchange needed. - quinn's
connecting.awaitthen returns a completedConnectionwith ALPNacme-tls/1. alknet'sdispatch_quinnwould find no handler for that ALPN and close the connection. The challenge already succeeded — the close is cosmetic. - Unlike the reverse-proxy (TCP +
LazyConfigAcceptor), quinn gives no "peek at ClientHello" hook. The challenge is fully TLS-layer-handled; the application only needs to close challenge connections gracefully (silent close, not a "no handler" warning).
Key constraint: ACME requires with_cert_resolver(ResolvesServerCertAcme),
not with_single_cert. You cannot just append acme-tls/1 to an
X509/SelfSigned config — there'd be no resolver to serve the
challenge cert. ACME is a distinct ServerConfig construction path.
(Challenge handling at this layer is an alknet endpoint concern.)
Decision
1. Add TlsIdentity::Acme variant (static config data only) (alknet concern)
pub enum TlsIdentity {
X509 { cert: PathBuf, key: PathBuf },
RawKey(Ed25519SecretKey), // see Decision 3
SelfSigned,
Acme { // NEW
domains: Vec<String>,
cache_dir: PathBuf,
directory: AcmeDirectory, // enum: Production, Staging, Custom(String)
contact: Vec<String>, // e.g. ["mailto:admin@example.com"]
},
}
Acme holds only static, Clone/Debug-safe config data. No
AcmeState, no resolver, no runtime objects. The async state machine is
constructed at endpoint setup time (Decision 2).
2. Split server-config construction into two phases (alknet concern)
Replace the synchronous build_rustls_server_config(&TlsIdentity) -> ServerConfig with a two-phase construction:
Phase 1 — TlsSetup (async, at endpoint construction):
struct TlsSetup {
server_config: rustls::ServerConfig,
acme_state: Option<AcmeStateHandle>, // spawned task + handle for shutdown
}
For X509, SelfSigned, RawKey: construct ServerConfig
synchronously (current path, unchanged). acme_state is None.
For Acme: construct AcmeConfig, spawn the AcmeState event loop,
get ResolvesServerCertAcme, build ServerConfig with
with_cert_resolver(resolver), add acme-tls/1 to alpn_protocols.
acme_state is Some(handle) so the endpoint can abort the ACME task
on shutdown.
Phase 2 — use TlsSetup.server_config to build quinn::ServerConfig:
Same as today: QuicServerConfig::try_from(rustls_config) →
quinn::ServerConfig::with_crypto(...).
The TlsSetup is constructed inside AlknetEndpoint::new() (or
run_quinn_accept_loop), not inside TlsIdentity. The TlsIdentity
enum stays a pure data structure.
3. Decouple RawKey from iroh — use ed25519-dalek directly (alknet concern)
Replace TlsIdentity::RawKey(iroh::SecretKey) with
TlsIdentity::RawKey(Ed25519SecretKey), where Ed25519SecretKey is a
thin alknet-core-owned wrapper over ed25519_dalek::SigningKey:
pub struct Ed25519SecretKey(ed25519_dalek::SigningKey);
This type is Clone, Debug (redacting), Zeroize, and not gated
behind any feature flag. ed25519-dalek becomes a direct dependency of
alknet-core (it's already in the dependency tree transitively via iroh).
The RawKeyCertResolver and Ed25519SigningKey rustls impls move from
#[cfg(all(feature = "quinn", feature = "iroh"))] to
#[cfg(feature = "quinn")] — raw-key TLS identity works in quinn-only
builds.
The iroh feature gate on TlsIdentity::RawKey is removed. The
variant is always available.
4. iroh transport converts from Ed25519SecretKey (alknet concern)
build_iroh_endpoint currently reads TlsIdentity::RawKey(iroh::SecretKey)
and passes it to iroh::Endpoint::builder().secret_key(...). After
decoupling, it converts:
if let Some(TlsIdentity::RawKey(key)) = static_config.tls_identity.as_ref() {
let iroh_key = iroh::SecretKey::from_bytes(key.as_bytes());
builder = builder.secret_key(iroh_key);
}
iroh::SecretKey::from_bytes(&[u8; 32]) accepts raw Ed25519 key bytes —
no information loss. This conversion is #[cfg(feature = "iroh")] only.
5. ACME ALPN challenge handling in dispatch (moved from dispatch_quinn by alknet ADR-083) (alknet concern)
Add an early-return guard in dispatch (the shared dispatch path,
moved from dispatch_quinn by alknet ADR-083) before the handler lookup:
// In the shared `dispatch` method (moved from `dispatch_quinn` by alknet ADR-083):
if alpn == b"acme-tls/1" {
debug!("acme-tls/1 challenge connection completed at TLS layer; closing");
connection.close(0u32.into(), b"acme done");
return;
}
This avoids the misleading "no handler for ALPN" warning. The challenge
is already answered at the TLS layer; the application just closes
gracefully. No ProtocolHandler registration for acme-tls/1. The
guard is transport-agnostic — it fires for any connection whose TLS
handshake negotiated acme-tls/1, regardless of which transport
delivered it. In practice ACME TLS-ALPN-01 challenges arrive over
TCP+TLS (CAs validate via TCP to port 443, not QUIC); advertising
acme-tls/1 on a QUIC listener that shares the ACME config is
harmless. See alknet ADR-083 for the full rationale.
(The guard lives in the alknet endpoint's ALPN dispatch loop. alkhttp's
HttpAdapter — the ProtocolHandler for h2/http/1.1 — never sees
acme-tls/1 connections; TLS identity and ALPN dispatch remain alknet
concerns per alknet ADR-010/ADR-001.)
6. Feature-gate ACME behind a new acme feature (alknet concern)
Add a acme feature to alknet-core:
[features]
acme = ["dep:rustls-acme"]
TlsIdentity::Acme is available regardless of feature (it's just config
data), but constructing TlsSetup with an Acme variant requires the
acme feature. Without it, TlsIdentity::Acme at endpoint construction
returns an error ("ACME feature not enabled"). This keeps the
footprint down for nodes that don't need ACME — rustls-acme and its
dependencies are only compiled when the feature is on.
7. acme-tls/1 in ALPN list only when ACME is active (alknet concern)
When TlsIdentity::Acme is configured, acme-tls/1 is appended to the
alpn_protocols list alongside the handler ALPNs. When ACME is not
configured, acme-tls/1 is not advertised — no behavior change for
non-ACME nodes.
What alkhttp inherits from this decision
- Browsers require X.509. Browsers cannot verify or present RFC 7250 raw Ed25519 keys; any deployment that serves browsers (the WebSocket browser bidirectional path — alkhttp ADR-044/ADR-048 — and the gateway endpoints) needs the hub's TLS listener to present an X.509 certificate chain (WebPKI/CA-issued, e.g. via ACME) rather than a raw key. This is the constraint that motivates the ACME work above, and it is why alknet ADR-027 is ported here at all.
- Identity selection is upstream of alkhttp. The
HttpAdapterregisters on the standard HTTP ALPNs (h2,http/1.1) per alkhttp ADR-001/ADR-002 and is transport-agnostic: the TLS identity that secures the listener (raw key for P2P, X.509 for browser-facing) is chosen by the consumer's assembly/endpoint layer, not by this crate.
Consequences
- Breaking change to
TlsIdentity(alknet concern):RawKey(iroh::SecretKey)→RawKey(Ed25519SecretKey). Pre-1.0 crate, in-repo consumers only. The assembly layer and tests that constructTlsIdentity::RawKeymust update. ed25519-dalekbecomes a direct dependency of alknet-core (alknet concern). It's already in the dependency tree (transitive via iroh), so no new compilation cost forirohbuilds. Quinn-only builds that were not usingRawKeybefore will now compileed25519-dalek— it's a small, pure-Rust crate with no C dependencies.rustls-acmeis feature-gated (acmefeature) (alknet concern). Nodes not using ACME don't compile it. The feature is compatible withquinn(ACME is quinn-only; iroh uses its own TLS).build_rustls_server_configbecomes async (or is replaced by an asyncTlsSetup::new) (alknet concern). The accept loop already runs in an async context, so this is a local change.- ACME state machine lifecycle (alknet concern): the
AcmeStatetask is spawned inAlknetEndpoint::new()and aborted on shutdown. TheTlsSetupstruct carries theJoinHandlesoAlknetEndpoint::shutdown()can abort it. - No handler needed for
acme-tls/1(alknet concern): thedispatch_quinnguard handles it.HandlerRegistryis not involved. - For alkhttp: no API surface change. The crate gains a documented constraint — browser-facing deployments require X.509 on the listener — which its consumers must satisfy at the endpoint layer.
Alternatives Considered
A. ACME as a ResolvesServerCert wrapper behind X509 (alknet concern)
OQ-12 suggested ACME "fits naturally as an additional TlsIdentity
variant or as a rustls::ResolvesServerCert implementation behind the
existing X509 path." The second option — wrapping X509 — was
rejected because ACME needs async state + config fields (domains, cache,
contact) that don't fit behind the static X509 { cert, key } variant.
A ResolvesServerCert that internally does ACME would need to be
constructed at config time with those fields, which means X509 would
need to carry them — bloating the variant for non-ACME users. A
dedicated Acme variant is cleaner.
B. Keep RawKey coupled to iroh, only add ACME (alknet concern)
Rejected because the coupling is the root cause of quinn-only builds not
supporting the "default" identity mode. Fixing only ACME would leave the
artificial iroh dependency in place. Since both changes touch
TlsIdentity and build_rustls_server_config, doing them together
avoids two breaking changes to the same enum.
C. Use iroh::SecretKey for both, re-export from alknet-core (alknet concern)
Rejected because it would make iroh a non-optional dependency of
alknet-core, defeating the feature-gated transport design (alknet
ADR-010). ed25519-dalek is a lightweight, pure-Rust crate; iroh is
not.
D. Register a no-op ProtocolHandler for acme-tls/1 (alknet concern)
Rejected because it would require the handler registry to know about
ACME (a TLS-layer concern), polluting the ALPN dispatch abstraction.
The dispatch_quinn guard is a one-line check that keeps ACME handling
in the endpoint layer where it belongs.
Cross-References
- OQ-12 (TLS identity provisioning) — updated by this ADR (alknet OQ)
- alknet ADR-010 — multi-connectivity endpoint, feature-gated transports; the ALPN router and endpoint that owns TLS identity and dispatch (an alknet decision; not ported to alkhttp — see Port notes)
- alknet ADR-004 — auth as shared core (an alknet decision; ported to alkhttp as alkhttp ADR-004, same number, different scope)
docs/architecture/crates/core/endpoint.md(alknet doc) — TLS identity use casesdocs/architecture/crates/core/config.md(alknet doc) —TlsIdentityenum/workspace/@alkdev/reverse-proxy/src/tls/— proven ACME implementation patternrustls-acmecrate — ACME state machine + cert resolver- alkhttp ADR-044 — the WebSocket browser path that makes the X.509 requirement load-bearing for this crate
- alkhttp ADR-034 — browsers are not peers; the public X.509 endpoint role and the hub role in the peer model
Port notes
- All TLS provisioning mechanics (
TlsIdentity,TlsSetup,build_rustls_server_config,AcmeState, theacmefeature, theacme-tls/1dispatch guard) are alknet concerns — they live in the alknet endpoint/config layer (alknet ADR-010, ADR-001), not in alkhttp. alkhttp is transport-coupling-free (no TLS, no endpoint, no accept loop); sections describing them are marked "(alknet concern)" inline and retained for provenance. The clause that is substantive for alkhttp — browsers require X.509 for browser-facing TLS — is restated under "What alkhttp inherits from this decision." alknet-coreownership ofEd25519SecretKeyis historical: the core types now live in the alkcall crate (vendored there). The decision text is preserved as written; the wrapper type is an alkcall-owned type today.- Reference links rewritten per alkhttp docs conventions: the original
relative sibling-ADR links to alknet ADR-010 and alknet ADR-004 are
textual references above (neither is ported to alkhttp under those
numbers/slug; alkhttp ADR-004 is a different document — auth as
shared core). The
crates/core/*.mdspec links are dropped in favor of the textual "alknet doc" annotations because the alknet spec tree is not part of this crate's docs. - The original ADR-083 is an alknet decision (shared
dispatchguard relocation); it is cited textually as "alknet ADR-083" and is not ported. - Original title preserved: "TLS Identity Redesign — ACME Integration + RawKey Decoupling".