Files
alkhttp/docs/architecture/decisions/048-websocket-native-session-not-gateway.md
T
glm-5.3-flash 802d94ec07 docs(review 007 Unit 2): WS-31 discovery-shadowing note + record corrections
- WS-31: websocket.md §"Data channels for browsers" + ADR-067's landed
  note record that WS-session discovery is the bootstrap set — the
  hook's bootstrap `services/*` registrations overwrite a
  base-registry `services/*` registration on the WS path by design
  (a deployment's custom `services/list` is shadowed on WS sessions
  only).
- ADR-048's landed note: correction + completion — the WS-26
  retention sentence was aspirational at the landed commit (WS-28) and
  is now real; the UP-02 posture's override half is now an explicit
  surface (`with_ws_op_register_acl` / `OpRegisterAcl`), with the
  note that `ChannelsPolicy` could not carry an op ACL.
- ADR-067's landed note: review-007 notes (WS-28 fix + gate, WS-29
  surface, WS-31 record).
- OQ-05 resolution: the retention claim carries the WS-28 correction.
- review-006 UP-02 log + WS-26 paragraph: corrections marking what the
  pre-fix tree did not have, with the landed remediation named.
- review-002 WS-17: the "bounded at 64 sessions" claim corrected —
  the bare-registry semaphore was per-request and bounded nothing;
  `SessionSlots` is the shared-cap surface.
- review-007 status: open for remediation → remediated, with the
  decisions taken (both "implement" options) and the gate names.

Verification: cargo test 454 passed / 0 failed; cargo doc --no-deps
clean (6 pre-existing warnings, identical at baseline).

Review: docs/reviews/007-ws-data-channel-surface-review.md
2026-09-05 05:45:31 +00:00

24 KiB
Raw Blame History

ADR-048: WebSocket Carries the Native Call-Protocol Session, Not the Gateway Shape

Ported from alknet ADR-048 (WebSocket Carries the Native Call-Protocol Session, Not the Gateway Shape); re-targeted to alkhttp.

Status

Accepted

Reconciliation note (2026-08-29): the bidirectionality this ADR promises for the WS path (§4 — the hub calling browser-registered ops through the connection-local Layer 2 overlay) is decided design, not a v1 implementation commitment. Today the WS path installs channel 0 only; no data-channel open path and no browser-side registration wiring exists (review-001 finding WS-03). The cut and its rationale are recorded in OQ-05; the native-session contract below stands as what the deferred wiring must satisfy.

Re-point (2026-09-03): the two alkcall mechanisms this wiring composes on now exist. alkcall review 004 Units 13 landed the per-session fork as the dispatch registry (alkcall ADR-047 §4 amendment #2), the full-duplex serving loop (Dispatcher::serve_single_stream, opt-in via ChannelClient::from_connection_with_serving), and the op/register bootstrap op (alkcall ADR-022 amendment 2026-09-03 — the bootstrap-op set each side may serve). The browser bidirectionality promise is no longer standing on unmechanized commitments: the deferred WS wiring (OQ-05, alkhttp review 003 Unit 2) composes on those alkcall ADRs.

Updated (2026-09-04): alkcall review 005 remediated the landed mechanisms (serving-loop concurrency, op/register collision policy, spec round-trip completeness) and alkcall 0.3.0 shipped them; alkhttp now consumes 0.3. The ADR-022 collision policy (2026-09-04 sub-amendment) binds here too: a peer-announced op may replace other peer-announced ops but never the serving side's own registrations — the WS session's op/register handler gates on the session fork.

Landed (2026-09-04, review 006 Unit 2+3): the WS wiring this note tracks is in — the hook forks the base registry per session, registers the channel ops + openables + bootstrap discovery + op/register on the fork, and dispatches over it; the session retains its live Arc<CallConnection> in WsSessions (the hub's reach-the-browser handle). §4's hub→browser call direction now has its object: announced ops land in the connection overlay via op/register, and the hub composes them through the connection handle (gate: op_register_served_per_session_and_collision_is_already_exists). The op/register ACL posture on this surface: registered with AccessControl::default() (the SRV-10 permissive-crate-default precedent); deployments gate via a stricter ChannelsPolicy passed through the hook (review 006 UP-02 decision).

Review-007 correction + completion (2026-09-05): the retention sentence above was, at the time of the landed note, aspirational — review 007 WS-28 found the ConnectionGuard dropping at the end of its if let block (the handle visible for microseconds) and remediation bound it in the channel-0 task's frame; the retention is now real, gated by live_connections_visible_mid_session_and_drain_after_teardown. The ACL posture's second half is likewise now real as an explicit surface (the ChannelsPolicy object could not carry an op ACL): HttpAdapter::with_ws_op_register_acl / the OpRegisterAcl request extension set the op/register op's AccessControl — default unchanged (AccessControl::default(), any authenticated peer may announce); a deployment restricting which authenticated peers may announce threads a stricter value. The UP-02 posture stands; only the override surface it named now exists.

Status amendment (alkhttp port)

  • The WS path carries the channels session (alkhttp ADR-067): a browser WS connection is demultiplexed by the channels protocol — 8-byte chunk headers per alkcall ADR-034/ADR-035 — rather than being a bare EventEnvelope stream. Channel 0 is pre-negotiated as alk/call (alkcall ADR-036) and carries the native call-protocol session exactly as this ADR describes — the dispatch loop, the overlay rules, and the browsers-not-peers property all stand unchanged; they apply to channel 0.
  • Framing on channel 0 is length-prefixed JSON (alkcall's frame format, alkcall ADR-014) inside the 8-byte chunk headernot one-envelope-per-WS-message. The WS message boundary carries chunks, not envelopes; see alkhttp ADR-067 §framing. Sentences below that speak of "one EventEnvelope = one binary WS message" are the original 2026 framing, retained as decision history; the operative framing is the channels-chunk model just described.
  • The default WS upgrade path is /alk/channels (was /alknet/call in the alknet original — renamed per the alkcall ADR-004 alk/ ALPN convention and per alkhttp ADR-067's channels session).

Context

alkhttp ADR-044 (Accepted) removed h3/WebTransport from this crate's scope (see alkhttp ADR-069; the alknet record deferred it) and committed WebSocket as the browser bidirectional path: a browser upgrades an HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2 request to WebSocket and the resulting full-duplex WS connection carries the call protocol's EventEnvelope frames (in the current wire model: on channel 0, as length-prefixed JSON inside channels chunks). alkhttp ADR-044 §1 established that the call protocol's call.requested/call.responded/call.completed/call.aborted exchange "works over WebSocket with no protocol change — the same Dispatcher, the same PendingRequestMap, the same correlation by request ID."

alkhttp ADR-044 §1 also established what shape the WS session carries — the native EventEnvelope call-protocol session — but it does so as part of a larger argument about why WebTransport isn't required, not as a crisp rule an implementer is told not to violate. Two facts make the distinction worth its own explicit decision record:

  1. The HTTP surface has a deliberate, well-documented invoke contract: the to_openapi gateway pattern (alkhttp ADR-042, alkhttp ADR-047). The gateway is 5 fixed endpoints (/search, /schema, /call, /batch, /subscribe), where /call takes { "operation": "/fs/readFile", "input": {...} } and invokes through OperationRegistry::invoke(). It is a well-shaped, simple contract. An implementer writing the WS handler could plausibly ask: "should the WS path expose the same 5-endpoint gateway shape, so a WS client looks like an HTTP client?" That is a reasonable question, and the answer is no — but the answer is currently implicit in alkhttp ADR-044's framing, not stated as a rule.

  2. The two surfaces serve different architectural roles, and that difference is load-bearing. The HTTP gateway is, by HTTP's nature, a one-directional projection — client initiates, server responds (see the alkhttp server spec, §"One-directional projection"). The whole reason WebSocket exists in this architecture is to restore the call protocol's native bidirectionality for browsers (alkhttp ADR-044 §4): a WS connection is full-duplex, so both sides can initiate call.requested frames. Putting the gateway's one-directional shape on WS re-introduces the one-directional limitation that WS exists to fix. The two surfaces are not interchangeable; they are deliberately different tools for deliberately different jobs.

The two invoke contracts, contrasted

Aspect HTTP gateway (/call, alkhttp ADR-042/047) WS native session (this ADR)
Direction One-directional (client→server calls only) Bidirectional (either side can call.requested)
Wire unit HTTP request/response Channels chunk (8-byte header, alkcall ADR-034/035); channel 0 payload = length-prefixed-JSON EventEnvelope (alkcall ADR-014)
Invoke shape POST /call with { "operation": "/fs/readFile", "input": {...} } call.requested event with { operation, input } payload (the call protocol's native shape)
Discovery GET /search (gateway endpoint) services/list as an ordinary call-protocol op
Schema GET /schema (gateway endpoint) services/schema as an ordinary call-protocol op
Streaming POST /subscribe (SSE frames) call.responded events as channel-0 frames (no SSE)
Dispatcher axum route handler → OperationRegistry::invoke() shared Dispatcher (alkcall ADR-015, stream-agnostic)
Multiplexing HTTP/2 native; HTTP/1.1 sequential Channels channel IDs (alkcall ADR-034/035) + request ID (alkcall ADR-015)

The WS row is the call protocol's own native session, with WebSocket as the transport instead of QUIC (carried on channel 0 of the channels session per alkcall ADR-036). The HTTP row is a projection of that session into HTTP's one-directional shape, with the gateway as the deliberate interface for clients that only speak HTTP.

Why the gateway shape is wrong on WS

Three concrete reasons:

  1. It duplicates the native invoke path with a lossier one. The call protocol's call.requested event is the invoke primitive; the gateway's /call is that primitive wrapped in an HTTP envelope. On WS, the envelope is unnecessary — there is no HTTP request/response cycle to fit into. A gateway-on-WS would be a translation layer translating the call protocol to itself, losing bidirectionality in the process.

  2. It loses the per-caller filtering property the native session already has. The gateway's /search exists to give HTTP clients the AccessControl::check(identity)-filtered discovery that the call protocol provides natively via services/list. On WS, services/list is already a call-protocol op the browser can call directly — the filtering is already there. A gateway-on-WS re-implements a filtering property the native session already provides.

  3. It breaks the symmetry with the QUIC path. The alk/call QUIC path (alkcall ADR-015, alkcall ADR-022) is the native EventEnvelope session over QUIC bidirectional streams. WS is the same session over WS messages (via the channels session's channel 0 — alkcall ADR-036). Making the WS path different from the QUIC path (by putting the gateway on WS) creates two browser-reachable invoke contracts for no architectural reason — the QUIC path is the reference, and WS should mirror it, not diverge from it.

The prior art is already native-session-shaped

The @alkdev/pubsub WebSocket client/server (event-target-websocket-client.ts, event-target-websocket-server.ts) — the working prior art alkhttp ADR-044 cites as the reason the WS path is cheap — already carries the EventEnvelope { type, id, payload } shape over WS binary messages, with no gateway-style wrapping. The call protocol's EventEnvelope was derived from the pubsub envelope (refined with typed event names and structured payloads); the delta is small and well-defined (see the alkcall crate docs, §"Transport agnosticism"). A browser/Node WS client derived from the pubsub prior art speaks the native session shape, not a gateway shape. The gateway-on-WS variant would require un-translating the pubsub client's native-session shape into the gateway's { operation, input } shape — work that has no payoff because the native shape is what both the QUIC path and the pubsub prior art use. (In the current wire model, the client additionally speaks the channels chunk framing around those envelopes — alkcall ADR-034/035 via alkhttp ADR-067.)

Decision

1. A WebSocket connection is a native EventEnvelope call-protocol session, not the HTTP gateway shape

The WS handler on HttpAdapter hands the WS message stream to the call protocol's shared Dispatcher — the same dispatch loop the call adapter uses for alk/call QUIC connections (alkcall ADR-015, stream-agnostic correlation; a WS message stream is another BiStream-satisfying transport). Concretely in alkhttp (per alkhttp ADR-067): the WS handler demultiplexes the 8-byte chunk framing of the channels protocol (alkcall ADR-034/ADR-035); channel 0 is pre-negotiated as alk/call (alkcall ADR-036) and its chunk payloads are EventEnvelope frames in alkcall's length-prefixed JSON frame format (alkcall ADR-014). The browser writes EventEnvelope frames as channel-0 chunks; the handler reads them and dispatches via OperationRegistry::invoke(). Responses (call.responded, call.error, call.completed, call.aborted) are written back as channel-0 chunks.

The to_openapi gateway endpoints (/search, /schema, /call, /batch, /subscribe — alkhttp ADR-042, alkhttp ADR-047) do not appear on the WebSocket path. They are the HTTP one-directional projection's invoke contract; WS carries the call protocol's own native session, which is a different (and richer) thing.

2. Discovery and schema are call-protocol ops, not WS-specific endpoints

The browser calls services/list and services/schema as ordinary call.requested events over the WS connection (channel 0). They are call-protocol operations, not WS endpoints. There is no /search or /schema on WS — those are the HTTP gateway's names for the same discovery primitives. The filtering the gateway provides via AccessControl::check(identity)-filtered /search (alkhttp ADR-042 §3) is provided on the WS path by the same mechanism the call protocol uses everywhere: services/list is AccessControl-filtered natively (see the alkcall crate docs, client-and-adapters, §"services/list"). No WS-specific discovery surface exists or is needed.

3. Subscriptions project as native call.responded events, not SSE

A Subscription operation invoked over WS streams call.responded events as channel-0 frames directly — no SSE data: framing (that is the h2/http/1.1 projection for /subscribe, per the streaming handler decision, alkhttp ADR-049; on WS it is unnecessary because WS is already a framed full-duplex channel). call.completed closes the stream; call.aborted closes it with an error frame. This is the native streaming projection for the WS path, mirroring how subscriptions work on the QUIC path.

4. Bidirectionality is native and unchanged from the QUIC path

The WS call-protocol session inherits the call protocol's native bidirectionality (alknet ADR-043 §2, transferred to WebSocket per alkhttp ADR-044 §3): both sides can send call.requested frames. The browser calls operations on the hub; the hub can call operations registered on the browser's side, over the same session, using the same PendingRequestMap and EventEnvelope framing as alk/call. The browser case where the client registers no operations of its own is the common case — the server→client call direction is unused because the browser has nothing to call. That is a use-case scoping, not an architectural limitation.

5. This is a clarifying decision, not a new one

alkhttp ADR-044 §1 commits the native-session shape ("the call protocol's framing fits the WebSocket path cleanly ... the same Dispatcher, the same PendingRequestMap, the same correlation by request ID"). This ADR does not change that decision; it makes the implication an explicit, implementer-visible rule: the WS path is the native session, and the gateway shape is deliberately not applied to it. An implementer reading alkhttp ADR-044 alone could plausibly ask "should the WS path expose the gateway endpoints too?" — this ADR's job is to make the answer discoverable as a decision record, not implicit in framing.

Consequences

Positive:

  • One invoke model for the call protocol, regardless of transport. The QUIC path and the WS path run the same EventEnvelope session through the same Dispatcher (on the WS path, via channel 0 of the channels session — alkhttp ADR-067); the HTTP gateway is the one-directional projection for clients that only speak HTTP. An implementer building the WS handler reuses the Dispatcher and OperationRegistry::invoke() dispatch path verbatim — no WS-specific routing, no WS-specific discovery surface, no second invoke contract to design or maintain.
  • The @alkdev/pubsub/@alkdev/operations TypeScript clients sync to the call protocol with no translation layer: their EventEnvelope shape is already the native session shape, and the call protocol's envelope is a refined superset of the pubsub envelope (alkhttp ADR-044 §"Concrete prior art"). The gateway-on-WS variant would have required un-translating the pubsub client's native-session shape; this decision avoids that un-translation entirely. (The clients also speak the channels chunk layer around those envelopes — alkcall ADR-034/035.)
  • Per-caller AccessControl-filtered discovery is already a property of the native session (services/list). No WS-specific filtering surface to build or document; the call protocol's authorization model applies unchanged.
  • The browser is a bidirectional call target during a live session, not a peer-graph member (alkhttp ADR-044 §5, alkhttp ADR-034 §4). The native session shape is what makes this clean: the browser gets bidirectional call capability through the connection-local Layer 2 overlay (alkcall ADR-019) without peer-graph membership, and the gateway shape would not have changed this — but it would have made the WS path diverge from the QUIC path for no benefit.

Negative:

  • A WS client cannot use the gateway's { "operation": ..., "input": ... } body shape — it must speak the call protocol's native call.requested event (inside the channels chunk framing). This is honest (the WS path is the call protocol), but a developer who learned the gateway shape from the HTTP surface must learn the EventEnvelope shape (plus the chunk framing) for WS. The pubsub prior art and the @alkdev/operations TypeScript client already speak the envelope shape, so the delta is small for the primary consumer — but it is a real difference from the HTTP gateway's simpler { operation, input } invoke body.
  • The 5 gateway endpoint names (/search, /schema, /call, /batch, /subscribe) are HTTP-specific and do not carry over to WS. A deployment documenting its surface for both HTTP and WS clients documents two invoke shapes (the gateway for HTTP; the native session for WS). This is the cost of using the right tool for each transport instead of forcing one shape onto both.

Reversal

This ADR clarifies a decision alkhttp ADR-044 already committed (§1 describes the native session; this ADR makes that the explicit, implementer-visible rule). The reversal posture is therefore alkhttp ADR-044's, not a separate one: the WS path itself is not deferred (it is the browser path), and the native-session-not-gateway choice is a clarification of what that path carries — reversing it would mean adopting the gateway shape on WS, which would re-introduce the one-directional limitation WS exists to fix (§Context reason 1). The original text's realistic reversal path — "WebTransport revives and adds a second browser bidirectional path" — is an alknet posture and does not apply to this crate: WebTransport is removed from alkhttp scope entirely (alkhttp ADR-069), and the ALPN-stream-proxy (alknet ADR-040) is an alknet record, not ported here. If a second browser bidirectional transport ever exists, it is an alknet transport concern fronting the stable HTTP surface this crate publishes; this ADR's rule (WS = native session on the channels path, not gateway) is unaffected — the gateway shape stays HTTP-only regardless of how many browser bidirectional transports exist.

Assumptions

  1. The call protocol's EventEnvelope framing fits the WebSocket path cleanly. In the original 2026 framing: an EventEnvelope is a self-delimited JSON object; one envelope per WS binary message. In the current wire model (alkhttp ADR-067): the WS message boundary carries channels chunks (8-byte header, alkcall ADR-034/ADR-035), and channel 0 — pre-negotiated as alk/call (alkcall ADR-036) — carries EventEnvelope frames as length-prefixed JSON (alkcall ADR-014's frame format) inside the chunk payload. The load-bearing property — self-delimited frames, no streaming deserializer across frame boundaries — is unchanged. This is verified by prior art: the @alkdev/pubsub WebSocket client/server carries the same { type, id, payload } envelope over WS binary messages.

  2. The shared Dispatcher runs over the WS path unchanged. alkcall ADR-015 commits stream-agnostic correlation; a WS message stream is another BiStream-satisfying transport (per alkcall ADR-038, the channels ChannelConnection is itself a BiStreamSource). The Dispatcher and PendingRequestMap are transport-agnostic; only the connection-establishment half differs (WS upgrade handler vs QUIC accept/dial).

  3. The primary WS consumer is a browser or Node client derived from the @alkdev/pubsub/@alkdev/operations prior art. That client already speaks the native EventEnvelope shape (now wrapped in the channels chunk framing). The gateway's simpler { operation, input } body shape is the HTTP path's affordance for clients that only speak HTTP; a client that has chosen WS has already opted into the call protocol's native framing.

  4. services/list and services/schema are sufficient discovery for the WS path. They are AccessControl-filtered (per-caller) and return the full OperationSpec respectively. The gateway's /search and /schema are HTTP-shaped names for these same primitives; on WS the primitives apply directly. No WS-specific discovery surface is needed.

References

  • alkhttp ADR-067 — the amendment that defines the current WS wire model: the WS session carries the channels protocol (8-byte chunk multiplexing); channel 0 is pre-negotiated alk/call and carries the native call-protocol session described here.
  • alkcall ADR-034 / alkcall ADR-035 — the channels wire format (8-byte chunk header; pure channel multiplexing).
  • alkcall ADR-036 — channel 0 is pre-negotiated alk/call.
  • alkcall ADR-014 — the call protocol's hand-rolled EventEnvelope framing (length-prefixed JSON); the frame format carried in channel-0 chunk payloads.
  • alkcall ADR-015 — call-protocol stream model; stream-agnostic correlation (Dispatcher/PendingRequestMap); a WS message stream is another BiStream-satisfying transport.
  • alkcall ADR-038 — ChannelConnection as a BiStreamSource; the channels-session side of the stream-agnostic claim.
  • alkcall ADR-022 §5 — to_* adapters are projections that consume the registry; WS is not a to_* adapter (it carries the native session, it doesn't project it).
  • alkcall ADR-019 — Layer 2 per-connection overlay where browser-registered ops (if any) land.
  • alkhttp ADR-034 §4 (amended by alkhttp ADR-044 §5) — browsers are not peers; the connection-local overlay gives the browser bidirectional-call capability without peer-graph membership.
  • alkhttp ADR-049 — the SSE projection for /subscribe (the HTTP one-directional streaming path; on WS, subscriptions project as native call.responded events, no SSE).
  • alkhttp ADR-042 — the gateway pattern this ADR clarifies is HTTP-only.
  • alknet ADR-043 §2/§3 — bidirectionality and the no-PeerId connection-local overlay, transferred to WebSocket per alkhttp ADR-044 §3 (alknet record; not ported to alkhttp).
  • alkhttp ADR-044 — the ADR that committed WS as the browser path; this ADR clarifies the shape of what it committed (§1 implies the native session; this ADR makes it an explicit rule).
  • alkhttp ADR-047 — the gateway as the sole HTTP invoke path (the HTTP-only contract this ADR clarifies does not extend to WS).
  • alkhttp ADR-001 / ADR-002 — ALPN-based dispatch; HttpAdapter as the ProtocolHandler for h2/http/1.1; the WS upgrade rides the HTTP surface.
  • alkhttp ADR-069 — WebTransport removed from alkhttp scope (context for the reversal posture above).
  • The alkcall crate docs — call-protocol spec (§"Transport agnosticism") and client-and-adapters spec (§"services/list"); the old relative links into the alknet spec tree became textual references to the alkcall crate's own documentation.