157f1dfb180ae0c167ebeff4674a79e7269514fd
9 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b71db99753 |
docs(http): add ADR-048 and websocket.md — WS carries native session, not gateway
Promote the WebSocket browser path from a section in http-server.md to a first-class spec (websocket.md) and commit the contract-pattern decision (ADR-048): a WS connection carries the native EventEnvelope call-protocol session, not the HTTP gateway shape. The gateway endpoints are HTTP-only; discovery on WS is via services/list/services/schema as ordinary call-protocol ops; subscriptions project as native call.responded events (no SSE). ADR-044 already decided WS as the v1 browser bidirectional path; ADR-048 clarifies the shape of what ADR-044 committed (§1 implies native session; the ADR makes it an explicit implementer-visible rule). The from_wss adapter (importing a remote node's ops over WS) is recorded as out-of-scope with a concrete reversal trigger so it is not re-derived later. Spec cleanup: http-server.md WS section collapsed to a stub pointer; websocket.md Why section references ADRs rather than re-arguing them; length-prefix decision made canonical (no prefix on WS — message boundary is the delimiter); default upgrade path pinned (/alknet/call) with HTTP/2 extended CONNECT noted; indexes (README, http/README, overview) updated. |
|||
| 2a6e4c371a |
docs(http): resolve OQ-39; add ADRs 045-047; record pubsub prior art for WS path
OQ-39 (to_openapi published-spec versioning) resolved by ADR-045:
info.version semver tracks the gateway endpoint contract, not the
operation set — per-caller operations discovered via /search do not
bump the version. The gateway pattern (ADR-042) dissolved most of the
original churn concern.
ADR-046: assembly-layer custom HTTP routes on HttpAdapter. The HTTP
router had no documented extension point for deployment-specific
endpoints (e.g., an OAI-compatible proxy at /v1/chat/completions). Adds
extra_routes: Option<Router> at construction; raw HTTP, not operations;
default surface takes precedence on collision. The mechanism is the
one-way door; specific routes are two-way.
ADR-047: remove the direct-call POST /{service}/{op} HTTP surface. The
gateway /call is the sole invoke path — the simplified contract is a
few fixed endpoints, not a per-operation REST tree. The direct-call
surface re-introduced the 'dump the full API regardless of privs'
failure mode at the HTTP level that the gateway /search was built to
escape. ADR-036's routing decision is superseded; its non-routing
clauses (SSE, Bearer auth, /healthz, stealth, error mapping) survive.
A deployment wanting a REST-like per-operation surface builds it as a
custom route projection (ADR-046).
ADR-044 updated with the tradeoff framing (WSS is the right tool for
the call-protocol-from-browser case; WebTransport is the right tool for
the generalized ALPN-stream-proxy case we don't have yet — coexist, not
migrate) and the @alkdev/pubsub concrete prior art (the EventEnvelope
{type,id,payload} the call protocol was derived from already has a
working WebSocket client/server; the sync is a small adjustment, not a
from-scratch build).
call-protocol.md references the pubsub lineage for the
transport-agnosticism claim.
|
|||
| 3327d585da |
docs(http): resolve OQ-40 reqwest client config — ClientWithMiddleware + retry/retry-after middleware stack
OQ-40 resolved: alknet-http owns a shared reqwest_middleware::ClientWithMiddleware (not a bare reqwest::Client) with a two-layer middleware stack — RetryTransientMiddleware (reqwest-retry, exponential backoff on transient failures) + inlined RetryAfterMiddleware (from melotic/reqwest-retry-after, MIT, ~50 lines, inlined to bound the upstream's unbounded HashMap storage). The two are complementary: reqwest-retry's default strategy does not honor Retry-After. Hot-reload is rebuild-and-swap via ArcSwap (same pattern as ConfigIdentityProvider, ADR-035); a rebuild drops the connection pool, which is acceptable since a config change wanting a fresh pool is the trigger. The three one-way constraints stand unchanged: alknet-http owns its client (no env-var config, no shared global), credentials inject per-request from OperationContext.capabilities, outbound TLS uses the system trust store. Records the downstream layering boundary: the agent crate's provider SSE normalization (the solid part of aisdk's pattern — Vercel-UI-message normalization) sits on top of this client, consuming the reqwest::Response stream; it does not replace the client. The aisdk core/client.rs reference for client construction is dropped (env-var config + hand-rolled retry are the anti-patterns discarded); the from_openapi.ts SSE normalization reference in the forwarding-handler section is kept (separate, solid pattern). No ADR — the decision is internal to alknet-http: the client type does not cross crate boundaries (alknet-call never sees reqwest), the library choice is reversible, and it does not touch the system's structure, constraints, or cross-crate API surface. Updates: http-adapters.md (HTTP client section rewritten, references updated, constraints/OQ bullets updated), http-mcp.md (OQ-40 status flip), open- questions.md (OQ-40 resolved with full config-shape table), README.md (OQ-40 folded into the existing two-way-doors bucket), and three secondary docs (crates/http/README.md, overview.md, http-server.md) that carried stale 'open' OQ-40 references. |
|||
| 125cb49cc4 |
docs(http): defer h3/WebTransport (ADR-044); browsers use WebSocket for v1
Working through the WebTransport implementation path surfaced a scope question distinct from the hedging-as-deferral anti-pattern ADR-038 was written to correct. Three findings drove the re-evaluation: 1. The browser bidirectional call-protocol path doesn't require WebTransport — WebSocket is full-duplex, EventEnvelope fits a WS binary message boundary cleanly, and the Dispatcher is stream- agnostic (ADR-012). What WebTransport gives over WebSocket (native multi-stream multiplexing, the ALPN-as-stream substrate) benefits the proxy use case, not the call protocol. 2. WebTransport is a draft standard (-07, not RFC) on an experimental Rust dependency stack (wtransport/h3 both self-describe as not production-ready). Either choice puts a draft protocol on the security surface of the first release. 3. The ALPN-stream-proxy (ADR-040) is speculative — its WASM parser consumers (browser SSH/SFTP/git clients) don't exist yet, and the downstream crates WebTransport deferral blocks (SSH, git, SFTP) expose their ALPNs natively over QUIC regardless. This is a scope decision (per ADR-009: a decision that 'genuinely doesn't need to be made yet because the use case isn't concrete'), not hedging. The reversal trigger is concrete: a real deployment needing the ALPN-stream-proxy. ADR-038 is superseded (its anti-pattern correction stands; its specific 'h3 in scope now' decision is reversed). ADR-040 and ADR-043 are parked, not superseded — their designs revive unchanged when WebTransport revives, with §2 (bidirectionality) and §3 (no-PeerId overlay) of ADR-043 transferring to WebSocket for v1. ADR-044 §5 also states the 'browser is not a peer' rationale that ADR-034 §4 closed without arguing: peer = addressable node in the call-protocol peer graph (stable PeerId, PeerRef::Specific-reachable, identity stable across reconnects), not 'any endpoint that exchanges calls during a live session.' A browser is the second but not the first (no stable crypto identity of its own, ephemeral, not addressable from other nodes). ADR-034 §4 and Assumption 2 are amended by reference. The wtransport-vs-hyperium dependency question is recorded (not resolved — WebTransport is deferred) in ADR-044 §'Research note' and webtransport.md so the revival doesn't re-derive it: wtransport probably isn't the right choice (axum-bridge friction — it owns its own HTTP serving path); the hyperium stack (h3 + h3-quinn + h3-webtransport) fits the axum integration better but its server-side WebTransport API needs verification before commitment. Reviewed by architecture-review subagent; all critical cross-reference issues (ADR-034 §5 stale 'in scope' assertion, ADR-036 Context listing h3 as implemented, webtransport.md Design Decisions table) resolved. |
|||
| 0a78306686 |
docs(http): add ADR-043 WebTransport bidirectional ALPN substrate; fix spec drift from mid-spec pivot
A consistency review of the alknet-http specs found two classes of
issues: internal contradictions from the mid-spec pivot (the to_openapi
gateway pattern landed in prose but not in cross-references), and a
systematic client→server assumption that only holds for the OpenAPI/MCP
case leaking into the WebTransport architecture.
Class 1 (internal contradictions):
- C1: to_openapi was half-refactored — body described the ADR-042
gateway pattern but the decisions table and ADR-036 still said
'paths mirror /{service}/{op}'. ADR-036's to_openapi clause is now
amended as superseded by ADR-042; the stale decisions row and README
Principle 2 are fixed.
- C2: the axum Router route list didn't include the 5 gateway endpoints
(/search, /schema, /call, /batch, /subscribe). Added them; clarified
/openapi.json as the gateway description doc; added gateway paths to
the decoy exclusion list.
- C3: ADR-034 §5 still talked about the 'h3/WebTransport deferral
bucket' that ADR-038 eliminated. Amended §5/Consequences/References
to drop the deferral framing (the auth-model decision stands; only
the 'when' wording was stale).
Class 2 (one-way direction assumption):
- C4/C5/C6: the WebTransport specs framed the session as browser→hub
one-way, when the call protocol is bidirectional and WebTransport is
a general ALPN transport substrate. New ADR-043 reframes WebTransport
as a bidirectional ALPN transport substrate (call protocol is the
first/canonical target; needs no WASM parser), names the call
protocol's bidirectionality over WebTransport sessions, and states
the inbound no-PeerId connection-local overlay as the mirror of
ADR-034 §2. webtransport.md is updated to reflect this framing;
ADR-040 is repositioned (not superseded) as the substrate's non-call-
ALPN mechanism.
- C7: the HTTP/1.1+HTTP/2 surface's one-directionality is now named as
a lossy consequence of HTTP request/response; WebTransport is named
as the surface that restores the bidirectional call model.
- C8: overview.md acknowledges the from/to direction model is
OpenAPI/MCP-specific, not a call-protocol property.
A review subagent pass on ADR-043 + webtransport.md found no critical
issues; warnings W1-W3 (residual browser-as-subject framing, ADR-009
rationale in spec, opening abstract tone) and suggestions S2/S4/S5
were addressed.
|
|||
| 69ebe58bab |
docs(http): add ADR-042 OpenAPI gateway pattern for to_openapi
The to_openapi spec was describing one OpenAPI path per alknet operation
— the inverse of from_openapi. That inverse is genuinely messy: the call
protocol's input is a flat JSON object, and generating a traditional
OpenAPI path entry (POST /fs/{path} with path param, body, query params)
requires reverse-engineering which fields are path/query/body — metadata
the call protocol doesn't carry. The three options (leaky HTTP metadata
on OperationSpec, fragile heuristics, manual annotation) are all messy.
ADR-042 replaces this with the gateway pattern (same as ADR-041 for
to_mcp): to_openapi generates 5 fixed endpoints (search, schema, call,
batch, subscribe) that gate access to the full operation registry. The
input is always a flat JSON body — no path/query/body split to
reverse-engineer. JSON Schema is already in the OperationSpec.
The per-caller API surface is the key advantage: /search is
AccessControl-filtered, so the client sees only what it can call. The
Gitea failure mode (dumping admin ops to every caller in a static
OpenAPI doc) is structurally impossible — the per-caller surface is the
default, not an afterthought. OpenAPI has no per-caller filtering
concept; the gateway pattern provides it through /search.
Gateway endpoint set:
- /search -> services/list (AccessControl-filtered, names + descriptions)
- /schema -> services/schema (full OperationSpec)
- /call -> call.requested (Query/Mutation, flat JSON body)
- /batch -> multiple call.requested (correlated IDs)
- /subscribe -> call.requested (Subscription, SSE) — the one endpoint
the MCP gateway excludes (MCP is request/response; OpenAPI/SSE
supports streaming)
A traditional per-operation-paths projection is additive (a deployment
that wants the nice Swagger UI builds it with HTTP-specific metadata),
not a replacement. The gateway is the default.
http-adapters.md to_openapi section rewritten: the gateway endpoint
set, per-caller filtering, error fidelity on the /call endpoint, and
the additive traditional projection. The 'Why' section adds the
flat->structured and per-caller-surface rationale.
README/overview ADR tables and the top-level README current-state note
updated for ADR-042.
|
|||
| 5fc074713c |
docs(http): add ADR-041 MCP tool-gateway pattern for to_mcp
The to_mcp spec was describing one MCP tool per alknet operation — the tool-bloat problem. An LLM connecting to a node with 200 operations gets 200 MCP tools dumped into its context, degrading reasoning and wasting context budget. ADR-041 replaces this with the tool-gateway pattern (same pattern as opencode's memory and worktree tools): to_mcp exposes 4 fixed meta-tools (search, schema, call, batch) that gate access to the full operation registry. The LLM has a few tools in context, discovers operations on demand through search + schema, then calls. Same principle as Linux's man command — don't preload all documentation; query on demand. Gateway tool set: - search -> services/list (names + descriptions, AccessControl-filtered) - schema -> services/schema (full OperationSpec for a specific op) - call -> call.requested (Query/Mutation only, request/response) - batch -> multiple call.requested (correlated IDs, OQ-14) Subscription operations are excluded — MCP tool calls are request/response by protocol design (the client blocks until CallToolResult returns); streaming subscriptions don't fit. Subscriptions are filtered out of search results and cannot be invoked via call. http-mcp.md to_mcp section rewritten: the gateway tool set, Subscription exclusion, and the service behavior (tools/list returns 4 fixed tools, tools/call dispatches through the gateway). The 'Why' section adds the tool-bloat rationale and the memory/worktree tool pattern that informed the design. README/overview ADR tables and the top-level README current-state note updated for ADR-041. |
|||
| 398e3d512d |
docs(http): add ADR-040 WebTransport ALPN-stream-proxy and reframe OQ-38
The 'WebTransport proxy' concept was conflating two distinct things; this pass separates them: 1. In-process ALPN-stream-proxy (ADR-040, in alknet-http): the h3 handler hands a WebTransport stream to another ALPN handler (SshAdapter, GitAdapter, etc.) as a Connection, so a browser with a WASM parser can reach any ALPN service via WebTransport. Path-based routing (the CONNECT path declares the target: /alknet/ssh -> SshAdapter). HttpAdapter gains Arc<HandlerRegistry> for the lookup. The browser's WASM parser implements BiStream (ADR-007) over the WebTransport stream. SSH-over-WebTransport is HTTPS-shaped at the network layer (anti-censorship: the 'VPN-like without being a VPN' use case on a clean foundation). russh-sftp demonstrates WASM targeting is feasible; SSH is the next target. 2. Standalone relay service (OQ-38, future alknet-relay crate): a full relay - fork of iroh-relay - with WebTransport proxy fallback for NAT traversal. This is infrastructure, not a mode of the h3 handler. OQ-38 reframed to be the standalone-relay scope question (distinct from the in-process proxy now resolved by ADR-040). webtransport.md updated: three stream destinations (call protocol, ALPN-handler proxy, other sub-protocols) with path-based routing; new 'ALPN-stream-proxy' section covering the WASM client side, auth model (bearer token gates the session; protocol's own auth gates the protocol session), and the HandlerRegistry reference. README/overview ADR tables and OQ summaries updated for ADR-040. |
|||
| ab47dac4ad |
docs(http): draft alknet-http architecture specs and ADRs 036-039
First speccing pass for alknet-http (HTTP interface crate: h2/http1.1/h3 server + from_openapi/to_openapi/from_mcp/to_mcp adapters). Specs (crates/http/): - README.md, overview.md — crate index, two-roles-in-one-crate framing, adapter location map, feature gates (h3, mcp), no-env-vars invariant - http-server.md — HttpAdapter for h2/http1.1, axum over QUIC stream, Bearer auth, SSE projection for subscriptions, /healthz, stealth decoy - http-adapters.md — from_openapi (reqwest) and to_openapi (projection), error fidelity (HTTP_<status> per ADR-023), type definitions - http-mcp.md — from_mcp/to_mcp (feature-gated), streamable-HTTP-only - webtransport.md — h3/WebTransport handler, browser streaming path, HTTP/3 request vs WebTransport session distinguished at framing layer ADRs: - ADR-036 HTTP-to-Call Operation Mapping (Proposed) — direct path mapping; to_openapi is projection, not router (the load-bearing one-way door from Phase 0 DH-3) - ADR-037 MCP Stdio Transport Exclusion (Proposed) — streamable HTTP only; stdio is not built (RCE-vector security position) - ADR-038 HTTP/3 and WebTransport as First-Class HTTP Transports (Proposed) — corrects the Phase 0 DH-2 deferral framing; h3 is in scope, not deferred, per ADR-009 §'What this framework is NOT' - ADR-039 HTTP Server and Client Host Colocated in alknet-http (Proposed) — one crate for server + client host (shared HTTP deps, shared operation-spec->HTTP mapping) - ADR-003 Amendment 1 — clarifies alknet-call is a protocol-foundation crate (the alknet-http -> alknet-call dependency edge) Open questions (OQ-38, OQ-39, OQ-40 added under 'Theme: alknet-http'): - OQ-38 WebTransport relay-as-proxy scope (genuine scope question, not a deferral — the decision is made when the use case becomes concrete) - OQ-39 to_openapi published-spec versioning (one-way after first publication) - OQ-40 reqwest client config and connection pooling (two-way-door) Architecture README and overview updated with doc table, ADR table (036-039), current-state note, and crate graph (alknet-http -> alknet-call edge). Reviewed by architecture-reviewer subagent: 3 critical, 4 warning, 5 suggestion issues found and fixed (missing ADR-039, WebTransport stream routing conflation, undefined types, stale OQ-37 deferral language, README OQ table completeness, Bearer-only attribution, cross-references, ADR-038 ALPN quote, feature-gate placeholder, MCP temporal language). |
