---
status: draft
last_updated: 2026-06-19
---

# Open Questions

Questions are organized by theme. Each question has a stable OQ-ID for cross-referencing from spec documents.

Door type classifications follow ADR-009:
- **One-way door**: Reversal requires rewriting significant code or permanently closes a capability. Requires ADR before implementation.
- **Two-way door**: Reversal is cheap or additive. Can be decided during implementation.

## Theme: Core Types

### OQ-01: BiStream Type Definition

- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: BiStream is a trait (`AsyncRead + AsyncWrite + Send + Unpin`). Handlers receive a `Connection` (not a single BiStream). This preserves the WASM door — browser clients can implement BiStream over WebTransport streams. See ADR-007.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-002, ADR-007, ADR-009

### OQ-02: AuthContext Resolution Timing

- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: Hybrid model (Option C) — endpoint resolves what it can (e.g., TLS client certificate), handler resolves what it must (e.g., AuthToken in first frame). AuthContext may be partial when `handle()` is called. See ADR-004.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-002, ADR-004

## Theme: ALPN and Routing

### OQ-03: ALPN String Naming Convention

- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: Custom ALPNs use `alknet/<name>` prefix (no version), standard ALPNs use IANA strings. No version negotiation initially. See ADR-006.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-001, ADR-006

### OQ-04: Dynamic Handler Registration at Runtime vs Static at Startup

- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: Two-way
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: Static registration at startup. `HandlerRegistry` is immutable after construction. ALPN strings in the TLS `ServerConfig` are derived from the registry at startup — adding a handler at runtime requires rebuilding the TLS config. The `ArcSwap<HandlerRegistry>` pattern can be applied later if needed (two-way door). See ADR-010.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-001, ADR-010, [endpoint.md](crates/core/endpoint.md)

## Theme: Transport and Endpoint

### OQ-05: Multi-Connectivity Endpoint

- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: `AlknetEndpoint` supports both `quinn::Endpoint` (public QUIC+TLS) and `iroh::Endpoint` (P2P relay-assisted) simultaneously, both optional and feature-gated. Both produce QUIC connections that dispatch through the same `HandlerRegistry` by ALPN string. These are not interchangeable transports — they serve fundamentally different deployment contexts (public IP vs NAT traversal). TCP is not an endpoint concern — bare TCP SSH is handled by the SSH handler directly. See ADR-010.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-001, ADR-010, [endpoint.md](crates/core/endpoint.md)

### OQ-06: Server-Side ALPN vs Client-Side ALPN

- **Origin**: ADR-001
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: One ALPN per connection. Clients open one QUIC connection per ALPN. QUIC connections are cheap (multiplexed over the same UDP flow). See ADR-006.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-001, ADR-006

## Theme: Call Protocol

### OQ-07: Call Protocol Scope Within a Connection

- **Origin**: ADR-005
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: Two-way
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: The call protocol uses bidirectional QUIC streams with EventEnvelope framing and ID-based correlation via PendingRequestMap. The protocol is stream-agnostic — the client can open one stream per operation, multiplex on one stream, or any mix. Correlation is by request ID, not by stream. Both sides can initiate calls. One `alknet/call` connection gives access to the full operation registry (call, subscribe, batch, schema). No multiplexing layer is needed inside the connection. See ADR-012.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-005, ADR-012

## Theme: Security

### OQ-08: Vault Integration Point

- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: CLI-embedded, assembly-layer only. The CLI binary instantiates `VaultServiceHandle` locally at startup, derives and decrypts the credentials each handler needs, and injects them into handler capabilities. alknet-vault has no ALPN, no alknet-core dependency, and no operations registered in the call protocol. The master seed and derived private keys never cross the network. The vault is a capability source, not a network service. See ADR-008 and ADR-014.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-003, ADR-005, ADR-008, ADR-014

## Deferred Questions

These questions are acknowledged but not active. They will be promoted to open when their crate is being specified.

### OQ-09: WASM Target Boundaries

- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
- **Status**: deferred
- **Door type**: One-way (when applicable)
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: Not an active question — WASM compatibility is a design constraint (see ADR-009, overview.md design principles), not a deliverable. Specific WASM targeting decisions will be made when individual crates are implemented. The BiStream trait decision (ADR-007) has already preserved the most important WASM door.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-007, ADR-009

### OQ-10: Git Adapter Scope — Smart Protocol Only or Full Server?

- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
- **Status**: deferred
- **Door type**: Two-way
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: Deferred per the cleanup plan. Start with git smart protocol over QUIC streams. ERC721 integration and full server capabilities are additive. Resolve when speccing alknet-git.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-001

## Theme: alknet-core

### OQ-11: Handler-Level Auth Resolution Observability

- **Origin**: [auth.md](crates/core/auth.md)
- **Status**: open
- **Door type**: Two-way
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: When a handler resolves identity inside `handle()`, should the resolved `Identity` be stored somewhere for observability (e.g., connection logging), or is the handler's local variable sufficient? Options: (A) handlers return the resolved identity from `handle()`, (B) handlers call a method on Connection to set identity, (C) handlers log locally and the resolved identity stays local. Two-way door — can be decided during implementation.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-004, ADR-011

### OQ-12: TLS Identity Provisioning in AlknetEndpoint

- **Origin**: [endpoint.md](crates/core/endpoint.md), [config.md](crates/core/config.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: TLS identity in alknet has two distinct use cases, not one:

  **Use case 1 — P2P / key-based identity (default for most alknet nodes):** RFC 7250 raw Ed25519 public keys. No domain, no CA, no cert renewal. The Ed25519 public key IS the node's identity. This is the same model iroh uses with its `NodeId`. It works natively with SSH auth (same key type) and git (SSH key-based auth). `TlsIdentity::RawKey` in `StaticConfig` covers this. This is the primary identity mode for alknet-native clients — most nodes will use this.

  **Use case 2 — Domain-hosted services (relays, public-facing nodes):** X.509 certificates with domain names. Required for browser/WebTransport clients, which don't support RFC 7250. This has two sub-cases:
  - **Manual**: Provide cert/key file paths via `TlsIdentity::X509`. Already specified in `StaticConfig`.
  - **ACME auto-provisioning**: Let's Encrypt via rustls-acme. The reverse-proxy project (`/workspace/@alkdev/reverse-proxy`) demonstrates the complete pattern: per-listener ACME state machine, `ResolvesServerCertAcme` rustls integration, TLS-ALPN-01 challenge handling, automatic renewal. This is a proven, solved implementation pattern — not speculative future work. It will be adapted to alknet's `AlknetEndpoint` context when domain-hosted nodes need it.

  **Browser constraint**: Browsers require X.509 and don't support RFC 7250. For browser/WebTransport clients, domain-hosted nodes with X.509 certs are mandatory. All other clients (SSH, git, alknet-native) work with raw keys by default.

  The `TlsIdentity` enum in `StaticConfig` already captures all three modes (`X509`, `RawKey`, `SelfSigned`). ACME auto-provisioning is additive — it produces an X.509 cert at runtime rather than from files, and fits naturally as an additional `TlsIdentity` variant or as a `rustls::ResolvesServerCert` implementation behind the existing `X509` path.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-010, [config.md](crates/core/config.md), [endpoint.md](crates/core/endpoint.md)

### OQ-13: Operation Path Format and Routing Scope

- **Origin**: [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: Two-way
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: alknet-call uses `/{service}/{op}` (e.g., `/fs/readFile`, `/agent/chat`, `/services/list`). This is the correct format for the alknet-call crate — it is not a "Phase 1 simplification" but the right design for this architecture. The `/{node}/{service}/{op}` pattern from the reference implementation served a head/worker routing model that is a separate architectural concern. Remote dispatch (federation / node-level routing) would be a different mechanism at a different layer, not a prefix added to alknet-call's operation paths. If remote dispatch is ever needed, it would be addressed by a separate crate or a routing layer above the operation registry, not by changing alknet-call's path format. Two-way door — the path format can be extended later if needed, but `/{service}/{op}` is the correct design now.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-005, ADR-012

### OQ-14: Batch Operation Semantics

- **Origin**: [call-protocol.md](crates/call/call-protocol.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: Two-way
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: Batch is a client-side pattern — multiple `call.requested` events with correlated IDs, responses arrive independently. This is the correct protocol design, not a simplification to be "upgraded" later. QUIC's stream multiplexing already provides the concurrency and ordering guarantees that batch would need. Batch-specific event types (e.g., `batch.requested`, `batch.responded`) would add protocol complexity without clear benefit over sending multiple `call.requested` events. If a compelling use case for atomic batch semantics emerges, it can be added as a new event type without breaking existing clients. Two-way door.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-012

## Theme: alknet-call

### OQ-15: Call Protocol Client and Adapter Contract

- **Origin**: [call-protocol.md](crates/call/call-protocol.md), [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md), ADR-013
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: `CallClient` opens QUIC connections and shares the dispatch loop with `CallAdapter` — both sides can send and receive `call.requested` once connected. Connection direction (who opened the connection) is independent of call direction (who calls whom). `from_call` adapter discovers remote operations via `services/list` + `services/schema` and registers them with forwarding handlers — same pattern as `from_openapi` and `from_mcp`. `to_openapi` and `to_mcp` project local operations to external protocols. Adapter contract trait (`OperationAdapter`) produces `(OperationSpec, Handler)` pairs. Cross-node call tree: abort cascade (ADR-016) propagates across node boundaries through `from_call` handlers. Credentials for connections come from capabilities (ADR-014). Adapter-registered operations are `Internal` by default (ADR-015). See ADR-017.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-005, ADR-013, ADR-014, ADR-015, ADR-016, ADR-017, [call-protocol.md](crates/call/call-protocol.md), [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md)

### OQ-16: Safe Vault Operations for Call Protocol Exposure

- **Origin**: [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md), ADR-008
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: No vault operations are exposed over the call protocol for now. The vault is accessed only at the assembly layer (CLI binary at startup). Handlers receive secret material through `OperationContext.capabilities`, not by calling vault operations over the wire. The `operation-registry.md` spec previously showed `vault/derive`, `vault/unlock`, and `vault/decrypt` registered as call protocol operations — that was a contradiction with ADR-008's "capability source" model and has been corrected. If a future use case requires exposing a vault operation over the call protocol (e.g., a restricted `vault/public-key` operation that returns only public key material for identity verification), it would require its own ADR with an explicit threat model justification. See ADR-014.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-008, ADR-014, [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md)

### OQ-17: Abort Cascade Semantics for Nested Calls

- **Origin**: [call-protocol.md](crates/call/call-protocol.md), [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way (protocol schema), two-way (mechanism)
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: `call.aborted` cascades to all non-terminal descendants in the call tree. The CallAdapter walks the tree (indexed by `parent_request_id` in `PendingRequestMap`) and sends `call.aborted` for each descendant. Default policy is `abort-dependents` (abort everything downstream); `continue-running` is an opt-in for long-running work that should survive a parent's abort. Handlers clean up via Rust's async drop semantics (future dropped → `Drop` guards release resources). The cascade is protocol-level (server discovers descendants and propagates); the mechanism (parent-indexed map, cancellation tokens, or a separate graph) is a two-way door. See ADR-016.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-012, ADR-015, ADR-016, [call-protocol.md](crates/call/call-protocol.md), [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md)

### OQ-18: Privilege Model and Authority Context

- **Origin**: [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Door type**: One-way (ACL model), two-way (specific APIs)
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: The `internal` flag on `OperationContext` marks calls that originated from composition (a handler calling another operation via `OperationEnv`), as opposed to external calls that arrived as `call.requested` from a wire client. The `internal` flag switches the authority context: the ACL check runs against the composing handler's identity (set at registration), not the caller's identity and not as a blanket skip. This replaces the previous `trusted` flag, which skipped ACL entirely — a privilege escalation vector. Operations have External/Internal visibility. Internal operations return `NOT_FOUND` when called from the wire and are excluded from `services/list`. The composition env is scoped — a handler can only invoke a declared set of operations. Handler identity is carried on `OperationContext` alongside caller identity (the principal/agent pair). See ADR-015.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-014, ADR-015, [call-protocol.md](crates/call/call-protocol.md), [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md)

### OQ-19: Session-Scoped Operation Registries and Agent-Written Operations

- **Origin**: [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md)
- **Status**: open
- **Door type**: Two-way (protocol doesn't need changes), one-way (if implementation closes the door)
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: The agent service pattern includes a self-improving workflow where agents write their own operations (tools, scripts) within a session. A POC at `/workspace/toolEnv` demonstrated the mechanism: a quickjs WASM sandbox inside Deno web workers, with a `Proxy`-based env that intercepts property access and bridges to the operation registry via `postMessage`. The sandbox runs with locked-down permissions (no net, no fs, no env). The POC exposed the full registry to the sandbox — a security gap that the scoped composition env (OQ-18) addresses.

  The registry model has three tiers:

  | Tier | Scope | Lifetime | Visibility | Who populates it |
  |------|-------|----------|------------|-------------------|
  | Core (global) | All sessions | Process lifetime, static at startup | External + Internal (curated) | Assembly layer at startup |
  | Session | One session | Session lifetime, dynamic | Internal only (never wire-facing) | Agent during session (sandbox) |
  | Promotion | Session → Core | One-time transition | Manual/curated review | Human or architect agent reviews, then redeploys |

  Session-scoped operations are always `Internal` (never wire-facing, never in `services/list`), run under the handler's identity (the agent handler that authorized the sandbox), can only compose operations in the handler's scoped env, and are ephemeral (gone when the session ends). Core operations are curated — reviewed by a human or architect agent before promotion. The promotion path is the curation checkpoint where autonomous (session-scoped) becomes curated (core). This is not auto-promotion.

  The call protocol does not need changes to support this. The `OperationEnv` trait is the composition point — a session-scoped env wraps the global env (check session registry first, fall through to global). The protocol constraints all apply regardless of which registry an operation lives in: abort cascade (OQ-17), privilege model (OQ-18), visibility (OQ-18), capabilities (ADR-014). The static registration constraint (OQ-04) applies to the global registry only; session registries are dynamic by nature and are a different registry overlaying the global one.

  The one-way door this OQ guards against: an implementation that makes `OperationEnv` concrete instead of a trait, or hardcodes the global registry into the dispatch path, would close the session-overlay pattern. The trait-based design already accommodates layering — this OQ documents the pattern so a future implementation doesn't accidentally close it.

  The security boundary: session-scoped operations run in a locked-down sandbox (no direct net/fs/env access), can only reach operations in the handler's scoped env, and their output should be validated against their declared schema before returning. The promotion path requires review — an agent with a `promote` scope (the architect role) performs the promotion; the writing agent (lower-privileged role) requests it. This is the role-based escalation pattern: privileges escalate through a chain of command, not through direct authority.

  This is a protocol-level concern in the sense that the protocol must not prevent it, but the agent-specific mechanism (quickjs sandbox, session registry lifecycle, promotion workflow) belongs to the agent crate spec. The call protocol's job is to keep the `OperationEnv` trait composable and the visibility/ACL model consistent across tiers.
- **Cross-references**: OQ-04, OQ-17, OQ-18, ADR-014, [operation-registry.md](crates/call/operation-registry.md)