Resolved all 11 open questions based on project guidance: Transport: - OQ-01/OQ-07: ACME/Let's Encrypt with domain + IP paths (ADR-008) - OQ-02: Default to n0 relay, --iroh-relay override (ADR-009) - OQ-05: Transport chaining supported natively (ADR-010) Client: - OQ-06: Programmatic-first API, no ~/.ssh/config (ADR-011) Server: - OQ-04: Ed25519 + OpenSSH cert-authority, no password auth (ADR-012) - OQ-08: fail2ban-friendly logging + built-in rate limiting (ADR-013) TUN: - OQ-03/OQ-09: Deferred entirely, recommend tun2proxy (ADR-014) - tun-shim.md marked deprecated NAPI: - OQ-10: Expose both connect() and serve() (ADR-016) - OQ-11: Use napi-rs for FFI bridge (ADR-015) Additional ADRs created during review: - ADR-006: No logging of tunnel destinations (was phantom reference) - ADR-017: Stealth mode protocol multiplexing - ADR-018: Control channel for pubsub over SSH Fixed: ADR-002 status → Superseded, ADR-007 title typo, WRAUTH_SERVER typo, ADR-005 stale wraith-tun refs, undefined ACL feature removed from server.md, --proxy semantic difference documented.
2.5 KiB
ADR-016: NAPI Exposes Both connect() and serve()
Status
Accepted
Context
The NAPI wrapper needs to provide TypeScript/Node.js consumers with access to wraith's functionality. The primary use case is @alkdev/pubsub's event target system, which needs both directions:
- connect(): Establish a client connection to a wraith server. Used by workers/spokes that need to tunnel events through a wraith server.
- serve(): Start a wraith server from Node.js. Used by hubs that want to accept wraith connections and route events.
The previous decision (ADR-007) was to expose only connect() for MVP, deferring serve(). However, the pubsub integration requires both: a spoke needs connect() to reach a hub, and a hub could use serve() to accept connections without running a separate wraith serve process.
More importantly, both connect() and serve() are fundamental operations of the wraith library. Since the NAPI wrapper is a thin layer over wraith-core, exposing both is straightforward — they're just Rust functions behind #[napi] attributes.
Decision
The NAPI wrapper exposes both connect() and serve() from the start:
// @alkdev/wraith
function connect(options: WraithConnectOptions): Promise<Duplex>;
function serve(options: WraithServeOptions): Promise<WraithServer>;
connect()returns aDuplexstream (as per ADR-007)serve()returns aWraithServerobject with aclose()method and events for new connections
The NAPI layer is transport-agnostic — it doesn't know about pubsub's EventEnvelope. The pubsub event target adapter wraps the Duplex stream to implement TypedEventTarget. This separation ensures the NAPI wrapper is reusable for any stream-based protocol, not just pubsub.
Consequences
- Positive: Pubsub can use both directions without running a separate binary for the server side.
- Positive: The NAPI wrapper becomes a complete bridge — any Node.js process can be either a client or server.
- Positive: Implementation is still minimal —
serve()is justwraith_core::server::run()behind#[napi]. - Negative: Slightly larger API surface (two functions +
WraithServertype instead of justconnect()). - Negative: Server-side NAPI needs to handle multiple concurrent connections, which adds complexity to
WraithServer.
References
- napi-and-pubsub.md
- ADR-007 — still valid; NAPI exposes single streams, but now from both sides
- OQ-10 — resolved by this ADR