Files
alknet/tasks/architecture/review-spec-foundation.md
glm-5.1 835724d087 tasks: clarify phase boundaries in remaining task descriptions
The remaining task descriptions implied that downstream concerns
(StorageIdentityProvider, irpc service layer, agent services, multi-node
deployment) already exist. Updated to clearly distinguish:

- spec-update-server: Phase 1 ships ConfigIdentityProvider, not irpc auth
- spec-update-call-protocol: Phase 1 is local dispatch only; irpc and remote
  dispatch are contracted for later. Agent services are downstream concerns.
- spec-update-overview: Note which crates exist now vs which are Phase 2+ contracts
- review-spec-foundation: Add phase boundary check to acceptance criteria
2026-06-07 10:40:48 +00:00

2.9 KiB

id, name, status, depends_on, scope, risk, impact, level
id name status depends_on scope risk impact level
architecture/review-spec-foundation Review Phase 0 specs — validate consistency, completeness, and ADR alignment pending
architecture/spec-configuration
architecture/spec-identity
architecture/spec-secret-service
architecture/spec-storage
architecture/spec-flowgraph
architecture/spec-interface
architecture/spec-services
architecture/spec-update-overview
architecture/spec-update-auth
architecture/spec-update-call-protocol
architecture/spec-update-server
architecture/spec-update-napi
architecture/spec-update-readme
architecture/spec-update-open-questions
broad low project review

Description

Review all Phase 0 spec documents after they're written. This is the Phase 0 review checklist from the integration plan, applied against the actual deliverables.

Acceptance Criteria

  • No inline decision rationale — all "why" decisions are in ADRs, specs reference ADR numbers
  • No inline open questions — all OQs are in open-questions.md, specs reference OQ numbers
  • Terminology is consistent — head/worker everywhere (no hub/spoke in specs, ADRs retain historical language)
  • Layer boundaries are clear — every component belongs to exactly one layer (Transport, Interface, Protocol)
  • Phase boundaries are clear — specs distinguish what ships in Phase 1 (ConfigIdentityProvider, ArcSwap, local dispatch) from what's contracted for later (StorageIdentityProvider, irpc service layer, application services, multi-node deployment). No spec should imply that alknet-storage, alknet-secret, or the irpc service implementations already exist.
  • Every spec has YAML frontmatter with status and last_updated
  • Identity is consistently defined — Identity struct is {id, scopes, resources} everywhere (identity.md is canonical, auth.md references it)
  • OperationEnv is consistently described — three dispatch paths match across services.md, call-protocol.md, and identity.md
  • irpc positioning is consistent — always described as one dispatch backend for OperationEnv, never as a replacement for the call protocol
  • Interface trait is consistent — SshInterface and RawFramingInterface match across interface.md and server.md
  • ForwardingPolicy is consistently placed — in DynamicConfig, checked before proxy spawn, reference in server.md and configuration.md
  • README.md and ADR table include all new documents and ADRs
  • No broken links between doc references
  • All specs follow the format: What, Why, Architecture, Constraints, Open Questions, Design Decisions

References

  • docs/research/integration-plan.md — Phase 0: Review Checklist
  • docs/architecture/ — all architecture docs

Notes

To be filled by implementation agent

Summary

To be filled on completion