Files
alknet/docs/architecture/crates/channels/channel-operations.md
T
glm-5.2 fd83fc1685 docs(arch): channels substrate simplification + stream_type decomposition + sub-crate split
Three simplifications to the channels spec, all flowing from the review:

1. Substrate simplification (ADR-071 revised): the 9-byte chunk header is
   used in ALL substrates — in-line (TCP+TLS, WebTransport), native (QUIC
   bidi streams), and multi-connection. The ChannelsAdapter reads headers
   off every bidi stream it accepts; the transport's native multiplexing
   is a performance optimization (independent flow-control windows), not a
   protocol change. One wire format, one code path, one handler experience.
   The channel_id in the header is the correlation key across substrates.

2. Stream_type decomposition (ADR-071 revised): every stream_type is
   unidirectional. Bidirectionality is two stream_types (write + read), not
   one 'bidirectional' stream_type. Grouped in threes: 0/1/2 = data
   write/read/err, 3/4/5 = control write/read/err, % 3 formula. This
   resolves the TTY control channel's 'not actually bidirectional' flaw —
   control is now 3 (write, client→server) + 4 (read, server→client), each
   with its own reassembly buffer and EOF. Channel 0 uses [0,1] (call frames
   bidirectional via 0=in, 1=out). TTY uses [0,1,2,3,4]. ADR-072, 073, 074,
   077 updated for the new stream_type assignments.

3. Sub-crate decomposition (ADR-081 new): channels-core (pure multiplexer —
   wire format, demux/mux, ChannelBidiStreamSource, ChannelManager; depends
   on alknet-core only, no call dependency, ALPN-blind) / channels-call
   (channel 0 pre-negotiation + lifecycle op registrations; depends on
   channels-core + alknet-call) / channels-hub (relay) / channels-worker
   (ChannelClient). Isolates the call-protocol coupling from the pure
   multiplexer so the dependency graph is honest.

ADR-077 (TTY inside channels) updated: TTY now uses 5 sub-streams [0,1,2,3,4]
with control properly bidirectional via 3/4; amends ADR-052's stream_type
assignments for direct mode too (direct alknet/tty now uses 0-4, not 0-3).

Spec docs updated: channels-wire, channels-connection, channels-adapter,
channel-operations, overview, README.
2026-07-12 15:47:42 +00:00

12 KiB

status, last_updated
status last_updated
draft 2026-07-12

channel-operations.md — Channel Lifecycle on the Call Protocol

Channel lifecycle is orchestrated by the call protocol on channel 0 (ADR-072). Four operations on channel 0's OperationRegistry (ADR-073) handle open, close, control, and resource discovery. All four go through the existing OperationContext / AccessControl::check path — no new auth machinery, no new framing.

The four operations

channel/open — open a data channel

Request (on channel 0):

{
  "operation": "channel/open",
  "input": {
    "alpn": "alknet/tty",
    "stream_types": [0, 1, 2, 3],
    "params": { "backend": "docker", "cmd": ["bash"], "container": "abc123" },
    "direction": "initiator-to-responder"
  }
}
field type meaning
alpn string The ALPN the channel will carry. Responder looks this up in its HandlerRegistry.
stream_types [u8] Which sub-stream types this channel will use. E.g. [0,1,2,3,4] for TTY (data in/out/err + control in/out), [0,1] for a tunnel, [0,1] for channel 0. See ADR-071 §stream_type decomposition.
params object ALPN-specific parameters. For alknet/tty this is NegotiateRequest. For alknet/tunnel this is the target resource. The channels layer does not interpret params.
direction string initiator-to-responder or responder-to-initiator. See "Direction semantics" below.

Response:

{
  "output": {
    "channel_id": 7,
    "stream_types": [0, 1, 2, 3]
  }
}
field type meaning
channel_id u32 Server-assigned (DP-1). The responder allocates via monotonic AtomicU32.
stream_types [u8] The negotiated set — the responder may narrow the initiator's requested set.

Channel ID allocation: server-assigned (DP-1). One round-trip before data flows — the same round-trip the call protocol makes for every operation. All current channel types (TTY, tunnel, SSH) already require a negotiation round-trip, so the open round-trip is not additive latency.

Error codes (new CallError.code strings, not new framing):

code meaning retryable
channel:unknown_alpn ALPN not in responder's HandlerRegistry false
channel:forbidden AccessControl::check denied the open false
channel:allocation_failed Handler allocate failed true (often transient)
channel:invalid_params params JSON didn't satisfy the ALPN's expectations false
channel:too_many_channels Per-connection channel limit hit (ADR-076) false
channel:stream_type_unavailable Responder can't provide a requested stream_type false

channel/close — tear down a channel

{
  "operation": "channel/close",
  "input": { "channel_id": 7, "reason": "exit" }
}

The responder (the side that didn't send the close) drains its reassembled streams for channel_id, signals EOF to the handler, and returns { "closed": true }. The channel_id is eligible for reuse after the drain completes (ADR-076 — monotonic IDs with wrap-around, not a free-list). reason is free-form for observability — not semantically required.

REQ-CH-06: exit-chunk-before-close ordering. The channel's data chunks MUST be written and flushed before the channel/close operation is sent on channel 0. The side closing must observe the data-channel pump complete before issuing the call operation. For TTY this is the exit-chunk-is-last invariant (ADR-055) carried forward; for tunnels it is the last data byte before close. This invariant crosses two channels (the data channel and channel 0), so the channels layer owns the ordering guarantee.

channel/control — out-of-band control on channel 0

For control that doesn't need ordering relative to data (resize, signal, keepalive):

{
  "operation": "channel/control",
  "input": {
    "channel_id": 7,
    "stream_type": 3,
    "message": { "type": "resize", "cols": 80, "rows": 24 }
  }
}

The channels layer routes message to the handler's control handle for channel_id. The message JSON is ALPN-specific; the channels layer does not interpret it.

channel/resources/subscribe — live resource discovery

This is a Subscription operation (ADR-049), not a polled Query. The call protocol has StreamingHandler / invoke_streaming (implemented and tested). The first consumer (the hub aggregating worker resources) needs live updates when workers connect/disconnect or containers start/stop.

{
  "operation": "channel/resources/subscribe",
  "input": {}
}

The responder registers a StreamingHandler that emits a ResponseEnvelope whenever the resource set changes. Each event:

{
  "output": {
    "resources": [
      {
        "alpn": "alknet/tty",
        "backends": ["docker", "local"],
        "access": { "required_scopes": ["tty:open"] }
      },
      {
        "alpn": "alknet/tunnel",
        "targets": ["container:*", "service:postgres"],
        "access": { "required_scopes_any": ["tunnel:open", "admin"] }
      }
    ]
  }
}
field type meaning
alpn string The ALPN this side accepts channel/open for.
backends / targets [string] ALPN-specific enumeration of what's available. The channels layer doesn't interpret these.
access object A preview of the AccessControl that channel/open will check. Advisory — lets the initiator fail fast. The real check happens on channel/open.

The stream emits an initial snapshot immediately, then subsequent events on any change. The stream is long-lived; the subscriber cancels by dropping the subscription (ADR-016 abort cascade applies).

A channel/resources (non-subscribe, Query) operation is NOT provided. The subscription's initial snapshot serves the poll use case (subscribe, read the first event, cancel). Providing both would be redundant and would pressure consumers toward the stale-poll path.

Direction semantics (OQ-CH-09 — pinned)

Channel open is bidirectional — either side can initiate. The direction field determines who is the ALPN-server (allocates the handler, writes the negotiation response) vs the ALPN-client (writes the first request).

direction Initiator role Responder role Who writes first
initiator-to-responder ALPN-client ALPN-server Initiator writes first (the request data); responder's handler is the server side. The common case: "open me a TTY on your docker container."
responder-to-initiator ALPN-server ALPN-client Responder writes first (the negotiation response); initiator's handler is the client side. The "worker exposes, hub consumes" case: the worker initiates the open to make itself available; the hub is the client.

The channels layer does not enforce write order. Write order is ALPN-specific, determined by which side is the ALPN-server. The channels layer routes chunks; the handlers negotiate who writes first via their ALPN's params contract.

channel_id allocation is always by the responder (DP-1), regardless of direction. The responder is the side that receives the channel/open call operation; it allocates the ID and returns it. In the responder-to- initiator case, the initiator (worker) sends the channel/open, so the responder (hub) allocates the ID — even though the worker is the ALPN-server for the channel's data. This keeps ID allocation in one place and avoids the collision-prone client-assigned alternative.

Control-message division (DP-4 — pinned)

Control path When Examples
Call operations on channel 0 (channel/control, channel/close) Control that doesn't need ordering relative to data, or lifecycle events resize, signal, keepalive, close
stream_type 3 chunks on the data channel Control that MUST be ordered relative to data EOF before exit, flush before close

The TTY crate's exit-chunk-is-last invariant (ADR-055) is the canonical example of data-ordered control — it rides on stream_type 3 because it must arrive after the last stdin chunk, guaranteed by chunk ordering within (channel_id, stream_type), not by a call-protocol round-trip. The channel/close operation that follows is on channel 0 and is ordered after the data pump completes (REQ-CH-06).

ACL flow (end-to-end)

A browser opening a TTY channel to a spoke through a hub (ADR-079):

  1. Browser's channel 0 → hub's channel 0: channel/open { alpn: "alknet/tty", params: { backend: "docker", cmd: ["bash"], container: "abc123" } }. The browser's identity is a bearer token (ADR-034).
  2. Hub's CallAdapter runs AccessControl::check on channel/open with the browser's identity. If denied → channel:forbidden.
  3. Hub forwards to spoke via from_call: the hub's forwarded_for handler constructs a call.requested with the hub as caller and the browser as forwarded_for (ADR-032 §3). The spoke receives channel/open with caller = hub, forwarded_for = browser.
  4. Spoke's CallAdapter runs AccessControl::check with the hub as caller (the spoke authorizes the hub — ADR-050). The spoke's ownership store verifies the hub (or the forwarded_for browser, per policy) owns container:abc123.
  5. Spoke allocates the channel via TtyAdapter / DockerTtyBackend, returns channel_id.
  6. Hub opens a matching channel on the browser's side and bridges them (byte-forward with channel_id rewrite — ADR-079).

The hub ran zero protocol-specific auth. It ran channel/open's AccessControl::check (call-protocol machinery) and forwarded. The channels layer inherited the auth model by being a call-protocol operation.

Hub relay contract (ADR-079 — summary)

The hub translates, not transparently forwards:

  1. Call-protocol layer (channel 0): translate. The hub terminates channel 0 on both legs. channel/open from the browser → hub's AccessControl::check → hub re-issues channel/open on the spoke leg with forwarded_for → spoke returns its channel_id → hub maps browser-id ↔ spoke-id.
  2. Data-channel layer: byte-forward with channel_id rewrite. The relay reads chunks for browser_id, rewrites the channel_id field to spoke_id, writes onto the spoke's channels connection — and vice versa. The relay does not parse the payload.

channel/control operations on channel 0 carry channel_id in their JSON payload; the hub's CallAdapter translates these too (rewrites channel_id in the payload). The relay does not touch channel/control — it's a call operation, translated, not byte-forwarded.

The hub never runs a handler for alknet/tty, alknet/ssh, or alknet/tunnel. It runs alknet/channels (the relay) and alknet/call (for its own hub-level operations + translation).

Design Decisions

All design decisions are documented as ADRs in decisions/.

ADR Decision Summary
073 Channel Lifecycle Operations The four ops; direction pinned; subscribe not poll
072 Channel 0 Pre-Negotiated Channel 0 = alknet/call
079 Hub Relay Translate channel 0, byte-forward data channels
049 StreamingHandler The machinery channel/resources/subscribe uses
032 Forwarded-For Identity The auth chain for hub-relayed opens
050 Dynamic Resource Ownership The ownership store the spoke queries

References

  • ADR-073: channel lifecycle operations (the decision)
  • ADR-079: hub relay (the translate contract)
  • docs/research/alknet-channels/phase-0-findings.md §Channel Open Negotiation, §ACL and Security Model