Files
alknet/docs/architecture/crates/vault/encryption.md
glm-5.2 dd1ca1de70 docs(architecture): add alknet-vault spec, ADR-018, ADR-019, OQ-20/21/22
Spec the vault crate from its existing implementation. The vault is
stable (implementation exists); this spec documents what IS so the
implementation-sync agent can reconcile source drift.

New spec documents (crates/vault/):
- README.md — crate index, security constraints, public API
- mnemonic-derivation.md — BIP39, SLIP-0010, BIP-0032, derivation paths
- encryption.md — AES-256-GCM, EncryptedData, key versioning, salt
- service.md — VaultServiceHandle lifecycle, actor dispatch, cache
- protocol.md — VaultProtocol irpc messages, DerivedKey redaction

New ADRs:
- ADR-018: Vault as standalone crate (zero alknet deps; own types/errors)
- ADR-019: Vault assembly-layer-only access (CLI is sole caller)

New open questions:
- OQ-20: Salt/KDF Phase B (open, low priority — salt field reserved)
- OQ-21: Remote vault administration (deferred — needs ADR if ever needed)
- OQ-22: Key rotation mechanism (open, low priority — workflow not specced)

Spec-vs-source drift explicitly flagged (for the sync agent):
- rand::random() used for IVs instead of OsRng (security-critical)
- unwrap() on every RwLock acquisition (must use unwrap_or_else)
- ADR-038 / OQ-SVC-03 references in source comments are stale (old numbering)
- VaultServiceActor::spawn returns a non-functional second actor (source bug)
- KeyVersionMismatch error variant is defined but unused in v1
2026-06-19 09:23:47 +00:00

8.8 KiB

status, last_updated
status last_updated
draft 2026-06-19

Encryption

AES-256-GCM encryption and decryption for external credentials that cannot be derived from the seed.

What

External credentials (API keys, OAuth tokens, signing keys obtained from third parties) cannot be derived from the BIP39 seed — they're arbitrary bytes, not deterministic functions of the seed. The vault encrypts these with a key derived from the seed, producing an EncryptedData blob that can be stored outside the vault (in a config file, a database, or external storage) and decrypted later with the same seed.

This is the second axis of the vault's secret model:

Axis Source Mechanism Example
Derived keys Seed → HD derivation Deterministic Node identity, SSH host key
Encrypted credentials External → AES-256-GCM Seed-derived key Google API key, OAuth token

Why AES-256-GCM

AES-256-GCM is an authenticated encryption scheme — it provides both confidentiality (encryption) and integrity (authentication tag). A tampered ciphertext fails decryption. This is the correct mode for credential storage: if an attacker modifies an encrypted API key in storage, decryption fails rather than producing a different (potentially dangerous) plaintext.

GCM is also hardware-accelerated on modern CPUs (AES-NI), making it fast enough that encryption is never a bottleneck.

Encryption Key

The encryption key is derived from the seed at path m/74'/2'/0'/0' (PATHS::ENCRYPTION):

pub struct EncryptionKey {
    key_bytes: [u8; 32],   // 32-byte AES-256 key
    key_version: u32,      // for rotation tracking
}
  • new(key_bytes, key_version): Construct from raw bytes.
  • from_derived_bytes(bytes, key_version): Take the first 32 bytes of derived key material (the private key bytes from SLIP-0010 derivation).
  • version(): Return the key version (for rotation).

EncryptionKey implements Zeroize and ZeroizeOnDrop — the key bytes are zeroized before deallocation.

The key is derived once (at unlock time or on first encrypt/decrypt) and cached in the KeyCache (see service.md). Subsequent encrypt/decrypt operations use the cached key.

EncryptedData

The encrypted blob format. This is the stable wire format shared with alknet-storage (a future crate) by type-level agreement, not by a crate dependency. Both crates must agree on the serialization format.

A TypeScript EncryptedDataSchema from the @alkdev/storage library predates the Rust implementation. The Rust EncryptedData is a superset of the TypeScript schema. The migration path is: re-encrypt TypeScript-encrypted data using the Rust vault with a new key version. This cross-language compatibility is why the wire format must stay stable — changing it breaks both alknet-storage and the TypeScript consumer.

#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct EncryptedData {
    pub key_version: u32,  // rotation tracking
    pub salt: String,      // base64, 32 bytes — reserved for Phase B (see OQ-20)
    pub iv: String,        // base64, 12 bytes — AES-GCM nonce
    pub data: String,      // base64 — ciphertext + auth tag
}

All binary fields are base64-encoded as strings for JSON serialization compatibility. The iv is 12 bytes (the standard GCM nonce size). The data field includes the GCM authentication tag appended to the ciphertext (the aes-gcm crate handles this).

Salt field (reserved for Phase B)

The salt field is reserved for future KDF-based key derivation (Phase B, OQ-20). In v1, the encryption key is derived directly from the seed at path m/74'/2'/0'/0' without using the salt. The salt is generated randomly (32 bytes) and stored in EncryptedData.salt for forward compatibility, but it plays no role in the v1 key derivation process.

When key rotation is implemented in Phase B, the salt will be used as input to HKDF or PBKDF2 for stretch-based key derivation, allowing the same seed to produce different encryption keys without changing the derivation path. The wire format does not need to change — the salt field is already present and populated.

This is a deliberate forward-compatibility decision: the field exists in v1 so that v2 can use it without a format migration. The cost is 32 extra bytes per EncryptedData; the benefit is no future format break.

Encrypt and Decrypt

pub fn encrypt(plaintext: &str, key: &EncryptionKey) -> Result<EncryptedData, EncryptionError>;
pub fn decrypt(encrypted: &EncryptedData, key: &EncryptionKey) -> Result<String, EncryptionError>;

encrypt:

  1. Generates a random 12-byte IV (must use OsRng — see Security Constraints)
  2. Generates a random 32-byte salt (stored, not used in v1)
  3. Encrypts the plaintext with AES-256-GCM
  4. Returns EncryptedData { key_version, salt, iv, data }

decrypt:

  1. Decodes the base64 IV and ciphertext
  2. Decrypts with AES-256-GCM (verifies the auth tag)
  3. Returns the plaintext string

The IV is generated fresh for each encryption call. IV reuse under the same key is catastrophic for GCM (authenticity breaks, two-time-pad on plaintext). The use of OsRng for IV generation is a security-critical constraint — see below.

Key Versioning

CURRENT_KEY_VERSION is 1. Key versioning allows re-encryption when the encryption key is rotated:

  1. Derive a new key from a new derivation path or new seed
  2. Decrypt all existing EncryptedData with key version 1
  3. Re-encrypt with key version 2
  4. Update storage

The key version is stored in EncryptedData.key_version so decryption can select the right key. The rotation workflow itself is not specced — see OQ-22.

Errors

pub enum EncryptionError {
    Encryption(String),       // encryption failed
    Decryption(String),       // decryption failed (wrong key, tampered data, bad UTF-8)
    Decoding(String),         // base64 decoding failed
    KeyVersionMismatch { expected: u32, actual: u32 },  // reserved for Phase B
}

Decryption failures are intentionally generic — they don't distinguish "wrong key" from "tampered data" from "corrupted storage" to avoid leaking information to an attacker.

KeyVersionMismatch is defined but unused in v1 — neither encrypt() nor decrypt() returns it. It is reserved for Phase B key rotation (OQ-22), where the vault may enforce version matching before decrypting. In v1, the key_version is stamped onto EncryptedData and EncryptionKey for forward compatibility but does not gate decryption. An implementer should not expect this variant to fire in v1.

Design Decisions

Decision ADR Summary
AES-256-GCM for credential encryption Authenticated encryption, hardware-accelerated
Salt reserved for Phase B (OQ-20) Forward-compatible wire format; v1 doesn't use salt
Key derived at m/74'/2'/0'/0' Dedicated account for encryption keys
Key versioning Rotation support without format break
All fields base64-encoded JSON serialization compatibility

Open Questions

See open-questions.md for full details.

  • OQ-20 (open): Salt/KDF Phase B — when and how to use the reserved salt field for KDF-based key derivation.
  • OQ-22 (open): Key rotation mechanism — the key versioning is in place, but the rotation workflow (re-encrypt all data, update storage) is not specced.

Security Constraints

These are security-critical implementation requirements.

  • OsRng for IVs: The IV must be generated with OsRng (or an equivalent CSPRNG), never rand::random(). IV reuse under the same key is catastrophic for GCM — it breaks authenticity and creates a two-time-pad on the plaintext. The current source uses rand::random() for IV generation (encryption.rs line 133) — this is a known drift from the spec and must be corrected during implementation sync. rand::random() uses the thread-local RNG which may not be a CSPRNG on all platforms; OsRng reads from the operating system's entropy source and is the correct choice for cryptographic nonces.
  • Zeroized drop: EncryptionKey derives Zeroize and ZeroizeOnDrop. The key bytes are zeroized before deallocation. Do not store key material in types that don't zeroize.
  • No plaintext in logs: EncryptedData is safe to log (it's ciphertext). The plaintext and the EncryptionKey are not. Do not add Debug or Display implementations that print key bytes or plaintext.

References

  • NIST SP 800-38D — AES-GCM specification
  • Implementation: crates/alknet-vault/src/encryption.rs
  • Tests: crates/alknet-vault/tests/test_vectors.rs, crates/alknet-vault/src/encryption.rs (unit tests)
  • service.md — how the vault caches the encryption key