Files
alknet/docs/architecture/questions/009-wasm-target-boundaries.md
T
glm-5.2 df5d04af1d tasks(arch): adopt taskgraph for architecture work — blocker tasks for deferred OQs, level mapping, status fixes
Establishes the tasks/architecture/ blocker-task half of the Safe Exit
protocol. Each deferred OQ now has an external-trigger tracker task
representing its unblocking condition, and the OQ's Blocked on field names
the tracker task ID — closing the gap where the deferral field existed but
the task-graph half was unenforced.

Changes:
- Add 6 external-trigger tracker tasks for the deferred OQs (OQ-09, 10, 32,
  41, 44, 46) under tasks/architecture/, tagged [external-trigger, deferred-oq]
- Add structured Blocked on field to OQ-09 and OQ-10 (previously used legacy
  'deferred' status with the reason in the Resolution prose); index now
  surfaces all 6 deferred OQs with concrete conditions, no placeholders
- Document the architecture-task level mapping (level: implementation for
  ADRs/specs, decomposition for spec-to-ADR breakdown, planning for backlog
  seeding, research/review direct fits) and the deferred-OQ blocker-task
  pattern in docs/sdd_process.md
- Mark architecture/safe-exit-blocker-task-mechanism and
  architecture/oq-09-10-blocking-conditions completed (implemented by this pass)
- Fix 4 pre-existing ADR-050 implementation tasks: status: done → completed
  (taskgraph enum is 'completed', not 'done') — taskgraph validate now passes
  for all 100 tasks
2026-07-06 16:34:01 +00:00

1.3 KiB

OQ-09: WASM Target Boundaries

  • Origin: overview.md
  • Status: deferred
  • Door type: One-way (when applicable)
  • Priority: low
  • Blocked on: A concrete server-side WASM use case, or a deliberate confirmation that WASM stays a client-side design constraint. Tracked as architecture/oq-09-wasm-server-use-case in tasks/architecture/.
  • Resolution: Not an active question — WASM compatibility is a design constraint (see ADR-009, overview.md design principles), not a deliverable. Specific WASM targeting decisions will be made when individual crates are implemented. BiStream being a trait preserves the client-side stream door — a browser can implement BiStream over WebTransport streams. The server-side dispatch door is NOT preserved by ADR-007 and is a known, accepted closure: Connection is a concrete quinn-bound struct (not a trait), the accept loop uses tokio::spawn (tokio does not run on WASM), and the call-protocol dispatch internals (PendingRequestMap, CallAdapter) use tokio oneshot/mpsc channels. A WASM server-side peer would require a Connection trait and a runtime-abstracted accept loop — not planned. The browser path is client-side via a JS SDK, not server-side Rust-to-WASM. This is an explicit one-way door, not an oversight.
  • Cross-references: ADR-007, ADR-009