The ownership premise ('we own fast-socks5') was wrong — it is
third-party upstream and has not been forked. The corrected posture
resolves OQ-SK-04: inline vendor. The wrapper's needs exceed the wasm
gate regardless (BIND absent upstream — POC #5 proved the wrapper
drives it; the run_udp_proxy_custom bind seam; private new_reply), so
carrying the T-generic subset (~120 cfg lines, POC #4-verified) pays
for itself independent of the adapter story.
AGENTS.md:
- convention 17 rewritten: 'Upstream: alkcall is ours to shape;
fast-socks5 is inlined' — the ownership split stated plainly, the
inline vendor + its four carried changes named, the courtesy PR
kept optional/never-waited-on, the vendor point (v1.0.0) noted
- convention 4: wasm posture note updated to the resolved vendor
- prior-art entry: fast-socks5 marked third-party/NOT ours
phase-0.md:
- OQ-SK-04 RESOLVED (2026-09-20): resolution note headers the OQ (the
two settling facts: wrong ownership premise; needs exceed the gate);
decision tree retained as reasoning trail with both legs annotated
(Case 2's premise falsified by the BIND need); the root question
reframed as retrospective; checklist item checked
- §Prior art fast-socks5: header + run_udp_proxy_custom caveat
reworded from 'fileable ask' to in-tree change
- settled-foundations wasm caveat resolved; survey + checklist
prior-art entries marked; 'What Phase 0 could NOT answer' wasm item
struck as resolved; convergence Layering bullet now enumerates the
four in-tree carried changes; upstream-asks bullet: fast-socks5
items are no longer asks
poc-connect-wasm-findings.md / poc-bind-findings.md /
iroh-socks5-eval.md: 'we own it' ask sections corrected to
in-tree-vendor changes (dangling fragment from an earlier edit also
fixed); ledger item 3 annotated
Verified: fast-socks5 upstream still 1.0.0, no net feature, BIND
refused (lib.rs:384-386/server.rs:813-816) — the needs-are-real facts
stand. Docs-only change; no build surface affected.
glm-5.3-flash
cced3b2b85