Wave 4 decomposed: Postgres engine — 11 tasks (schema, open/opts, seam, forwarder, mechanisms, scheduler/outbox, integration, review gate); plan synced

This commit is contained in:
glm-5.3-flash committed 2026-10-08 22:49:00 +00:00
1 parent ecb8211694
commit 4caea21098
11 files changed
+1287 -3

No files matched your search

+94
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
---
id: review-wave-4
name: Review gate — wave 4 (Postgres engine)
status: pending
depends_on: [pg-engine-integration]
scope: moderate
risk: low
impact: phase
level: review
tags: [wave-4, review]
---
## Description
Review the Postgres engine before wave 5 decomposes. Primary lens per
the plan's review gates: **engine-vs-contract conformance** — the same
discipline as the wave-3 gate, now against the second engine, with
the pg-specific machinery added. Wave 5 (the contract suite) pins
*cross-engine equivalence*; this gate checks the pg implementation
against the pinned contract text line by line.
Check:
- **Contract conformance**: every trait method's behavior against
core-contract.md's per-mechanism text — validation at entry points
(auto-commit AND tx paths), error arms (`Database`-only receivers,
`Codec` at payload seams, `LeadershipLost` vs clean stop), value
shapes (`Job`/`StreamEvent` field-for-field), the no-work-is-a-value
vocabulary (`None`/`false`/empty-`Vec` where pinned, never errors).
- **ADR-023 follow-through**: extent guards at trait-impl entry
(claims + all four stream reads); duration guards on both lock call
sites; `encode_payload` consumed fallibly at every call site.
- **ADR-016 §5**: the 8000-byte check is client-side, typed, before
any round trip, on both `notify` and `notify_tx`; the limit constant
has one owner.
- **Forwarder integrity** (the pg engine's own high-risk machinery —
the analogue of the wave-3 gate's seam-integrity lens): the two
POC-pinned deadlock pitfalls structurally excluded (poll loop
before first query; `Client` alive for the listener's lifetime);
reconnect backoff + re-LISTEN from the live channel set; the
synthetic reconnect-wake on the reserved string broadcast to every
subscriber; lag surfaced, not silent; receiver close semantics
exactly the pg arm (open across reconnects, close at shutdown
only, terminal, never reopens).
- **Seam integrity**: drop = rollback under panic; failed
COMMIT/ROLLBACK arms discard (not re-pool) the object — pool
accounting exact under error paths (deployment.md's ADR-021 note);
ops-after-consume fail closed; no `spawn_blocking` anywhere (the
natively-async posture — a stray bridge would be a finding).
- **Backoff curve + boundary math**: the engine-side formulas match
ADR-010 §3's pinned range/cap and ADR-009 §4's boundary guarantee
exactly (wave 5 pins cross-engine equivalence; this gate checks
this implementation against the text).
- **Schema posture**: one engine-owned schema; payload columns
`bytea` (exact bytes — no JSONB normalization); no per-queue
tables; bootstrap idempotent.
- **Backlog column**: the engine's suite rows present, stamped, green
against the pg factory; the `PayloadTooLarge` pg arm row present.
- **Family standards**: no panics, no unwrap/expect outside tests, no
inline comments (doc comments fine), module-per-file.
- **Gates**: full workspace build/test/clippy/fmt; the pg suite green
against the harness server.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Contract conformance spot-checked against the spec text (not
just the tests)
- [ ] ADR-023's numeric-domain + typed-encoding follow-through
verified at their sites
- [ ] Forwarder + seam integrity verified (code-read, not
test-name-trust)
- [ ] Backoff curve + scheduler boundary math match the pinned ADR
text
- [ ] Backlog column present, stamped, green against the pg factory
- [ ] All gates green (incl. against the harness server)
- [ ] Findings recorded; wave 5 decomposition may proceed
## References
- docs/plans/implementation.md (Review gates)
- docs/architecture/core-contract.md
- docs/architecture/engine-postgres.md
- docs/architecture/decisions/004-postgres-driver.md
- docs/architecture/decisions/016-deployment-honesty.md §5
- docs/architecture/decisions/023-fourth-review-round.md
- tasks/review-wave-3.md (the gate discipline's precedent)
## Notes
> To be filled by implementation agent
## Summary
> To be filled on completion