 glm-5.3-flash
|
7f749ac673
|
Contract-suite scheduler rows (task suite-scheduler-rows): the determinism-posture extension in properties.rs's module doc (runner-driving rows admitted — spawned run_schedules(stop) tasks on a core StopToken against state outcomes only, elapsed-boundary-band tolerances, never timing-value assertions, never two-task race windows; ADR-017 §2 class 4) and three version-stamped rows: scheduler_boundary_fires (fired jobs are ordinary claimable work with ScheduleOpts over the plain-queue derived defaults 300/9/5/none + payload exact, clean-stop Ok(()), fired count inside the elapsed-boundary band — no double-fire per boundary while one leader runs; ADR-009 §3/§4, ADR-020 §3, ADR-019 §4), scheduler_bounded_catchup (runner-less downtime proves no fire without a runner, ≥3 elapsed boundaries replay boundary-by-boundary bounded below the 64-cap and inside the band; ADR-009 §4), scheduler_leadership_discipline (two spawned runners on one store: exactly one Ok(())/Err(LeadershipLost) pair by value, no duplicated fires inside the band; ADR-009 §1/§6, ADR-019 §4) — wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tests, pg harness_row!s), suite tokio dep added for the runner rows. Dispositions recorded in Notes: the beyond-cap skip-forward leg stays pinned engine-side (both engines' scheduler tests already backdate next_fire_at directly — catch_up_replays_up_to_the_cap_then_skips_forward twins), and the pg fire-wake parity gap is not demanded by these rows' shapes (claim-polling observation only; the one-call wake_tx disposition recorded for a later task). Verified: sqlite suite 16/16, pg suite 16/16 vs harness twice + solo re-runs of the three rows per engine (determinism), workspace build/test green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean
|
2026-10-10 06:04:30 +00:00 |
|
|
glm-5.3-flash
|
5c9ae6a7fc
|
Contract-suite queue-depth rows (task suite-queue-depth-rows): the job-handle validity predicate row (in-window heartbeat/ack landing, late-heartbeat/post-lapse-ack/retry/fail refusals past a 1 s stamp with the row untouched, ack_batch per-id predicate live-1/lapsed-0/nonexistent-0, fail(None)→"failed" and retry-at-budget→"max attempts exceeded"), the ADR-010 depth row (reclaim consumes an attempt with claimed_at/deadline refreshed and the original holder refusing, reclaim-exhaustion dead-lettering with the pre-claim sweep — get_job-visible "max attempts exceeded"+died_at, cancel unconditional delete with the not-an-interrupt refusal shape plus pending/dead/missing arms), and the no-stranded-rows sweep row (both states move with "expired", unexpired/never-expiring untouched, retention TTL enforcing with the moved+deleted sum, None=forever) — each version-stamped per the suite convention (ADR-010 §1–§5, ADR-019 §3, ADR-008 §5), wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s). M-1's retention-failure pin dispositioned engine-side per the task's honest call: the storage-level DELETE failure is not injectable through the contract surface, so it lands in the SQLite substrate's trigger seam (sweep_rolls_back_the_retention_half_with_the_move — the move half rolls back with the retention half), with the pg twin verified structurally (both halves inside in_tx's frame) and the disposition recorded in the task Notes. Verified: sqlite suite 13/13, pg suite 13/13 vs harness twice (postgres/poc@:15432), substrate sweep-rollback tests 4/4, workspace build/test green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean
|
2026-10-10 05:50:26 +00:00 |
|
|
glm-5.3-flash
|
fb37da617d
|
Postgres engine integration: StoreFactory (fresh schema per open, owned idempotent CASCADE teardown, isolation/idempotence pinned), the engine's backlog column (all ten rows green against the harness server — exemplar verified, the three ADR-023 rows verified not rewritten, the five engine-scoped rows, the new pg-arm PayloadTooLarge row discharging the SQLite task's deferred adoption), test-observation accessors cfg(test)-gated with the unused PgStore::new cut, stale stub-era doc text removed, lib docs stating the finished-engine posture (task pg-engine-integration)
|
2026-10-09 10:22:25 +00:00 |
|