3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
glm-5.3-flash	21074bbcdb	Review gate — wave-5 suite passed (task review-wave-5): the suite stands as the compatibility instrument and the engine specs flip to stable. All 25 mechanism rows per engine column read in full and verified against core-contract.md §Verification backlog item by item (the appendix map's every claim confirmed by the pinning row/text, incl. the combined-coverage claim for save_offset_tx exactly-once and the five engine-side pins — SQLite open row, watcher-cadence knob, M-1 sweep-rollback: SQLite trigger seam live + the pg frame's in_tx structure code-read; beyond-64 skip-forward; cap-curve); all 25 'Contract stamp:' markers checked against the cited ADR § bodies (ADR-008 §3/§5/§7/§8, 009 §1/§3/§4/§6, 010 §1-§5, 014 §1, 015 §1-§5, 016 §5, 020 §1-§4, 021 §1/§3/§4/§5, 023 §1/§2, 012 §2, 019, 007, 006) — the enqueue_opts_resolution amendment accumulation rides ADR-023 §2 per the convention; all six parked dispositions audited and recorded (M-1 engine-side, skip-forward engine-side twins, cap engine-side, fire-wake parity not demanded, lock busy-path no divergence, reconnect-success test taken); conformance spot-checks clean (no row pins beyond ADR text, determinism posture holds incl. the two documented extensions, cross-references not duplication). Green on both engines this session: workspace build/test/clippy -D warnings/fmt; SQLite column 25/25 server-less twice (isolated + concurrent); pg column 25/25 vs the harness server three full runs (two consecutive + one concurrent with the SQLite column) plus 6 focused --test-threads=6 stress runs of the two development-time flake rows — all clean, the two unreproducible pg failures recorded with the bounded investigation and a wave-6 watch flag in the task's Notes. Docs: engine-sqlite.md and engine-postgres.md frontmatter status draft → stable with dated annotations citing this gate; implementation.md wave-table row 5 and review-rounds entry; suite-opts-backoff-rows.md placeholder remnants removed. Wave 6 (release readiness) decomposition may proceed	2026-10-10 08:13:17 +00:00
glm-5.3-flash	36023914b2	Contract-suite rows (task suite-opts-backoff-rows): the backoff-curve equivalence row and the deferred enqueue-opts clock legs. backoff_curve_equivalence — the equal-jitter exponential pinned as the range, not a jitter label (ADR-010 §3): claim → retry(err, None) cycles on a backoff_base_s = 2 queue land the ranges [1,2], [2,4], [4,8] across attempts 1–3, each computed delay read back through get_job's resolved run_at minus a clock read taken before the retry — the lower bound race-free (the retry's internal clock read cannot precede the suite's, so the observed value over-reads the delay, never under-reads) and the upper bound carrying a one-second straddle tolerance for the integer-second stamp crossing a wall second; identical bounds on both engines is the equivalence pin (ADR-012 §2, the row body shared). The explicit-delay override legs ride the same row: retry(err, Some(5)) honored verbatim ([5, 6] under the same straddle tolerance) and retry(err, Some(0)) resolving ready-now per the boundary-total rule (ADR-023 §2), claimed within a bounded wait. enqueue_opts_resolution extended in place with the wave-5 legs its deferral note named — the run_at-alone literal leg (a future run_at is the row's ready time verbatim, a deterministic equality with no clock read involved; a past run_at stores the literal too and is claimable now through the run_at <= now predicate within a bounded wait, the run_at-ASC ordering making the observation unambiguous among the row's other legs) and the neither-field leg (ready at the enqueue instant, abs_diff(now) <= 5 tolerance-bounded proximity, never a tight timing assert); the deferral note replaced by the completion statement, ADR-023 §2 stamp accumulated per the convention (ADR-020 §1 governs the resolutions). Cap-leg disposition recorded in Notes for the review gate: the 1-hour cap is not suite-pinnable (capped attempts need minute-scale waits) and stays pinned engine-side on both engines' unit tests per the wave-3/4 reviews. Ready-now waits are bounded claim_one poll loops (deadline asserts only, sequential single-store drive), with the one draft defect the finding surfaced (a re-claim after the bounded wait consumed nothing; the helper returns the claimed handle) noted. Wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio test, pg harness_row!), 25 rows per column up from 24. Verified: SQLite column green server-less (25/25 suite, 189 lib), pg column green vs harness (postgres/poc@:15432 — 25/25 suite, 121 lib + 9 schema), 3 solo re-runs of each new/extended row per engine (determinism), server-less pg skips cleanly via the reachability gate, cargo test -p alkstore-sqlite -p alkstore-postgres green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean	2026-10-10 07:26:55 +00:00
glm-5.3-flash	250511d480	decompose wave 5 — contract suite: audit-first split of the verification backlog (engines' columns already discharge most rows; map in review-wave-5's appendix), seven mechanism-grouped suite-row tasks (queue depth, scheduler, tx commit-atomicity, streams, locks, wakes, opts/backoff equivalence), two engine-side hardening tasks (sqlite commit-error arm, pg F-1 defense-in-depth), and the review-wave-5 gate that flips the engine specs to stable	2026-10-10 05:37:53 +00:00