Files
glm-5.3-flash
36023914b2
Contract-suite rows (task suite-opts-backoff-rows): the backoff-curve equivalence row and the deferred enqueue-opts clock legs. backoff_curve_equivalence — the equal-jitter exponential pinned as the range, not a jitter label (ADR-010 §3): claim → retry(err, None) cycles on a backoff_base_s = 2 queue land the ranges [1,2], [2,4], [4,8] across attempts 1–3, each computed delay read back through get_job's resolved run_at minus a clock read taken before the retry — the lower bound race-free (the retry's internal clock read cannot precede the suite's, so the observed value over-reads the delay, never under-reads) and the upper bound carrying a one-second straddle tolerance for the integer-second stamp crossing a wall second; identical bounds on both engines is the equivalence pin (ADR-012 §2, the row body shared). The explicit-delay override legs ride the same row: retry(err, Some(5)) honored verbatim ([5, 6] under the same straddle tolerance) and retry(err, Some(0)) resolving ready-now per the boundary-total rule (ADR-023 §2), claimed within a bounded wait. enqueue_opts_resolution extended in place with the wave-5 legs its deferral note named — the run_at-alone literal leg (a future run_at is the row's ready time verbatim, a deterministic equality with no clock read involved; a past run_at stores the literal too and is claimable now through the run_at <= now predicate within a bounded wait, the run_at-ASC ordering making the observation unambiguous among the row's other legs) and the neither-field leg (ready at the enqueue instant, abs_diff(now) <= 5 tolerance-bounded proximity, never a tight timing assert); the deferral note replaced by the completion statement, ADR-023 §2 stamp accumulated per the convention (ADR-020 §1 governs the resolutions). Cap-leg disposition recorded in Notes for the review gate: the 1-hour cap is not suite-pinnable (capped attempts need minute-scale waits) and stays pinned engine-side on both engines' unit tests per the wave-3/4 reviews. Ready-now waits are bounded claim_one poll loops (deadline asserts only, sequential single-store drive), with the one draft defect the finding surfaced (a re-claim after the bounded wait consumed nothing; the helper returns the claimed handle) noted. Wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio test, pg harness_row!), 25 rows per column up from 24. Verified: SQLite column green server-less (25/25 suite, 189 lib), pg column green vs harness (postgres/poc@:15432 — 25/25 suite, 121 lib + 9 schema), 3 solo re-runs of each new/extended row per engine (determinism), server-less pg skips cleanly via the reachability gate, cargo test -p alkstore-sqlite -p alkstore-postgres green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean
Contract-suite lock rows (task suite-lock-rows): two version-stamped rows discharging the lock backlog rows — lock_ttl_expiry_and_reacquisition (the ADR-008 §7 guarantee row: a held lock excludes a second acquirer (contender None); after a 1 s TTL the exclusion lapses silently — no revocation event, no error — and a second owner acquires; the original holder's post-expiry renew is refused (false, the lost-it arm); the second owner's release frees the name for a third acquirer, which consumes cleanly; tolerance-sleep posture, state outcomes only; ADR-008 §7 + ADR-019 §1, duration-guard legs cross-referenced to duration_refusal_on_non_positive_ttl) and concurrent_try_lock_loser_is_a_value (the contention posture: four sequential contenders — two owners, repeated — against a held lock all land the clean None value, never Database, never a busy-throw; the backlog row's SQLite busy-path open question answered: no divergence from the pg reference; release-then-contend cycle proves the loser path leaves no state blocking a later acquire, granted to a former loser and consumed cleanly; ADR-008 §5 + §7 + ADR-019 §1) — wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s), 23 rows per column up from 21. Dispositions in Notes: no divergence found (no fix/ADR call needed), ADR-023 §2 excluded from stamps (its guard property is the duration-refusal row's, cross-referenced), the backlog parenthetical re-acquire-does-not-refresh-TTL stays engine-pinned, renew-refusal asserted after the second owner's re-acquisition (strongest form), contenders distinct-owner only (same-owner re-acquire grants per the inherited substrate shape), and one unreproducible first-cold-run pg failure recorded (message lost to truncation; 13 subsequent clean runs incl. concurrent SQLite+pg — no timing hazard identified, the lapse assertions are post-sleep state outcomes). Drive-by: alkstore-contract-suite's tokio dep gained the macros feature — a pre-existing compile break in the crate's own tests/suite_harness.rs (since
7f749ac) failed the harness target and the workspace test gate on HEAD; test-side non-event (ADR-017 §2 class 4). Verified: cargo test -p alkstore-sqlite -p alkstore-postgres green (SQLite 121+23+9, pg 189+23 vs harness server on :15432, server-less pg skips clean), workspace cargo test green (12 binaries), clippy -D warnings, fmt clean