Files
alkstore/alkstore-sqlite
glm-5.3-flash 98de4a49cd Contract-suite lock rows (task suite-lock-rows): two version-stamped rows discharging the lock backlog rows — lock_ttl_expiry_and_reacquisition (the ADR-008 §7 guarantee row: a held lock excludes a second acquirer (contender None); after a 1 s TTL the exclusion lapses silently — no revocation event, no error — and a second owner acquires; the original holder's post-expiry renew is refused (false, the lost-it arm); the second owner's release frees the name for a third acquirer, which consumes cleanly; tolerance-sleep posture, state outcomes only; ADR-008 §7 + ADR-019 §1, duration-guard legs cross-referenced to duration_refusal_on_non_positive_ttl) and concurrent_try_lock_loser_is_a_value (the contention posture: four sequential contenders — two owners, repeated — against a held lock all land the clean None value, never Database, never a busy-throw; the backlog row's SQLite busy-path open question answered: no divergence from the pg reference; release-then-contend cycle proves the loser path leaves no state blocking a later acquire, granted to a former loser and consumed cleanly; ADR-008 §5 + §7 + ADR-019 §1) — wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s), 23 rows per column up from 21. Dispositions in Notes: no divergence found (no fix/ADR call needed), ADR-023 §2 excluded from stamps (its guard property is the duration-refusal row's, cross-referenced), the backlog parenthetical re-acquire-does-not-refresh-TTL stays engine-pinned, renew-refusal asserted after the second owner's re-acquisition (strongest form), contenders distinct-owner only (same-owner re-acquire grants per the inherited substrate shape), and one unreproducible first-cold-run pg failure recorded (message lost to truncation; 13 subsequent clean runs incl. concurrent SQLite+pg — no timing hazard identified, the lapse assertions are post-sleep state outcomes). Drive-by: alkstore-contract-suite's tokio dep gained the macros feature — a pre-existing compile break in the crate's own tests/suite_harness.rs (since 7f749ac) failed the harness target and the workspace test gate on HEAD; test-side non-event (ADR-017 §2 class 4). Verified: cargo test -p alkstore-sqlite -p alkstore-postgres green (SQLite 121+23+9, pg 189+23 vs harness server on :15432, server-less pg skips clean), workspace cargo test green (12 binaries), clippy -D warnings, fmt clean
2026-10-10 06:58:54 +00:00
..
Contract-suite queue-depth rows (task suite-queue-depth-rows): the job-handle validity predicate row (in-window heartbeat/ack landing, late-heartbeat/post-lapse-ack/retry/fail refusals past a 1 s stamp with the row untouched, ack_batch per-id predicate live-1/lapsed-0/nonexistent-0, fail(None)→"failed" and retry-at-budget→"max attempts exceeded"), the ADR-010 depth row (reclaim consumes an attempt with claimed_at/deadline refreshed and the original holder refusing, reclaim-exhaustion dead-lettering with the pre-claim sweep — get_job-visible "max attempts exceeded"+died_at, cancel unconditional delete with the not-an-interrupt refusal shape plus pending/dead/missing arms), and the no-stranded-rows sweep row (both states move with "expired", unexpired/never-expiring untouched, retention TTL enforcing with the moved+deleted sum, None=forever) — each version-stamped per the suite convention (ADR-010 §1–§5, ADR-019 §3, ADR-008 §5), wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s). M-1's retention-failure pin dispositioned engine-side per the task's honest call: the storage-level DELETE failure is not injectable through the contract surface, so it lands in the SQLite substrate's trigger seam (sweep_rolls_back_the_retention_half_with_the_move — the move half rolls back with the retention half), with the pg twin verified structurally (both halves inside in_tx's frame) and the disposition recorded in the task Notes. Verified: sqlite suite 13/13, pg suite 13/13 vs harness twice (postgres/poc@:15432), substrate sweep-rollback tests 4/4, workspace build/test green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean
2026-10-10 05:50:26 +00:00
Contract-suite lock rows (task suite-lock-rows): two version-stamped rows discharging the lock backlog rows — lock_ttl_expiry_and_reacquisition (the ADR-008 §7 guarantee row: a held lock excludes a second acquirer (contender None); after a 1 s TTL the exclusion lapses silently — no revocation event, no error — and a second owner acquires; the original holder's post-expiry renew is refused (false, the lost-it arm); the second owner's release frees the name for a third acquirer, which consumes cleanly; tolerance-sleep posture, state outcomes only; ADR-008 §7 + ADR-019 §1, duration-guard legs cross-referenced to duration_refusal_on_non_positive_ttl) and concurrent_try_lock_loser_is_a_value (the contention posture: four sequential contenders — two owners, repeated — against a held lock all land the clean None value, never Database, never a busy-throw; the backlog row's SQLite busy-path open question answered: no divergence from the pg reference; release-then-contend cycle proves the loser path leaves no state blocking a later acquire, granted to a former loser and consumed cleanly; ADR-008 §5 + §7 + ADR-019 §1) — wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s), 23 rows per column up from 21. Dispositions in Notes: no divergence found (no fix/ADR call needed), ADR-023 §2 excluded from stamps (its guard property is the duration-refusal row's, cross-referenced), the backlog parenthetical re-acquire-does-not-refresh-TTL stays engine-pinned, renew-refusal asserted after the second owner's re-acquisition (strongest form), contenders distinct-owner only (same-owner re-acquire grants per the inherited substrate shape), and one unreproducible first-cold-run pg failure recorded (message lost to truncation; 13 subsequent clean runs incl. concurrent SQLite+pg — no timing hazard identified, the lapse assertions are post-sleep state outcomes). Drive-by: alkstore-contract-suite's tokio dep gained the macros feature — a pre-existing compile break in the crate's own tests/suite_harness.rs (since 7f749ac) failed the harness target and the workspace test gate on HEAD; test-side non-event (ADR-017 §2 class 4). Verified: cargo test -p alkstore-sqlite -p alkstore-postgres green (SQLite 121+23+9, pg 189+23 vs harness server on :15432, server-less pg skips clean), workspace cargo test green (12 binaries), clippy -D warnings, fmt clean
2026-10-10 06:58:54 +00:00