Rewrote every prose em dash under docs/architecture/ with natural grammar (sentence splits, colons, semicolons, parentheses, commas); wire-format fences, JSON/BAST examples, and byte diagrams untouched. Verified: grep -rln '—' docs/architecture/ returns only overview.md's fenced dependency/module-map blocks (12 dashes), left verbatim per the fenced-code rule; all other files at zero.
6.4 KiB
ADR-001: Open-Op Params Layout (Resource + Substrate)
Status
Accepted (2026-09-07); amended 2026-09-16 (params layout is per-op: the direct op pins its own params, see Amendment 1)
Context
The tunnel open op's params (the input of the
channels/tunnel/sub operation, alkcall ADR-047) is the wire-stable
carrier of "what to open." alknet ADR-071 §ALPN table noted
alknet/tunnel as [0, 1] data in/out only; the addressing scheme
was never decided there. Phase 0 resolved the framing of the problem
(the OQ-TN-01 reframe, 2026-09-05): the rich "remote addressing"
framing was an XY problem. Except in the -D/dynamic case (which
composes at the assembly layer), a tunnel is either TCP or UDP, and
params need only identify a produced resource, not carry a
general-purpose address.
Constraints that shaped the decision:
paramsis ALPN-specific JSON, interpreted by the open op's establisher/handler, and never by the channels layer (alkcall ADR-039). The layout is a one-way door once a consumer exists (wire-stable once published; additive changes only).- The identifier must be substrate-extensible without format changes
(a new substrate is an additive
substratevalue, not a v2 format). SSH'sdirect-streamlocal(same open-op shape, degenerate address slots, new type string) and SOCKS5's ATYP (scheme-tagged addresses) are the prior-art anchors; both support the "one identifier + one discriminator" reduction. - The producer owns the backing: the consumer never learns an
address. A
host:portin params would leak the producer's topology into the wire and pin the wire to address-shaped targets. - alkcall's registry schema-validates the open op's input
(
input_schemaruns before the establisher, per review 007 Part B), so the layout must be schema-describable (no per-substrate polymorphic payloads in v1). - Both POCs used exactly this shape (
TunnelParams {resource, substrate}); 17 + 16 tests rode it end-to-end.
Decision
params for the channels/tunnel/sub open op is a self-contained
JSON object:
{
"resource": "postgres-primary",
"substrate": "tcp"
}
resource(string, required): the produced resource identifier: the producer's stable name for the tunnel target. NOT an address; the producer's registry (an assembly-side construct, OQ-TN-11) maps the name to its backing (a local port, a docker container's port, an in-process service, a unix socket path).substrate(string, required): the extensible discriminator:"tcp"|"udp"|"unix"in v1. A new substrate is a new value, not a format change, the same additive property SSH gets from channel-type strings and SOCKS5 gets from ATYP values. The discriminator also selects the data-plane framing (ADR-003): the establisher and both pumps must agree on it, so it rides the open op rather than being inferred.- The open op's
input_schemapins both fields as required strings;substrateis enum-validated against the v1 set. Unknown substrate values are a schema failure (typed open error): a consumer speaking a newer substrate to an older producer fails loudly, not silently. - Substrate-specific detail (the path of a unix socket, the UDP associate semantics) is owned by the producer's registry, not the wire. The resource name is opaque to the protocol.
- The open-failure error path rides alkcall ADR-049 (typed
channel:open_failedwithdetails.reason∈dial_failed/unknown_resource/resource_shortage/handler_error/timeout): an unknown resource name isunknown_resource; there is no params-level error field, no establishment frame (the pre-ADR-049 OQ-TN-09 hunch is superseded).
Rich in-band addressing (SOCKS5 ATYP, per-datagram remote addresses)
enters only through the -D/dynamic-target composition path; it is
carried INSIDE the tunnel payload by whatever protocol the tunnel
carries (socks5, udpgw-style framing), never in base params.
Consequences
- Wire-stable from the first consumer. Both fields are required;
renames are a breaking wire change (do not). Adding an optional
field is additive-safe; adding a
substratevalue is consumer-progressive (an older producer rejects withinvalid_input-class schema error, in the SSH "unknown channel type" posture, loud not silent). - The BAST question is moot for params. Params is JSON inside the
channels open op (which is already a JSON envelope); the data
plane's binary framing (ADR-003) carries its BAST doc at
docs/architecture/bast.md. Per AGENTS.md convention 12, the hand-rolled codec remains the runtime implementation with the BAST doc as the contract. - Producers own a naming discipline. Resource ids are
producer-scoped names (OQ-TN-11: collision domain = the producer's
registry). Consumers learn available resources through the
ACL-filtered ops listing (OQ-TN-08), so the spec's
OperationSpec.descriptionSHOULD carry a human-readable hint (e.g. "postgres on the worker's tailnet") since it round-trips through discovery. - No per-connection dynamic targets in base params.
-D/SOCKS composes by tunneling a socks5 connection (OQ-TN-08); a future multi-endpoint UDP gateway resource would be self-describing framing inside the channel payload, invisible to params.
References
- Phase 0: OQ-TN-01 (the reframe + survey input),
docs/research/ssh-socks5-survey.md§OQ-TN-01 residue - alkcall ADR-047 (openable ALPNs are operations;
input_schema), ADR-049 (typed establishment errors) - Forward POC:
docs/research/poc-summary.md(the shape riding 17 tests); reverse POC:docs/research/reverse-poc-summary.md - OQ-TN-01 (promoted), OQ-TN-11 (naming residue)
Amendment 1 (params layout is per-op, 2026-09-16)
The {resource, substrate} layout pins the channels/tunnel/sub open
op. It is per-op, not per-ALPN: ADR-007 adds the
channels/tunnel/direct op on the same alk/tunnel ALPN with its own
params ({substrate, target}, i.e. a dynamic target, a different
capability with its own scope; the resource-not-address invariant is
unchanged because a dynamic target is not a produced resource). The
per-op reading was always latent in the layout's basis, since params are
"the input of the operation" (alkcall ADR-047), and ops are
per-flavor once flavor-form op ids exist (ADR-002 Amendment 1).
Additive-only evolution per op stands: this amendment adds nothing to
the …/sub op's wire surface.