Split the last open substrate-placement question:
- Unix: ships with the local feature v1 (dial_unix — same halves
shape as TCP; the wire enum already carried unix per ADR-001;
the params task's schema list includes all three values)
- Stdio: OUT of scope — a spawned process's stdin/stdout/stderr IS
alktty's pipe mode (LocalTtyBackend + tokio::process + Stdio::piped,
alktty tty-local.md): three multiplexed logical streams + the
exit-code control chunk (alktty ADR-004) + signal forwarding
(REQ-TTY-02). A stdio bridge here would be alktty's runner mode
with the terminal stripped out — a strictly worse duplicate that
also drops the semantics that matter (a byte tunnel has neither
exit codes nor signals). Remote command execution composes via
alktty on the same channels substrate.
Updated: open-questions.md OQ-TN-14 (resolved), overview.md feature
gate + deps + OQ summary, producer.md OQ ref, OQ-TN-10 promotion
(#3 split), phase-0-findings + both POC summaries' resolution notes,
params task (schema enum includes unix), local-socket-halves task
(unix ships, stdio does NOT — with the composition rationale),
oq-tn-14-tracker task repurposed (boundary-maintenance: re-opens only
if a consumer needs stdio-without-process-semantics — which would
need its own ADR, or if the alktty/alktunnels boundary needs
sharpening).
Verified: taskgraph valid (12 tasks, no cycles)
glm-5.3-flash
3a447273a8