Renumber ADRs 095-102 to 001-008 and OQs 069-071 to 001-003, and update all cross-references (titles, body prose, file-path links, tables) across the 5 spec docs, README, open-questions index, and all 11 ADR/OQ files. Inline the ADR-009 door-type definition from the parent alknet project (broken cross-project reference). Rebrand prose: alknet-typedef -> alktype in headings, body text, dependency diagrams, and "additions" notes. Disambiguate the prior failed attempt at /workspace/@alkimiadev/alktype/ as "the @alkimiadev/alktype prototype" to distinguish it from this crate. Historical research citations (docs/research/*, /workspace/alknet-typedef-poc/) are kept as-is for provenance. Rename the crate in Cargo.toml ([package].name, [lib].name) and update the 11 use alknet_typedef::* imports across the 4 test files. Rebrand the crate-level doc comment in src/lib.rs. The TypeDef:* keyword strings, TypedefError/TypedefEngine identifiers, and other code-level references are unchanged — those are a separate code rebrand pass. Build, 295 tests, and clippy all pass clean.
5.0 KiB
status, last_updated
| status | last_updated |
|---|---|
| draft | 2026-07-22 |
Open Questions
Each open question lives in its own file under questions/,
named NNN-slug.md (mirroring the ADR convention). This file is the index:
theme-grouped tables for scannability, plus a cross-theme
Deferred / Blocked section that surfaces the
safe-exit deferrals with their blocking conditions inline — so "what's
currently parked and why" is answerable at a glance.
Status values:
open— Needs to be resolved now. Has a clear path to resolution.resolved— Decided. The resolution is stated cleanly, without caveats about how it could be changed later.deferred(scope)— Cannot be resolved yet. The information is genuinely missing — a crate spec, POC result, or use case that doesn't exist yet. Has a concrete blocking condition. Not a failure — scope management.deferred(unclear)— Cannot be resolved yet. The pieces exist (decided in other ADRs, existing types, existing patterns) but the composition — how they fit together — isn't clear yet. Resolution requires investigation (work through examples, maybe POC), not waiting. Has a concrete investigation target and an impacts field. Not a failure — honest uncertainty in a poorly-defined problem space.partially resolved— Some aspects decided, others deferred or open.dissolved— The question was reframed out of existence (e.g., superseded by an ADR that retires the premise). Kept for reference.
Impacts field: Every unresolved OQ (open, deferred(scope),
deferred(unclear), partially resolved) should have an Impacts
field stating what it blocks downstream. Be specific: "blocks the first
hub deployment because the hub dials workers" not "blocks the hub
crate." This is the triage signal that makes the deferral's urgency
visible.
Door type classifications describe reversal cost (how expensive it is to undo), not urgency:
- One-way door: Reversal requires rewriting significant code or permanently closes a capability. Getting it wrong is expensive — requires ADR before implementation.
- Two-way door: Reversal is cheap or additive. Getting it wrong is recoverable — decide, implement, revert if needed.
Door type is separate from whether a decision is made. A two-way door is a decision you make now and can revert later, not a decision to defer.
By Theme
Layout Engine
| OQ | Title | Status | Door | Pri |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OQ-001 | Arrays of Variable-Length-Element Structs | deferred(scope) | two | low |
Platform Support
| OQ | Title | Status | Door | Pri |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OQ-002 | no_std + alloc Support |
deferred(scope) | two | low |
Schema Construction
| OQ | Title | Status | Door | Pri |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OQ-003 | Builder API for Schema Construction | deferred(scope) | two | med |
Deferred / Blocked
The safe-exit visibility surface. These questions are parked because the information needed to resolve them does not exist yet — each has a concrete blocking condition. They are not failures; they are scope management. This section exists so "what's currently blocking the architect" is answerable at a glance, not by filtering the tables above.
OQ-001: Arrays of Variable-Length-Element Structs
- Blocked on: A concrete consumer that needs arrays of structs with
variable-length fields, where the elements are interleaved
(
[fixed_0][str_0][fixed_1][str_1]...) and the engine must walk sequentially rather than use a fixed stride. The SFTPNamepacket hasVec<File>whereFilecontains strings, but SFTP serializes this as a sequence of length-prefixed strings (the serdeSeqAccesspattern), not as an array of fixed-stride structs. Arrays of fixed-size structs are fully supported. - Priority: low
- Full file: OQ-001
OQ-002: no_std + alloc Support
- Blocked on: An embedded use case that requires
no_std+alloc(e.g., a microcontroller running Rust withoutstd). The WASM target hasstdavailable viawasm-bindgen. The engine's core (offset computation, read/write) is already allocation-free; thejsonschemadependency is the onlyallocconsumer. - Priority: low
- Full file: OQ-002
OQ-003: Builder API for Schema Construction
- Blocked on: A concrete need for programmatic schema construction in Rust. The current consumers (SFTP, metatensor, binary call frames, TTY negotiation) all have schemas that can be hand-written or generated from TypeBox. A builder API would be a fluent Rust API that produces the same JSON Schema structure — it would sit on top of the engine, not inside it.
- Priority: medium
- Full file: OQ-003