Architecture review session resolving all high-priority open questions and filling documentation gaps identified during review: Decisions resolved: - OQ-04: Flat props with inner escape hatch for column validation (ADR-007) - OQ-05: PG enum pre-declaration returns enums and tables (ADR-008) - OQ-06: Render results accumulate in root.ctx (resolved in hosts.md) - Column references vs fk: references is shorthand, explicit fk takes precedence (ADR-006) - ADR-001, 002, 003 promoted from Proposed to Accepted (probe-validated) Documentation improvements: - Complete DbColumnType mapping tables for all 14 types across 3 dialects - Define ColumnMeta, TableMeta, IndexMeta, FkMeta types in elements.md - Document inner prop, mode prop, and default prop semantics - Add PgRootCtx, SqliteRootCtx, MySqlRootCtx context types - Consolidate schema.md and module.md (remove duplication) - Add end-to-end pipeline walkthrough to README - Add glossary with 13 terms - Add error handling strategy - Remove duplicate content from hosts.md (cross-ref elements.md)
3.9 KiB
status, last_updated
| status | last_updated |
|---|---|
| stable | 2026-05-23 |
Schema: Domain Data Inside the Module
What goes into a dbtype Type.Module — table schemas, relation entries, derived schemas (insert, update, filter), and the schema derivation semantics. For the mechanical details of how Type.Module works (construction, validation, serialization, migration diffing, constraints), see module.md.
From Element Tree to Module
The element tree (<table>, <column>) is walked to extract a Record<string, TSchema> map, then compiled into a module:
UJSX elements → extractTable() → { name, schema, columns } → defs map → Type.Module(defs)
Each <column> element produces a TypeBox type based on its type prop:
| Column Type Prop | TypeBox Schema |
|---|---|
uuid |
Type.String({ format: 'uuid' }) |
string |
Type.String() |
integer |
Type.Integer() |
boolean |
Type.Boolean() |
timestamp |
Type.Number() |
enum |
Type.Union(values.map(v => Type.Literal(v))) |
For incremental construction patterns and compilation mechanics, see module.md.
Relations
Relations are stored as separate entries in the module, using Type.Ref to reference other tables:
defs.UsersRelations = Type.Object({ tasks: Type.Array(Type.Ref('Tasks')) })
defs.TasksRelations = Type.Object({ user: Type.Ref('Users') })
This gives:
- Type-safe validation:
Value.Check(M.Import('UsersRelations'), { tasks: [...] })validates the full nested structure - No circular import issues:
Type.Refresolves within the module namespace regardless of definition order - Queryable structure: The
$defsmap is enumerable — you can find all relations for a table by naming convention - Drizzle integration: The repo adapter reads relation entries to generate
relations()calls for drizzle's relational query builder
Foreign key metadata lives on the column element's references prop (<column name="userId" type="uuid" references="users" />), not in the relation entry. Relations describe the "from this side, I see many of those" semantics.
Schema Derivation
Select Schema
The module entry as-is is the select schema. Every column is present, nullable columns become Type.Union([innerType, Type.Null()]).
Insert Schema
Derive from the table entry by:
- Removing auto-generated primary keys (columns with
primaryKey: trueanddefaultset) - Making nullable columns and columns with defaults
Type.Optional - Keeping required (
notNullwithout default) columns mandatory
Implemented by adding a computed entry to the module:
defs.InsertUsers = Type.Object({
name: Type.String(),
email: Type.String(),
// id, createdAt, updatedAt omitted (auto-generated)
})
Update Schema
All columns optional. Use Type.Partial(Type.Ref('TableName')):
defs.UpdateUsers = Type.Partial(Type.Ref('Users'))
Filter Schema
Per-column comparison operators derived from the column type. Generated by the repo adapter, not the core module.
Open Questions
-
Should relation entries use a naming convention? Currently
UsersRelations/TasksRelations. Is this sufficient, or should relations be structured differently (e.g., arelationsfield on the table entry)? -
Derived schemas in the module or separate? Insert/update schemas can be added as module entries (
InsertUsers,UpdateUsers) or extracted by walking the module schema. Which is cleaner for the repo adapter? -
Should the module support multiple databases? One module per database, or one module with all tables across all databases? Probably one per database namespace.
References
- TypeBox Module API:
@alkdev/typeboxsource —type/module/module.ts,type/ref/ref.ts - Mechanical details: module.md
- Probe validation:
scripts/probe-e2e.ts - Research:
docs/research/architecture.md