hub/tasks/architecture/storage/document-cross-table-status-mapping.md at 85ff26ae51e1045207da9ef7ae4fc8f963e2a913

alkdev/hub

Files

glm-5.1 2b63cda1c7 Setup repo: migrate architecture specs, code stubs, and tasks from alkhub_ts

Copy architecture docs, ADRs, storage domain specs, research, reviews,
and 56 storage architecture tasks from the alkhub_ts monorepo. Adapt for
standalone @alkdev/hub repo structure (src/ not packages/hub/).

Sanitize all sensitive information:
- Replace private IPs (10.0.0.1) with localhost defaults
- Remove internal server hostnames (dev1, ns528096)
- Replace /workspace/ private paths with npm package references
- Remove hardcoded credentials from examples
- Rewrite infrastructure.md without private network details

Add Deno project scaffolding: deno.json (pinned deps), .gitignore,
AGENTS.md, entry point. Migrate existing code stubs (crypto, config
types, logger) with updated import paths.

2026-05-25 10:56:32 +00:00

1.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

id, name, status, depends_on, scope, risk, impact, level

name

status

depends_on

scope

risk

impact

level

document-cross-table-status-mapping

Document Cross-Table Status Enum Disambiguation

completed

moderate

medium

phase

implementation

Description

W11: Three tables have status with overlapping values (completed, failed, aborted appear on mappings, call_graph_nodes, and tasks), but the meanings differ (e.g., mappings.completed ≠ tasks.completed). table-reference.md only contrasts mappings.active vs call_graph_nodes.pending/running — it doesn't contrast tasks statuses with the others.

Add cross-table state mapping documentation. When a task goes in-progress, there should be an active mapping; when a task is completed, the mapping becomes completed. Document valid combinations and the semantic differences between same-named statuses in different tables.

Acceptance Criteria

table-reference.md has a cross-table status mapping section (table or diagram)
Each shared status value (completed, failed, aborted) has per-table semantic definition
Valid cross-table status combinations documented (e.g., task in-progress ⟹ mapping active)
tasks.status lifecycle contrasted with mappings.status lifecycle
Note that mappings.completed and tasks.completed have different semantic scope

References

docs/reviews/storage-architecture-review-2026-04-21.md#W11
docs/architecture/storage/table-reference.md:147-164
docs/architecture/storage/coordination.md:23
docs/architecture/storage/tasks.md:84-86

Notes

To be filled by implementation agent

Summary

To be filled on completion

1.6 KiB Raw Blame History