15 KiB
status, last_updated, reviewed_code, reviewer, based_on, trigger, fixes
| status | last_updated | reviewed_code | reviewer | based_on | trigger | fixes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mitigated | 2026-09-13 |
|
code-reviewer | docs/reviews/009-fix-never-deployed-and-streaming-body-bug.md | Production incident on dev1 (2026-09-11 ~21:00-23:00 UTC) — EMFILE busy-loop wrote ~6M ERROR lines (~1.9 GB log) in 2 hours |
|
Review #010 — EMFILE Accept-Loop Flood (6M ERROR lines, 1.9 GB log in 2 hours)
Summary
On 2026-09-11, between approximately 21:00 and 23:00 UTC, the production
reverse proxy on dev1 hit EMFILE ("No file descriptors available", os
error 24) and its accept loop busy-spun, emitting ~6M ERROR log lines
(~1.9 GB) in roughly 2 hours — approximately 460K ERROR lines in the
22:00 hour alone, sustained at ~127 lines/second.
The accept loop has no error backoff: tcp_listener.accept() fails
instantly and repeatedly when the process is out of file descriptors, and
the continue on error turns that into a hot spin. Every iteration writes
an error! line both to stdout (Docker json-file, unbounded by rotation)
and to the access log file. The access log grew to 1.9 GB in a day
(vs. ~60 MB on normal days); 99% of it was the EMFILE flood. This is the
same failure shape as a task leak: an unbounded resource (log bytes) with
no circuit breaker.
Two contributing design gaps made the EMFILE reachable at all:
- C1: the accept loop treats accept errors as transient
("log and continue"), which is correct for
EINTR/EAGAINbut catastrophic for persistent errors likeEMFILE/ENFILE— retry-without-delay on those is a busy loop. - C2:
max_connections = 1024(the semaphore cap on concurrent TLS connections) equals the container's Docker-defaultRLIMIT_NOFILE = 1024— zero headroom for the listener sockets, health/admin listener, log file FD, ACME renewal sockets, stdin/out/err, and epoll instances. The semaphore therefore admits connections right up to (and past, counting non-connection FDs) the FD ceiling.
Production mitigation applied (2026-09-12)
/opt/reverse-proxy/docker-compose.yml: addedulimits: nofile: {soft: 8192, hard: 8192}./etc/reverse-proxy/config.toml:max_connections1024 → 800.- Container restarted; verified: process limit shows 8192, health green, h2 traffic normal, zero EMFILE lines since.
With nofile = 8192 and max_connections = 800, the semaphore now caps
connection FDs at ~10% of the limit, leaving ample headroom. This removes
the trigger, not the failure mode — see C1/C2 for the code fixes that
remain open.
Evidence
Timeline (from /var/log/reverse-proxy/access.log.1, since rotated)
- 20:00 hour: 54 ERROR lines (baseline noise all day was 8–18/2h block)
- 21:00 hour: 5,558,249 ERROR lines (grep count) — flood begins
- 22:00 hour: 457,419 ERROR lines (flood tail)
- First ERROR overall:
2026-09-11T00:15:37Z; last:2026-09-12T07:30:27Z(the 07:30 last line is the deploy restart cutting off the tail)
Error line shape:
2026-09-11T22:00:00.000011Z ERROR reverse_proxy::server: failed to accept TCP connection error=No file descriptors available (os error 24)
2026-09-11T22:00:00.000024Z ERROR ... (repeat, ~80 µs apart)
Note the ~13 µs spacing between consecutive EMFILE lines at 22:00:00.000 — a pure busy loop, no backoff, no yield.
Rotated-log size comparison
| File | Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| access.log.2.gz (Sep 11→12) | 55 MB gz / 1.9 GB raw | flood day |
| access.log.3–7.gz (Sep 6→11) | 4.9–8.1 MB gz each | normal days |
Trigger conditions
The EMFILE state was reachable because concurrent TLS connections
(throttled only by the 1024 semaphore) plus the proxy's own FDs exceeded
the container's Docker-default RLIMIT_NOFILE = 1024. Verified live on
dev1 before mitigation:
Max open files 1024 519288 files (containerized process)
Traffic context: the flood hour followed sustained crawler load (~77K
requests from a 63-IP crawler fleet that day, plus a 30K-request poller
from 74.7.242.34). A burst of slow/held TLS connections (e.g. crawlers
opening connections and stalling handshakes) suffices to exhaust 1024 FDs;
TLS handshakes in progress each hold an FD, and connection_idle_timeout
only frees them after 60 s.
After mitigation (nofile 8192, max_connections 800): 0 EMFILE lines,
21 FDs in use at idle, health checks green.
Finding C1: Accept loop busy-spins on persistent accept errors [server]
Status: FIXED 2026-09-13. The accept loop in serve_https_listener()
now classifies accept errors and backs off (see "C1 fix" below).
Severity: High — turns any FD/socket exhaustion into a log flood that burns disk and I/O (1.9 GB in 2 hours observed) and starves the accept loop entirely.
Location: src/server.rs, serve_https_listener() (lines ~255–264):
loop {
tokio::select! {
accept_result = tcp_listener.accept() => {
let (tcp_stream, remote_addr) = match accept_result {
Ok(conn) => conn,
Err(e) => {
error!(error = %e, "failed to accept TCP connection");
continue; // <- busy spin on EMFILE/ENFILE
}
};
...
Why it matters: accept() fails immediately with EMFILE — there
is no blocking wait between retries, so continue yields a ~13 µs
error-log cycle. The log write itself (to file + stdout) makes the spin
slower and more destructive.
C1 fix (landed): src/server.rs implements:
is_transient_accept_error()—WouldBlock/Interruptedretry immediately with no log and no sleep (correct under load).is_resource_accept_error()—ConnectionAborted,EMFILE,ENFILE,ENOBUFS,ENOMEM→ log + 1 s backoff.- Everything else → log + 100 ms backoff.
AcceptErrorReporter— de-duplicates by error signature: first occurrence logs aterror!, repeats within a 10 s window are counted, and each window close emits one summary line withsuppressed=Nbackoff_ms=1000. The 6M-line incident shape would now produce ~720 log lines over 2 hours instead of 6M.- The
conn_sem.acquire_owned()error path (semaphore closed) also sleeps 100 ms instead of spinning.
Notes from implementation:
- The redirect (:80) and health (:9900) listeners use
axum::serve, which already applies the hyper-style 1 s backoff on non-connection accept errors (axum 0.8.9src/serve/listener.rs→handle_accept_error). No change needed there; the busy-spin existed only in the custom HTTPS loop. - Two follow-up findings surfaced while fixing C1 (tracked in
"Recommended next steps"):
C3 (new)— FIXED 2026-09-13:tls_acceptor.accept()had no timeout, so a stalled TLS handshake held an FD and a semaphore permit indefinitely (the idle watchdog only starts after the handshake completes). Fixed viatls_handshake_timeout_secs(default 10s) wrapping the accept intokio::time::timeout. This was the likely actual FD-exhaustion vector for slow/held crawler handshakes, and a slowloris amplifier.C4 (open)— FIXED 2026-09-13:conn_semwas per-listener (main.rsspawns oneserve_https_listenerper listener, each creating its own semaphore), so the effective connection cap wasmax_connections × listeners. Fixed via a singleConnectionSemaphore(Arc<Semaphore>wrapper, src/server.rs) created inmain.rsand shared by every listener;max_connectionsis now a process-wide cap. This is the topology the C2 RLIMIT cross-check should assume.
Original finding (pre-fix, preserved for context)
Location: src/server.rs, serve_https_listener() (lines ~255–264):
loop {
tokio::select! {
accept_result = tcp_listener.accept() => {
let (tcp_stream, remote_addr) = match accept_result {
Ok(conn) => conn,
Err(e) => {
error!(error = %e, "failed to accept TCP connection");
continue; // <- busy spin on EMFILE/ENFILE
}
};
...
Why it matters: accept() fails immediately with EMFILE — there
is no blocking wait between retries, so continue yields a ~13 µs
error-log cycle. The log write itself (to file + stdout) makes the spin
slower and more destructive.
Options worth considering while fixing:
- Log the first N occurrences of a repeated accept error at
error!, then demote to a periodic (e.g. once/10s) summary until the error clears — bounds log damage from any repeating accept failure. - On EMFILE specifically, a small sleep (500 ms–1 s) is both correct and cheap: the process cannot make progress on accepts until FDs are released anyway.
Note: the redirect (HTTP:80) listener and health listener use a
different loop shape (axum::serve) which already backs off; see the
implementation notes above.
Finding C2: max_connections is not cross-checked against RLIMIT_NOFILE [config]
Severity: Medium — the semaphore is the intended protection against FD exhaustion, but it can be configured at/above the process's real ceiling, making it a false safety net.
Location: src/config/static_config.rs (default_max_connections()
= 1024) and validation in src/config/validation.rs.
Why it matters: max_connections counts only TLS connections; the
process also needs FDs for: HTTPS + HTTP + health-check listener sockets,
the log file, stdin/stdout/stderr, epoll/timer FDs, and ACME renewal
outbound sockets (rustls-acme opens TCP + TLS per ACME interaction).
With max_connections == RLIMIT_NOFILE (the dev1 situation, both 1024),
the semaphore guarantees the ceiling can be hit under load.
Recommended fix: at startup (and reload), read the process soft
RLIMIT_NOFILE (via rlimit crate or getrlimit) and reject config (or
warn + clamp) if:
max_connections + reserved_fds > soft_limit
with reserved_fds ~64 (listeners + log + ACME + epoll headroom). Warn
prominently when the soft limit is the Docker default 1024; better, the
project's Docker/systemd docs should recommend nofile 8192 alongside
max_connections = 1024 (or vice versa: derive a sane default from the
observed limit).
Finding M1 (mitigation): raise nofile + lower max_connections [deploy]
Status: Applied 2026-09-12 (see Summary). Backups:
docker-compose.yml.bak.20260912-080241, config.toml.bak.20260912-080241.
Residual risk after mitigation: none identified for FD exhaustion at current traffic (peak concurrent connections observed ≪ 800); the code findings C2 remains the durable fix (C1 + C3 + C4 landed 2026-09-13).
Traffic-analysis side note (from the same investigation)
The EMFILE hunt began as a traffic-volume estimate for Gitea, which surfaced the flood because yesterday's rotated log was 1.9 GB vs ~60 MB normal. Traffic profile (2026-09-11, 204K REQUEST lines):
- ~77K requests from a 63-IP crawler fleet (57.141.20.x — GitHub's published crawler range), ~1.3K req/IP, commit/blame/raw pages
- ~30K requests from 74.7.242.34 (Microsoft) polling
/pulls+/issueson 3 repos (alkdev/alktunnels,alkdev/alktls,alkdev/alkgen) plus 56 onalkdev/typemap; all GET, no POSTs — dashboard-style monitoring, first seen that day - ~20 HTTPS git fetches, ~22 API calls, zero HTTPS pushes
- Zero POSTs to
/user/login; zero 401/403 that day — no credential attacks over HTTPS
None of this traffic is hostile per se, but it does mean the "1024 concurrent connections" ceiling is reachable from ordinary crawler behavior, which is exactly what made the EMFILE state reachable.
Recommended next steps
Land C1 (accept-loop error backoff + log de-duplication)— DONE 2026-09-13 (see Finding C1).Land C3 (TLS handshake timeout)— DONE 2026-09-13. New static configtls_handshake_timeout_secs(default 10s, must be > 0) wrapstls_acceptor.accept()intokio::time::timeout(accept_tls_with_timeout(), src/server.rs). On timeout the handshake future is dropped, releasing the TCP FD and the semaphore permit; the idle watchdog never needs to run for a stalled handshake. Closes the crawler slow-handshake vector described under "Trigger conditions".Land C4 (shared connection semaphore across listeners) so— DONE 2026-09-13.max_connectionsis a global cap rather than per-listenerserve_https_listener()no longer creates its own semaphore; it receives anArc<ConnectionSemaphore>(new public wrapper in src/server.rs) built once inmain.rsand cloned into every listener task.max_connectionsis now the process-wide concurrent TLS connection cap; the effective cap no longer scales with listener count. This is the topology C2's RLIMIT cross-check should assume.- Land C2 (RLIMIT cross-check at startup) with a prominent warning or
hard validation error. The FD budget assumes a shared semaphore
(landed, see step 3): connection FDs are capped at
max_connectionsprocess-wide. Lower urgency after M1: with the deploy baseline (nofile 8192,max_connections 800) the ceiling is ~10% of the limit, so C2 is a validation guard, not an active exposure. - Consider a doc note in
docs/architecture/operations.mddescribing the nofile/max_connections relationship (the mitigation values above are a working baseline:nofile 8192,max_connections 800). - Docker image: the deployment Dockerfile on dev1 is a two-line stub
(FROM + COPY); if the project's own
deploy/Dockerfileis ever used, it should also setulimitsguidance or rely on compose as done here. The repo's owndeploy/docker-compose.ymlstill lacks theulimitsblock applied to dev1, anddeploy/reverse-proxy.servicelacksLimitNOFILE.