- Create decisions/ directory with 32 numbered ADRs (ADR-001 through ADR-032) extracted from inline DD/SD/ED/SE decision sections - Create open-questions.md with 16 OQs organized by theme, cross-referenced to ADRs, with status tracking (resolved/open) - Create README.md as architecture index with doc table, ADR table, and lifecycle status definitions (draft/reviewed/stable/deprecated) - Replace inline decision sections in all spec docs with ADR reference tables - Replace inline open questions with OQ references to centralized tracker - Update frontmatter: metagraph-module.md, overview.md, sqlite-host.md → reviewed; schema-evolution.md and encrypted-data.md remain draft - DD1-DD10 → ADR-009 through ADR-018 - D1-D8 → ADR-001 through ADR-008 - SD1-SD5 → ADR-019 through ADR-023 (SD5 folded into ADR-006/008) - ED1-ED5 → ADR-023 through ADR-027 - SE1-SE5 → ADR-028 through ADR-032
922 B
922 B
ADR-008: Common columns pattern
Status
Accepted
Context
All tables need auditability (creation/modification timestamps) and extensibility (metadata). Without a common pattern, each table defines these differently.
Decision
All tables share id (text PK, consumer-generated), metadata (JSON text defaulting to {}), createdAt, and updatedAt (integer timestamps in SQLite, timestamptz in PG). The metadata column is an extension namespace following _subsystem.key namespacing — it's for opaque key-value pairs that subsystems add without schema changes, not for queryable data.
Consequences
- Every row has auditability and extensibility
- Subsystems add metadata without schema changes
- Columns that appear in WHERE/JOIN conditions should be proper columns, not metadata
- SQLite uses
integertimestamps; PG will usetimestamptz