Add architecture review findings and address documentation issues

Review of all ADR documents (001-007) and peripheral architecture docs
identified 3 critical, 10 warning, and 7 suggestion issues.

Addressed in this commit:
- W-1: Add draft qualifier to ADR-002 reference to incremental exploration
- W-2: Add Alternatives Considered section to ADR-001
- W-3: Add Document Lifecycle section to README.md (draft/stable/deprecated)
- W-4: Clarify includeCompleted semantics (only 'completed' status triggers exclusion)
- W-5: Document file I/O runtime constraints in frontmatter.md
- W-6: Add ADR reference to architecture.md redirect
- W-7: Verify CVE-2025-64718 (confirmed real, improved description)
- W-9: Convert workspace-absolute paths to relative/monorepo references
- S-7: Add future ADR-008 note to incremental-update-exploration.md

Critical issues (C-1, C-2, C-3) and remaining warnings (W-8, W-10, S-4, S-5)
were addressed by a parallel agent in a prior commit.

All 16 review tasks created and resolved.

tasks/architecture/w-8-limit-param-docs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+---
+id: architecture/w-8-limit-param-docs
+name: Document WorkflowCostOptions.limit semantics
+status: completed
+depends_on:
+  - architecture/w-4-taskstatus-enum-values
+created: 2026-04-26T09:10:59.676682205Z
+modified: 2026-04-26T09:10:59.676682713Z
+scope: narrow
+risk: medium
+---
+
+# Description
+
+**Review ref**: W-8 (Warning)
+**Files affected**: `docs/architecture/api-surface.md`
+
+`WorkflowCostOptions` includes `limit?: number` with no documentation of what this parameter constrains or its default behavior. Document what `limit` does (number of tasks in result? max depth?) and its behavior when omitted.
+
+Depends on W-4 (TaskStatus definition) if `limit` interacts with `includeCompleted` filtering semantics.
+
+**Source**: `/docs/reviews/architecture-review-2026-04-26.md` W-8