glm-5.1
039a6ccfe1
- C1(critical): Replace tsc build with tsup for dual ESM + CJS output - W2(warning): Change workflowCost to accept TaskGraph instead of TaskGraphInner - S1(suggestion): Add test for bottlenecks empty-graph early return - S2(suggestion): Document dangling-reference detection is unreachable via public API
1077 lines
44 KiB
TypeScript
1077 lines
44 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect } from "vitest";
|
|
import { calculateTaskEv, computeEffectiveP, workflowCost } from "../src/analysis/cost-benefit.js";
|
|
import { TaskGraph } from "../src/graph/construction.js";
|
|
import { CircularDependencyError } from "../src/error/index.js";
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Helper: create test graphs
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Create a simple chain graph: A → B → C
|
|
* All tasks have medium risk (p=0.80), narrow scope, isolated impact.
|
|
*/
|
|
function createChainGraph(): TaskGraph {
|
|
return TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "C", name: "Task C", dependsOn: ["B"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Create a diamond graph: A → B, A → C, B → D, C → D
|
|
* This tests that convergence correctly multiplies both inherited factors.
|
|
*/
|
|
function createDiamondGraph(): TaskGraph {
|
|
return TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "C", name: "Task C", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "D", name: "Task D", dependsOn: ["B", "C"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Create a cyclic graph for testing CircularDependencyError.
|
|
*/
|
|
function createCyclicGraph(): TaskGraph {
|
|
const tg = new TaskGraph();
|
|
// We manually add nodes and edges that form a cycle
|
|
// Note: TaskGraph prevents self-loops but we can create cycles
|
|
tg.addTask("A", { name: "Task A" });
|
|
tg.addTask("B", { name: "Task B" });
|
|
tg.addTask("C", { name: "Task C" });
|
|
// Create cycle: A → B → C → A
|
|
tg.addDependency("A", "B");
|
|
tg.addDependency("B", "C");
|
|
tg.addDependency("C", "A");
|
|
return tg;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// calculateTaskEv — pure function tests
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe("calculateTaskEv", () => {
|
|
// --- Basic formula verification ---
|
|
|
|
it("computes EV with default config (all zeros): C_fail = C_success", () => {
|
|
// When fallbackCost=0, timeLost=0, retries=0 → expectedRetries=0
|
|
// C_success = scopeCost * impactWeight
|
|
// C_fail = scopeCost * impactWeight + 0 + 0 = C_success
|
|
// EV = p * C_success + (1-p) * C_success = C_success
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.8, 3.0, 1.5);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.pSuccess).toBe(0.8);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(0.25); // (1-0.8)/0.8 = 0.25
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(3.0 * 1.5); // 4.5 — both terms equal C_success
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("computes EV = C_success when p = 1 (guaranteed success)", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(1.0, 4.0, 2.0);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.pSuccess).toBe(1.0);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(0); // (1-1)/1 = 0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(4.0 * 2.0); // 8.0 — only success term
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("computes EV = C_fail when p = 0 (guaranteed failure)", () => {
|
|
// When p=0, expectedRetries=0, so with default config:
|
|
// C_fail = scopeCost * impactWeight + 0 + 0 = scopeCost * impactWeight
|
|
// EV = 0 * C_success + 1 * C_fail = C_fail
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0, 3.0, 1.5);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.pSuccess).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBe(0); // p=0 → 0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(3.0 * 1.5); // 4.5 — only failure term
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("computes EV = C_fail when p = 0 with fallback cost", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0, 3.0, 1.5, { fallbackCost: 10, timeLost: 5 });
|
|
|
|
expect(result.pSuccess).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBe(0); // p=0 → 0, no retries
|
|
// C_fail = 3.0*1.5 + 10 + 5*0 = 4.5 + 10 + 0 = 14.5
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(14.5);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Geometric series for expectedRetries ---
|
|
|
|
it("computes expectedRetries as (1-p)/p for various p values", () => {
|
|
const cases: [number, number][] = [
|
|
[0.98, 0.02 / 0.98], // trivial risk
|
|
[0.90, 0.10 / 0.90], // low risk
|
|
[0.80, 0.20 / 0.80], // medium risk → 0.25
|
|
[0.65, 0.35 / 0.65], // high risk
|
|
[0.50, 0.50 / 0.50], // critical risk → 1.0
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
for (const [p, expectedRetries] of cases) {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(p, 1.0, 1.0);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(expectedRetries);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Impact weight scaling ---
|
|
|
|
it("impactWeight scales scopeCost in both C_success and C_fail (default config)", () => {
|
|
// With default config (no fallback/retry costs), both terms = scopeCost * impactWeight
|
|
const result1 = calculateTaskEv(0.8, 3.0, 1.0); // isolated
|
|
const result2 = calculateTaskEv(0.8, 3.0, 1.5); // component
|
|
const result3 = calculateTaskEv(0.8, 3.0, 3.0); // project
|
|
|
|
// All EVs should be scopeCost * impactWeight (since C_fail = C_success with default config)
|
|
expect(result1.ev).toBeCloseTo(3.0 * 1.0); // 3.0
|
|
expect(result2.ev).toBeCloseTo(3.0 * 1.5); // 4.5
|
|
expect(result3.ev).toBeCloseTo(3.0 * 3.0); // 9.0
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Fallback cost ---
|
|
|
|
it("adds fallbackCost to the failure term", () => {
|
|
const fallbackCost = 20;
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 2.0, 1.0, { fallbackCost });
|
|
|
|
// C_success = 2.0 * 1.0 = 2.0
|
|
// expectedRetries = (1-0.5)/0.5 = 1.0
|
|
// C_fail = 2.0 + 20 + 0 * 1.0 = 22.0
|
|
// EV = 0.5 * 2.0 + 0.5 * 22.0 = 1.0 + 11.0 = 12.0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(12.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Time lost per retry ---
|
|
|
|
it("adds timeLost * expectedRetries to the failure term", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 2.0, 1.0, { timeLost: 5 });
|
|
|
|
// expectedRetries = 1.0
|
|
// C_fail = 2.0 + 0 + 5 * 1.0 = 7.0
|
|
// EV = 0.5 * 2.0 + 0.5 * 7.0 = 1.0 + 3.5 = 4.5
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(4.5);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("combines fallbackCost and timeLost in C_fail", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.8, 3.0, 1.5, {
|
|
fallbackCost: 10,
|
|
timeLost: 5,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// expectedRetries = 0.25
|
|
// C_success = 3.0 * 1.5 = 4.5
|
|
// C_fail = 4.5 + 10 + 5 * 0.25 = 15.75
|
|
// EV = 0.8 * 4.5 + 0.2 * 15.75 = 3.6 + 3.15 = 6.75
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(6.75);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Retries cap ---
|
|
|
|
it("caps expectedRetries at config.retries when retries > 0", () => {
|
|
// p=0.5 → expectedRetries = 1.0, but config.retries = 3 → capped at 1.0 (below cap)
|
|
const result1 = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 2.0, 1.0, { retries: 3, timeLost: 5 });
|
|
expect(result1.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(1.0); // not capped
|
|
|
|
// p=0.2 → expectedRetries = 4.0, config.retries = 2 → capped at 2
|
|
const result2 = calculateTaskEv(0.2, 2.0, 1.0, { retries: 2, timeLost: 5 });
|
|
expect(result2.expectedRetries).toBe(2); // capped
|
|
|
|
// C_fail with cap: 2.0 + 0 + 5 * 2 = 12.0
|
|
// EV = 0.2 * 2.0 + 0.8 * 12.0 = 0.4 + 9.6 = 10.0
|
|
expect(result2.ev).toBeCloseTo(10.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not cap expectedRetries when retries = 0 (default)", () => {
|
|
// p=0.2 → expectedRetries = 4.0
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.2, 2.0, 1.0);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(4.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("respects retries cap with low probability and large expectedRetries", () => {
|
|
// p=0.1 → expectedRetries = 9.0, retries=1 → capped at 1
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.1, 2.0, 1.0, { retries: 1, timeLost: 3 });
|
|
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBe(1); // capped
|
|
// C_fail = 2.0 + 0 + 3 * 1 = 5.0
|
|
// EV = 0.1 * 2.0 + 0.9 * 5.0 = 0.2 + 4.5 = 4.7
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(4.7);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Value rate conversion ---
|
|
|
|
it("multiplies final EV by valueRate when non-zero", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.8, 3.0, 1.0, { valueRate: 100 });
|
|
|
|
// Without valueRate: EV = 3.0 (default config, C_fail = C_success)
|
|
// With valueRate: EV = 3.0 * 100 = 300
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(300);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not multiply by valueRate when valueRate is 0 (default)", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.8, 3.0, 1.0);
|
|
|
|
// EV = scopeCost * impactWeight * 1.0 = 3.0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(3.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("applies valueRate after full EV calculation including fallback and time costs", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 2.0, 1.0, {
|
|
fallbackCost: 10,
|
|
timeLost: 5,
|
|
valueRate: 10,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// expectedRetries = 1.0
|
|
// C_success = 2.0
|
|
// C_fail = 2.0 + 10 + 5 * 1.0 = 17.0
|
|
// EV_raw = 0.5 * 2.0 + 0.5 * 17.0 = 1.0 + 8.5 = 9.5
|
|
// EV = 9.5 * 10 = 95
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(95);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Known calculations from Python research model ---
|
|
|
|
it("matches Python research model: medium risk + narrow scope + isolated impact (default task)", () => {
|
|
// p=0.80, scopeCost=2.0 (narrow), impactWeight=1.0 (isolated)
|
|
// No retry costs in simplest case → EV = scopeCost * impactWeight = 2.0
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.80, 2.0, 1.0);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.pSuccess).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(0.25);
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(2.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("matches Python research model: high risk + broad scope + component impact with retries", () => {
|
|
// p=0.65, scopeCost=4.0 (broad), impactWeight=1.5 (component)
|
|
// With retries=3, timeLost=2, fallbackCost=8
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.65, 4.0, 1.5, {
|
|
retries: 3,
|
|
timeLost: 2,
|
|
fallbackCost: 8,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// expectedRetries = (1-0.65)/0.65 = 0.538... → not capped (below 3)
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(0.35 / 0.65);
|
|
|
|
const p = 0.65;
|
|
const cSuccess = 4.0 * 1.5; // = 6.0
|
|
const cFail = 6.0 + 8 + 2 * (0.35 / 0.65); // = 14 + 1.0769... = 15.0769...
|
|
const expectedEv = p * cSuccess + (1 - p) * cFail;
|
|
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(expectedEv);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("matches Python research model: critical risk + system scope + project impact", () => {
|
|
// p=0.50, scopeCost=5.0 (system), impactWeight=3.0 (project)
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.50, 5.0, 3.0);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.pSuccess).toBeCloseTo(0.50);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(1.0);
|
|
// Default config: C_fail = C_success = 5.0 * 3.0 = 15.0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(15.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("matches Python research model: trivial risk + single scope + isolated impact", () => {
|
|
// p=0.98, scopeCost=1.0 (single), impactWeight=1.0 (isolated)
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.98, 1.0, 1.0);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.pSuccess).toBeCloseTo(0.98);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(0.02 / 0.98);
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(1.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Boundary values ---
|
|
|
|
it("handles very small p > 0", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.01, 1.0, 1.0);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.pSuccess).toBe(0.01);
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(0.99 / 0.01); // = 99
|
|
// Default config: C_fail = C_success = 1.0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(1.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("handles p very close to 1", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.999, 1.0, 1.0);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(0.001 / 0.999);
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(1.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns zero EV when scopeCost is 0", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 0, 1.0);
|
|
|
|
// C_success = 0, C_fail = 0 + 0 + 0 = 0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns zero EV when impactWeight is 0 and no fallback costs", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 5.0, 0);
|
|
|
|
// C_success = 0, C_fail = 0 + 0 + 0 = 0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("preserves p as pSuccess in the result without modification", () => {
|
|
expect(calculateTaskEv(0.75, 2.0, 1.0).pSuccess).toBe(0.75);
|
|
expect(calculateTaskEv(0, 2.0, 1.0).pSuccess).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(calculateTaskEv(1, 2.0, 1.0).pSuccess).toBe(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Config variations ---
|
|
|
|
it("undefined config defaults all fields to 0", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 2.0, 1.0, undefined);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(1.0);
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(2.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("empty config object defaults all fields to 0", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 2.0, 1.0, {});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(1.0);
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(2.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("partial config: only retries set", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.2, 2.0, 1.0, { retries: 1 });
|
|
|
|
// expectedRetries = (1-0.2)/0.2 = 4, capped at 1
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBe(1);
|
|
// C_success = 2.0, C_fail = 2.0 + 0 + 0 * 1 = 2.0
|
|
// EV = 0.2 * 2.0 + 0.8 * 2.0 = 0.4 + 1.6 = 2.0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(2.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("partial config: only fallbackCost set", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 2.0, 1.0, { fallbackCost: 5 });
|
|
|
|
// expectedRetries = 1.0 but timeLost=0 → retry cost = 0
|
|
// C_fail = 2.0 + 5 + 0 = 7.0
|
|
// EV = 0.5 * 2.0 + 0.5 * 7.0 = 1.0 + 3.5 = 4.5
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(4.5);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("partial config: only timeLost set (no effect without retries generating cost)", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 2.0, 1.0, { timeLost: 10 });
|
|
|
|
// expectedRetries = 1.0
|
|
// C_fail = 2.0 + 0 + 10 * 1.0 = 12.0
|
|
// EV = 0.5 * 2.0 + 0.5 * 12.0 = 1.0 + 6.0 = 7.0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(7.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("full config with all parameters", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateTaskEv(0.5, 2.0, 1.5, {
|
|
retries: 2,
|
|
fallbackCost: 10,
|
|
timeLost: 3,
|
|
valueRate: 50,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// expectedRetries = (1-0.5)/0.5 = 1.0, not capped (below 2)
|
|
expect(result.expectedRetries).toBeCloseTo(1.0);
|
|
|
|
// C_success = 2.0 * 1.5 = 3.0
|
|
// C_fail = 3.0 + 10 + 3 * 1.0 = 16.0
|
|
// EV_raw = 0.5 * 3.0 + 0.5 * 16.0 = 1.5 + 8.0 = 9.5
|
|
// EV = 9.5 * 50 = 475.0
|
|
expect(result.ev).toBeCloseTo(475.0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// computeEffectiveP — DAG-propagation probability tests
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe("computeEffectiveP", () => {
|
|
// Helper to create a graph and compute effective probabilities
|
|
const qr0_9 = 0.9; // default qualityRetention
|
|
|
|
it("returns pIntrinsic in independent mode regardless of parents", () => {
|
|
const graph = createChainGraph();
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
// Even with upstream data, independent mode returns pIntrinsic
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("A", 0.65);
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
computeEffectiveP("B", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "independent", 0.80)
|
|
).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns pIntrinsic for root tasks (no prerequisites)", () => {
|
|
const graph = createChainGraph();
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
|
|
// Task A has no prerequisites — pEffective should equal pIntrinsic
|
|
expect(
|
|
computeEffectiveP("A", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.80)
|
|
).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("computes inherited quality for a simple chain: A → B", () => {
|
|
// A has p=0.65 (high risk), B has intrinsic p=0.80 (medium risk)
|
|
// qualityRetention = 0.9 (default)
|
|
// inheritedQuality from A = 0.65 + (1 - 0.65) * 0.9 = 0.65 + 0.315 = 0.965
|
|
// pEffective_B = 0.80 * 0.965 = 0.772
|
|
const graph = createChainGraph();
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("A", 0.65);
|
|
|
|
const pEff_B = computeEffectiveP(
|
|
"B", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.80
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const inheritedFromA = 0.65 + (1 - 0.65) * 0.9; // 0.965
|
|
expect(pEff_B).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromA);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("computes compounding for a 3-node chain: A → B → C", () => {
|
|
// A (p=0.65) → B (p=0.80) → C (p=0.80)
|
|
// Step 1: pEff_A = 0.65 (root, no parents)
|
|
// Step 2: B has parent A with p=0.65
|
|
// inheritedFromA = 0.65 + (1-0.65)*0.9 = 0.965
|
|
// pEff_B = 0.80 * 0.965 = 0.772
|
|
// Step 3: C has parent B with p=0.772
|
|
// inheritedFromB = 0.772 + (1-0.772)*0.9 = 0.772 + 0.2052 = 0.9772
|
|
// pEff_C = 0.80 * 0.9772 = 0.78176
|
|
const graph = createChainGraph();
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
|
|
// A (root)
|
|
const pEff_A = computeEffectiveP("A", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.65);
|
|
expect(pEff_A).toBeCloseTo(0.65);
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("A", pEff_A);
|
|
|
|
// B depends on A
|
|
const pEff_B = computeEffectiveP("B", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
const inheritedFromA = 0.65 + (1 - 0.65) * 0.9;
|
|
expect(pEff_B).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromA);
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("B", pEff_B);
|
|
|
|
// C depends on B
|
|
const pEff_C = computeEffectiveP("C", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
const inheritedFromB = pEff_B + (1 - pEff_B) * 0.9;
|
|
expect(pEff_C).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromB);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("computes diamond graph: A → B, A → C, B → D, C → D", () => {
|
|
// A=0.65 (high risk), B=C=D=0.80 (medium risk)
|
|
// Step 1: pEff_A = 0.65
|
|
// Step 2 (B): parent A with p=0.65
|
|
// inheritedFromA = 0.65 + 0.35*0.9 = 0.965
|
|
// pEff_B = 0.80 * 0.965 = 0.772
|
|
// Step 3 (C): parent A with p=0.65
|
|
// pEff_C = same as B = 0.772
|
|
// Step 4 (D): parents B (p=0.772) and C (p=0.772)
|
|
// inheritedFromB = 0.772 + 0.228*0.9 = 0.772 + 0.2052 = 0.9772
|
|
// inheritedFromC = same = 0.9772
|
|
// pEff_D = 0.80 * 0.9772 * 0.9772
|
|
const graph = createDiamondGraph();
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
|
|
// A (root)
|
|
const pEff_A = computeEffectiveP("A", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.65);
|
|
expect(pEff_A).toBeCloseTo(0.65);
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("A", pEff_A);
|
|
|
|
// B depends on A
|
|
const pEff_B = computeEffectiveP("B", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
const inheritedFromA = 0.65 + (1 - 0.65) * 0.9;
|
|
expect(pEff_B).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromA);
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("B", pEff_B);
|
|
|
|
// C depends on A
|
|
const pEff_C = computeEffectiveP("C", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
expect(pEff_C).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromA); // same as B
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("C", pEff_C);
|
|
|
|
// D depends on B and C
|
|
const pEff_D = computeEffectiveP("D", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
const inheritedFromB = pEff_B + (1 - pEff_B) * 0.9;
|
|
const inheritedFromC = pEff_C + (1 - pEff_C) * 0.9;
|
|
expect(pEff_D).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromB * inheritedFromC);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses per-edge qualityRetention from edge attributes", () => {
|
|
// Create a graph with custom qualityRetention per edge
|
|
const tg = TaskGraph.fromRecords(
|
|
[
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [] },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"] },
|
|
],
|
|
[
|
|
{ from: "A", to: "B", qualityRetention: 0.5 }, // lower retention
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("A", 0.65);
|
|
|
|
// With qualityRetention=0.5: inheritedQuality = 0.65 + 0.35*0.5 = 0.825
|
|
// pEffective = 0.80 * 0.825 = 0.66
|
|
const pEff = computeEffectiveP("B", tg.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, 0.9, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
expect(pEff).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * (0.65 + (1 - 0.65) * 0.5));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("falls back to defaultQualityRetention when edge has no qualityRetention attribute", () => {
|
|
// Create a graph using raw graphology API so edges don't have qualityRetention
|
|
const tg = new TaskGraph();
|
|
tg.addTask("A", { name: "Task A" });
|
|
tg.addTask("B", { name: "Task B" });
|
|
// Add edge directly via raw graphology, without qualityRetention attribute
|
|
tg.raw.addEdgeWithKey("A->B", "A", "B", {});
|
|
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("A", 0.65);
|
|
|
|
// Since the edge has no qualityRetention attribute, defaultQualityRetention=0.85 is used
|
|
// inheritedQuality = 0.65 + 0.35*0.85 = 0.65 + 0.2975 = 0.9475
|
|
// pEffective = 0.80 * 0.9475 = 0.758
|
|
const pEff = computeEffectiveP("B", tg.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, 0.85, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
expect(pEff).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * (0.65 + 0.35 * 0.85));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("qualityRetention=1.0 gives independent model (inherited quality = 1.0)", () => {
|
|
// With qualityRetention=1.0: inheritedQuality = parentP + (1-parentP)*1.0 = 1.0
|
|
// pEffective = pIntrinsic * 1.0 = pIntrinsic
|
|
// Create graph with edges that have qualityRetention=1.0
|
|
const tg = TaskGraph.fromRecords(
|
|
[
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [] },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"] },
|
|
],
|
|
[
|
|
{ from: "A", to: "B", qualityRetention: 1.0 },
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("A", 0.50);
|
|
|
|
const pEff = computeEffectiveP("B", tg.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, 0.9, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
expect(pEff).toBeCloseTo(0.80); // pIntrinsic unchanged
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("qualityRetention=0.0 gives full propagation (inherited quality = parentP)", () => {
|
|
// With qualityRetention=0.0: inheritedQuality = parentP + (1-parentP)*0.0 = parentP
|
|
// So pEffective = pIntrinsic * parentP
|
|
// Create graph with edges that have qualityRetention=0.0
|
|
const tg = TaskGraph.fromRecords(
|
|
[
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [] },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"] },
|
|
],
|
|
[
|
|
{ from: "A", to: "B", qualityRetention: 0.0 },
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
upstreamSuccessProbs.set("A", 0.65);
|
|
|
|
const pEff = computeEffectiveP("B", tg.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, 0.9, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
expect(pEff).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * 0.65); // pIntrinsic * parentP
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("skips parents not in upstream map (robustness)", () => {
|
|
// B depends on A, but A is not in upstreamSuccessProbs yet
|
|
// This shouldn't happen in normal usage (topological order ensures processing)
|
|
// but the function should gracefully skip missing parents
|
|
const graph = createChainGraph();
|
|
const upstreamSuccessProbs = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
// A not in map — should be skipped, so no inherited quality factors
|
|
// pEffective = pIntrinsic (no parents found in map)
|
|
|
|
const pEff = computeEffectiveP("B", graph.raw, upstreamSuccessProbs, qr0_9, "dag-propagate", 0.80);
|
|
// With no parents found in map, product is 1.0, so pIntrinsic
|
|
// Wait — actually B has a parent A in the graph, but A isn't in the map.
|
|
// The function skips it, so no multiplication happens.
|
|
// inheritedProduct stays at 1.0 → pEffective = pIntrinsic
|
|
expect(pEff).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// workflowCost — integration tests
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe("workflowCost", () => {
|
|
it("computes workflow cost for a simple chain with dag-propagate mode", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Planning", dependsOn: [], risk: "high", scope: "narrow", impact: "phase" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Implementation", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "broad", impact: "component" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.propagationMode).toBe("dag-propagate");
|
|
|
|
// Task A (root, high risk, narrow scope, phase impact)
|
|
// pIntrinsic_A = 0.65, pEffective_A = 0.65 (root, no parents)
|
|
// EV_A = 0.65 * (2.0 * 2.0) + 0.35 * (2.0 * 2.0) = 4.0 (default config, C_fail=C_success)
|
|
const taskA = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "A")!;
|
|
expect(taskA).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(taskA.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.65);
|
|
expect(taskA.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.65);
|
|
expect(taskA.scopeCost).toBeCloseTo(2.0); // narrow
|
|
expect(taskA.impactWeight).toBeCloseTo(2.0); // phase
|
|
|
|
// Task B (depends on A, medium risk, broad scope, component impact)
|
|
// inheritedFromA = 0.65 + 0.35*0.9 = 0.965
|
|
// pEffective_B = 0.80 * 0.965 = 0.772
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
expect(taskB).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(taskB.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * (0.65 + 0.35 * 0.9));
|
|
expect(taskB.scopeCost).toBeCloseTo(4.0); // broad
|
|
expect(taskB.impactWeight).toBeCloseTo(1.5); // component
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("computes workflow cost in independent mode (no propagation)", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Planning", dependsOn: [], risk: "high", scope: "narrow", impact: "phase" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Implementation", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "broad", impact: "component" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "independent" });
|
|
|
|
expect(result.propagationMode).toBe("independent");
|
|
|
|
// In independent mode, pEffective = pIntrinsic for all tasks
|
|
const taskA = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "A")!;
|
|
expect(taskA.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.65); // high risk
|
|
expect(taskA.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.65);
|
|
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80); // medium risk, no propagation
|
|
expect(taskB.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("dag-propagate mode shows degradation vs independent mode", () => {
|
|
// Key insight: in dag-propagate, downstream tasks have lower pEffective
|
|
// than their pIntrinsic, because upstream quality degrades them
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Planning", dependsOn: [], risk: "critical", scope: "broad", impact: "phase" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Implementation", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "moderate", impact: "component" },
|
|
{ id: "C", name: "Review", dependsOn: ["B"], risk: "low", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const dagResult = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "dag-propagate" });
|
|
const indepResult = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "independent" });
|
|
|
|
// In dag-propagate, every task that has parents should have pEffective < pIntrinsic
|
|
// (assuming qualityRetention < 1.0)
|
|
for (const task of dagResult.tasks) {
|
|
const indepTask = indepResult.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === task.taskId)!;
|
|
if (indepTask) {
|
|
// Root task has pEffective = pIntrinsic in both modes
|
|
if (task.taskId === "A") {
|
|
expect(task.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(task.pIntrinsic);
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Propagation should reduce pEffective below pIntrinsic
|
|
expect(task.pEffective).toBeLessThan(task.pIntrinsic);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Total EV may be the same with default config (C_fail = C_success),
|
|
// but pEffective values differ which is the key metric
|
|
// Verify that at least one task has different pEffective between modes
|
|
let anyDifferent = false;
|
|
for (const task of dagResult.tasks) {
|
|
const indepTask = indepResult.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === task.taskId)!;
|
|
if (Math.abs(task.pEffective - indepTask.pEffective) > 0.001) {
|
|
anyDifferent = true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
expect(anyDifferent).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("computes chain with compounding effect — each hop compounds quality loss", () => {
|
|
// A (critical, p=0.50) → B (medium, p=0.80) → C (medium, p=0.80)
|
|
// In dag-propagate: pEff degrades at each hop
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "critical", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "C", name: "Task C", dependsOn: ["B"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "dag-propagate" });
|
|
|
|
const taskA = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "A")!;
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
const taskC = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "C")!;
|
|
|
|
// A is root: pEffective = pIntrinsic = 0.50
|
|
expect(taskA.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.50);
|
|
expect(taskA.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.50);
|
|
|
|
// B has parent A (p=0.50):
|
|
// inheritedFromA = 0.50 + 0.50*0.9 = 0.95
|
|
// pEffective_B = 0.80 * 0.95 = 0.76
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * (0.50 + 0.50 * 0.9));
|
|
|
|
// C has parent B (p=0.76):
|
|
// inheritedFromB = 0.76 + 0.24*0.9 = 0.76 + 0.216 = 0.976
|
|
// pEffective_C = 0.80 * 0.976 = 0.7808
|
|
const pEff_B = 0.80 * (0.50 + 0.50 * 0.9);
|
|
const inheritedFromB = pEff_B + (1 - pEff_B) * 0.9;
|
|
expect(taskC.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromB);
|
|
|
|
// Verify compounding: C has more degradation than B
|
|
const degradation_B = taskB.pIntrinsic - taskB.pEffective;
|
|
const degradation_C = taskC.pIntrinsic - taskC.pEffective;
|
|
// Both are degraded, and the degradation accumulates
|
|
expect(degradation_B).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(degradation_C).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("diamond graph: convergence multiplies inherited quality factors", () => {
|
|
const graph = createDiamondGraph();
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph);
|
|
|
|
const taskA = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "A")!;
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
const taskC = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "C")!;
|
|
const taskD = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "D")!;
|
|
|
|
// All have medium risk (p=0.80)
|
|
expect(taskA.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
expect(taskB.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
expect(taskC.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
expect(taskD.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
|
|
// A is root, no degradation
|
|
expect(taskA.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
|
|
// B and C both depend on A — they get the same degradation
|
|
const inheritedFromA = 0.80 + 0.20 * 0.9; // = 0.98
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromA);
|
|
expect(taskC.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromA);
|
|
|
|
// D depends on both B and C — product of both inherited factors
|
|
const inheritedFromB = taskB.pEffective + (1 - taskB.pEffective) * 0.9;
|
|
const inheritedFromC = taskC.pEffective + (1 - taskC.pEffective) * 0.9;
|
|
expect(taskD.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * inheritedFromB * inheritedFromC);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("excludes completed tasks when includeCompleted=false but propagates with p=1.0", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "high", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated", status: "completed" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph, { includeCompleted: false });
|
|
|
|
// A should not appear in the task list
|
|
expect(result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "A")).toBeUndefined();
|
|
|
|
// B's propagation should use p=1.0 for A (completed)
|
|
// inheritedFromA = 1.0 + (1-1.0)*0.9 = 1.0
|
|
// pEffective_B = 0.80 * 1.0 = 0.80
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
expect(taskB).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80); // No degradation from completed parent
|
|
expect(taskB.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("excludes completed tasks by default (includeCompleted defaults to false)", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "high", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated", status: "completed" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph); // default includeCompleted=false
|
|
|
|
// A should NOT appear in the task list (default behavior)
|
|
expect(result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "A")).toBeUndefined();
|
|
|
|
// B's propagation uses p=1.0 for A (completed)
|
|
// inheritedFromA = 1.0 + (1-1.0)*0.9 = 1.0
|
|
// pEffective_B = 0.80 * 1.0 = 0.80
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("includes completed tasks when includeCompleted=true", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "high", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated", status: "completed" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph, { includeCompleted: true });
|
|
|
|
// A should appear in the task list when explicitly included
|
|
const taskA = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "A")!;
|
|
expect(taskA).toBeDefined();
|
|
|
|
// When includeCompleted=true, A propagates with its pEffective (not 1.0)
|
|
// A is a root with risk="high" → pIntrinsic = 0.65, pEffective = 0.65
|
|
expect(taskA.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.65);
|
|
expect(taskA.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.65);
|
|
|
|
// B's propagation uses A's pEffective = 0.65
|
|
// inheritedFromA = 0.65 + 0.35*0.9 = 0.965
|
|
// pEffective_B = 0.80 * 0.965 = 0.772
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * (0.65 + 0.35 * 0.9));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("completed task with includeCompleted=false still propagates correctly to downstream", () => {
|
|
// A (completed) → B → C
|
|
// A propagates p=1.0
|
|
// B should not be degraded by A's completion
|
|
// C should receive B's degraded probability (not A's)
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "critical", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated", status: "completed" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "high", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "C", name: "Task C", dependsOn: ["B"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph, { includeCompleted: false });
|
|
|
|
// A should not be in results
|
|
expect(result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "A")).toBeUndefined();
|
|
|
|
// B's parent A propagates with p=1.0 (completed)
|
|
// inheritedFromA = 1.0 + 0.0 * 0.9 = 1.0
|
|
// pEffective_B = 0.65 (high risk) * 1.0 = 0.65
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
expect(taskB.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.65); // high risk
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.65); // no degradation from completed parent
|
|
|
|
// C depends on B (p=0.65 propagated)
|
|
// inheritedFromB = 0.65 + 0.35*0.9 = 0.965
|
|
// pEffective_C = 0.80 * 0.965 = 0.772
|
|
const taskC = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "C")!;
|
|
expect(taskC.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * (0.65 + 0.35 * 0.9));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("failed and blocked tasks are always included regardless of includeCompleted", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated", status: "failed" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated", status: "blocked" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph, { includeCompleted: false });
|
|
|
|
// Both failed and blocked tasks should be included
|
|
expect(result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "A")).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")).toBeDefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("throws CircularDependencyError for cyclic graph", () => {
|
|
const graph = createCyclicGraph();
|
|
expect(() => workflowCost(graph)).toThrow(CircularDependencyError);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("handles empty graph", () => {
|
|
const graph = new TaskGraph();
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.tasks).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(result.totalEv).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.averageEv).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.propagationMode).toBe("dag-propagate");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("handles single node graph", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.tasks).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(result.tasks[0]!.taskId).toBe("A");
|
|
expect(result.tasks[0]!.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.80); // medium risk
|
|
expect(result.tasks[0]!.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80); // root, no parents
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("respects defaultQualityRetention option when per-edge attribute is absent", () => {
|
|
// Create a graph using raw graphology API so edges don't have qualityRetention
|
|
const tg = new TaskGraph();
|
|
tg.addTask("A", { name: "Task A", risk: "critical", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" });
|
|
tg.addTask("B", { name: "Task B", risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" });
|
|
// Add edge without qualityRetention attribute
|
|
tg.raw.addEdgeWithKey("A->B", "A", "B", {});
|
|
|
|
// With defaultQualityRetention = 1.0, should behave like independent model
|
|
const result = workflowCost(tg, { defaultQualityRetention: 1.0 });
|
|
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
// inheritedQuality = parentP + (1-parentP) * 1.0 = 1.0
|
|
// pEffective = pIntrinsic * 1.0 = pIntrinsic
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(taskB.pIntrinsic);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("per-edge qualityRetention overrides default", () => {
|
|
// Create graph with custom qualityRetention on the edge
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromRecords(
|
|
[
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "critical", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
],
|
|
[
|
|
{ from: "A", to: "B", qualityRetention: 0.5 },
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph); // default qualityRetention=0.9
|
|
const taskB = result.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "B")!;
|
|
|
|
// Per-edge qualityRetention = 0.5 overrides default 0.9
|
|
// inheritedFromA = 0.50 + 0.50*0.5 = 0.75
|
|
// pEffective_B = 0.80 * 0.75 = 0.60
|
|
expect(taskB.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * (0.50 + 0.50 * 0.5));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("applies limit to task entries", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "C", name: "Task C", dependsOn: ["B"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph, { limit: 2 });
|
|
|
|
expect(result.tasks).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
// limit only affects the result list, not propagation
|
|
expect(result.tasks[0]!.taskId).toBe("A");
|
|
expect(result.tasks[1]!.taskId).toBe("B");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("includes both pIntrinsic and pEffective in per-task entries", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "high", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph);
|
|
for (const task of result.tasks) {
|
|
expect(typeof task.pIntrinsic).toBe("number");
|
|
expect(typeof task.pEffective).toBe("number");
|
|
expect(typeof task.probability).toBe("number");
|
|
expect(task.probability).toBeCloseTo(task.pEffective);
|
|
expect(typeof task.scopeCost).toBe("number");
|
|
expect(typeof task.impactWeight).toBe("number");
|
|
expect(typeof task.taskId).toBe("string");
|
|
expect(typeof task.name).toBe("string");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("computes totalEv and averageEv correctly", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "independent" });
|
|
|
|
// Two independent tasks with medium risk, narrow scope, isolated impact
|
|
// p=0.80, scopeCost=2.0, impactWeight=1.0
|
|
// EV = 0.80 * 2.0 + 0.20 * 2.0 = 2.0 each
|
|
// totalEv = 4.0, averageEv = 2.0
|
|
expect(result.totalEv).toBeCloseTo(4.0);
|
|
expect(result.averageEv).toBeCloseTo(2.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses defaults for tasks with null categorical fields", () => {
|
|
// Task with no risk/scope/impact specified — should use defaults
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [] },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph);
|
|
|
|
const taskA = result.tasks[0]!;
|
|
// defaults: risk=medium (p=0.80), scope=narrow (costEstimate=2.0), impact=isolated (weight=1.0)
|
|
expect(taskA.pIntrinsic).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
expect(taskA.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
expect(taskA.scopeCost).toBeCloseTo(2.0);
|
|
expect(taskA.impactWeight).toBeCloseTo(1.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("independent mode produces same pIntrinsic and pEffective for all tasks", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "critical", scope: "broad", impact: "project" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: ["A"], risk: "high", scope: "moderate", impact: "component" },
|
|
{ id: "C", name: "Task C", dependsOn: ["B"], risk: "low", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const result = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "independent" });
|
|
|
|
for (const task of result.tasks) {
|
|
expect(task.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(task.pIntrinsic);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("dag-propagate with high risk parent shows significant degradation vs independent", () => {
|
|
// Planning task with critical risk (p=0.50) followed by implementation
|
|
// This matches the Python research model insight
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "planning", name: "Planning", dependsOn: [], risk: "critical", scope: "broad", impact: "phase" },
|
|
{ id: "implementation", name: "Implementation", dependsOn: ["planning"], risk: "medium", scope: "broad", impact: "component" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const dagResult = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "dag-propagate" });
|
|
const indepResult = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "independent" });
|
|
|
|
const dagImpl = dagResult.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "implementation")!;
|
|
const indepImpl = indepResult.tasks.find(t => t.taskId === "implementation")!;
|
|
|
|
// DAG-propagate should show lower pEffective for implementation
|
|
// because the critical-risk parent degrades quality
|
|
expect(dagImpl.pEffective).toBeLessThan(indepImpl.pEffective);
|
|
|
|
// The degradation should be significant due to critical risk (p=0.50)
|
|
// inheritedQuality = 0.50 + 0.50*0.9 = 0.95
|
|
// pEffective_dag = 0.80 * 0.95 = 0.76
|
|
expect(dagImpl.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80 * 0.95);
|
|
expect(dagImpl.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.76);
|
|
|
|
// Independent: pEffective = pIntrinsic = 0.80
|
|
expect(indepImpl.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(0.80);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("parallel tasks with no shared parent have same pEffective in both modes", () => {
|
|
const graph = TaskGraph.fromTasks([
|
|
{ id: "A", name: "Task A", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
{ id: "B", name: "Task B", dependsOn: [], risk: "medium", scope: "narrow", impact: "isolated" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const dagResult = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "dag-propagate" });
|
|
const indepResult = workflowCost(graph, { propagationMode: "independent" });
|
|
|
|
// No dependencies → no propagation → same result
|
|
expect(dagResult.tasks[0]!.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(indepResult.tasks[0]!.pEffective);
|
|
expect(dagResult.tasks[1]!.pEffective).toBeCloseTo(indepResult.tasks[1]!.pEffective);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// CircularDependencyError for cyclic graphs
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe("workflowCost cycle detection", () => {
|
|
it("throws CircularDependencyError when graph has cycles", () => {
|
|
const graph = createCyclicGraph();
|
|
expect(() => workflowCost(graph)).toThrow(CircularDependencyError);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("CircularDependencyError contains cycle information", () => {
|
|
const graph = createCyclicGraph();
|
|
try {
|
|
workflowCost(graph);
|
|
expect.fail("Should have thrown CircularDependencyError");
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
expect(error).toBeInstanceOf(CircularDependencyError);
|
|
const err = error as CircularDependencyError;
|
|
expect(err.cycles.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
// The cycle should include the nodes A → B → C
|
|
const cycleFlat = err.cycles.flat();
|
|
expect(cycleFlat).toContain("A");
|
|
expect(cycleFlat).toContain("B");
|
|
expect(cycleFlat).toContain("C");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
}); |