Files
alkblobs/tasks/store-fleet-put.md
T
glm-5.3-flash 009de420e1 docs(tasks): decompose wave 6 — the fleet GC mechanism, the architecture's most intricate state machine under concurrency
- store-fleet-construction: the fleet: true declaration slotting into
  the fleet-capable constructors (the recorded non-event), the
  composite fleet-validity predicate enforced at the constructor
  (kv=postgres AND pg-lo-same-instance OR local-on-declared-shared-
  media OR kv-only re-routing), the TTL/owner-id fleet state, the
  same-instance probe design point
- engine-pg-lo-joint: the pg-lo joint contribution — staged-put
  mechanics (512 KiB knee, CAS, transactional LO creation) into the
  store-held PgJointTx, the wave-5 deferred API-shape design point
- store-fleet-put: the joint entry+pin tx driver (amendment A1's
  drop discipline lands here — its recorded owner), the pin guard's
  TTL/3 renewal form, the dedup upsert-renewal, pin-first/
  publish-second for large=local, the consolidation one-tx put
- store-fleet-sweep: the SQL sweep lease (ADR-013 §2 semantics),
  SQL-level delete arbitration on the direct + window-execution
  paths, the expired-pin reaping clause (the seam as the named home
  for fleet-clause growth), the fleet liveness registration verb,
  the two-domain arbitration composition
- suite-column-fleet: the fleet column — two-instance factories over
  one schema, the exact-count fleet sweep rows (the wave's gate),
  lease contention, cross-instance arbitration, TTL/renewal rows,
  the fleet-validity predicate rows
- review-wave-6: the fleet gate per the plan, plus a standing
  code-smell/hygiene block — cargo doc --no-deps asserted clean
  (the twice-bitten PGLO-1 rustdoc private-link class), the
  allow(dead_code) scope notes audited against their remainder,
  stale wave-6 forward references, and task-Summary-vs-diff
  correctness

Harness server cited in every server-touching task: dockerized
pglo-poc (postgres:16-alpine) on :15432, db blobs, postgres/poc
(verified live 2026-10-12); env-driven ALKBLOBS_PG_* settings, clean
server-less skips, acceptance requires green against the server.

Dependency graph validated: two parallel roots (construction, pg-lo
joint), put merging them, sweep parallel to put, the fleet column
merging, the review gate last; no cycles.
2026-10-12 14:22:55 +00:00

171 lines
9.2 KiB
Markdown

---
id: store-fleet-put
name: the fleet put path — the joint entry+pin tx driver and the pin guard's fleet form
status: pending
depends_on: [store-fleet-construction, engine-pg-lo-joint]
scope: broad
risk: high
impact: phase
level: implementation
tags: [wave-6, store, gc, fleet, put]
---
## Description
Route the put paths through the **joint entry+pin transaction** under
`fleet: true` (ADR-008 §2; ADR-010 §2; ADR-012 §3/§4) — the store core
holds the tx from `begin_joint_tx` to `pin_commit`, engines contribute
mechanics, and publish + protection land in one step — plus the pin
guard's fleet form: the **TTL/3 renewal duty** on the guard. The
non-fleet put paths are byte-unchanged (the ADR-005 in-process
protocol verbatim; every wave-2/3/4/5 put test stays green).
- **The joint-tx driver** (the store core, `src/store.rs`): under
fleet mode, a put whose entry lands on the kv engine (postgres)
runs `begin_joint_tx` → `joint_put` (the engine's CAS row write
inside the held tx) → `pin_commit(tx, [PinRow { key, owner,
expiry }])` — the pin row carries the store-instance id
(`store-fleet-construction`'s owner id) and `expiry = now + TTL`
(the store resolves the expiry; ADR-012 §2's rename — the TTL lives
with the store's renewal schedule). The public `put` signature is
unchanged; the routing branches on the fleet flag, never on
re-deriving from the engine set.
- **Amendment A1 — the joint-tx drop discipline** (the wave-4 gate's
owner lands here): the driver owes tx termination on **every** path
from `begin_joint_tx` onward — the natural `?` propagation between
the driver's steps must never return a mid-flight `PgJointTx` to
the pool (deadpool's `Fast` recycle never resets transaction
state — PG-2's hazard). **Named design point — the termination
design**: catch-propagate-terminate (every error path between
begin and commit terminates the tx before propagating) per A1's
recorded options — an explicit abort verb would need a new ADR (the
seam shape is pinned; `pin_commit`'s terminal-consume reading
stays). Record the design; the zero-residue atomicity is already
the engine clause's contract (wave 4) — the driver's duty is never
abandoning the tx mid-flight.
- **The pin guard's fleet form** (ADR-008 §2: "the pin guard renews
its row every TTL/3"): the `Pin` guard returned by a fleet put
carries the **renewal duty** — while the guard lives, its pin row's
expiry moves forward every TTL/3 (via the engine's `pin_renew(key,
owner)` — the never-resurrect semantics: an expired row is never
revived; the guard's renewal failing after expiry is the
delete-then-recover backstop's territory, ADR-008's expiry
semantics verbatim). **Named design points — the renewal
lifecycle**: the duty's mechanism (a per-guard tokio task on a
TTL/3 interval vs a shared renewal sweep keyed off the guard
registry — decide, record), the abort-on-drop discipline (a
dropped/converted/batch-contributed guard stops its renewal — no
leaked tasks, no renewal past the guard's life), and the failure
posture (a failed renewal is logged-and-continued or silent — the
row's expiry is the protection, a missed renewal degrades to the
expiry semantics, never an error on the put path). The guard's
in-process refcount machinery continues to function (instance-local
bookkeeping — the batch's one-step release, the ordered-step
conversion); the row is the cross-instance protection. Batch puts
(`put_in_batch`): each member's joint tx commits its row; the
batch's one-step release ends the members' renewals (the rows
expire and the sweeper's maintenance step reaps them —
`store-fleet-sweep`).
- **The dedup re-put under fleet**: CAS dedup means no new entry —
the joint tx commits the pin row alone (an empty `joint_put`
contribution is the engine's recorded CAS form) and the row
upsert-renews `(key, owner)` (the wave-4 recorded shape). A
different instance's re-put is a different pin row — protection
composes by row (ADR-010 §2's refcount-in-rows reading).
- **`large = local` on declared shared media — pin-first,
publish-second** (ADR-012 §4): the joint tx is unachievable across
media, so the ordering is pinned: the pin row commits on the kv
engine (a joint tx carrying only the pin row — `begin_joint_tx` →
`pin_commit` without `joint_put`) **before** the stage file's
commit-rename publishes the entry. The invariant survives (an entry
becomes visible only after its pin row is durable — sweep
arbitration can never observe a visible-unpinned entry); the crash
window moves to the harmless side (an orphan pin row, reaped by the
expiry machinery — no new recovery mechanism). The reverse ordering
is rejected (ADR-012 §4) — do not implement it.
- **The pg-lo consolidation put** (kv = postgres + large = pg-lo,
same instance): the large entry's content reaches the store-held tx
through the pg-lo engine's joint contribution (`engine-pg-lo-joint`)
— LO writes + companion-row insert inside the tx, the pin-row
insert + commit via `pin_commit`. One tx over the shared instance;
the dispatch threshold routes to the joint form exactly as the
non-fleet path routes to the staged form.
- **Unit tests** (env-driven, skipping cleanly server-less; the
harness server `pglo-poc`, :15432, db `blobs`, `postgres`/`poc` —
verified live 2026-10-12): the kv joint put publishes entry + pin
row atomically (an independent connection sees both or neither);
the forced-failure zero-residue form (A1's discipline exercised —
a mid-driver failure leaves no dirty pooled session); the guard's
renewal moves the row's expiry (a short test TTL; the renewal
cadence observed); the never-resurrect form (an expired row is not
renewed back to life); the batch form (members' rows commit; batch
release ends renewals); the dedup re-put's upsert-renewal; the
local-shared-media pin-first ordering (the pin row is durable
before the committed file exists); the pg-lo consolidation
round-trip through the public `put` (both tiers, one tx — the
byte-exact large-entry form); the non-fleet paths unchanged (the
existing suites green).
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Under `fleet: true`, kv-tier puts route through the joint tx
(entry + pin row in one step; an independent connection never
observes one without the other); under `fleet: false` the put
paths are byte-unchanged (all existing suites green)
- [ ] Amendment A1 landed: the driver terminates the tx on every path
from `begin_joint_tx` onward (the termination design recorded;
a forced mid-driver failure leaves zero residue and returns no
dirty session to the pool)
- [ ] The pin guard's fleet form: renewal every TTL/3 while the guard
lives; drop/conversion/batch-contribution stops the renewal
with no leaked tasks; a failed renewal never resurrects an
expired row (the lifecycle design points decided and recorded)
- [ ] The dedup re-put commits the pin row alone (CAS; upsert-
renewal); a different instance's re-put composes protection by
row
- [ ] `large = local` fleet puts: pin-row-first, publish-second
(contract-tested — the pin row is durable before the committed
file exists; the orphan-pin crash window is the expiry
machinery's)
- [ ] The pg-lo consolidation put round-trips through the public
`put` (one tx over the shared instance; byte-exact large-entry
form)
- [ ] `cargo test` (default) green; `cargo test --features postgres`
and `--features "postgres,pg-lo"` green server-less (skipping)
and against the harness server at acceptance;
`cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings` and
`cargo fmt --check` green (default + the postgres/pg-lo
variants); `cargo doc --no-deps` clean
## References
- src/store.rs (the put seam's two internal paths; the fleet
declaration's flag from `store-fleet-construction`)
- src/gc.rs (`EngineFleetState` — the clauses the driver calls;
`PinRow`; the ownership rule)
- src/postgres.rs (`PgJointTx` — PG-2's hazard doc; the wave-4
joint-clause bodies)
- src/pg_lo.rs (the joint contribution from `engine-pg-lo-joint`)
- docs/architecture/decisions/008-trait-size-probe-fleet-gc-and-large-engines.md
§2 (pins are rows; the TTL/3 renewal; the expiry semantics)
- docs/architecture/decisions/010-backend-io-seams-and-fleet-state-home.md
§2 (the store holds the tx; the engine contributes mechanics), §4
(the guard-drops-at-response-time reading — the ops edition; the
public-API guard lives as long as the caller holds it)
- docs/architecture/decisions/012-pre-decomposition-consistency-rulings.md
§3 (activation), §4 (the host; pin-first/publish-second for
large=local; the one-tx consolidation)
- docs/architecture/decisions/013-family-composition-reactive-boundary-and-feature-graph.md
§1 (the renewal worker's cadence is embedder composition above the
facade — the guard's own TTL/3 duty is the in-crate half)
- tasks/review-wave-4.md (amendment A1 — this task is its owner)
- tasks/store-fleet-construction.md, tasks/engine-pg-lo-joint.md (the
declaration and the contribution this drives)
## Notes
> To be filled by implementation agent
## Summary
> To be filled on completion