Files
alkcall/docs/reviews/007-establishment-follow-ups-review.md
T
glm-5.3-flash d25deb5eaf docs(review 007): mark R-01/R-02/R-03 resolved; record the two sketch deviations
Status → Resolved with the three unit commits; both deviations from
the review's sketches (typed-opaque ChannelPlan over Option<Value>;
(u64, u64) over io::Result) recorded up top with their rationale, as
the ADRs carry them.
2026-09-07 08:48:06 +00:00

343 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Review 007 — Establishment Follow-Ups (from the alktunnels UDP POC)
## Status
Resolved — all three units landed in alkcall 0.6.0 (2026-09-07):
Unit 1 `dc4ad2b` (R-01 + R-02's doc notes), Unit 2 `8f122b0` (R-02's
telemetry), Unit 3 `9c6fec1` (R-03 + ADR-050). Two deviations from
the sketches below, both recorded in the ADRs: (1) R-01's plan is
**typed-opaque** (`ChannelPlan = Arc<dyn Any + Send + Sync>`), not
`Option<Value>` — the sketch could not satisfy this review's own
verification gate, because the payloads establishers hand off are
live handles (dialed sockets, TTY handles) with no JSON
representation; (2) R-03's helper returns `(u64, u64)`, not
`io::Result<(u64, u64)>` — both pumps swallow copy errors by the
ADR-078 contract (mid-stream error = abrupt close), so an `Err` state
would be dead code. Original findings below, retained as filed
(verified against tree `36e74cd`, 0.5.0).
Open — findings filed from the alktunnels UDP POC pass
(`alktunnels-udp-poc`, 2026-09-06; summary at
`/workspace/@alkdev/alktunnels/docs/research/poc-summary.md`). This
review exists to prevent a second fix→publish→update-dependents cycle:
every finding below is either (a) guaranteed to be needed by
alktunnels Phase 1 implementation, or (b) a documented contract gap
that will bite the next `OpenHandler` author the way it bit the POC.
Nothing here is speculative — each finding was reached by writing
working code against 0.5.0 and finding the shape insufficient.
Findings continue the review numbering with prefix `R` (001–006 used
P/C/R/A/B/C/D/F/G/E — each review numbers independently).
> **Post-remediation note (2026-09-07):** the "Open —" paragraph
> above is the original filing state, retained for the record. All
> units landed; see Status above and ADR-049 amendment 2 + ADR-050.
## Scope
The ADR-049 establishment surface (`OpenEstablisher`, `Establishment`,
`EstablishmentError`, `register_openable_with_establisher`) and the
`OpenHandler` contract, reviewed from the alktunnels UDP POC's
consumer/producer implementations. Everything verified against source
at tree `36e74cd` (0.5.0). Cross-references: alkcall review 006
(E-01..E-04), alkcall ADR-049, alktunnels `poc-summary.md`
(§Issues Surfaced), alktty's channels establisher
(`make_tty_establisher`).
```
Verified against: alkcall 36e74cd (0.5.0)
Reading list: src/channels/operations.rs (OpenEstablisher, Establishment,
run_open_wrapper, teardown_failed_channel), src/channels/client.rs
(ChannelOpenError::establishment_reason), src/channels/manager.rs
(teardown_channel, adopt_channel), docs/architecture/decisions/
047 + 049, and the consumers: alktty src/channels.rs (make_tty_
establisher / make_tty_open_handler), alkhttp src/websocket/
upgrade.rs (OpenableAlpn ferry), alktunnels-udp-poc src/producer.rs
```
## Severity legend
Same scale as reviews 004–006.
---
# Part A — The findings
## R-01 [major] — `Establishment` is payloadless, but the channel plan is exactly what establishers need to hand to the pump handler
**Verified:** YES — by building against the API. The ADR-049 §1 text
itself anticipates this: *"Reserved for a channel plan — today the
wrapper consults only success/failure, so `()` carries no data"*
(`src/channels/operations.rs:341-345`, the empty
`pub struct Establishment {}`).
### The mechanism
The establisher is pre-data-plane: it cannot see the channel's
yield-once `BiStream` (ADR-049 amendment), so anything it
establishes — a dialed socket, an allocated handle — must cross to
the pump handler through a side channel the ALPN crate invents. The
alktunnels POC's workaround is a resource-keyed
`Mutex<HashMap<String, SubstrateHandle>>` + a poll-loop `take`
(`producer.rs::HandleHandoff`) that works only because the wrapper
guarantees establisher-before-handler ordering. The costs:
1. **Concurrent same-resource opens race the slot.** Two opens of the
same resource: the second establisher's `deliver` overwrites the
first handler's not-yet-taken handle. The POC documents this as a
simplification; a real crate cannot.
2. **alktty hit the same wall and documented it as a limitation.**
`alktty/src/channels.rs:253-257`: the establisher cannot carry the
allocated `TtyHandle` across, so *backend allocation* stays
post-open in the pump handler (`allocate_failed` remains an
in-band negotiation error frame — ADR-010) — exactly the
phantom-channel-ish shape ADR-049 exists to eliminate, still
alive one layer down. TTY's establisher can only validate/lookup/
ownership-check; the one thing that can actually fail with a
runtime error (allocate) is unreachable from the typed error path.
3. **Every ALPN crate pays the side-channel tax again.** Handoffs,
slots, poll loops or oneshots — per crate, per resource key, all
with the same concurrency caveat.
### The ask
Give `Establishment` its payload — the channel plan ADR-047 §3
originally described ("return a 'channel plan'... the wrapper consults
its result"). Minimal shape:
```rust
pub struct Establishment {
/// ALPN-defined plan data — the dialed handle, an allocation
/// ticket, whatever the pump phase needs. Opaque to alkcall.
pub plan: Option<Value>,
}
```
or, keeping it typed at the boundary:
```rust
pub struct Establishment { pub plan: Option<Value> }
```
with the wrapper passing `establishment.plan` (or `Null`) to the
`OpenHandler`'s `input` — e.g. as a well-known key the pump handler
reads, or as a third callback parameter. The wire surface is
**unchanged** (the plan is process-local: establisher → wrapper →
handler in the same process on the producing side; nothing crosses
the transport that isn't already the open op's input). Consumers'
`Ok(Establishment {})` construction sites (alktty has two; alkhttp's
ferry has none) break mechanically at 0.6 — `Establishment::new(plan)`
/ `Establishment::default()` make the migration one-liners.
**The break is the point of doing this now:** 0.5.0 published
yesterday with `Establishment {}` documented as reserved. The next
consumer (alktunnels) needs the payload in Phase 1 — implementing
Phase 1 without it means shipping the POC's side-channel handoff into
the real crate, with its same-resource race, and then the payload
lands later anyway as *another* breaking release. Filling the
reserved field now is the cheap moment; the alternative is paying the
breaking change twice.
### Severity
[major] — the capability gap is structural for any establisher whose
backend produces a handle (tunnels: dial; TTY: allocate), not a
polish item. Not [critical] because workarounds exist (the POC proves
one), but every workaround carries the same-resource race or forces
failure classes back into per-crate in-band frames — the exact cost
ADR-049 was written to remove.
---
## R-02 [minor] — The `OpenHandler` `JoinHandle` lifetime contract is undocumented and load-bearing (found empirically by the POC)
The POC's first pump implementation returned a wrapper task that
spawned the pump as a nested fire-and-forget task. The result:
**every tunnel connected then instantly EOF'd with zero bytes** — the
wrapper awaited the (already-complete) handler task, tore the channel
down at birth, and both pumps saw immediate EOF. Everything upstream
(establisher, open reply, channel routing) looked healthy; the bug
was purely in the handler's return-value semantics.
The contract, as implemented: the wrapper awaits the returned
`JoinHandle` and *that completion is the teardown trigger*
(`run_open_wrapper`'s spawned task: `let _ = raw_task.await;`
→ `teardown_channel(id)` → drop the demux sender → EOF to the
handler's read half). Therefore:
- **The returned `JoinHandle` must track the data-plane lifetime.** A
handler that returns before its pumps finish tears the channel down
at birth. The pump must be awaited *inline* inside the handler task
(`let _ = pump_halves(...).await;`), not spawned-and-forgotten.
- Half-open semantics fall out of this correctly (one pump finishing
shuts down the opposite sink per ADR-078; the handler's task
completes when both pumps finish — which is when teardown *should*
happen). The contract is right; only its documentation is missing.
The current type docs (`operations.rs:325-339`) say the handle is
"recorded for teardown (abort on `channel/close` / connection drop)"
— abort semantics — but never say **early return = teardown-at-birth**.
alktty got this right by accident of shape (`drive_session_pre_negotiated`
awaited inline in its single spawned task — `channels.rs:355-395`);
the POC got it wrong the natural way. The next consumer will write
the wrong shape too, because the natural reading of "spawn your
protocol and return the `JoinHandle`" is a task-spawner, not a
lifecycle promise.
**The ask:** doc note on `OpenHandler` and
`ChannelCore::register_openable*` — "the returned `JoinHandle` must
track the data-plane lifetime: the wrapper awaits it and tears the
channel down on completion; return a task that runs the handler to
completion, never a spawner that exits early" — plus the ADR-049
amendment (§1 or §6) recording the semantics. Optional hardening (not
required): a `debug!` in `run_open_wrapper` when the awaited handler
exits without the channel's `BiStream` having been accepted (a
telemetry hint for the birth-teardown pattern; the accept is
observable in-process). Doc-only; no break.
---
## R-03 [minor, optional unit] — The two-pump helper's convergence test is satisfied; extracting it now removes the last reason for a later sweep
alknet ADR-078 deferred helper extraction until a second two-pump
consumer existed and the shapes converged. The POC supplies both
halves of that test:
- **Producer side:** the alktunnels POC's `pump_halves` — two
`tokio::io::copy` pumps over split channel-vs-substrate halves,
each pump shutting down the opposite sink on completion, joined.
- **Consumer side:** `TunnelSession::take_halves` + the assembly
layer's copy — the same shape modulo channel side.
The shapes converged. The helper (`pump_bidi` or similar) is a
candidate for **this same 0.6 sweep** — additive (a new pub fn in
`channels` or `core`), zero breaking change, and it pins the
ADR-078 contract in one place instead of three. The natural signature
follows the POC:
```rust
pub async fn pump_bidi<A, B>(a: A, b: B) -> io::Result<(u64, u64)>
where
A: AsyncRead + AsyncWriteExt + Send + Unpin,
B: AsyncRead + AsyncWriteExt + Send + Unpin,
```
(join'd two-pump with shutdown-on-completion; returns the copy
counts for observability). alktty's three-pump session does not fit
it (the exit future is a third signal) — that is fine; the helper
serves the two-pump shape, TTY stays as-is.
**The ask:** decide in this sweep — either extract in 0.6 (additive;
recommended, since alktunnels Phase 1 will implement the pattern
anyway and an upstream helper makes the third consumer free), or
record the explicit decision to keep it per-crate. Do not leave it
half-decided: an un-extracted helper is not itself a break, but
finding this out during Phase 1 would be the same
fix→publish→update treadmill for a purely additive change.
---
# Part B — Verified non-issues (bounded so the next review doesn't re-check)
- **The reverse-flow (`-R`) story needs no upstream change.** A hub
proxy opening a channel *toward* a worker is the worker serving its
own open op on the connect side — supported by
`ChannelClient::from_connection_with_serving` (ADR-022 §2 both-sides
semantics) + `ChannelOperations::register_on` on the serving
registry + the wrapper allocating on the serving side (ADR-047 §5
"the side that holds the `ChannelManager` allocates" — both sides
do, with odd/even split per ADR-047 §5). Verified by trace; no API
gap. alktunnels' reverse-flow POC (OQ-TN-10 #2) will exercise this
end-to-end, but no upstream mechanism is missing.
- **The establisher receives registry-validated input** —
`invoke_streaming`'s `input_schema` check runs before the wrapper
(`registration.rs:397`); the establisher's `input.clone()`
(`operations.rs:718`) is post-schema. Confirmed; no gap.
- **Typed establishment errors are complete on the wire** —
`establishment_error_to_call_error` carries both `reason` and
`message` in `details` (`operations.rs:646-653`); the client-side
`establishment_reason()` branches on it (`client.rs:75-83`); alktty's
open spec declares the matching `ErrorDefinition` (ADR-016). The
vocabulary needs no extension for tunnels (`dial_failed` /
`unknown_resource` / `resource_shortage` / `handler_error` /
`timeout` cover every tunnel establisher failure class — verified by
the POC's three typed-error tests).
- **The early-arrival park cap (64)** — reviewed in 006 E-04; the POC
treated it as a sizing constraint, not a defect. Unchanged.
- **`EstablishmentError`'s reason set is sufficient** — the POC's
establisher used three of four reasons; `handler_error` covers
params-parse failures (the TTY pattern). No new reason needed.
---
# Remediation plan
## Unit 1 — `Establishment` carries the channel plan (R-01)
1. ADR-049 amendment (or ADR-050-adjacent amendment): `Establishment`
gains `plan: Option<Value>` (ALPN-opaque); the wrapper threads
`plan` into the pump handler (third `OpenHandler` parameter, or
merged into `input` under a reserved key — decide in the ADR; the
separate-parameter shape avoids colliding with the input schema).
2. Bump to 0.6.0 (breaks `Ok(Establishment {})` construction sites —
alktty, two sites; mechanical `Establishment::default()` or
`Establishment { plan: None }`).
3. Migration: alktty can then move backend `allocate` into its
establisher (killing the in-band `allocate_failed` frame on the
channels path — ADR-010's reason for that frame disappears);
alktunnels Phase 1 uses `plan` for the dialed handle; alkhttp's
ferry passes `Option` through unchanged.
## Unit 2 — `OpenHandler` lifetime doc note (R-02)
Doc-only (type docs + ADR-049 amendment). Optional debug warning.
No break.
## Unit 3 (optional) — `pump_bidi` helper extraction (R-03)
Additive pub fn + tests. No break. Do it in the same 0.6 or record
the decision not to.
## What must NOT ride along
Nothing else. The remaining alktunnels Phase 1 needs (UDP codec ADR,
reverse-flow lifecycle, access-policy details) are alktunnels-local
spec work — the POC validated the mechanics and found no further
upstream gaps. The deliberate goal of this review: **0.6 is the last
breaking sweep forced by known work**; anything after it should be a
genuinely new discovery, not a known-dangling item.
## Verification gates
- Unit 1: end-to-end test — establisher dials, `plan` carries the
handle, pump handler receives it; concurrent same-resource opens
each get their own handle (the race the POC documented is
unreachable); alktty migration test (`allocate` in the establisher
→ `allocate_failed` is a call error, no in-band frame).
- Unit 2: doc gate only (`cargo doc` clean; the note present on both
the type and the registration entry points).
- Unit 3: helper test — the POC's two-pump semantics (EOF from one
direction completes the other; shutdown-on-completion) reproduced
through the helper.
## References
- alkcall review 006 (E-01 establishment gap; R-01 is the payload
half of E-01's own remediation — ADR-047 §3's "channel plan"
through the reserved `Establishment` field) and ADR-049 (the
establishment phase; §1's original sketch already described the
plan-carrying shape).
- alkcall ADR-047 §3 ("return a 'channel plan'" — the original shape
this review restores), ADR-022 §2 (both-sides serving — the
reverse-flow non-finding), ADR-047 §5 (odd/even allocation —
reverse-flow allocation on the serving side).
- alknet ADR-078 (the two-pump contract; R-03's helper pins it
upstream).
- alktunnels `docs/research/poc-summary.md` (§Issues Surfaced #1/#2 —
the empirical findings; §#4 — the convergence input for R-03) and
the POC crate (`/workspace/alktunnels-udp-poc`, 17 tests — the
empirical basis for every finding here).
- alktty `src/channels.rs:253-257` — the existing documentation of
the R-01 cost on the TTY side (`allocate` cannot cross; in-band
`allocate_failed` remains), the second consumer confirming the gap
is not tunnel-specific.