Files
alkcall/docs/architecture/decisions/030-peer-composite-env-peer-operations.md
glm-5.2 cc470a363a docs: port architecture specs + 45 ADRs from alknet, renumbered
Port the call + channels architecture documentation from the alknet
mono-repo into docs/architecture/, renumbered as alkcall ADR-001..045.

Renumbering map (alknet -> alkcall):
  Core:        001,002,004,006,007,011,065,070,092,014,050,091 -> 001-012
  Call:        005,064,012,023,015,022,024,016,049,017,028,029,030,032,066,069,067,068 -> 013-030
  Shared:      003,009,013 -> 031-033
  Channels:    071,093,072,073,074,075,076,094,079,080,081,089 -> 034-045

3 superseded/reversed ADRs kept for historical trail:
  - ADR-013 (irpc foundation, superseded by ADR-014)
  - ADR-023 (peer-scoped filtering, superseded by ADR-024)
  - ADR-077 (TTY inside channels, reversed by ADR-035 — not ported, TTY-only)

Ported docs (11 spec files + README + open-questions):
  - call-README.md, call-protocol.md, operation-registry.md, client-and-adapters.md
  - channels-README.md, channels-overview.md, channels-wire.md, channels-connection.md, channels-adapter.md, channel-operations.md, channel-client.md
  - README.md (index with doc table, ADR table grouped by category, key principles)
  - open-questions.md (lean — 30 OQs, renumbered OQ-01..030; includes new OQ-22 for the pub/sub gap)

Cross-reference rewriting:
  - All ADR-NNN references rewritten single-pass (no chaining bug)
  - Markdown link paths fixed
  - Title lines aligned with filenames
  - Non-ported ADR refs (052, 082, 086, etc.) left as-is with README note

The open-questions.md includes OQ-22 (new): the call protocol pub/sub
gap — subscribe exists but pub does not, needed for channels
channel/resources/subscribe fan-out. This is the next ADR to write
(alkcall ADR-046).
2026-08-12 07:06:57 +00:00

155 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown

# ADR-030: PeerCompositeEnv::peer_operations Override
## Status
Proposed
## Context
`OperationEnv::peer_operations` (defined in `registry/env.rs:63-65`) has a
default implementation returning `Vec::new()`. `PeerCompositeEnv` overrides
`invoke_with_policy`, `contains`, `invoke_peer`, `peer_contains`, and
`peer_ids` — but does **not** override `peer_operations`. This means
`peer_operations` on a `PeerCompositeEnv` always returns an empty `Vec`.
The `services/list-peers` handler (`registry/discovery.rs:245-296`) calls
`ctx.env.peer_operations(&peer_id)` to discover what operations each peer
serves. Since `PeerCompositeEnv` does not override this, non-local peers
always show empty operation lists in the `list-peers` response. The
`peer_ids()` method correctly returns the peer IDs, but the operations for
each peer are always empty.
This is a pure gap — the `services/list-peers` handler is specced to enumerate
each peer's operations (ADR-024 §6), and the `PeerCompositeEnv` type has all
the data needed to implement it (each peer's `OverlayOperationEnv` holds a
`HashMap<String, HandlerRegistration>`). The override is one method collecting
each peer overlay's registered op names.
The alkapi project identified this as gap G.6: a hub consumer calling
`services/list-peers` gets `peers: [{peer_id: "dev1", operations: []}]` until
this is fixed.
## Decision
`PeerCompositeEnv` overrides `peer_operations` to collect the operation names
from each peer's connection overlay:
```rust
fn peer_operations(&self, peer: &PeerId) -> Vec<String> {
match self.connections.get(peer) {
Some(overlay) => {
// The overlay is an OverlayOperationEnv wrapping a
// HashMap<String, HandlerRegistration>. We need the op names.
// Rather than adding a method to OperationEnv (which would
// require every impl to add it), we use the existing `contains`
// method — but that requires knowing the name to check.
//
// The correct approach: iterate the overlay's known names.
// OverlayOperationEnv already has the data (the HashMap keys).
// We add a `list_operation_names(&self) -> Vec<String>` method
// to OperationEnv with a default returning Vec::new(), and
// OverlayOperationEnv overrides it to return the keys.
overlay.list_operation_names()
}
None => Vec::new(),
}
}
```
### 1. `OperationEnv` gains `list_operation_names` with a default impl
```rust
fn list_operation_names(&self) -> Vec<String> {
Vec::new()
}
```
The default returns empty — existing impls (`LocalOperationEnv`, test-only
envs) don't need to change. Only `OverlayOperationEnv` overrides it.
### 2. `OverlayOperationEnv` overrides `list_operation_names`
```rust
impl OperationEnv for OverlayOperationEnv {
fn list_operation_names(&self) -> Vec<String> {
self.overlay.read().keys().cloned().collect()
}
// ... existing impl unchanged
}
```
### 3. `PeerCompositeEnv::peer_operations` uses `list_operation_names`
The override delegates to each peer's overlay:
```rust
fn peer_operations(&self, peer: &PeerId) -> Vec<String> {
self.connections
.get(peer)
.map(|overlay| overlay.list_operation_names())
.unwrap_or_default()
}
```
### Why a new trait method instead of a different approach
Alternatives considered:
- **Add `fn operations(&self) -> Vec<String>` to `OperationEnv`**: Same
concept, different name. `list_operation_names` is chosen to match the
existing `list_operations` naming on `OperationRegistry`.
- **Make `peer_operations` on `PeerCompositeEnv` reach into
`OverlayOperationEnv`'s internals**: Requires `OverlayOperationEnv` to
expose its `HashMap` or a method. The trait method is cleaner — it keeps
the abstraction boundary intact.
- **Have `services/list-peers` iterate `ctx.env.peer_ids()` and call
`contains` for every known op name**: Requires knowing all possible op
names (from the registry), which is a cross-layer coupling. The trait
method keeps the data where it lives.
The trait method is the smallest surface change: one new method with a
default impl, one override on `OverlayOperationEnv`, one override on
`PeerCompositeEnv`. No existing code changes.
## Consequences
**Positive:**
- `services/list-peers` returns actual operation lists for each peer. A hub
consumer calling `services/list-peers` gets `peers: [{peer_id: "dev1",
operations: [{name: "docker/container/exec", ...}, ...]}]` — the specced
behavior.
- The fix is small: one trait method, two overrides. No existing code paths
change.
- The `list_operation_names` method is generally useful — any future code
that needs to enumerate an env's operations can use it.
**Negative:**
- `OperationEnv` gains a method. The default impl preserves back-compat for
all existing implementors. Only `OverlayOperationEnv` and
`PeerCompositeEnv` override it.
- The `OverlayOperationEnv` override holds the `RwLock` read for the
duration of the `keys().cloned().collect()`. This is a `Vec<String>`
allocation — cheap for typical peer operation counts (tens, not thousands).
## Assumptions
1. **`OverlayOperationEnv`'s `RwLock<HashMap<String, HandlerRegistration>>`
read is cheap.** The lock is held only for the `keys()` iteration and
`collect()`. Typical peer operation counts are small (tens of ops).
2. **`list_operation_names` is the right name.** It matches the existing
`list_operations` naming on `OperationRegistry` and avoids confusion with
`peer_operations` (which takes a `PeerId` parameter).
## References
- ADR-024 §6: `services/list-peers` opt-in peer-attributed re-export listing
- ADR-029: Aggregated Peer-Environment Wiring (sibling hub-wiring decision)
- ADR-028: from_call Is a Manual Free Function (sibling hub-wiring decision)
- `crates/alknet-call/src/registry/env.rs:63-65` — default `peer_operations`
- `crates/alknet-call/src/registry/env.rs:155-301``PeerCompositeEnv`
- `crates/alknet-call/src/protocol/connection.rs:305-397`
`OverlayOperationEnv`
- `crates/alknet-call/src/registry/discovery.rs:245-296`
`services_list_peers_handler`
- alkapi gap G.6: `PeerCompositeEnv::peer_operations` unimplemented