Resolves review 001 finding A-1 (critical): ADR-012 §3's "scope
git:admin OR ownership" gate is not expressible in alkcall's
AccessControl (AND-composition). Resolution is the review's option (a)
shape with the OR-term generalized: the per-repo grant action set gains
manage, authorize(record, identity, read|write|manage) becomes the
single policy function for git access and repo administration, and the
delete/update/get gate is admin scope OR manage grant (handler-side,
generic FORBIDDEN, unknown-repo = unauthorized per ADR-008). Repo
create seeds the creator's {read, write, manage} grants —
administration is grantable, so collaborators/bots/app-compiled roles
work without global scopes. Ownership stays as alkcall spawn-tracking
(mint at create unchanged); "ownership never implies git access" is
superseded.
- ADR-015 (new): manage grant tier, op gate, flat-grants-as-replication-
substrate, opaque grant-key rule
- ADR-011: action set + policy domain amended, references updated
- ADR-012 §3: gate table replaced, two-tier paragraph superseded
- backend.md/doors.md/overview.md: gate + grant restatements, ADR tables
- OQ-16 (new, deferred(scope)): grant-key identity namespace —
globally-comparable ids for cross-assembly/replicator grant state;
tracker task tasks/architecture/oq-16-grant-identity-namespace.md
- review 001: A-1 marked resolved (ADR-015)
- vision.md: supersession notes (Internal-ops framing, v1 grant set)
Verification: cargo test, clippy -D warnings, fmt --check, doc --no-deps
all clean.
1.9 KiB
id, name, status, depends_on, scope, risk, impact, level, tags
| id | name | status | depends_on | scope | risk | impact | level | tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| architecture/oq-16-grant-identity-namespace | OQ-16 unblock — first cross-assembly record sharing | pending | narrow | trivial | component | research |
|
Description
Tracker for OQ-16 (deferred(scope)): the grant-key identity namespace.
Grants on RepoRecord key on opaque identity-id strings (ADR-011,
ADR-015 §7). Within one assembly those are alkcall's cluster-local
Identity.id — sufficient for v1. The question of a
globally-comparable id format (compound {namespace}/{id} shapes,
did-key/contract-derived identifiers, or (authority, local-id)
tuples) only becomes real when repo records are shared across
assemblies — the distributed-git/replicator phase, where a hub mirrors
grant state published by an external authority.
Constraints any resolution must satisfy are already recorded in the OQ entry (ADR-015 §7): grants stay flat sets keyed on opaque strings; alkgit never parses or interprets the id; collision-freedom is the identity-provider's guarantee.
Work
None while blocked. When the first cross-assembly record-sharing deployment is designed (the distributed-git phase, or a platform app that federates grant state), decide the id format: either a payload-level namespace convention (alkgit-side, opaque strings with a namespaced grammar) or a family-wide identity-id format (alkcall-level change). Record the resolution in an ADR; update the OQ entry.
Verification
- OQ-16 status matches
docs/architecture/open-questions.md. - If resolved: an ADR exists and the grant-schema freeze inventory (OQ-03) reflects the chosen id format.
Out of scope
- Building the distributed-git replication machinery (separate phase).
- Changing alkcall's
Identitymodel (only if the family-wide option is chosen, and as that crate's own decision).
Summary
Filled on completion.