Focused review of the OQ-05 deferral (review-001 WS-03): what is
missing to wire browser/native data channels over WS, the deferral
rationale check, and the design gaps found behind the 'nothing new
to design' assumption.
Findings (continuing review-002 numbering):
- WS-20..22 [major]: mechanical wiring gap — install_channel_zero
discards the ChannelManager, generic channel lifecycle ops never
registered, no openable-ALPN deployment surface
- WS-23 [minor]: no browser-opened-channel e2e test; OQ-05 reopen
trigger reframed (native WS consumers are not blocked on OQ-04)
- WS-24 [major, cross-crate]: top-level dispatch never consults the
connection overlay — the ADR-047 §4 amendment mechanism cannot
resolve open ops on the wire (needs an alkcall decision)
- WS-25 [major]: no wire mechanism for client-side op registration —
ADR-048 browser-side bidirectionality is undesignable as specified
- WS-26 [major]: no retained live connection handle; hub cannot
reach a session's overlay or push toward it
- WS-27 [minor]: dead-code-gated test hook cleanup
Includes a non-findings section (channel-id split, demux hardening,
open-op wrapper completeness, idle-knob posture) and a 4-unit
remediation plan sequenced so the alkcall decision task (Unit 1)
gates the alkhttp wiring shape (Unit 2).
Verification: cargo test (453) / --all-features (575), clippy
(all-targets, both feature sets), fmt — all clean at 58665f2.
