Files
alkhttp/docs/architecture/open-questions.md
T
glm-5.3-flash a5b294e965 docs(adrs): reconcile WS-03 browser data-channel promise (ADR-067/048)
Record the v1 cut for browser-opened data channels over WS (review-001
WS-03): the design (ADR-067) stands; only the wiring is deferred.

- open-questions.md: add OQ-05 (deferred(scope: v1 cut)) with gap
  detail and deferred scope
- ADR-067: dated status amendment + v1-cut note at the data-channel
  step; References point to OQ-05
- ADR-048: dated reconciliation note — overlay bidirectionality is
  decided design, not a v1 implementation commitment
- websocket.md: status notes on §"Data channels for browsers" and
  upgrade step 7
- task review-001-ws-data-channel-decision: completed, Summary filled

Verification: taskgraph validate (38 tasks OK); cargo doc --no-deps
(pre-existing warnings only).
2026-08-29 13:57:24 +00:00

125 lines
7.3 KiB
Markdown

# Open Questions
Centralized tracker. Format follows the SDD process
(`docs/sdd_process.md` §Open Questions Format). Ported alknet OQs that
resolved before the extraction are recorded in the resolved section
with their resolutions; new alkhttp OQs start at OQ-01.
## Status legend
`open` | `resolved` | `deferred(scope)` | `partially resolved`
## Open
### OQ-01: WS ↔ byte-stream adaptation semantics
- **Origin**: [websocket.md](websocket.md), [ADR-067](decisions/067-websocket-carries-channels.md)
- **Status**: resolved (POC `ws-byte-adapter`; validated end-to-end — see
the task's Summary in `tasks/websocket/byte-adapter.md`)
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: The adapter treats the WS message stream as a byte
stream in both directions; the 8-byte chunk header is the only
framing. Inbound: WS read task → bounded mpsc (64 slots; backpressure
= send awaiting capacity, applying TCP-level backpressure to the
socket) → `AsyncRead` drains; channel close = EOF. Outbound: a writer
task parses 8-byte chunk headers out of the pending byte buffer (live-
confirmed: a single response frame arrives as TWO chunks —
`write_frame`'s prefix and body surface as separate mux payloads) and
emits one WS message per chunk, splitting at a 1 MiB
`WS_MESSAGE_CAP` (receiver's boundary is the chunk header, not the
message). Flush is a no-op (writes queue; the writer task emits
independently). Close: WS close → read EOF → REQ-CH-02 teardown;
`shutdown` closes the write channel (mux pumps emit zero-length
sentinels on sender drop). Client-side consequence: chunk ≠ frame —
channel-0 consumers reassemble length-prefixed frames from the byte
stream; and the dispatcher reads `operationId` from the request
payload.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-067, [websocket.md](websocket.md),
tasks/websocket/byte-adapter.md
### OQ-02: `/publish` body framing details
- **Origin**: [ADR-068](decisions/068-gateway-publish-endpoint.md)
- **Status**: resolved (implementation: gateway-publish task, 2026-08-28)
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: First line of the NDJSON body carries
`{ "operation": "/{service}/{op}", "chunk": {...} }`; subsequent
lines are chunk values only. Terminal errors are plain HTTP status +
JSON body (NOT an NDJSON line) — consistent with every other gateway
endpoint's error surface. A `?operation=` query parameter was
considered and rejected: it duplicates the first-line field and adds
a second way to name the op (two sources of truth) for no curl-ability
gain. The first-line convention is the single naming point.
Implemented in `src/gateway/routes.rs::publish_handler`.
### OQ-03: `from_wss` reconnection semantics
- **Origin**: [ADR-070](decisions/070-from-wss-consumer-adapter.md)
- **Status**: open
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: (pending)
- **Question**: On a dropped WSS connection, does `from_wss`
auto-reconnect + re-discover (`services/list`) + reconcile imported
registrations, or does v1 surface call failures (`INTERNAL`,
retryable) and leave the policy to the assembly layer? The v1
default (fail with retryable errors) is documented in ADR-070; the
question is whether a built-in policy is ever warranted.
### OQ-04: Browser client library ownership
- **Origin**: [websocket.md](websocket.md)
- **Status**: open
- **Priority**: low
- **Blocked on**: a concrete browser consumer (the alk UI) needing the
JS/TS client for channels-over-WS. The framing contract is the
alkcall BAST document (`chunk-header.bast.json`); the client library
lives outside this crate. Deferred(scope: browser UI work).
### OQ-05: Browser-opened data channels over WS — v1 cut
- **Origin**: review-001 finding WS-03 (`docs/reviews/001-initial-implementation-review.md`),
[ADR-067](decisions/067-websocket-carries-channels.md),
[ADR-048](decisions/048-websocket-native-session-not-gateway.md)
- **Status**: deferred(scope: v1 cut — no browser consumer yet; reopened
when one lands)
- **Priority**: medium
- **Question**: ADR-067 §"Data channels for browsers" promises
browser-opened data channels (open ops on channel 0 → chunk
demultiplexing of channels 1..N), and ADR-048's bidirectionality
promise leans on the same connection-local machinery. The v1
implementation wires channel 0 only (`install_channel_zero` +
`Dispatcher::run_loop_single_stream`, `src/websocket/upgrade.rs`);
no `ChannelCore`/`register_openable`/`ChannelOperations` path exists
for a browser to open a data channel (grep-verified, review-001).
The design is decided (ADR-067: the browser opens data channels
exactly as any channels consumer — nothing new to design); what is
deferred is the *wiring*: passing the deployment's openable-ALPN
registrations and `ChannelLifecyclePolicy` through the WS upgrade
path, plus a browser-opened-channel end-to-end test.
- **Resolution**: (pending — v1 cut recorded 2026-08-29 in ADR-067 and
ADR-048; the recently landed WS robustness work — idle-read timeout,
session caps/eviction, pump consolidation — is the foundation the
deferred work builds on)
- **Cross-references**: [ADR-067](decisions/067-websocket-carries-channels.md),
[ADR-048](decisions/048-websocket-native-session-not-gateway.md),
[websocket.md](websocket.md), tasks/websocket/review-001-ws-data-channel-decision.md
## Resolved (ported)
Resolutions inherited from the alknet architecture; recorded here for
reference. Full rationale in the alknet mono-repo's open-questions.md
and the cited ADRs.
| OQ (alknet) | Title | Resolution | Where it lives now |
|-------------|-------|------------|--------------------|
| OQ-11 | Handler-level auth resolution observability | Resolved: resolved identity stored on `Connection` via `set_identity` | alkcall core; [http-server.md](http-server.md) §Auth |
| OQ-13 | Operation path format | Resolved: `/{service}/{op}` is the operation path format (gateway bodies carry it; no direct-call surface) | [ADR-036](decisions/036-http-to-call-operation-mapping.md), [ADR-047](decisions/047-remove-direct-call-http-surface.md) |
| OQ-17 | Call protocol client and adapter contract | Resolved: `OperationAdapter` async trait; `to_*` projections | alkcall ADR-022; [ADR-017](decisions/017-call-protocol-client-and-adapter-contract.md) |
| OQ-24 / OQ-26 | Operation error schemas / `AdapterError` variants | Resolved: protocol/operation codes distinct; `HTTP_<status>` prefix; `AdapterError` `#[non_exhaustive]` | alkcall ADR-016; [ADR-023](decisions/023-operation-error-schemas.md) |
| OQ-37 | X.509 outgoing-only / three peer roles | Resolved: browsers are not peers | [ADR-034](decisions/034-outgoing-only-x509-and-three-peer-roles.md) |
| OQ-39 | `to_openapi` published-spec versioning | Resolved: `info.version` semver tracks the gateway endpoint contract | [ADR-045](decisions/045-to-openapi-gateway-spec-versioning.md) |
| OQ-40 | reqwest client config and connection pooling | Resolved: `ClientWithMiddleware` + retry + Retry-After middleware; rebuild-and-swap | [http-adapters.md](http-adapters.md) §HTTP client |
| OQ-12 | TLS identity provisioning | Resolved (alknet): browsers require X.509; provisioning itself is an alknet concern | [ADR-027](decisions/027-tls-identity-redesign-acme-rawkey-decoupling.md); [ADR-069](decisions/069-webtransport-out-of-scope.md) |
Not carried: OQ-38 (WebTransport standalone relay scope) — moot here;
the relay is an alknet concern ([ADR-069](decisions/069-webtransport-out-of-scope.md)).