Decomposition of docs/reviews/002-post-remediation-review.md per its 5-unit remediation plan: - Unit 1 (security-critical): gw15-publish-body-cap, prj16-schema-via-call (CF-004 filed alkcall-side), fwd13-dot-segments, fwd16-missing-capability, oai11-ref-memoization - Unit 2 (timeout/terminality): ws13-idle-progress, fwd15-stream-timeout, cli01-retry-after-budget, con17-mcp-pagination, con18-wss-sweep-exit - Unit 3 (projection/docs): projection-truthfulness, mcp-batch-cap, gw16-status-drift - Unit 4 (spec-import): yaml-normalization, oai13-path-item-wildcards, import-loudness-cluster, js01-placeholder-check, fwd17-19-contract-decisions - Unit 5 (WS polish + tests): con18b-ws-polish, client-policy-wire-tests, cov-deployment-knobs, cov13-dead-code, srv11-srv12-router-ordering - review-002-bracketed-followup: tentatively planned post-bulk pass (stale-check, OQA-18 enforcement decision, CON-08/09 close() lever, cross-crate re-checks) — deliberately not serialized against the bulk Also: review-002 numbering repair (CON-14 was double-booked; MCP pagination now CON-14, from_wss monitor renumbered CON-18, missing CON-14 section added). taskgraph: 66 valid, no cycles; 24 pending (all review-002); gen-1/gen-2 parallel waves identified; workflow-cost hotspots are prj16 (12.8) and ws13 (11.1), both carrying the reviewed slicing guidance in their Notes.
4.1 KiB
id, name, status, depends_on, scope, risk, impact, level, tags
| id | name | status | depends_on | scope | risk | impact | level | tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| review-002-client-policy-wire-tests | Wire tests — redirect policy, retry gate/budget, streaming terminal arms, TLS error arms (CLI-02/03, COV-10/11) | pending |
|
moderate | low | component | implementation |
|
Description
The crate's highest-value coverage gap: the outbound client's policy
stack — the code that protects credentials — has never run against a
redirect or a retry on the wire, and forward_stream's terminal arms
are dark end-to-end (review 002 COV-11: same_host_redirect_policy
100% dark; COV-10: SSE terminal arms dark). Concretely:
- CLI-02 (redirect): no test in the crate sends any 3xx. Add:
(a) same-host 302 → followed, credential headers forwarded;
(b) cross-host 302 → response surfaced (HTTP_302-family), the second
endpoint receives zero requests (count at the attacker server) —
the FWD-03 property, pinned. Hop-cap (>10) → loud error, third test.
The
spawn_responderseam at forward.rs:1415-1477 already speaks raw HTTP and can emitlocation:. - CLI-03 (retry): counting-responder tests: POST + 500 ⇒ exactly
1 upstream hit (method gate, :362-366); GET + 500×2 ⇒ 3 hits then
success; budget exhaustion (
max_total_retry_durationsmall) stops retries even under a generous attempt cap (:381); PEM parse-failure arms (:487-507) via garbage-PEM files assertingCaBundleParse/ClientCertParse+ path (never key material). - COV-10 (streaming/forward terminal arms): (a) upstream SSE line
1 MiB without newline through the real
forward_stream→ single INTERNAL terminal envelope, stream ends; (b) responder sendsdata: a\n\nthen aborts the socket → terminal error envelope; (c) responder ends without trailing blank line → pending event dispatched at EOF; (d) dead-port transport failure through bothforward(:719-722) andforward_stream(:851-853) → INTERNAL envelope; (e) binaryapplication/octet-stream200 → byte-array envelope (:638-643); (f)application/json200 with malformed body → INTERNAL decode envelope (:656-658). - Plus the small dark arms from COV-12 that live in this seam:
ApiKey/Basic malformed-credential loud arms (extend the FWD-08 test
family), declared-header-param invalid name/value rejections, and
SharedHttpClient::config()reflecting a reloaded config (FWD-12's atomicity assertion).
Acceptance Criteria
- Redirect: 3 tests (same-host follow, cross-host refuse + zero-contact assert, hop-cap error) passing
- Retry: 3 tests (POST single-hit, GET retry-to-success with counted hits, budget-bounded) passing
- TLS: 2 parse-failure tests (CaBundleParse, ClientCertParse) + config()-after-reload assertion
- Streaming: 6 terminal-arm tests (oversized line, socket abort, EOF-flush, dead-port×2, binary decode, malformed-JSON decode) passing
- Credential arms: ApiKey/Basic malformed-value tests land
cargo test --all-features,cargo clippy --all-features --all-targets -- -D warnings,cargo fmt --checkpass
References
- docs/reviews/002-post-remediation-review.md (Part D', CLI-02/03; Part G', COV-09/10/11/12)
- src/client/http_client.rs:300-316 (redirect policy), :354-395 (retry gate/budget), :487-507 (PEM arms)
- src/adapters/forward.rs:1415-1477 (spawn_responder seam), :887-925 (stream terminal arms)
- tests/client_tls.rs (the TLS harness pattern)
- tasks/client/review-002-fwd15-stream-timeout.md and review-002-cli01-retry-after-budget.md (land first — these tests pin their new behavior too)
Notes
Pure test-addition task (plus any test-seam helpers). Land after the
two client behavior tasks so the tests assert final semantics, not
interim ones. Slice: (1) redirect tests, (2) retry tests, (3)
streaming terminal arms, (4) TLS + config arms — independent commits.
If spawn_responder needs a "count requests per host" surface, build
it once and reuse — the cross-host zero-contact assertion is the
load-bearing one.