Files
alknet/tasks/core/endpoint-request-client-cert.md
glm-5.2 00edfc0889 feat(core): ADR-027 — RawKey decoupling, client cert request, ACME integration
Three tasks implementing ADR-027:

1. core/rawkey-decouple-from-iroh: TlsIdentity::RawKey now uses
   Ed25519SecretKey (alknet-core-owned wrapper over ed25519_dalek)
   instead of iroh::SecretKey. RawKeyCertResolver and Ed25519SigningKey
   un-gated from #[cfg(all(quinn, iroh))] to #[cfg(quinn)] only.
   Quinn-only builds (default) now support RFC 7250 raw-key identity.
   iroh transport converts via iroh::SecretKey::from_bytes.

2. core/endpoint-request-client-cert: replaced with_no_client_auth()
   with AcceptAnyCertVerifier — a custom ClientCertVerifier that
   requests client certs but doesn't require them or verify against
   a CA. alknet's identity model is fingerprint-based (the
   authorized_fingerprints set is the trust anchor), not PKI-based.
   Peer certs are extracted at the TLS layer for fingerprinting;
   peers without certs connect normally.

3. core/acme-integration: TlsIdentity::Acme variant (domains,
   cache_dir, directory, contact) + AcmeDirectory enum. TlsSetup
   two-phase construction: synchronous for X509/RawKey/SelfSigned,
   async for Acme (spawns AcmeState event loop, builds ServerConfig
   with ResolvesServerCertAcme). acme-tls/1 ALPN added when ACME is
   active; dispatch_quinn guard closes challenge connections
   gracefully (challenge is TLS-layer-handled). acme feature gate
   keeps rustls-acme out of non-ACME builds.

Workspace: build/test/clippy green across all 3 feature configs
(quinn-only, quinn+iroh, quinn+acme, all-features). 331 tests, 0
failures, 0 warnings.
2026-06-24 20:29:43 +00:00

90 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown

---
id: core/endpoint-request-client-cert
name: Switch rustls ServerConfig from with_no_client_auth to request-but-don't-require client certs
status: completed
depends_on: [core/endpoint-client-fingerprint]
scope: narrow
risk: medium
impact: component
level: implementation
---
## Description
`core/endpoint-client-fingerprint` landed the extraction logic: when a
client certificate *is* presented, `dispatch_quinn` / `dispatch_iroh`
extract the fingerprint and populate `AuthContext`. However, the server
still builds `rustls::ServerConfig` with `with_no_client_auth()` in all
three `TlsIdentity` branches (`endpoint.rs:477`, `490`, `501`), so the
server never *requests* a client cert. Extraction is a safe no-op until
this task changes the server-side TLS config.
This follow-up switches from `with_no_client_auth()` to a
request-but-don't-require mode so that peers presenting a client cert
(X.509 or RFC 7250 raw Ed25519 key) flow through the extraction path
landed in the predecessor task, while peers without a cert still connect
without regression.
### Design decision: how to request-but-not-require
rustls does not have a direct `with_optional_client_auth()` builder.
The standard approach is:
1. Build the config with `.with_client_auth(verifier)` where `verifier`
is a custom `ServerCertVerifier` that accepts any presentation (returns
`Ok(Certified::yes())` when a cert is presented, `Ok(Certified::no())`
when none is presented — rustls 0.23's `WebPkiServerVerifier` cannot
be used directly for optional auth).
2. Alternatively, use `rustls::server::WebPkiServerVerifier` with a
`NoClientAuth` fallback — check the exact rustls API available in the
pinned version before implementing.
Read the rustls API docs for the pinned version
(`rustls::server::ServerConfig::builder_with_provider`) and confirm the
correct verifier construction. The key property: a peer *may* present a
cert, and if it does, `peer_identity()` returns it; if it doesn't, the
connection still succeeds.
### iroh path
iroh's `Endpoint` builder uses its own TLS session internally. For the
raw-key path (`TlsIdentity::RawKey`), iroh already advertises
`only_raw_public_keys()` via `RawKeyCertResolver` — the server-side half
of RFC 7250. The client-side presentation is set by the client's
`rustls::ClientConfig`, not the server. So the iroh path may already
receive peer identities when the client is an iroh node (the `NodeId` is
always in the TLS cert). Verify: does `Connection::remote_node_id()`
already work for iroh connections today, or does it require the server to
request client certs? If iroh always presents a cert (raw-key mode), no
server-side change is needed for the iroh path — only quinn/X.509 needs
this task. Confirm before implementing.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] `build_rustls_server_config` uses request-but-don't-require client auth (not `with_no_client_auth()`) for at least the X.509 path
- [ ] Peer presenting a client cert: `peer_identity()` returns the cert chain → fingerprint extraction works end-to-end
- [ ] Peer without a client cert: connection still succeeds, `tls_client_fingerprint` is `None` (no regression)
- [ ] iroh path: confirm whether a server-side change is needed; if yes, apply it; if no, document why
- [ ] Integration test: quinn endpoint with a client that presents a cert → `AuthContext.tls_client_fingerprint` is `Some(SHA256:...)`
- [ ] Integration test: quinn endpoint with a client that presents no cert → `AuthContext.tls_client_fingerprint` is `None` and connection succeeds
- [ ] `cargo test -p alknet-core --all-features` succeeds
- [ ] `cargo clippy -p alknet-core --all-features --all-targets` succeeds with no warnings
- [ ] `auth.md` updated: server-config decision documented (request-but-don't-require, not no-client-auth)
## References
- tasks/core/endpoint-client-fingerprint.md — predecessor task (landed extraction, deferred this config change)
- crates/alknet-core/src/endpoint.rs:477, 490, 501 — the three `with_no_client_auth()` sites
- crates/alknet-core/src/endpoint.rs — `extract_quinn_client_fingerprint` / `extract_iroh_client_fingerprint` (already landed, waiting for certs to flow)
- docs/architecture/crates/core/auth.md — fingerprint format table and endpoint-level resolution flow
- docs/architecture/decisions/004-auth-as-shared-core.md — ADR-004 (hybrid resolution)
- docs/architecture/open-questions.md — OQ-12 (TLS identity provisioning)
## Notes
> Split from `core/endpoint-client-fingerprint` per the task's own
> suggestion: extraction is correct either way (returns `None` when no
> cert), so landing it first is a safe no-op. This task is the
> behavioral change that makes fingerprints actually flow. The risk is
> medium because it alters the TLS handshake for every connection —
> ensure the no-cert-peer case has explicit test coverage.