glm-5.2
df5d04af1d
Establishes the tasks/architecture/ blocker-task half of the Safe Exit protocol. Each deferred OQ now has an external-trigger tracker task representing its unblocking condition, and the OQ's Blocked on field names the tracker task ID — closing the gap where the deferral field existed but the task-graph half was unenforced. Changes: - Add 6 external-trigger tracker tasks for the deferred OQs (OQ-09, 10, 32, 41, 44, 46) under tasks/architecture/, tagged [external-trigger, deferred-oq] - Add structured Blocked on field to OQ-09 and OQ-10 (previously used legacy 'deferred' status with the reason in the Resolution prose); index now surfaces all 6 deferred OQs with concrete conditions, no placeholders - Document the architecture-task level mapping (level: implementation for ADRs/specs, decomposition for spec-to-ADR breakdown, planning for backlog seeding, research/review direct fits) and the deferred-OQ blocker-task pattern in docs/sdd_process.md - Mark architecture/safe-exit-blocker-task-mechanism and architecture/oq-09-10-blocking-conditions completed (implemented by this pass) - Fix 4 pre-existing ADR-050 implementation tasks: status: done → completed (taskgraph enum is 'completed', not 'done') — taskgraph validate now passes for all 100 tasks
10 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
10 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# OQ-09: WASM Target Boundaries
|
|
|
|
- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
|
|
- **Status**: deferred
|
|
- **Door type**: One-way (when applicable)
|
|
- **Priority**: low
|
|
- **Blocked on**: A concrete server-side WASM use case, or a deliberate confirmation that WASM stays a client-side design constraint. Tracked as `architecture/oq-09-wasm-server-use-case` in `tasks/architecture/`.
|
|
- **Resolution**: Not an active question — WASM compatibility is a design constraint (see ADR-009, overview.md design principles), not a deliverable. Specific WASM targeting decisions will be made when individual crates are implemented. **BiStream being a trait preserves the *client-side* stream door** — a browser can implement BiStream over WebTransport streams. **The *server-side* dispatch door is NOT preserved by ADR-007 and is a known, accepted closure**: `Connection` is a concrete quinn-bound struct (not a trait), the accept loop uses `tokio::spawn` (tokio does not run on WASM), and the call-protocol dispatch internals (`PendingRequestMap`, `CallAdapter`) use tokio `oneshot`/`mpsc` channels. A WASM server-side peer would require a `Connection` trait and a runtime-abstracted accept loop — not planned. The browser path is client-side via a JS SDK, not server-side Rust-to-WASM. This is an explicit one-way door, not an oversight.
|
|
- **Cross-references**: ADR-007, ADR-009
|