Working through the WebTransport implementation path surfaced a scope question distinct from the hedging-as-deferral anti-pattern ADR-038 was written to correct. Three findings drove the re-evaluation: 1. The browser bidirectional call-protocol path doesn't require WebTransport — WebSocket is full-duplex, EventEnvelope fits a WS binary message boundary cleanly, and the Dispatcher is stream- agnostic (ADR-012). What WebTransport gives over WebSocket (native multi-stream multiplexing, the ALPN-as-stream substrate) benefits the proxy use case, not the call protocol. 2. WebTransport is a draft standard (-07, not RFC) on an experimental Rust dependency stack (wtransport/h3 both self-describe as not production-ready). Either choice puts a draft protocol on the security surface of the first release. 3. The ALPN-stream-proxy (ADR-040) is speculative — its WASM parser consumers (browser SSH/SFTP/git clients) don't exist yet, and the downstream crates WebTransport deferral blocks (SSH, git, SFTP) expose their ALPNs natively over QUIC regardless. This is a scope decision (per ADR-009: a decision that 'genuinely doesn't need to be made yet because the use case isn't concrete'), not hedging. The reversal trigger is concrete: a real deployment needing the ALPN-stream-proxy. ADR-038 is superseded (its anti-pattern correction stands; its specific 'h3 in scope now' decision is reversed). ADR-040 and ADR-043 are parked, not superseded — their designs revive unchanged when WebTransport revives, with §2 (bidirectionality) and §3 (no-PeerId overlay) of ADR-043 transferring to WebSocket for v1. ADR-044 §5 also states the 'browser is not a peer' rationale that ADR-034 §4 closed without arguing: peer = addressable node in the call-protocol peer graph (stable PeerId, PeerRef::Specific-reachable, identity stable across reconnects), not 'any endpoint that exchanges calls during a live session.' A browser is the second but not the first (no stable crypto identity of its own, ephemeral, not addressable from other nodes). ADR-034 §4 and Assumption 2 are amended by reference. The wtransport-vs-hyperium dependency question is recorded (not resolved — WebTransport is deferred) in ADR-044 §'Research note' and webtransport.md so the revival doesn't re-derive it: wtransport probably isn't the right choice (axum-bridge friction — it owns its own HTTP serving path); the hyperium stack (h3 + h3-quinn + h3-webtransport) fits the axum integration better but its server-side WebTransport API needs verification before commitment. Reviewed by architecture-review subagent; all critical cross-reference issues (ADR-034 §5 stale 'in scope' assertion, ADR-036 Context listing h3 as implemented, webtransport.md Design Decisions table) resolved.
13 KiB
ADR-042: OpenAPI Gateway Pattern for to_openapi
Status
Proposed
Context
The current to_openapi spec (crates/http/http-adapters.md) describes
to_openapi as generating a traditional OpenAPI document with one path
entry per alknet External operation — POST /fs/readFile,
POST /agent/chat, etc., each with parameters, request body, and
responses built from the operation's input_schema/output_schema/
error_schemas. This is the "inverse of from_openapi" framing: since
from_openapi merges OpenAPI path params / query params / request body
into a single flat JSON input schema, to_openapi should split them
back out.
The flat→structured problem
The inverse is genuinely messy. The call protocol's input is a flat JSON
object (e.g., { path, content, encoding } for fs/writeFile). To
generate a traditional OpenAPI path entry (POST /fs/{path} with path
param path, body content), to_openapi would need to know which
fields are path params, which are query params, and which is the body.
That information isn't in the flat schema — it's metadata the call
protocol doesn't carry because it doesn't care about HTTP parameter
structure. to_openapi would need either:
- HTTP-specific metadata on
OperationSpec(which fields are path params, etc.) — a leaky abstraction that puts HTTP concerns in the protocol-foundation crate (alknet-call), or - Heuristics (guess that fields named
idare path params?) — fragile and wrong, or - Manual annotation per operation — boilerplate that defeats the "pure projection" promise.
All three are messy. The flat→structured split is the hard direction,
and it's the one to_openapi has to do.
The per-caller API surface problem
A traditional OpenAPI document is static — it describes the full API
surface regardless of who's reading it. Real APIs have per-caller
authorization: an admin sees admin operations, a regular user sees a
subset. OpenAPI has no standard mechanism for "show me only what I have
access to." The Gitea API is a concrete failure case: its OpenAPI spec
dumps the full API (including admin operations) to every caller,
regardless of privilege. A user reading the spec can't tell which
endpoints they can actually call without trial-and-error 403s.
The call protocol already has the per-caller filtering primitive:
services/list is AccessControl::check(identity)-filtered — the
caller sees only the operations they are authorized to call. A
to_openapi that generates a static full-surface doc loses this
property. A to_openapi that uses the gateway pattern preserves it.
The pattern that works
The same tool-gateway pattern ADR-041 applies to to_mcp applies here:
to_openapi exposes a small fixed set of endpoints that gate access to
the full operation registry. The external client (a code generator, a
human developer, a fetch-based client) calls search to discover
operations, schema to learn an operation's input shape, call to
invoke. The input is always a flat JSON body — no path/query/body split
to reverse-engineer. JSON Schema for the input/output is already in the
OperationSpec — no conversion beyond wrapping it in OpenAPI's schema
format.
The OpenAPI gateway has one endpoint the MCP gateway doesn't:
subscribe (SSE). OpenAPI/SSE supports streaming; MCP tool calls don't.
So the OpenAPI gateway is 5 endpoints; the MCP gateway is 4.
Decision
1. to_openapi exposes a fixed gateway endpoint set, not one path per operation
to_openapi generates an OpenAPI document with a small fixed set of
endpoints that gate access to the full operation registry. The external
client discovers and invokes operations through the gateway.
The gateway endpoint set (initial, two-way-door extensible):
| OpenAPI path | Call protocol operation | HTTP method | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
/search |
services/list |
GET |
List/search available operations (filtered by the caller's AccessControl). Returns names + descriptions. |
/schema |
services/schema |
GET |
Get an operation's full OperationSpec (input/output JSON Schemas, error schemas). |
/call |
call.requested (Query/Mutation) |
POST |
Invoke an operation by name with a JSON input. Returns the output or a typed error (ADR-023). |
/batch |
multiple call.requested |
POST |
Invoke multiple operations in one request (correlated request IDs, OQ-14). Returns an array of results. |
/subscribe |
call.requested (Subscription) |
GET (SSE) |
Invoke a streaming operation. Returns text/event-stream — each call.responded is an SSE frame, call.completed closes the stream. |
Five endpoints. The client calls /search to find operations, /schema
to learn the input shape, /call (or /subscribe for streaming) to
invoke. The input is always a flat JSON body ({ operation: "/fs/readFile", input: { ... } }); the output is the operation's result
as JSON. No path/query/body split to reverse-engineer.
2. subscribe is the OpenAPI gateway's streaming endpoint (SSE)
The OpenAPI gateway includes subscribe (which the MCP gateway excludes
— ADR-041, MCP tool calls are request/response). The subscribe
endpoint maps Subscription operations onto SSE: GET /subscribe with
Accept: text/event-stream, each call.responded event is an SSE
data: frame, call.completed closes the stream, call.aborted closes
with an error frame. This is the same SSE projection ADR-036 describes
for h2/http/1.1 clients — the gateway's subscribe endpoint is the
single SSE entry point instead of per-operation SSE streams.
3. The generated OpenAPI doc is per-caller (AccessControl-filtered)
The /search endpoint's results are filtered by the caller's
AccessControl::check(identity) — the client sees only the operations
it is authorized to call. The /call and /subscribe endpoints run the
same AccessControl check on dispatch. The generated OpenAPI doc
describes the gateway endpoints (5 fixed paths); the per-caller
operation surface is discovered through /search, not preloaded into
the doc.
This is the key advantage over a traditional per-operation-paths OpenAPI
doc: the per-caller API surface is the default, not an afterthought. A
client reading the gateway OpenAPI doc learns the gateway's shape (5
endpoints, stable); a client calling /search learns what it can call
(per-caller, AccessControl-filtered). The Gitea failure mode (dumping
admin ops to every caller) is structurally impossible — /search doesn't
return operations the caller can't call.
4. The gateway OpenAPI doc is a compatibility contract
Once published, the gateway endpoint set (5 endpoints) and the request/response shapes are a compatibility contract (ADR-017 Consequences). Adding endpoints is additive (non-breaking); removing or renaming is a one-way door. The initial 5-endpoint set is the published contract. The versioning strategy for the generated doc is tracked as OQ-39 (same as the per-operation-paths versioning question — the gateway pattern doesn't eliminate the versioning concern, it simplifies it to 5 stable endpoints instead of a per-operation surface).
5. A traditional per-operation-paths projection is additive, not replacement
A deployment that wants a traditional REST OpenAPI doc (per-operation
paths with split parameters) can build it as a separate projection with
the HTTP-specific metadata (which fields are path params, etc.). The
gateway pattern is the default to_openapi projection; the traditional
projection is an additive alternative for deployments that need it. The
gateway does not foreclose the traditional projection — it just doesn't
require it for the common case.
Consequences
Positive:
- No flat→structured split. The gateway's input is always a flat JSON
body (
{ operation, input }); the operation's input/output schemas are already JSON Schemas in theOperationSpec. No reverse- engineering of path/query/body semantics. The messy direction of thefrom_openapiinverse is sidestepped. - Per-caller API surface by default.
/searchisAccessControl-filtered; the client sees only what it can call. The Gitea failure mode (dumping admin ops to every caller) is structurally impossible. This is a property the traditional per-operation-paths OpenAPI doc cannot provide (OpenAPI has no per-caller filtering concept). - Easy to build clients for. Any language's
fetch+ JSON Schema libraries can call the gateway:POST /callwith a JSON body, get a JSON result. No code generator needed for the common case; a code generator produces aCallClient(call/search/schema/batch/ subscribe) instead of typed per-operation methods. - 5 stable endpoints instead of a per-operation surface. The versioning concern (OQ-39) is simpler — 5 endpoints that rarely change vs. a per-operation surface that changes on every operation addition/modification.
subscribemaps cleanly onto SSE — the same projection ADR-036 describes, just as a single gateway entry point instead of per- operation SSE streams.- A deployment that wants the traditional REST surface can build it additively. The gateway doesn't foreclose it.
Negative:
- The generated OpenAPI doc is not a "nice UI" by default. A Swagger UI rendering shows 5 generic endpoints instead of a REST tree. This is the tradeoff for avoiding the flat→structured split and gaining per- caller filtering. A deployment that wants the nice UI builds the traditional projection (additive, with metadata).
- A code generator reading the gateway OpenAPI doc produces a
CallClient(generic call/search/schema methods), not typed per- operation methods. Typed methods require the traditional projection (with metadata) or a client that reads/search+/schemaand generates typed wrappers at build time. The gateway is optimized for thefetch-and-JSON-Schema use case, not the code-generation use case. - The gateway doc is less "traditional" — a developer expecting a REST OpenAPI doc sees a small RPC-style surface instead. This is honest (the call protocol is a flat JSON RPC, not a REST API), but it's a departure from OpenAPI conventions.
Assumptions
-
The gateway endpoint set is stable. Once external clients build against the 5-endpoint gateway, changing the endpoint set (renaming, removing) breaks them. Adding endpoints is additive (non-breaking). The initial 5-endpoint set is the published contract.
-
AccessControlfiltering is the right per-caller mechanism. The client sees the operations it's authorized to call. If an operation's existence is itself sensitive,Visibility::Internal(ADR-015) is the mechanism — Internal ops are excluded fromservices/listand therefore from/searchresults. The gateway does not add a separate visibility layer. -
The common case is
fetch+ JSON Schema, not code generation. The gateway is optimized for the developer who callsPOST /callwith a JSON body and parses the result. The code-generation case (typed per-operation methods) is served by the traditional projection (additive) or a client that generates wrappers from/search+/schemaat build time. -
subscribe(SSE) is the streaming projection for the gateway. Overh2/http/1.1, subscriptions are SSE. Over WebSocket (the v1 browser bidirectional path, ADR-044), subscriptions project onto the WS connection directly as binary messages — the gateway's/subscribeis theh2/http/1.1SSE path; the WebSocket path is the native call-protocol session (http-server.md§"WebSocket browser path"). WebTransport (h3, deferred per ADR-044) would project onto WebTransport streams; the deferred design is atwebtransport.md.
References
- ADR-015 —
External/Internal visibility (Internal ops excluded from
services/list, therefore from/search) - ADR-017 —
to_*adapters are projections; published-spec compatibility contract - ADR-023 — typed error
detailsmapped to OpenAPI error responses - ADR-036 — the SSE projection
for subscriptions over
h2/http/1.1(the gateway's/subscribeendpoint uses the same SSE framing) - ADR-044 —
WebSocket is the v1 browser bidirectional path;
h3/WebTransport deferred (the gateway's/subscribeis theh2/http/1.1SSE path; the WS path is the native call-protocol session). ADR-038 is superseded by ADR-044. - ADR-041 — the sibling gateway
pattern for
to_mcp(4 tools;subscribeexcluded because MCP tool calls are request/response) - OQ-39 —
to_openapipublished-spec versioning (simplified by the gateway pattern to 5 stable endpoints) crates/http/http-adapters.md— the spec that implements the gateway