The iroh-proxy POC (/workspace/iroh-proxy-poc, 5/5 runs clean) settled
OQ-67: iroh does NOT expose a socket-injection hook for the IP/direct
transport (noq_endpoint() is pub(crate), the IP transport binds its own
netwatch::UdpSocket, CustomTransport operates on a separate CustomAddr
address space iroh's hole-punching doesn't route through). The quinn
POC's Socks5UdpSocket does not transfer to iroh. The decision: force
relay-only when a proxy is configured, via three stable public iroh
Builder knobs — clear_ip_transports() + addr_filter(relay_only) +
proxy_url. The peer sees the relay's IP; the relay sees the proxy's IP;
the client's real IP is hidden on both surfaces. No iroh fork required.
Because iroh's proxy_url expects an HTTP CONNECT proxy (not SOCKS5),
the integration runs a tiny local HTTP-to-SOCKS5 bridge (~80 lines) so
a single Socks5ProxyConfig covers all three dials uniformly: UDP
ASSOCIATE for dial_quic, CONNECT for dial_tcp_tls, force-relay-only +
HTTP-to-SOCKS5 bridge for dial_iroh.
The POC also corrected a factual error: iroh's proxy_url proxies the
relay WebSocket only, not pkarr/DoH (those use pkarr/hickory-resolver
directly). Acceptable for the force-relay-only config (QAD disabled);
spec text corrected.
Force relay-only forgoes iroh's direct-path latency advantage (negligible
for the hub deployment, which runs its own relay) and makes relay
availability a hard dependency — the intended privacy/availability
tradeoff; a caller that prefers availability over privacy for the iroh
path simply does not set the proxy.
- ADR-090 §5 amended: iroh force-relay-only decision + proxy_url
coverage correction + HTTP-to-SOCKS5 bridge
- OQ-67: resolved (force relay-only)
- client README: iroh proxy row, bridge, limitations, ADR/OQ entries
- README/open-questions: OQ-67 resolved, Current State amendment