Add 10 new tasks under tasks/architecture/ for Phase 0a (ADR writing): - 9 ADR tasks (026-034) with dependency-ordered structure - 1 review checkpoint task before Phase 0b spec writing ADR dependency graph (3 generations): Gen 1 (parallel): 026, 029, 030, 031, 032, 034 Gen 2 (depends on 029): 027, 028 Gen 3 (depends on 027+028): 033 Gen 4: review checkpoint Also mark all 34 prior implementation tasks as completed — they were finished but still showing as pending in the taskgraph.
2.3 KiB
2.3 KiB
id, name, status, depends_on, scope, risk, impact, level
| id | name | status | depends_on | scope | risk | impact | level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| architecture/adr-031-forwarding-policy | Write ADR-031 — Forwarding policy | pending | narrow | low | phase | implementation |
Description
Write ADR-031 establishing the forwarding policy model for channel_open_direct_tcpip access control.
Currently any authenticated client can open a channel to any destination. This ADR defines ForwardingPolicy, ForwardingRule, and TargetPattern as part of DynamicConfig (reloadable without restart).
Key design decisions from the research:
- Default-allow for migration compatibility (preserves current behavior)
- Default-deny is recommended for production
- Rules are evaluated per-channel-open, matched against the authenticated
IdentityfromIdentityProvider TransportKindmatch in rules enables transport-specific restrictions (e.g., WebTransport clients restricted to alknet-* channels)- OQ-12 resolved: start with global rules + principal matching from Identity.scopes; per-user scope from peer_credentials.metadata.scopes via IdentityProvider
- OQ-16 resolved: add TransportKind match in ForwardingRule; WebTransport clients can be scoped
- OQ-18 resolved: IdentityProvider owns scopes, ForwardingPolicy consumes them
Acceptance Criteria
docs/architecture/decisions/031-forwarding-policy.mdexists- ADR follows established format
- Context explains the security gap: any authenticated client gets unrestricted access
- Decision states: ForwardingPolicy with allow/deny rules, TargetPattern matching, default-allow for migration, TransportKind-aware rules, ForwardingPolicy is part of DynamicConfig (reloadable), Identity.scopes consumed by policy
- Includes ForwardingRule and TargetPattern type signatures
- Consequences: operators can restrict access per identity, per destination, per transport; default-allow preserves backward compatibility
- Resolves OQ-12, OQ-16, OQ-18 (reference in ADR)
- References: research/configuration.md, auth.md, open-questions.md
References
- docs/research/configuration.md — ForwardingPolicy section
- docs/architecture/auth.md — Identity.scopes and IdentityProvider
- docs/architecture/open-questions.md — OQ-12, OQ-16, OQ-18
- docs/research/integration-plan.md — ADR 031 entry, Phase 1.3
Notes
To be filled by implementation agent
Summary
To be filled on completion