Resolve the contradiction between ADR-008's "capability source" model and operation-registry.md showing vault operations on the wire. ADR-014 establishes: vault is assembly-layer only, capabilities carry outbound credentials (distinct from inbound identity), call protocol carries no secret material, adapters take credential sources not static tokens. - Add ADR-014 (Secret Material Flow and Capability Injection) - Remove vault/derive, vault/unlock, vault/decrypt from call protocol registration examples and all spec examples - Add Capabilities field to OperationContext, propagate through LocalOperationEnv nested calls - Add Capability Injection section to operation-registry.md - Add no-secret-material wire constraint to call-protocol.md - Add streaming subscribe example (LLM chat with Vercel UI chunks) - Add Security Model section to overview.md (identity vs capabilities) - Trim WASM treatment from ~20 lines to a design-constraint note - Add OQ-16 (resolved: no vault ops on wire), update OQ-08, OQ-15 - Update ADR-003, ADR-008, ADR-013 to remove stale "via call protocol" vault references
19 KiB
status, last_updated
| status | last_updated |
|---|---|
| draft | 2026-06-18 |
Operation Registry
OperationSpec, Handler, OperationRegistry, AccessControl, service discovery, and irpc integration.
What
The operation registry maps operation names to specs and handlers. It is the dispatch core of the call protocol — when a call.requested event arrives, the registry looks up the operation by name, checks access control, invokes the handler, and returns the result.
The registry is populated at startup by the CLI binary (or by the assembly layer in embedded contexts). Operations cannot be added or removed at runtime. This is consistent with OQ-04 (static registration at startup) and the HandlerRegistry model in alknet-core.
Why
The operation registry provides:
- Discoverability: Clients can query
/services/listand/services/schemato learn what operations exist before calling them - Access control: Each operation declares its required scopes and resources; the registry enforces ACL before invoking the handler
- Type safety: JSON Schema for input and output enables validation and client code generation
- Composability: Handlers can invoke other operations through
OperationEnv(local dispatch — remote dispatch is a separate architectural concern, see Constraints)
The registry design is informed by the @alkdev/operations TypeScript package, which demonstrated the same capabilities in JavaScript runtimes. The Rust implementation in alknet-call is canonical — it preserves the behavioral contract (namespace + operation name → invoke with input, return output) while defining the adapter contract (from_, to_) in Rust (see ADR-013).
Architecture
OperationSpec
Every registered operation has a spec that declares its name, type, schemas, and access control:
pub struct OperationSpec {
pub name: String, // e.g., "fs/readFile", "agent/chat" (no leading slash)
pub namespace: String, // e.g., "fs", "agent"
pub op_type: OperationType, // Query, Mutation, Subscription
pub input_schema: Value, // JSON Schema for input
pub output_schema: Value, // JSON Schema for output
pub access_control: AccessControl,
}
pub enum OperationType {
Query, // Read-only, idempotent (e.g., "fs/readFile", "services/list")
Mutation, // Side effects (e.g., "bash/exec", "github/authenticate")
Subscription, // Streaming (e.g., "agent/chat", "events/subscribe")
}
Operation names use slash-based paths without a leading slash, aligned with URL path conventions: fs/readFile, agent/chat, services/list. The leading slash is added when needed for display (spec.path() returns /fs/readFile) and for wire format (the call.requested payload uses /fs/readFile). See OQ-13 for the path format decision (single-node service/op vs head/worker node/service/op).
The namespace field is derived from the name: for fs/readFile it's fs, for agent/chat it's agent. It's a convenience accessor for ACL matching and service grouping.
AccessControl
pub struct AccessControl {
pub required_scopes: Vec<String>, // AND-checked: caller must have ALL
pub required_scopes_any: Option<Vec<String>>, // OR-checked: caller must have at LEAST ONE
pub resource_type: Option<String>, // e.g., "service"
pub resource_action: Option<String>, // e.g., "read"
}
When a call.requested event arrives:
- The
CallAdapterresolves the caller'sIdentityfromAuthContext(and possibly anAuthTokenin the payload) - The registry checks
access_control.check(identity)before invoking the handler - If access is denied, the adapter returns
call.errorwith codeFORBIDDEN - If the identity is
Noneand the operation has restrictions, the adapter returnscall.errorwith codeFORBIDDENand message"authentication required"
Operations with empty AccessControl (no required scopes, no resource checks) are accessible to all callers, including unauthenticated ones.
Trusted calls skip ACL: When a handler invokes another operation through OperationEnv, the nested call is marked trusted: true and skips access control checks. This prevents double-checking: if /agent/chat is allowed and it internally calls /auth/verify, the auth check is trusted.
Handler
pub type Handler = Arc<dyn Fn(Value, OperationContext) -> Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = ResponseEnvelope> + Send>> + Send + Sync>;
Handlers are async — many operations (file I/O, HTTP service calls, irpc service calls) are inherently asynchronous. The handler receives an async runtime context and returns a Future<Output = ResponseEnvelope>.
A handler receives:
input: Value— the deserializedpayloadfrom thecall.requestedevent (alwaysserde_json::Value)context: OperationContext— request ID, identity, metadata, env
And returns a ResponseEnvelope containing the result or an error.
OperationContext
pub struct OperationContext {
pub request_id: String,
pub parent_request_id: Option<String>,
pub identity: Option<Identity>,
pub capabilities: Capabilities,
pub metadata: HashMap<String, Value>,
pub env: OperationEnv,
pub trusted: bool,
}
request_id: Correlates with thecall.requestedevent'sidfieldparent_request_id: Set when this call was initiated by another operation (viaOperationEnv)identity: The authenticated identity making the call (fromIdentityProvider) — inbound auth (who is calling me)capabilities: Outbound credentials the handler may use (decrypted API keys, scoped vault access) — see Capability Injection belowmetadata: Additional context (connection info, tracing IDs). Must not hold secret material — see ADR-014env: The operation environment for composing calls to other operationstrusted: Whentrue, ACL checks are skipped (set byOperationEnv, not by callers). Thetrustedfield uses module-private construction — handlers constructOperationContextthroughOperationEnv::invoke()which setstrusted: true, or through theCallAdapterdispatch path which setstrusted: false. The field is notpubfor writes; onlypub fn is_trusted(&self) -> boolis exposed for reads.
identity and capabilities are orthogonal: identity is inbound (resolved per-request from the caller's credentials), capabilities are outbound (provisioned by the assembly layer from the vault). See ADR-014 for the full rationale.
OperationRegistry
pub struct OperationRegistry {
operations: HashMap<String, (OperationSpec, Handler)>,
}
The registry maps operation names to (OperationSpec, Handler) pairs. Key methods:
register(spec, handler): Add an operation at startuplookup(name): Find an operation by name, returning spec and handlerinvoke(name, input, context): Look up, check ACL, invoke handler, return resultlist_operations(): Return all registered specs (for/services/list)
The OperationRegistryBuilder provides a fluent API for constructing the registry at startup:
let registry = OperationRegistryBuilder::new()
.with(services_list_spec(), Arc::new(services_list_handler))
.with(services_schema_spec(), Arc::new(schema_handler))
.with(agent_chat_spec(), Arc::new(agent_chat_handler))
.build();
The CLI binary (or assembly layer) constructs the registry and passes it to the CallAdapter. Handlers are constructed with injected capabilities (see Capability Injection) before registration. Once built, the registry is immutable.
OperationEnv
#[async_trait]
pub trait OperationEnv: Send + Sync {
async fn invoke(&self, namespace: &str, operation: &str, input: Value, parent: &OperationContext) -> ResponseEnvelope;
}
OperationEnv is the universal composition mechanism. A handler calls context.env.invoke("fs", "readFile", input, &context) and gets a ResponseEnvelope back — regardless of whether the operation runs locally, via an irpc service, or on a remote node.
The parent parameter propagates the calling context: the nested call gets parent_request_id: Some(parent.request_id), inherits parent.identity, and is marked trusted: true.
Local dispatch only. The initial OperationEnv implementation dispatches directly through the local OperationRegistry:
pub struct LocalOperationEnv {
registry: Arc<OperationRegistry>,
}
#[async_trait]
impl OperationEnv for LocalOperationEnv {
async fn invoke(&self, namespace: &str, operation: &str, input: Value, parent: &OperationContext) -> ResponseEnvelope {
let name = format!("{namespace}/{operation}");
let context = OperationContext {
request_id: format!("env-{name}"),
parent_request_id: Some(parent.request_id.clone()),
identity: parent.identity.clone(), // Inherit caller's identity
capabilities: parent.capabilities.clone(), // Inherit caller's capabilities
metadata: parent.metadata.clone(), // Inherit caller's metadata
env: self.clone(),
trusted: true, // Nested calls skip ACL
};
self.registry.invoke(&name, input, context).await
}
}
Future work may add irpc service dispatch and remote call protocol dispatch as additional backends. The handler-facing API stays the same.
Service Discovery
Two built-in operations expose what the node offers:
| Operation name | Display path | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
services/list |
/services/list |
Query | List registered operation names and metadata |
services/schema |
/services/schema |
Query | Get the OperationSpec for a specific operation |
These are read-only — no admin operations are exposed through the call protocol itself.
services/list returns:
{
"operations": [
{ "name": "fs/readFile", "namespace": "fs", "op_type": "query" },
{ "name": "agent/chat", "namespace": "agent", "op_type": "subscription" },
{ "name": "events/subscribe", "namespace": "events", "op_type": "subscription" }
]
}
services/schema accepts { "name": "fs/readFile" } and returns the full OperationSpec including input/output JSON Schemas.
irpc Integration
irpc and the operation registry serve different scopes:
| Layer | Mechanism | Serialization | Scope |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call protocol (external) | EventEnvelope over QUIC streams |
JSON | Cross-language, cross-node |
| irpc services (internal) | VaultProtocol derive macro, Service trait |
postcard (binary) | Rust-to-Rust, in-process or in-cluster |
| Local dispatch (in-process) | Direct function call through OperationRegistry |
None | Same process |
irpc services are an internal dispatch mechanism — they are not directly exposed on the call protocol. The vault's VaultProtocol uses irpc for in-process, type-safe dispatch via VaultServiceHandle (postcard serialization for in-cluster, direct calls for in-process). The vault is accessed by the assembly layer (CLI binary) at startup, not by handlers at call time. See ADR-008 and ADR-014.
If a handler internally uses an irpc-based service, the handler bridges the two: it receives JSON input from the call protocol, calls the irpc service in-process (postcard, type-safe), and serializes the result back to JSON for the call protocol response. This layering preserves irpc's type safety for internal calls while keeping the external interface cross-language.
Operation Registration at Startup
The CLI binary (or assembly layer) constructs handlers with the credentials they need (from the vault — see Capability Injection), then registers them before starting the endpoint:
// Assembly layer: unlock vault, derive credentials, construct handlers
let vault = VaultServiceHandle::new();
vault.unlock(&mnemonic, passphrase.as_deref())?;
let google_api_key = vault.decrypt(&google_key_blob)?;
let github_signing_key = vault.derive_ed25519(PATHS::GITHUB_SIGNING)?;
// Construct handlers with injected capabilities
let agent_handler = Arc::new(agent_chat_handler(Capabilities::new()
.with_api_key("google", google_api_key)));
let github_handler = Arc::new(github_authenticate_handler(Capabilities::new()
.with_signing_key(github_signing_key)));
// Register operations — vault operations are NOT registered here
let registry = OperationRegistryBuilder::new()
// Built-in service discovery
.with(services_list_spec(), Arc::new(services_list_handler))
.with(services_schema_spec(), Arc::new(schema_handler))
// Agent and GitHub handlers (constructed with injected capabilities)
.with(agent_chat_spec(), agent_handler)
.with(github_authenticate_spec(), github_handler)
.build();
let call_adapter = CallAdapter::new(Arc::new(registry), identity_provider);
The vault is used at construction time, not registered as call protocol operations. The registry is immutable after construction. Adding operations requires restarting the process. This is consistent with OQ-04, ADR-008, and ADR-014.
Capability Injection
Handlers that need outbound credentials (LLM provider API keys, signing keys, HTTP service tokens) receive them through the Capabilities type on OperationContext, not by calling vault operations over the wire and not from environment variables. This is the mechanism that ADR-008 described in prose ("derived keys and decrypted credentials are injected into operation contexts at the assembly layer") and that ADR-014 specifies as a one-way door.
The flow is:
Assembly layer (CLI startup):
1. Unlock vault (local, mnemonic from secure prompt or file)
2. Derive / decrypt the credentials each handler needs
3. Construct handlers with those credentials
4. Register operations with the constructed handlers
5. Start the endpoint
Handler invocation (at call time):
call.requested → OperationContext { capabilities, identity, ... }
handler reads capabilities → uses the credential for its outbound call
The Capabilities type holds non-serializable, zeroized secret material. It does not implement Serialize — it cannot cross the call protocol wire even by accident. The concrete shape of the type (a typed map, a struct with named fields, a trait object) is a two-way door for implementation. The one-way constraints are fixed by ADR-014:
- Capabilities are populated by the assembly layer at handler construction (the common case: a static decrypted API key) or scoped per-request for trusted-internal-only flows. They are never populated from call protocol inputs.
- Capabilities hold secret material that does not implement
Serializeand does not appear inEventEnvelopepayloads. - The call protocol carries no secret material. See call-protocol.md for the wire-level constraint.
No vault operations are registered in the call protocol. The vault is assembly-layer only (ADR-008, ADR-014). A handler that needs a child key for a specific operation (e.g., signing for GitHub auth) receives a scoped capability that performs the derivation in-process — it never holds the master seed and never calls a network-exposed vault operation.
Adapters take credential sources. The from_openapi and from_jsonschema adapter patterns (see OQ-15, constrained by ADR-014) register HTTP-backed operations. The credential the HTTP service needs (bearer token, API key) is provided by the assembly layer at registration time — the adapter receives a credential source, not a static token string. This is the integration point where the vault feeds credentials into HTTP-backed operations, including LLM providers that expose OpenAPI-compatible endpoints.
Constraints
- The registry is immutable after construction. No runtime registration or deregistration. Two-way door —
ArcSwap<OperationRegistry>can be added later. - Operation specs use JSON Schema. The call protocol's external interface is always JSON. irpc's postcard serialization is internal only.
OperationEnv::invoke()dispatches through the local registry. Remote dispatch (federation, head/worker routing) would be a separate mechanism at a different layer — not a prefix added to operation paths. irpc service dispatch is contracted but not built.- The call protocol does not depend on any database. Operation specs are in-memory, populated at startup.
OperationContext.trustedis set byOperationEnv, not by callers. A handler cannot mark its own call as trusted.- No vault operations are registered in the call protocol. The vault is assembly-layer only (ADR-008, ADR-014). Handlers receive secret material through
OperationContext.capabilities, not by calling vault operations over the wire. - The call protocol carries no secret material. Secret material (private keys, API keys, mnemonics, decrypted credentials) must not appear in
call.requestedpayloads,call.respondedpayloads, orOperationContext.metadata. See ADR-014.
Design Decisions
| Decision | ADR | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| irpc as call protocol foundation | ADR-005 | irpc provides framing and service dispatch |
| Call protocol stream model | ADR-012 | Bidirectional streams, EventEnvelope, ID-based correlation |
| Static handler registration | ADR-010 | Registry is immutable after construction |
| Vault integration via assembly layer | ADR-008 | Vault is a capability source, accessed at assembly time |
| Secret material flow and capability injection | ADR-014 | Capabilities carry outbound credentials; call protocol carries no secret material |
Open Questions
See open-questions.md for full details.
- OQ-13 (resolved): Operation path format is
/{service}/{op}. Remote dispatch is a separate mechanism, not a path prefix. - OQ-14 (resolved): Batch is a client-side pattern of correlated
call.requestedevents, not a protocol primitive. - OQ-15 (open): Call protocol client and adapter contract. ADR-014 constrains the adapter contract: adapters take credential sources from the assembly layer, not static tokens.
- OQ-16 (resolved by ADR-014): No vault operations are exposed over the call protocol for now.
References
- call-protocol.md — CallAdapter, EventEnvelope, stream model, PendingRequestMap
- ADR-005: irpc as call protocol foundation
- ADR-008: Vault integration point
- ADR-010: ALPN router and endpoint (static registration)
- ADR-012: Call protocol stream model
- Reference implementation:
/workspace/@alkdev/alknet-main/crates/alknet-core/src/call/