Files
alknet/docs/architecture/crates/channels/channel-operations.md
T
glm-5.2 a3cb44968e docs(adr): 093 — channels pure channel multiplexing (8-byte header, no stream_type)
Prune the channels spec to reflect the stream-unification resolution
(docs/research/stream-unification/findings.md): the channels wire format
goes from 9 bytes to 8 bytes, the channels layer no longer carries a
stream_type concept, into_sub_streams() is removed, and TTY always uses
its 5-byte format (carried transparently in the channels payload).

ADR-093 is the umbrella decision (the channels-layer consequence of
ADR-092's BiStream handler leaf): every channel is a BiStream, the
handler owns its sub-stream multiplexing, the channels layer routes by
channel_id only. Amends ADR-071 (8-byte header, no stream_type),
ADR-074 (into_sub_streams removed, accept_bi yields BiStream), reverses
ADR-077 (TTY always 5-byte), and the channels-facing clauses of
ADR-072/073/075/076/080/081. Adds ADR-092 forward-reference note
(into_sub_streams preservation subsequently reversed by ADR-093) and
the missing ADR-092 cross-reference on ADR-070.

Adds OQ-68 (add/strip API shape — built-in vs utility; the contract is
decided in ADR-093, the function surface is open; two-way door, low
priority, decision-ready when the channels crate's implementation
begins).

Rewrites the 7 channels spec docs (README, overview, channels-wire,
channels-connection, channels-adapter, channel-operations, channel-client)
to describe the post-amendment shape as current, with the 8-byte header,
the add/strip composition, single accept_bi accessor, BiStream per
channel, and TTY-always-5-byte.

Touch-up cross-references in hub README, client README, ADR-085, and
the OQ-45/47/65 question files (TTY-internal stream_type 3 →
STREAM_CTRL_IN; channels 9-byte → 8-byte).
2026-07-18 18:10:17 +00:00

14 KiB

status, last_updated
status last_updated
draft 2026-07-18

channel-operations.md — Channel Lifecycle on the Call Protocol

Channel lifecycle is orchestrated by the call protocol on channel 0 (ADR-072). Four operations on channel 0's OperationRegistry (ADR-073) handle open, close, control, and resource discovery. All four go through the existing OperationContext / AccessControl::check path — no new auth machinery, no new framing.

The four operations

channel/open — open a data channel

Request (on channel 0):

{
  "operation": "channel/open",
  "input": {
    "alpn": "alknet/tty",
    "params": { "backend": "docker", "cmd": ["bash"], "container": "abc123" },
    "direction": "initiator-to-responder"
  }
}
field type meaning
alpn string The ALPN the channel will carry. Responder looks this up in its HandlerRegistry.
params object ALPN-specific parameters. For alknet/tty this is NegotiateRequest. For alknet/tunnel this is the target resource. The channels layer does not interpret params.
direction string initiator-to-responder or responder-to-initiator. See "Direction semantics" below.

Response:

{
  "output": {
    "channel_id": 7
  }
}
field type meaning
channel_id u32 Server-assigned (DP-1). The responder allocates via monotonic AtomicU32.

Channel ID allocation: server-assigned (DP-1). One round-trip before data flows — the same round-trip the call protocol makes for every operation. All current channel types (TTY, tunnel, SSH) already require a negotiation round-trip, so the open round-trip is not additive latency.

Amendment (ADR-093, 2026-07-18): the stream_types field is removed from channel/open's input and output. The channels layer has no stream_type concept (ADR-093) — the handler owns its sub-stream multiplexing on the BiStream it receives. The handler's sub-stream set is implicit in its ALPN's wire format (e.g., TTY's 5-byte format declares its own stream_type set internally; the channels layer carries the bytes transparently). The channel:stream_type_unavailable error code is removed (the channels layer can't refuse a stream_type it doesn't know about).

Error codes (new CallError.code strings, not new framing):

code meaning retryable
channel:unknown_alpn ALPN not in responder's HandlerRegistry false
channel:forbidden AccessControl::check denied the open false
channel:allocation_failed Handler allocate failed true (often transient)
channel:invalid_params params JSON didn't satisfy the ALPN's expectations false
channel:too_many_channels Per-connection channel limit hit (ADR-076) false

channel/close — tear down a channel

{
  "operation": "channel/close",
  "input": { "channel_id": 7, "reason": "exit" }
}

The responder (the side that didn't send the close) drains its reassembled stream for channel_id, signals EOF to the handler, and returns { "closed": true }. The channel_id is eligible for reuse after the drain completes (ADR-076 — monotonic IDs with wrap-around, not a free-list). reason is free-form for observability — not semantically required.

REQ-CH-06: exit-chunk-before-close ordering. The channel's data chunks MUST be written and flushed before the channel/close operation is sent on channel 0. The side closing must observe the data-channel pump complete before issuing the call operation. For TTY this is the exit-chunk-is-last invariant (ADR-055) carried forward — the exit control message rides on TTY's STREAM_CTRL_OUT (stream_type 4, inside TTY's 5-byte payload format); for tunnels it is the last data byte before close. This invariant crosses two channels (the data channel and channel 0), so the channels layer owns the ordering guarantee.

channel/control — out-of-band control on channel 0

For control that doesn't need ordering relative to data (resize, signal, keepalive):

{
  "operation": "channel/control",
  "input": {
    "channel_id": 7,
    "message": { "type": "resize", "cols": 80, "rows": 24 }
  }
}

The channels layer routes message to the handler's control handle for channel_id. The message JSON is ALPN-specific; the channels layer does not interpret it.

Amendment (ADR-093, 2026-07-18): the stream_type field is removed from channel/control's input. Under ADR-093, the channels layer has no stream_type concept — the control message is routed to the handler's control handle (an ALPN-specific concept the handler owns), not to a channels-layer (channel_id, stream_type) reassembly buffer. The handler decides what to do with the message.

channel/resources/subscribe — live resource discovery

This is a Subscription operation (ADR-049), not a polled Query. The call protocol has StreamingHandler / invoke_streaming (implemented and tested). The first consumer (the hub aggregating worker resources) needs live updates when workers connect/disconnect or containers start/stop.

{
  "operation": "channel/resources/subscribe",
  "input": {}
}

The responder registers a StreamingHandler that emits a ResponseEnvelope whenever the resource set changes. Each event:

{
  "output": {
    "resources": [
      {
        "alpn": "alknet/tty",
        "backends": ["docker", "local"],
        "access": { "required_scopes": ["tty:open"] }
      },
      {
        "alpn": "alknet/tunnel",
        "targets": ["container:*", "service:postgres"],
        "access": { "required_scopes_any": ["tunnel:open", "admin"] }
      }
    ]
  }
}
field type meaning
alpn string The ALPN this side accepts channel/open for.
backends / targets [string] ALPN-specific enumeration of what's available. The channels layer doesn't interpret these.
access object A preview of the AccessControl that channel/open will check. Advisory — lets the initiator fail fast. The real check happens on channel/open.

The stream emits an initial snapshot immediately, then subsequent events on any change. The stream is long-lived; the subscriber cancels by dropping the subscription (ADR-016 abort cascade applies).

A channel/resources (non-subscribe, Query) operation is NOT provided. The subscription's initial snapshot serves the poll use case (subscribe, read the first event, cancel). Providing both would be redundant and would pressure consumers toward the stale-poll path.

Direction semantics (OQ-CH-09 — pinned)

Channel open is bidirectional — either side can initiate. The direction field determines who is the ALPN-server (allocates the handler, writes the negotiation response) vs the ALPN-client (writes the first request).

direction Initiator role Responder role Who writes first
initiator-to-responder ALPN-client ALPN-server Initiator writes first (the request data); responder's handler is the server side. The common case: "open me a TTY on your docker container."
responder-to-initiator ALPN-server ALPN-client Responder writes first (the negotiation response); initiator's handler is the client side. The "worker exposes, hub consumes" case: the worker initiates the open to make itself available; the hub is the client.

The channels layer does not enforce write order. Write order is ALPN-specific, determined by which side is the ALPN-server. The channels layer routes chunks; the handlers negotiate who writes first via their ALPN's params contract.

channel_id allocation is always by the responder (DP-1), regardless of direction. The responder is the side that receives the channel/open call operation; it allocates the ID and returns it. In the responder-to- initiator case, the initiator (worker) sends the channel/open, so the responder (hub) allocates the ID — even though the worker is the ALPN-server for the channel's data. This keeps ID allocation in one place and avoids the collision-prone client-assigned alternative.

Control-message division (DP-4 — pinned)

Control path When Examples
Call operations on channel 0 (channel/control, channel/close) Control that doesn't need ordering relative to data, or lifecycle events resize, signal, keepalive, close
Data-ordered bytes on the data channel's BiStream (handler-internal framing) Control that MUST be ordered relative to data EOF before exit, flush before close

The TTY crate's exit-chunk-is-last invariant (ADR-055) is the canonical example of data-ordered control — it rides on TTY's STREAM_CTRL_OUT (stream_type 4, inside TTY's 5-byte payload format) because it must arrive after the last data on TTY's stdout stream_type, guaranteed by TTY's per-stream_type chunk ordering within its own 5-byte format, not by a call-protocol round-trip. The channel/close operation that follows is on channel 0 and is ordered after the data pump completes (REQ-CH-06).

The control-message division is handler-internal. Under ADR-093, the channels layer has no stream_type concept — it carries the handler's framing transparently in the payload. TTY's STREAM_CTRL_IN (stream_type 3) and STREAM_CTRL_OUT (stream_type 4) are stream_types in TTY's 5-byte format (ADR-052, amended by Phase 7), not channels-layer concepts. The channels layer routes by channel_id only; the handler owns its sub-stream multiplexing on the BiStream it receives. The "bidirectional control channel" property is a TTY-layer concern, fixed at the TTY layer by Phase 7's split — the channels layer doesn't know about it.

ACL flow (end-to-end)

A browser opening a TTY channel to a spoke through a hub (ADR-079):

  1. Browser's channel 0 → hub's channel 0: channel/open { alpn: "alknet/tty", params: { backend: "docker", cmd: ["bash"], container: "abc123" } }. The browser's identity is a bearer token (ADR-034).
  2. Hub's CallAdapter runs AccessControl::check on channel/open with the browser's identity. If denied → channel:forbidden.
  3. Hub forwards to spoke via from_call: the hub's forwarded_for handler constructs a call.requested with the hub as caller and the browser as forwarded_for (ADR-032 §3). The spoke receives channel/open with caller = hub, forwarded_for = browser.
  4. Spoke's CallAdapter runs AccessControl::check with the hub as caller (the spoke authorizes the hub — ADR-050). The spoke's ownership store verifies the hub (or the forwarded_for browser, per policy) owns container:abc123.
  5. Spoke allocates the channel via TtyAdapter / DockerTtyBackend, returns channel_id.
  6. Hub opens a matching channel on the browser's side and bridges them (byte-forward with channel_id rewrite — ADR-079).

The hub ran zero protocol-specific auth. It ran channel/open's AccessControl::check (call-protocol machinery) and forwarded. The channels layer inherited the auth model by being a call-protocol operation.

Hub relay contract (ADR-079 — summary)

The hub translates, not transparently forwards:

  1. Call-protocol layer (channel 0): translate. The hub terminates channel 0 on both legs. channel/open from the browser → hub's AccessControl::check → hub re-issues channel/open on the spoke leg with forwarded_for → spoke returns its channel_id → hub maps browser-id ↔ spoke-id.
  2. Data-channel layer: byte-forward with channel_id rewrite. The relay reads chunks for browser_id, rewrites the channel_id field to spoke_id, writes onto the spoke's channels connection — and vice versa. The relay does not parse the payload.

channel/control operations on channel 0 carry channel_id in their JSON payload; the hub's CallAdapter translates these too (rewrites channel_id in the payload). The relay does not touch channel/control — it's a call operation, translated, not byte-forwarded.

The hub never runs a handler for alknet/tty, alknet/ssh, or alknet/tunnel. It runs alknet/channels (the relay) and alknet/call (for its own hub-level operations + translation).

Design Decisions

All design decisions are documented as ADRs in decisions/.

ADR Decision Summary
073 Channel Lifecycle Operations The four ops; direction pinned; subscribe not poll
072 Channel 0 Pre-Negotiated Channel 0 = alknet/call
079 Hub Relay Translate channel 0, byte-forward data channels
093 channels Pure Channel Multiplexing stream_types field removed from channel/open; stream_type removed from channel/control; handler owns sub-stream multiplexing
049 StreamingHandler The machinery channel/resources/subscribe uses
032 Forwarded-For Identity The auth chain for hub-relayed opens
050 Dynamic Resource Ownership The ownership store the spoke queries

References

  • ADR-073: channel lifecycle operations (the decision)
  • ADR-079: hub relay (the translate contract)
  • docs/research/alknet-channels/phase-0-findings.md §Channel Open Negotiation, §ACL and Security Model