review 002: the protocol core reviewed — readiness-contract hardening + two convention fixes
The batch-1 gate review (tasks/implementation/review-protocol-core.md): all eight criteria examined (seam contracts, wire fidelity, access control, teardown/lifecycle, conventions, wasm, POC fidelity, docs sync); the gate to batch 2 opens. Findings R-1/R-2 were corrected in the review change; R-3..R-5 are doc residues fixed in the same change; R-6 is accepted with rationale. - R-1 (major): the datagram stage's Ok(None) re-park is unsafe against a zero-yield egress — a next_reply that is a pure instantly-ready Ok(None) with no await wins every select! poll and livelocks the stage on a current-thread runtime (empirically reproduced; the landed unit test's mutex masked the hazard at its lock's yield boundary; multi-thread survives). Fix: the Ok(None) handler yields before re-parking; a pinning unit test drives the strictest zero-yield violator. - R-2: the two into_inner expect()s (consumer sessions) become typed Result<_, SpentSessionError> — convention 2's no-panic rule; spent- session unit tests pin the shape; test call sites updated. - R-3/R-4/R-5: doc residues — stale task-time phrasings in egress.rs/producer.rs, producer.md's register() sketch reconciled to the landed signature, the establishment-bound test doc reworded to what the substrate-free probe actually pins. - R-6 (accepted): the wasm gate rides a transitive getrandom/wasm_js feature unification (alkcall -> jsonschema/referencing -> ahash) — verified compiling clean today; noted for OQ-SK2-06. Verified: cargo test 348 green; --all-features green; clippy --all-targets -D warnings clean; fmt --check clean; both wasm checks clean (from a clean wasm target dir); cargo doc --no-deps clean. The bind-only-identity reconciliation from the integration session was independently verified as correct (ADR-006 as landed; the suite pins it). Batch boundary holds: no local/composed code exists.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
1ad8d9d489
commit
16b21e3447
7 files changed
+466
-46
No files matched your search
@@ -140,7 +140,9 @@ let producer = Socks5Producer::builder()
|
||||
.egress(egress_factory) // EgressFactory — required for ASSOCIATE
|
||||
.accept(bind_accept_factory) // BindAcceptFactory — required for BIND
|
||||
.build();
|
||||
producer.register(&mut channel_core)?; // register_openable_with_establisher
|
||||
// register(&core, ®istry, auth, witness) — the establisher rides
|
||||
// the registration (the optional witness is the CF-006 test probe).
|
||||
producer.register(&core, ®istry, auth, None)?;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Missing callbacks = those commands refuse RFC-faithfully
|
||||
|
||||
+70
-10
@@ -67,6 +67,15 @@ use crate::rfc1928::util::target_addr::{read_address, TargetAddr, ToTargetAddr};
|
||||
use crate::rfc1928::{ReplyError, Socks5Command, SocksError, UdpHeaderError};
|
||||
use crate::wire::{frame, DatagramReader, WireError};
|
||||
|
||||
/// The spent-session marker (review 002 R-2): [`Socks5ChannelSession
|
||||
/// ::into_inner`] / [`AssociateSession::into_inner`] return it when
|
||||
/// the pipe/stream was already taken — reachable only by calling
|
||||
/// twice on a session whose inner is gone. Carries nothing: a spent
|
||||
/// session's teardown is already done (the reap ran with the take).
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
|
||||
#[error("the session's pipe/stream was already taken (spent)")]
|
||||
pub struct SpentSessionError;
|
||||
|
||||
/// A completed SOCKS5 CONNECT session on the consumer side: the
|
||||
/// adopted channel + the post-reply byte pipe to the target.
|
||||
///
|
||||
@@ -159,11 +168,18 @@ impl Socks5ChannelSession {
|
||||
/// The session rides along still owning the channel's teardown:
|
||||
/// drop the pair (or `close` the session) when done — dropping
|
||||
/// `inner` EOFs the data plane structurally.
|
||||
pub fn into_inner(mut self) -> TakenInner {
|
||||
let inner = self.inner.take();
|
||||
TakenInner {
|
||||
session: self,
|
||||
inner: inner.expect("into_inner on a spent session"),
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`SpentSessionError`] on a spent session (the pipe already
|
||||
/// taken): a spent session's manager entry is always reaped
|
||||
/// already (`close`/`shutdown`/`Drop` all take it), so dropping
|
||||
/// it loses nothing — no panic path (AGENTS.md convention 2).
|
||||
pub fn into_inner(mut self) -> Result<TakenInner, SpentSessionError> {
|
||||
match self.inner.take() {
|
||||
Some(inner) => Ok(TakenInner {
|
||||
session: self,
|
||||
inner,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
None => Err(SpentSessionError),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -426,11 +442,19 @@ impl AssociateSession {
|
||||
/// the POC's `raw_mut` seam, widened). The session rides along
|
||||
/// still owning the channel's teardown: drop the pair (or
|
||||
/// `shutdown`/`close` the session) when done.
|
||||
pub fn into_inner(mut self) -> TakenAssociateInner {
|
||||
let inner = self.inner.take();
|
||||
TakenAssociateInner {
|
||||
session: self,
|
||||
inner: inner.expect("into_inner on a spent session"),
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`SpentSessionError`] on a spent session (the stream already
|
||||
/// taken): a spent session's manager entry is always reaped
|
||||
/// already (`shutdown`/`close`/`Drop` all take it), so dropping it
|
||||
/// loses nothing — no panic path (AGENTS.md convention 2), and the
|
||||
/// `Err` side stays small (a spent session is not carried).
|
||||
pub fn into_inner(mut self) -> Result<TakenAssociateInner, SpentSessionError> {
|
||||
match self.inner.take() {
|
||||
Some(inner) => Ok(TakenAssociateInner {
|
||||
session: self,
|
||||
inner,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
None => Err(SpentSessionError),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -864,6 +888,22 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
assert!(session.split().is_none(), "no pipe after teardown");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn spent_session_into_inner_is_an_err_not_a_panic() {
|
||||
// The `expect` the review removed (R-2): the spent-session
|
||||
// path is reachable (a session whose inner is gone), so it
|
||||
// must be a typed `Err` — no panic path.
|
||||
let session = Socks5ChannelSession {
|
||||
channel_id: 9,
|
||||
manager: None,
|
||||
inner: None,
|
||||
};
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
session.into_inner().is_err(),
|
||||
"a spent session must return Err, not Ok"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn open_errors_carry_the_typed_surface_through_connects_mapping() {
|
||||
// The mapping `connect` applies to an open failure: the typed
|
||||
@@ -909,6 +949,26 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
assert!(session.relay_addr().is_none());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn spent_associate_into_inner_is_an_err_not_a_panic() {
|
||||
// The `expect` the review removed (R-2): the spent-session
|
||||
// path is reachable (`into_inner` twice), so it must be a
|
||||
// typed `Err` — no panic path. The teardown owner rides back
|
||||
// to the caller either way.
|
||||
let session = AssociateSession {
|
||||
channel_id: 9,
|
||||
manager: None,
|
||||
inner: None,
|
||||
reader: DatagramReader::new(),
|
||||
pending: Default::default(),
|
||||
relay_addr: None,
|
||||
};
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
session.into_inner().is_err(),
|
||||
"a spent session must return Err, not Ok"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[tokio::test]
|
||||
async fn recv_datagram_persists_reader_state_across_calls() {
|
||||
use crate::wire::frame as wire_frame;
|
||||
|
||||
+5
-4
@@ -39,10 +39,11 @@
|
||||
//! session-level refusal stays channels-level, target-level refusal
|
||||
//! is in-stream).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The readiness-contract behavioral test (an instant-`Ok(None)`
|
||||
//! egress must not starve the datagram stage) lands with the
|
||||
//! producer-associate task — it needs the stage. This module carries
|
||||
//! the error→reply-code mapping tables, the sync-lift factory
|
||||
//! The readiness-contract behavioral tests (an instant-`Ok(None)`
|
||||
//! egress must not starve the datagram stage — including the
|
||||
//! zero-yield shape, review 002 R-1) live in the producer module's
|
||||
//! test suite, next to the stage they pin. This module carries the
|
||||
//! error→reply-code mapping tables, the sync-lift factory
|
||||
//! constructor, and the compile-shape assertions.
|
||||
|
||||
use std::future::Future;
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ pub mod wire;
|
||||
|
||||
pub use consumer::{
|
||||
AssociateSession, BindDataPlane, BindReply1, BindSession, Socks5ChannelSession,
|
||||
TakenAssociateInner,
|
||||
SpentSessionError, TakenAssociateInner,
|
||||
};
|
||||
pub use egress::{
|
||||
egress_factory, BindAccept, BindAcceptError, BindAcceptFactory, BindAcceptFactoryError,
|
||||
|
||||
+121
-12
@@ -24,7 +24,8 @@
|
||||
//! A channels-level refusal is the registry ACL gate's job (it runs
|
||||
//! before the establisher — `socks5:open`, ADR-006; the scope-less
|
||||
//! identity fails closed with `FORBIDDEN`, no phantom channel). The
|
||||
//! establisher itself never refuses in this task's scope.
|
||||
//! establisher itself never refuses — it is the identity-recording
|
||||
//! session gate (ADR-005).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## The pump handler + dispatch
|
||||
//!
|
||||
@@ -320,8 +321,11 @@ where
|
||||
/// - **The egress readiness contract** (`Egress::next_reply`): it
|
||||
/// must be `Pending` when no reply is ready; an instantly-ready
|
||||
/// `Ok(None)` starves a biased select into livelock. The stage
|
||||
/// tolerates a spurious `Ok(None)` by re-parking (never a hot
|
||||
/// loop); an `Err` ends the association (the egress drops with it).
|
||||
/// tolerates a spurious `Ok(None)` by yielding once and re-parking
|
||||
/// (never a hot loop — and never a zero-yield hot spin on a
|
||||
/// current-thread scheduler, the livelock a pure `async { Ok(None)
|
||||
/// }` egress reproduces); an `Err` ends the association (the egress
|
||||
/// drops with it).
|
||||
/// - **Framing applied exactly once, by the wire layer** — the stage
|
||||
/// reads frames via `DatagramReader` (channel → egress `send` gets
|
||||
/// the payload) and writes frames via `frame_inner` (egress
|
||||
@@ -353,7 +357,14 @@ where
|
||||
loop {
|
||||
tokio::select! {
|
||||
// The egress's reply stream (its own pump; `None` = a
|
||||
// spurious wakeup, the stage re-parks — never a hot loop).
|
||||
// spurious wakeup — the stage re-parks, never a hot
|
||||
// loop). The yield makes the tolerance safe against a
|
||||
// contract-violating zero-yield egress too: without it a
|
||||
// pure `async { Ok(None) }` starves the channel branch
|
||||
// and the runtime's other tasks on a current-thread
|
||||
// scheduler (an instantly-ready branch that yields
|
||||
// nothing wins every poll — the readiness contract's POC
|
||||
// #2 finding, hardened by review 002 R-1).
|
||||
reply = egress.next_reply() => {
|
||||
match reply {
|
||||
Ok(Some(frame)) => {
|
||||
@@ -369,7 +380,7 @@ where
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(None) => {}
|
||||
Ok(None) => tokio::task::yield_now().await,
|
||||
Err(err) => {
|
||||
tracing::debug!("udp egress relay ended: {err:#}");
|
||||
return StageExit::EgressEnded;
|
||||
@@ -1299,6 +1310,103 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
.expect("clean");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The readiness contract's zero-yield bound (review 002 R-1): an
|
||||
/// egress whose `next_reply` is a pure `async { Ok(None) }` —
|
||||
/// instantly ready AND yielding no poll boundary — must still not
|
||||
/// starve the stage's channel branch. The stage's `Ok(None)`
|
||||
/// handler yields before re-parking; this test hangs (livelock)
|
||||
/// without that yield, on any scheduler.
|
||||
#[tokio::test]
|
||||
async fn udp_zero_yield_ok_none_egress_does_not_starve_the_stage() {
|
||||
struct PureHotNoneEgress {
|
||||
inbound: tokio::sync::mpsc::UnboundedSender<Bytes>,
|
||||
outbound: tokio::sync::mpsc::UnboundedReceiver<Bytes>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl crate::egress::Egress for PureHotNoneEgress {
|
||||
fn send(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
addr: TargetAddr,
|
||||
payload: Bytes,
|
||||
) -> futures::future::BoxFuture<'_, Result<(), EgressError>> {
|
||||
Box::pin(async move {
|
||||
let mut inner = addr
|
||||
.to_be_bytes()
|
||||
.map_err(|e| EgressError::General(format!("addr encode: {e}")))?;
|
||||
inner.extend_from_slice(&payload);
|
||||
self.inbound
|
||||
.send(Bytes::from(inner))
|
||||
.map_err(|_| EgressError::General("egress closed".into()))
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn next_reply(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
) -> futures::future::BoxFuture<'_, Result<Option<Bytes>, EgressError>> {
|
||||
Box::pin(async {
|
||||
// Zero awaits: instantly ready, no yield point at
|
||||
// all — the strictest readiness-contract
|
||||
// violation (the mutex-guarded hot egress in
|
||||
// `udp_instant_ok_none_egress_does_not_starve_
|
||||
// the_stage` accidentally yields at its lock;
|
||||
// this one must be survived structurally).
|
||||
match self.outbound.try_recv() {
|
||||
Ok(inner) => Ok(Some(inner)),
|
||||
Err(_) => Ok(None),
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let factory: EgressFactory = Arc::new(|| {
|
||||
Box::pin(async {
|
||||
let (inbound, outbound) = tokio::sync::mpsc::unbounded_channel();
|
||||
Ok(Box::new(PureHotNoneEgress { inbound, outbound }) as Box<dyn Egress + Send>)
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
let (client_end, server_end) = tokio::io::duplex(64 * 1024);
|
||||
let handle = tokio::spawn(serve_socks5_over(
|
||||
server_end,
|
||||
None,
|
||||
Some(factory),
|
||||
None,
|
||||
false,
|
||||
));
|
||||
let mut client = client_end;
|
||||
greet(&mut client).await;
|
||||
write_request(
|
||||
&mut client,
|
||||
&Socks5Command::UDPAssociate,
|
||||
&TargetAddr::Domain("pure.hot".into(), 1080),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await;
|
||||
let (code, _addr) = read_reply(&mut client).await;
|
||||
assert_eq!(code, 0x00);
|
||||
|
||||
let target = TargetAddr::Ip(SocketAddr::from(([10, 0, 0, 6], 53)));
|
||||
client
|
||||
.write_all(&datagram_frame(&target, b"pure"))
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let mut buf = vec![0u8; 2 + 7 + 4];
|
||||
tokio::time::timeout(std::time::Duration::from_secs(5), async {
|
||||
client.read_exact(&mut buf).await
|
||||
})
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.expect("the channel branch is not starved — the echo arrived")
|
||||
.expect("read the echo");
|
||||
let (_, echoed) = decode_datagram(&buf);
|
||||
assert_eq!(&echoed[..], b"pure");
|
||||
|
||||
drop(client);
|
||||
tokio::time::timeout(std::time::Duration::from_secs(5), handle)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.expect("session ends")
|
||||
.expect("join")
|
||||
.expect("clean");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A missing egress callback refuses ASSOCIATE RFC-faithfully
|
||||
/// (`CommandNotSupported` 0x07 — ADR-008's missing-callback class,
|
||||
/// never a panic), and CONNECT still serves the same registration
|
||||
@@ -1973,7 +2081,8 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
/// The establishment bound covers only the open-op round trip
|
||||
/// (ADR-007): the quiet wait outlives any establishment-length
|
||||
/// timeout — a client that BINDs and stays silent (no dial) keeps
|
||||
/// the session alive well past the alkcall 10s default bound.
|
||||
/// the session alive (the wait is teardown-governed; the
|
||||
/// over-channels shape is the harness's pin).
|
||||
#[tokio::test]
|
||||
async fn bind_quiet_wait_is_not_under_the_establishment_bound() {
|
||||
let accept = parked_accept_factory();
|
||||
@@ -1988,12 +2097,12 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let (code, _addr) = read_reply(&mut client).await;
|
||||
assert_eq!(code, 0x00, "reply#1 succeeded");
|
||||
|
||||
// Stay silent past the 10s establishment bound — the wait is
|
||||
// teardown-governed, not establishment-governed. (The
|
||||
// substrate-free shape has no alkcall bound; the harness
|
||||
// integration test pins the over-channels shape. Here the
|
||||
// parked accept still answers after a sleep — the wait is
|
||||
// alive, not under any in-stream timeout.)
|
||||
// Stay silent — the wait is teardown-governed, not
|
||||
// establishment-governed. (The substrate-free shape has no
|
||||
// alkcall bound; the harness integration test pins the
|
||||
// over-channels shape. Here the parked accept still answers
|
||||
// after a sleep — the wait is alive, not under any in-stream
|
||||
// timeout.)
|
||||
tokio::time::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_millis(500)).await;
|
||||
client.write_all(b"x").await.unwrap();
|
||||
let mut buf = [0u8; 1];
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: review-protocol-core
|
||||
name: Review — the protocol core before any assembly-layer work
|
||||
status: pending
|
||||
status: completed
|
||||
depends_on: [implementation/core-integration-suite]
|
||||
scope: narrow
|
||||
risk: low
|
||||
@@ -43,26 +43,274 @@ Review against the architecture, in this order:
|
||||
teardown matrix tests actually pin the semantics; no
|
||||
teardown-at-birth paths (the third-witness pattern held).
|
||||
5. **Convention compliance** (AGENTS.md): no `unwrap`/`expect`/
|
||||
panics outside tests; `thiserror` surfaces; no comments in code
|
||||
except doc comments + pinned non-obvious-correctness notes;
|
||||
naming; module structure (one module per file, `lib.rs`
|
||||
re-exports); producer/consumer vocabulary (no server/client
|
||||
framing outside RFC vocabulary).
|
||||
panics outside tests; `thiserror` surfaces; no comments in code
|
||||
except doc comments + pinned non-obvious-correctness notes;
|
||||
naming; module structure (one module per file, `lib.rs`
|
||||
re-exports); producer/consumer vocabulary (no server/client
|
||||
framing outside RFC vocabulary).
|
||||
6. **Wasm-clean invariant** (ADR-009): both wasm checks green; no
|
||||
`net`-shaped feature; tokio on the wasm-clean subset; the harness
|
||||
and tests stay out of the wasm build.
|
||||
`net`-shaped feature; tokio on the wasm-clean subset; the harness
|
||||
and tests stay out of the wasm build.
|
||||
7. **POC-fidelity spot-check**: for two or three of the trickiest
|
||||
behaviors (the readiness contract, the quiet-wait two-exit
|
||||
semantics, the split-datagram reader persistence), diff the
|
||||
crate's behavior against the POC crates' findings — the POCs are
|
||||
the empirical record; drift is a finding.
|
||||
behaviors (the readiness contract, the quiet-wait two-exit
|
||||
semantics, the split-datagram reader persistence), diff the
|
||||
crate's behavior against the POC crates' findings — the POCs are
|
||||
the empirical record; drift is a finding.
|
||||
8. **Docs sync**: the specs match what landed (the integration
|
||||
task's reconciliation verified; any residue is a finding).
|
||||
task's reconciliation verified; any residue is a finding).
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
> To be filled by implementation agent
|
||||
> Filled by the review agent — see the Summary and the Findings.
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
> To be filled on completion
|
||||
Review performed 2026-09-24 against the eight-criteria order; the
|
||||
gate opens. Two findings were corrected in the review change itself
|
||||
(R-1 readiness-contract hardening; R-2 a non-test `expect`), plus
|
||||
three minor residues (R-3..R-5, fixed in the same change); no
|
||||
seam-contract, wire-fidelity, ACL, teardown, wasm, or POC-fidelity
|
||||
drift was found. One prior-session reconciliation (the bind-only
|
||||
identity row) was independently verified as correct — see the Notes.
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Seam contracts (ADR-004, producer.md §The Three Seams) — clean,
|
||||
one finding corrected (R-1).** The readiness contract is documented
|
||||
on the trait (`egress.rs:174-185`), table-tested, and pinned
|
||||
behaviorally twice (the producer unit test's mutex-guarded hot
|
||||
egress + the integration suite's hot-`Ok(None)` under concurrent
|
||||
load). Ownership rides the handle structurally (`TargetHandle`/
|
||||
`BindTargetHandle` payloads own their halves; no `_` bindings of
|
||||
owning values anywhere in the crate — swept); the accept future owns
|
||||
its resources end-to-end (`BindAccept::new` boxes it; the quiet
|
||||
wait's `select!`-pinned drop is the client-gone teardown, pinned by
|
||||
the drop-flag tests in `src/producer.rs` and `tests/core-
|
||||
integration.rs`); framing-once holds (`Egress::send` takes payload
|
||||
only, `next_reply` returns inner bytes, `frame_inner`/`frame` are
|
||||
the only prefixers; `frame == frame_inner` byte-identity is
|
||||
table-tested). R-1 is the readiness contract's own tolerance: see
|
||||
the Findings.
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Wire fidelity — clean.** The datagram frame matches wire.md §The
|
||||
Data Plane byte-for-byte: `[len: u16 BE][addr + data]`, the joint
|
||||
bound (`frame`/`frame_inner` reject > 65535 with the exact per-form
|
||||
maxima pinned: 65528 v4 / 65516 v6 / 65276 domain), F-2 at payload
|
||||
level (empty datagram round-trips end to end, never EOF; `len == 0`
|
||||
inner is `EmptyFrame` — unreachable from a compliant peer), RSV/FRAG
|
||||
absent from the in-band codec. The phase model holds: no mode byte;
|
||||
post-reply garbage is refused structurally in all three commands
|
||||
(CONNECT = pure pipe, ASSOCIATE = garbage ATYP fails loud, BIND =
|
||||
the quiet wait's one-byte read ends the session with no reply#2) —
|
||||
each pinned by test. Sentinels verified: ASSOCIATE's `127.0.0.1:0`
|
||||
(asserted in the integration suite + the raw probes), BIND's
|
||||
variant-3 zeros (`0.0.0.0:0` reply#1 + reply#2, pinned);
|
||||
association lifetime = channel lifetime (EOF rows in the teardown
|
||||
matrix). The BAST document's joint-constraint note matches the
|
||||
codec.
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Access control (ADR-006) — clean.** The open gate is
|
||||
`required_scopes = ["socks5:open"]` on the single op spec
|
||||
(`socks5_open_spec`); the command gate resolves `socks5:bind` from
|
||||
the per-call opener identity at BIND dispatch and precedes the
|
||||
accept seam (a scope-less BIND never mints a listener — pinned).
|
||||
Both refusals are RFC-faithful (0x02 at the command gate; the
|
||||
registry's `FORBIDDEN` at the open gate); the mapping tables
|
||||
(dial/egress/accept/factory errors → reply codes) are table-tested
|
||||
and route through the forked `ReplyError` — nothing collapsed into
|
||||
generic errors. The integration suite's identity matrix pins all
|
||||
three rows end to end with the CF-006 witness asserted.
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Teardown/lifecycle — clean.** `pump_bidi` is awaited inline in
|
||||
all three data planes (CONNECT, BIND post-reply#2) inside the
|
||||
handler task; the `JoinHandle` tracks the data-plane lifetime (R-02
|
||||
held — no spawn-and-forget). The teardown matrix tests pin the real
|
||||
semantics (half-close / EOF / client-gone-with-parked-accept, each
|
||||
followed by fresh sessions of every command). No teardown-at-birth
|
||||
paths: the egress-drop witness test flips the flag on stage exit,
|
||||
the accept-drop witness flips on the client-gone branch; the
|
||||
consumer sessions reap on `close`/`shutdown`/`Drop` with the leak
|
||||
probes asserting no phantom channels on either side.
|
||||
|
||||
**5. Convention compliance — one finding corrected (R-2).** No
|
||||
`unwrap`/`expect`/`panic!`/`unreachable!` in non-test library code
|
||||
after R-2 (swept: `src/` non-test regions are clean; the forked
|
||||
core's panic translations were re-verified). `thiserror` surfaces
|
||||
throughout; naming/module structure (one module per file, `lib.rs`
|
||||
re-exports) hold; producer/consumer vocabulary holds (RFC-facing
|
||||
"server"/"client" only inside `src/rfc1928/`, the RFC vocabulary's
|
||||
home). Cargo.toml's two inline policy comments are the
|
||||
extraction-review F-3-accepted posture (carried, no fix demanded).
|
||||
|
||||
**6. Wasm-clean invariant — green, with one accepted note (R-5).**
|
||||
Both wasm checks clean (`cargo check`/`clippy --target
|
||||
wasm32-unknown-unknown -- -D warnings`, from scratch); no
|
||||
`net`-shaped feature (the two declared features are empty markers);
|
||||
tokio on the wasm-clean subset with `default-features = false` (no
|
||||
`full` in `[dependencies]`); the harness/tests ride dev-deps only.
|
||||
R-5: see the Findings (a transitive `getrandom` carrier outside
|
||||
this crate's control).
|
||||
|
||||
**7. POC-fidelity spot-check — clean, one finding corrected (R-1).**
|
||||
- *Readiness contract*: the crate's stage matches the POC's
|
||||
`select!`-driven shape (channel reads ∥ reply drains, `Ok(None)`
|
||||
tolerated as a spurious wakeup); the POC's LocalEgress/
|
||||
ComposedEgress both park properly (`readable()` / queue
|
||||
`recv().await`) and the ComposedEgress's closed-queue arm returns
|
||||
`Err` rather than a hot `None` — exactly the posture the crate
|
||||
inherited. The drift the spot-check surfaced is the *zero-yield*
|
||||
bound of the contract (R-1) — a pure `async { Ok(None) }` egress
|
||||
livelocked the landed stage on a current-thread runtime
|
||||
(empirically reproduced; the POC's findings named the biased-select
|
||||
and hot-None hazards, the no-yield variant is the same class one
|
||||
step further). Fixed in the review change.
|
||||
- *Quiet-wait two-exit semantics*: the landed `select!` is
|
||||
single-shot with exactly the two exits (accept / EOF-garbage-error),
|
||||
not a loop — matches the POC's `never_loop` finding; the parked-
|
||||
accept probes make both exits deterministic; reply#1/reply#2 carry
|
||||
the factory's `bind_addr`/peer byte-exactly on the provider
|
||||
variant and the sentinels on variant 3.
|
||||
- *Split-datagram reader persistence*: `AssociateSession::recv_
|
||||
datagram`'s reader + pending queue persist across calls (pinned by
|
||||
the 2-byte-prefix chunk test and the consumer-associate suite) —
|
||||
matches ADR-003's re-read of the POC finding.
|
||||
|
||||
**8. Docs sync — clean, three residues fixed in the review change.**
|
||||
The integration task's reconciliation was verified against ADR-006
|
||||
§Consequences, producer.md §Scope Gating, and the landed spec/tests
|
||||
(see the Notes). Residues found and fixed: `src/egress.rs`'s module
|
||||
doc still said the readiness tests "land with the producer-associate
|
||||
task" (that task is landed — reworded to point at where they live);
|
||||
`src/producer.rs`'s establisher doc said "in this task's scope"
|
||||
(same class — reworded); producer.md §Wiring's sketch showed
|
||||
`producer.register(&mut channel_core)` — the landed signature takes
|
||||
`(&ChannelCore, &OperationRegistry, AuthContext, Option<IdentityWitness>)`
|
||||
and also carries the establisher (corrected). The rest of the specs
|
||||
(wire.md, consumer.md §Wiring, ADR-006, rfc1928.md, README Current
|
||||
State, lib.rs crate docs) match the tree.
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Seam contracts hold (readiness / ownership / accept-future /
|
||||
framing-once) — with R-1 corrected
|
||||
- [x] Wire fidelity: the frame, phase model, sentinels, lifetimes
|
||||
byte-checked against wire.md/bast.md
|
||||
- [x] Access control: both gates + never-implied grants pinned, the
|
||||
prior session's reconciliation verified
|
||||
- [x] Teardown/lifecycle: pump_bidi inline, the matrix pins the
|
||||
semantics, no teardown-at-birth paths
|
||||
- [x] Convention compliance: no unwrap/expect/panics outside tests
|
||||
after R-2; thiserror; naming; module structure; vocabulary
|
||||
- [x] Both wasm checks green (from clean), no net-shaped feature,
|
||||
tokio on the wasm-clean subset
|
||||
- [x] POC-fidelity spot-check of the three trickiest behaviors —
|
||||
the zero-yield drift (R-1) found and fixed
|
||||
- [x] Docs sync: specs match the tree; residues fixed in the same
|
||||
change
|
||||
- [x] Findings recorded; the gate to batch 2 opens
|
||||
|
||||
### Findings
|
||||
|
||||
- **R-1 (major → fixed in the review change)**: the datagram stage's
|
||||
`Ok(None)` tolerance (re-park) is safe against a hot egress only
|
||||
while its futures yield at least one poll boundary. A *zero-yield*
|
||||
egress — `next_reply` = a pure `async { Ok(None) }`, no await at
|
||||
all — wins every `select!` poll forever: the channel branch and
|
||||
every other task on a current-thread scheduler starve (empirically
|
||||
reproduced: the echo never arrives; the multi-thread runtime
|
||||
survives, so the landed mutex-guarded unit test masked the hazard
|
||||
at its lock's yield boundary). The POC's contract wording ("must
|
||||
be `Pending` when nothing is ready") is right; the landed stage's
|
||||
handling had one gap. Fix: the stage's `Ok(None)` handler now
|
||||
`yield_now()`s before re-parking (`src/producer.rs`
|
||||
`run_datagram_stage`), plus a pinning unit test with a pure
|
||||
zero-yield egress (the strictest violator — hangs without the
|
||||
yield) alongside the existing hot-None test. ADR-003's contract
|
||||
prose and `egress.rs`'s trait doc stay as written (the contract
|
||||
is on the egress; the stage now additionally defends itself).
|
||||
- **R-2 (convention, fixed in the review change)**: `Socks5Channel
|
||||
Session::into_inner` / `AssociateSession::into_inner` ended in
|
||||
`inner.expect("into_inner on a spent session")` — the only
|
||||
non-test `expect` in `src/`. Reachability is narrow (a spent
|
||||
session's inner is gone only after close/shutdown/Drop, and no
|
||||
public API constructs a spent session), but convention 2's rule is
|
||||
the rule: the shape is now `Result<TakenInner, SpentSessionError>`
|
||||
/ `Result<TakenAssociateInner, SpentSessionError>` with a
|
||||
zero-carrier error type (`SpentSessionError` — a spent session's
|
||||
manager entry is always already reaped, so dropping it loses
|
||||
nothing; the large-Err/unit-Err lints shaped the choice), pinned
|
||||
by two spent-session unit tests. Test call sites updated
|
||||
(`.expect("the session is live")` — test-side, allowed).
|
||||
- **R-3 (doc residue, fixed)**: `src/egress.rs` module docs + the
|
||||
`src/producer.rs` establisher doc carried task-time phrasings
|
||||
("lands with the producer-associate task" / "this task's scope")
|
||||
that are stale now the tasks are landed. Reworded to point at the
|
||||
landed reality.
|
||||
- **R-4 (doc residue, fixed)**: producer.md §Wiring's assembly sketch
|
||||
showed a one-argument `producer.register(...)`; the landed
|
||||
signature takes the core/registry/auth/witness quadruple. Reconciled
|
||||
(the same sync discipline the integration task applied to
|
||||
consumer.md).
|
||||
- **R-5 (doc residue, fixed)**: the
|
||||
`bind_quiet_wait_is_not_under_the_establishment_bound` test doc
|
||||
claimed the substrate-free probe exercises "the alkcall 10s
|
||||
default bound" — it cannot (the substrate-free shape has no
|
||||
alkcall bound; the over-channels wait-outlives-establishment
|
||||
behavior is the harness's pin by construction). Reworded to say
|
||||
what the test actually pins (the wait is teardown-governed, no
|
||||
in-stream timeout).
|
||||
- **R-6 (accepted, no fix demanded)**: the wasm-clean invariant rides
|
||||
a transitive feature unification outside this crate: `alkcall →
|
||||
jsonschema/referencing → ahash (runtime-rng) → getrandom 0.3.4`,
|
||||
and `wasm_js` (required to compile `getrandom` on
|
||||
`wasm32-unknown-unknown`) is enabled only because jsonschema/
|
||||
referencing declare it for the wasm32 target. The default-crate
|
||||
check passes today (verified from a clean target dir), and the
|
||||
alkty sibling shows the identical posture; but a future
|
||||
alkcall/jsonschema feature change could silently break the wasm
|
||||
gate with no in-tree cause. Not actionable in this crate (the dep
|
||||
graph is alkcall's); noted for the wasm-adapter story's
|
||||
eventual OQ-SK2-06 work and for the batch-2 wasm checks.
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- docs/architecture/wire.md, producer.md, consumer.md, rfc1928.md,
|
||||
bast.md, README.md (the specs under review)
|
||||
- docs/architecture/decisions/001/003/004/006/007/009/013
|
||||
- docs/research/poc-udp-associate-findings.md,
|
||||
poc-bind-findings.md, poc-connect-wasm-findings.md (the POC
|
||||
fidelity sources)
|
||||
- /workspace/alksocks-udp-poc (the POC reference for the readiness
|
||||
contract's empirical record)
|
||||
- AGENTS.md (conventions 1–17; the verification commands)
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- The prior integration session's Notes/Summary were read and
|
||||
cross-checked against the specs and the tree. The one
|
||||
reconciliation it flagged — the task file's identity-matrix row 2
|
||||
expecting a bind-only identity to serve BIND, vs ADR-006's landed
|
||||
`required_scopes = ["socks5:open"]` unconditionally — is **correct
|
||||
as landed**: the op spec (the single op, all three commands, ADR-
|
||||
001) carries the open gate unconditionally; a bind-only identity
|
||||
therefore fails closed for every command (FORBIDDEN at the
|
||||
registry, the establisher never runs, no phantom channel — pinned
|
||||
producer- and consumer-side in
|
||||
`identity_matrix_bind_only_fails_closed_at_the_open_gate`), and a
|
||||
BIND-capable deployment grants both scopes explicitly. The suite
|
||||
pins this; ADR-006 §Consequences states the asymmetry explicitly
|
||||
("never implied, in either direction"); the task file's Notes
|
||||
record the reasoning. No residue: the drift was a Phase-0-era task
|
||||
phrasing, not a spec-vs-code contradiction. The user's flag was
|
||||
well-placed — this review treats the reconciliation as verified
|
||||
rather than open.
|
||||
- The self-reported verification claims reproduce (the landed suite
|
||||
was green at review start; this review's fixes re-ran the full
|
||||
sweep — see below).
|
||||
- Post-review verification (the review change included): `cargo
|
||||
test` 348 green (121 lib + 38 connect + 39 associate + 40 bind +
|
||||
40 integration + 30 differential + 37 rfc1928 + 3 doctests — the
|
||||
two R-1/R-2 additions and the four R-2 call-site updates
|
||||
included), `cargo test --all-features` green, `cargo clippy
|
||||
--all-targets -- -D warnings` clean, `cargo fmt --check` clean,
|
||||
both wasm checks clean (re-run from a clean wasm target dir),
|
||||
`cargo doc --no-deps` clean. The batch boundary holds: no
|
||||
`local`/`composed` code exists.
|
||||
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ async fn half_close_write_eof_ends_the_producer_pump() {
|
||||
let TakenInner {
|
||||
session: _owner,
|
||||
inner,
|
||||
} = session.into_inner();
|
||||
} = session.into_inner().expect("the session is live");
|
||||
let (mut read, mut write) = tokio::io::split(inner);
|
||||
write.write_all(b"pre").await.expect("write");
|
||||
let mut buf = [0u8; 3];
|
||||
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ async fn into_inner_pairs_the_pipe_with_the_teardown_owner() {
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.expect("the session connects");
|
||||
let channel_id = session.channel_id();
|
||||
let TakenInner { session, inner } = session.into_inner();
|
||||
let TakenInner { session, inner } = session.into_inner().expect("the session is live");
|
||||
assert!(topo.consumer.manager().has_channel(channel_id));
|
||||
|
||||
let (mut read, write) = tokio::io::split(inner);
|
||||
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ async fn close_after_into_inner_reaps() {
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.expect("the session connects");
|
||||
let channel_id = session.channel_id();
|
||||
let TakenInner { session, .. } = session.into_inner();
|
||||
let TakenInner { session, .. } = session.into_inner().expect("the session is live");
|
||||
// The inner pipe was taken; `close` still reaps the entry.
|
||||
assert!(session.close().await, "the entry existed before the close");
|
||||
no_leaked_channels(&topo).await;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user