Contract-suite queue-depth rows (task suite-queue-depth-rows): the job-handle validity predicate row (in-window heartbeat/ack landing, late-heartbeat/post-lapse-ack/retry/fail refusals past a 1 s stamp with the row untouched, ack_batch per-id predicate live-1/lapsed-0/nonexistent-0, fail(None)→"failed" and retry-at-budget→"max attempts exceeded"), the ADR-010 depth row (reclaim consumes an attempt with claimed_at/deadline refreshed and the original holder refusing, reclaim-exhaustion dead-lettering with the pre-claim sweep — get_job-visible "max attempts exceeded"+died_at, cancel unconditional delete with the not-an-interrupt refusal shape plus pending/dead/missing arms), and the no-stranded-rows sweep row (both states move with "expired", unexpired/never-expiring untouched, retention TTL enforcing with the moved+deleted sum, None=forever) — each version-stamped per the suite convention (ADR-010 §1–§5, ADR-019 §3, ADR-008 §5), wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s). M-1's retention-failure pin dispositioned engine-side per the task's honest call: the storage-level DELETE failure is not injectable through the contract surface, so it lands in the SQLite substrate's trigger seam (sweep_rolls_back_the_retention_half_with_the_move — the move half rolls back with the retention half), with the pg twin verified structurally (both halves inside in_tx's frame) and the disposition recorded in the task Notes. Verified: sqlite suite 13/13, pg suite 13/13 vs harness twice (postgres/poc@:15432), substrate sweep-rollback tests 4/4, workspace build/test green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
250511d480
commit
5c9ae6a7fc
6 files changed
+746
-15
No files matched your search
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ pub mod version_stamp;
|
||||
pub use factory::StoreFactory;
|
||||
pub use properties::{
|
||||
duration_refusal_on_non_positive_ttl, enqueue_opts_resolution, extent_clamp_semantics,
|
||||
in_tx_reads_see_own_writes, name_validation_rejects_empty_and_reserved,
|
||||
payload_round_trip_stores_exact_encoding, payload_too_large_never_produced_on_sqlite,
|
||||
payload_too_large_produced_on_pg, receiver_close_and_save_arms,
|
||||
in_tx_reads_see_own_writes, job_handle_validity_predicate,
|
||||
name_validation_rejects_empty_and_reserved, payload_round_trip_stores_exact_encoding,
|
||||
payload_too_large_never_produced_on_sqlite, payload_too_large_produced_on_pg,
|
||||
queue_depth_reclaim_and_dead_letter, receiver_close_and_save_arms, sweep_no_stranded_rows,
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -996,6 +996,548 @@ pub async fn payload_too_large_produced_on_pg(factory: &dyn StoreFactory) {
|
||||
factory.teardown().await.expect("factory teardown");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The suite's lapse-tolerance sleep: bounded well past a 1-second
|
||||
/// stamp's resolution (a stamp set on second `T` has lapsed for any
|
||||
/// clock read `> T + 1`; 2.5 s guarantees it, 3.5 s the `expires: 2`
|
||||
/// stamps). Timing posture: state outcomes are asserted, never
|
||||
/// durations.
|
||||
fn past_stamp_sleep(millis: u64) {
|
||||
std::thread::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_millis(millis));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// **Job-handle validity predicate** — the uniform rule (processing
|
||||
/// state + unexpired claim deadline) on every handle op: an in-window
|
||||
/// heartbeat lands (renewal) and an in-window ack deletes
|
||||
/// (delete-on-ack); the late heartbeat is refused exactly at the
|
||||
/// lapsed claim — the short-stamp row claims with a 1 s visibility
|
||||
/// stamp and tolerance-sleeps past it (the sleep-then-assert-state
|
||||
/// shape is sequential single-store and fits the suite's determinism
|
||||
/// posture); the post-lapse ack does not land (at-least-once: the
|
||||
/// worker's ack does not land after lapse), and `retry`'s refusal is
|
||||
/// `false` with the row untouched (state, attempts, claimant, and
|
||||
/// deadline all as the claim left them). `fail(None)` after lapse is
|
||||
/// refused identically — deadline lapse refuses *all* ops, not just
|
||||
/// heartbeat. `ack_batch` applies the predicate per id: a lapsed id
|
||||
/// and a never-claimed id are silently not counted — the returned
|
||||
/// count reflects only the live acks.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The engine-default strings land identically: `fail(None)` records
|
||||
/// `"failed"`, and retry-at-exhausted-budget dead-letters with
|
||||
/// `"max attempts exceeded"` (the reclaim-exhaustion arm of that
|
||||
/// string pins in the queue-depth row's exhaustion leg).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Contract stamp: ADR-010 §2 (the uniform validity predicate — the
|
||||
/// late-heartbeat refusal, post-lapse ack refusal); ADR-010 §1
|
||||
/// (delete-on-ack; `ack_batch`'s per-id predicate, partial success
|
||||
/// ordinary); ADR-010 §4 (the engine-default strings); ADR-019 §3
|
||||
/// (the claim handle's op surface — one-shot consumables, repeatable
|
||||
/// heartbeat); ADR-008 §5 (refusals are `false`, never errors).
|
||||
pub async fn job_handle_validity_predicate(factory: &dyn StoreFactory) {
|
||||
let store = factory.open().await.expect("factory opens a store");
|
||||
|
||||
let slow = store
|
||||
.queue("handles", alkstore::QueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let fast = store
|
||||
.queue(
|
||||
"lapse",
|
||||
alkstore::QueueOpts {
|
||||
visibility_timeout_s: 1,
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// In-window ops land: renewal + delete-on-ack under the live
|
||||
// claim.
|
||||
let live_id = fast
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "in-window"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let held = fast
|
||||
.claim_one("w1")
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("a ready row claims");
|
||||
assert_eq!(held.job().id, live_id);
|
||||
assert_eq!(held.job().state, JobState::Processing);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
held.heartbeat(600).await.unwrap(),
|
||||
"an in-window heartbeat lands (renewal)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let mid = fast
|
||||
.get_job(live_id)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("the row still lives mid-claim");
|
||||
assert_eq!(mid.state, JobState::Processing);
|
||||
assert!(held.ack().await.unwrap(), "an in-window ack lands");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
fast.get_job(live_id).await.unwrap().is_none(),
|
||||
"delete-on-ack completed work leaves no row"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Lapse legs: one claim per refusal op, all stamped with the 1 s
|
||||
// visibility, one tolerance sleep past every deadline at once.
|
||||
let ack_refused = fast
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "ack-refused"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let retry_refused = fast
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "retry-refused"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let fail_refused = fast
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "fail-refused"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let lapsed_ack = fast.claim_one("w2").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
let lapsed_retry = fast.claim_one("w2").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
let lapsed_fail = fast.claim_one("w2").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
(
|
||||
lapsed_ack.job().id,
|
||||
lapsed_retry.job().id,
|
||||
lapsed_fail.job().id
|
||||
),
|
||||
(ack_refused, retry_refused, fail_refused),
|
||||
"claims hand out in enqueue order (equal priority)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let retry_before = lapsed_retry.job().clone();
|
||||
past_stamp_sleep(2_500);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!lapsed_ack.heartbeat(600).await.unwrap(),
|
||||
"late heartbeat must be refused: the deadline has lapsed"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!lapsed_retry
|
||||
.retry(Some("boom".to_string()), Some(5))
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
"retry's refusal under the lapsed claim is false"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!lapsed_fail.fail(None).await.unwrap(),
|
||||
"deadline lapse refuses fail identically — the predicate is uniform"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let retry_after = fast
|
||||
.get_job(retry_refused)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("the retried-at row survived");
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
retry_after, retry_before,
|
||||
"retry's refusal leaves the row untouched: the claim keeps pre-call state"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// ack_batch applies the predicate per id: the live id counts, the
|
||||
// lapsed id and a never-claimed id silently do not. (Own queue —
|
||||
// the lapsed legs above left reclaimable rows in `lapse`, and any
|
||||
// later claim there would reclaim FIFO-first. The live id survives
|
||||
// the 1 s stamp the same way the lapsed one lapsed: a renewal.)
|
||||
let batch = store
|
||||
.queue(
|
||||
"batch",
|
||||
alkstore::QueueOpts {
|
||||
visibility_timeout_s: 1,
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let batch_live_id = batch
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "batch-live"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let batch_lapse_id = batch
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "batch-lapsed"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let batch_live = batch.claim_one("w3").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
let batch_lapsed = batch.claim_one("w3").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
(batch_live.job().id, batch_lapsed.job().id),
|
||||
(batch_live_id, batch_lapse_id),
|
||||
"claims hand out in enqueue order (equal priority)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
batch_live.heartbeat(600).await.unwrap(),
|
||||
"the renewal keeps this id's claim live through the batch"
|
||||
);
|
||||
past_stamp_sleep(2_500);
|
||||
let counted = batch
|
||||
.ack_batch(&[batch_live_id, batch_lapse_id, 987_654_321])
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
counted, 1,
|
||||
"the returned count reflects only the live acks (lapsed and nonexistent ids not counted)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
batch.get_job(batch_live_id).await.unwrap().is_none(),
|
||||
"the counted id acked (deleted)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let lapsed_alive = batch
|
||||
.get_job(batch_lapse_id)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("the lapsed id's row survives the batch");
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
lapsed_alive.state,
|
||||
JobState::Processing,
|
||||
"the lapsed id was silently not counted, not deleted"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// The engine-default strings (fail(None); retry at exhausted
|
||||
// budget) on a long-visibility queue — no lapse interference.
|
||||
let failed = slow
|
||||
.enqueue(
|
||||
json!({"leg": "fail-default"}),
|
||||
EnqueueOpts {
|
||||
max_attempts: Some(1),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let held_fail = slow.claim_one("w4").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(held_fail.job().id, failed);
|
||||
assert!(held_fail.fail(None).await.unwrap());
|
||||
let dead_failed = slow
|
||||
.get_job(failed)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("fail(None) dead-letters");
|
||||
assert_eq!(dead_failed.state, JobState::Dead);
|
||||
assert_eq!(dead_failed.last_error.as_deref(), Some("failed"));
|
||||
assert!(dead_failed.died_at.is_some());
|
||||
|
||||
let exhausting = slow
|
||||
.enqueue(
|
||||
json!({"leg": "exhaustion"}),
|
||||
EnqueueOpts {
|
||||
max_attempts: Some(1),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let held_retry = slow.claim_one("w5").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(held_retry.job().id, exhausting);
|
||||
assert!(held_retry.retry(None, Some(5)).await.unwrap());
|
||||
let dead_exhausted = slow
|
||||
.get_job(exhausting)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("retry at exhausted budget dead-letters");
|
||||
assert_eq!(dead_exhausted.state, JobState::Dead);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
dead_exhausted.last_error.as_deref(),
|
||||
Some("max attempts exceeded"),
|
||||
"the engine-default exhaustion string lands identically"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(dead_exhausted.died_at.is_some());
|
||||
|
||||
factory.teardown().await.expect("factory teardown");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// **Queue-depth reclaim and dead-letter** — the ADR-010 depth
|
||||
/// properties over a 1 s-visibility queue: a visibility reclaim
|
||||
/// consumes an attempt (the expired claim reclaims to a second
|
||||
/// claimant with `attempts` incremented and `claimed_at` refreshed —
|
||||
/// the original holder's ops refuse after the reclaim), exhaustion
|
||||
/// dead-letters into get_job-visible dead storage (`"max attempts
|
||||
/// exceeded"` + `died_at` — the pre-claim sweep shape: a row whose
|
||||
/// reclaim consumed its budget dead-letters at the next claim), and
|
||||
/// `cancel` is an unconditional delete of either state — not an
|
||||
/// interrupt: the row is gone (live and dead alike refuse `cancel`
|
||||
/// with `false`), and the holder's next op refuses with the same
|
||||
/// shape as a lapse.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Contract stamp: ADR-010 §2 (a reclaim consumes an attempt; the
|
||||
/// original holder refuses post-reclaim); ADR-010 §3 (exhaustion via
|
||||
/// reclaim dead-letters); ADR-010 §1 (cancel — unconditional, not an
|
||||
/// interrupt); ADR-010 §4 (dead-visible `get_job` with
|
||||
/// `last_error`/`died_at`; the exhaustion string).
|
||||
pub async fn queue_depth_reclaim_and_dead_letter(factory: &dyn StoreFactory) {
|
||||
let store = factory.open().await.expect("factory opens a store");
|
||||
let depth = store
|
||||
.queue(
|
||||
"depth",
|
||||
alkstore::QueueOpts {
|
||||
visibility_timeout_s: 1,
|
||||
max_attempts: 2,
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// Visibility reclaim consumes an attempt.
|
||||
let reclaimed = depth
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "reclaim"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let first = depth.claim_one("w1").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(first.job().id, reclaimed);
|
||||
assert_eq!(first.job().attempts, 1);
|
||||
let t1 = first.job().claimed_at.expect("claim stamps claimed_at");
|
||||
let e1 = first
|
||||
.job()
|
||||
.claim_expires_at
|
||||
.expect("claim stamps the deadline");
|
||||
past_stamp_sleep(2_500);
|
||||
|
||||
let second = depth
|
||||
.claim_one("w2")
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("the lapsed claim reclaims");
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.job().id, reclaimed, "the same row reclaims");
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.job().attempts, 2, "a reclaim consumes an attempt");
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.job().state, JobState::Processing);
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.job().worker_id.as_deref(), Some("w2"));
|
||||
let t2 = second
|
||||
.job()
|
||||
.claimed_at
|
||||
.expect("the reclaim re-stamps claimed_at");
|
||||
let e2 = second
|
||||
.job()
|
||||
.claim_expires_at
|
||||
.expect("the reclaim re-stamps the deadline");
|
||||
assert!(t2 > t1, "claimed_at is refreshed by the reclaim");
|
||||
assert!(e2 > e1, "the deadline is refreshed, not inherited");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!first.heartbeat(600).await.unwrap(),
|
||||
"the original holder refuses after the reclaim"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(second.ack().await.unwrap(), "the reclaiming holder acks");
|
||||
assert!(depth.get_job(reclaimed).await.unwrap().is_none());
|
||||
|
||||
// Exhaustion: the reclaim that spends the budget, then the
|
||||
// next claim's pre-claim sweep dead-letters the row.
|
||||
let exhausted = depth
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "exhausted"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
depth.claim_one("w1").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
past_stamp_sleep(2_500);
|
||||
let at_budget = depth.claim_one("w2").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(at_budget.job().id, exhausted);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
at_budget.job().attempts,
|
||||
at_budget.job().max_attempts,
|
||||
"the reclaim spent the budget"
|
||||
);
|
||||
past_stamp_sleep(2_500);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
depth.claim_one("w3").await.unwrap().is_none(),
|
||||
"the budget-spent row dead-letters instead of reclaiming"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let dead = depth
|
||||
.get_job(exhausted)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("the dead row is get_job-visible");
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
dead.state,
|
||||
JobState::Dead,
|
||||
"exhaustion moves to dead storage"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(dead.last_error.as_deref(), Some("max attempts exceeded"));
|
||||
assert!(dead.died_at.is_some());
|
||||
|
||||
// Cancel is an unconditional delete — either state, any holder —
|
||||
// and not an interrupt: the holder's next op refuses the same
|
||||
// shape as a lapse, and nothing re-enters the claim path.
|
||||
let cancelled_live = depth
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "cancel-live"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let holder = depth.claim_one("w1").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(holder.job().id, cancelled_live);
|
||||
assert!(depth.cancel(cancelled_live).await.unwrap());
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
depth.get_job(cancelled_live).await.unwrap().is_none(),
|
||||
"cancel deletes the row whole: no re-claim, no dead row"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!holder.heartbeat(600).await.unwrap(),
|
||||
"not an interrupt — the holder's next op refuses identically"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let cancelled_pending = depth
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "cancel-pending"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
assert!(depth.cancel(cancelled_pending).await.unwrap());
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
depth.claim_one("w1").await.unwrap().is_none(),
|
||||
"a cancelled pending row never becomes claimable"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!depth.cancel(987_654_321).await.unwrap(),
|
||||
"no missing live row cancels"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!depth.cancel(exhausted).await.unwrap(),
|
||||
"a dead row is outside cancel's live-row reach"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
depth.get_job(exhausted).await.unwrap().is_some(),
|
||||
"cancel on a dead id deletes nothing"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
factory.teardown().await.expect("factory teardown");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// **Sweep: no stranded rows** — `sweep_expired()` moves *every*
|
||||
/// past-expiry row (any state: the pending-expired and the
|
||||
/// processing-expired alike — an enqueued job with an `expires`
|
||||
/// deadline is eventually in exactly one of pending, processing, or
|
||||
/// dead, never stuck unreachable), stamps the `"expired"` string, and
|
||||
/// enforces dead-letter retention (rows past a set
|
||||
/// `dead_letter_retention_s` delete; retention `None` = forever) —
|
||||
/// the count being the moved + retention-deleted sum. Unexpired and
|
||||
/// never-expiring rows stay untouched.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The M-1 follow-up (the sweep's retention half rolling back with
|
||||
/// the sweep on a retention-DELETE failure) is pinned engine-side —
|
||||
/// the failure is storage-level, not injectable through the contract
|
||||
/// surface; see the SQLite substrate's
|
||||
/// `sweep_rolls_back_the_retention_half_with_the_move` and this
|
||||
/// task's Notes for the disposition.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Contract stamp: ADR-010 §5 (the no-stranded-rows property, both
|
||||
/// states, and the retention enforcement); ADR-010 §4 (the
|
||||
/// `"expired"` string; retention default = forever).
|
||||
pub async fn sweep_no_stranded_rows(factory: &dyn StoreFactory) {
|
||||
let store = factory.open().await.expect("factory opens a store");
|
||||
|
||||
let sweeping = store
|
||||
.queue("sweepme", alkstore::QueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
// The processing-expired row is claimed first (it is the only row
|
||||
// at claim time) with a 2 s expiry stamp; the pending-expired row
|
||||
// enqueues after the claim so FIFO never hands it out.
|
||||
let processing = sweeping
|
||||
.enqueue(
|
||||
json!({"leg": "expired-processing"}),
|
||||
EnqueueOpts {
|
||||
expires: Some(2),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let held = sweeping.claim_one("w1").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(held.job().id, processing, "the expiry-stamped row claims");
|
||||
let pending = sweeping
|
||||
.enqueue(
|
||||
json!({"leg": "expired-pending"}),
|
||||
EnqueueOpts {
|
||||
expires: Some(2),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let unexpired = sweeping
|
||||
.enqueue(
|
||||
json!({"leg": "unexpired"}),
|
||||
EnqueueOpts {
|
||||
expires: Some(3600),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let never = sweeping
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "never-expiring"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
past_stamp_sleep(3_500);
|
||||
|
||||
let moved = sweeping.sweep_expired().await.unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
moved, 2,
|
||||
"every past-expiry row moves — both states, exactly the expired ones"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let dead_processing = sweeping
|
||||
.get_job(processing)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("the processing-expired row moved to dead");
|
||||
assert_eq!(dead_processing.state, JobState::Dead);
|
||||
assert_eq!(dead_processing.last_error.as_deref(), Some("expired"));
|
||||
assert!(dead_processing.died_at.is_some());
|
||||
let dead_pending = sweeping
|
||||
.get_job(pending)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("the pending-expired row moved to dead");
|
||||
assert_eq!(dead_pending.state, JobState::Dead);
|
||||
assert_eq!(dead_pending.last_error.as_deref(), Some("expired"));
|
||||
for (id, label) in [(unexpired, "unexpired"), (never, "never-expiring")] {
|
||||
let live = sweeping.get_job(id).await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(live.state, JobState::Pending, "{label} row untouched");
|
||||
}
|
||||
drop(held);
|
||||
|
||||
// Retention enforcement: a dead row past its stamp deletes; the
|
||||
// same-shaped row on a retention-None queue lives forever.
|
||||
let retained = store
|
||||
.queue(
|
||||
"retained-1s",
|
||||
alkstore::QueueOpts {
|
||||
dead_letter_retention_s: Some(1),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let keeping = store
|
||||
.queue("keeper", alkstore::QueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let expires_1s = retained
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "aged-out"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let held_dies = retained.claim_one("w1").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert!(held_dies.fail(None).await.unwrap());
|
||||
let expires_never = keeping
|
||||
.enqueue(json!({"leg": "kept"}), EnqueueOpts::default())
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let kept_dies = keeping.claim_one("w1").await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert!(kept_dies.fail(None).await.unwrap());
|
||||
past_stamp_sleep(2_500);
|
||||
|
||||
let deleted = retained.sweep_expired().await.unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
deleted, 1,
|
||||
"the retention deletion reports through the sweep count"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
retained.get_job(expires_1s).await.unwrap().is_none(),
|
||||
"the dead row past its retention stamp is gone"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(keeping.sweep_expired().await.unwrap(), 0);
|
||||
let kept = keeping.get_job(expires_never).await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
kept.state,
|
||||
JobState::Dead,
|
||||
"retention None = dead rows live forever"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
factory.teardown().await.expect("factory teardown");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Shared clock helper for the suite's clock-adjacent rows: unix
|
||||
/// seconds now (rows never assert tight timings — the tolerance is
|
||||
/// the stamp's resolution).
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user