glm-5.3-flash 5c9ae6a7fc Contract-suite queue-depth rows (task suite-queue-depth-rows): the job-handle validity predicate row (in-window heartbeat/ack landing, late-heartbeat/post-lapse-ack/retry/fail refusals past a 1 s stamp with the row untouched, ack_batch per-id predicate live-1/lapsed-0/nonexistent-0, fail(None)→"failed" and retry-at-budget→"max attempts exceeded"), the ADR-010 depth row (reclaim consumes an attempt with claimed_at/deadline refreshed and the original holder refusing, reclaim-exhaustion dead-lettering with the pre-claim sweep — get_job-visible "max attempts exceeded"+died_at, cancel unconditional delete with the not-an-interrupt refusal shape plus pending/dead/missing arms), and the no-stranded-rows sweep row (both states move with "expired", unexpired/never-expiring untouched, retention TTL enforcing with the moved+deleted sum, None=forever) — each version-stamped per the suite convention (ADR-010 §1–§5, ADR-019 §3, ADR-008 §5), wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s). M-1's retention-failure pin dispositioned engine-side per the task's honest call: the storage-level DELETE failure is not injectable through the contract surface, so it lands in the SQLite substrate's trigger seam (sweep_rolls_back_the_retention_half_with_the_move — the move half rolls back with the retention half), with the pg twin verified structurally (both halves inside in_tx's frame) and the disposition recorded in the task Notes. Verified: sqlite suite 13/13, pg suite 13/13 vs harness twice (postgres/poc@:15432), substrate sweep-rollback tests 4/4, workspace build/test green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean

2026-10-10 05:50:26 +00:00

.opencode/agents

phase 0 setup: agent defs cleaned, AGENTS.md, initial phase-0.md draft

2026-10-03 16:36:46 +00:00

alkstore

docs alignment: v1 TLS posture owned by deployment.md, QueueOpts numeric consumer-obligation notes (task pg-fix-docs-alignment, review 002 Finding 6 remainder)

2026-10-10 05:08:27 +00:00

alkstore-contract-suite

Contract-suite queue-depth rows (task suite-queue-depth-rows): the job-handle validity predicate row (in-window heartbeat/ack landing, late-heartbeat/post-lapse-ack/retry/fail refusals past a 1 s stamp with the row untouched, ack_batch per-id predicate live-1/lapsed-0/nonexistent-0, fail(None)→"failed" and retry-at-budget→"max attempts exceeded"), the ADR-010 depth row (reclaim consumes an attempt with claimed_at/deadline refreshed and the original holder refusing, reclaim-exhaustion dead-lettering with the pre-claim sweep — get_job-visible "max attempts exceeded"+died_at, cancel unconditional delete with the not-an-interrupt refusal shape plus pending/dead/missing arms), and the no-stranded-rows sweep row (both states move with "expired", unexpired/never-expiring untouched, retention TTL enforcing with the moved+deleted sum, None=forever) — each version-stamped per the suite convention (ADR-010 §1–§5, ADR-019 §3, ADR-008 §5), wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s). M-1's retention-failure pin dispositioned engine-side per the task's honest call: the storage-level DELETE failure is not injectable through the contract surface, so it lands in the SQLite substrate's trigger seam (sweep_rolls_back_the_retention_half_with_the_move — the move half rolls back with the retention half), with the pg twin verified structurally (both halves inside in_tx's frame) and the disposition recorded in the task Notes. Verified: sqlite suite 13/13, pg suite 13/13 vs harness twice (postgres/poc@:15432), substrate sweep-rollback tests 4/4, workspace build/test green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean

2026-10-10 05:50:26 +00:00

alkstore-postgres

Contract-suite queue-depth rows (task suite-queue-depth-rows): the job-handle validity predicate row (in-window heartbeat/ack landing, late-heartbeat/post-lapse-ack/retry/fail refusals past a 1 s stamp with the row untouched, ack_batch per-id predicate live-1/lapsed-0/nonexistent-0, fail(None)→"failed" and retry-at-budget→"max attempts exceeded"), the ADR-010 depth row (reclaim consumes an attempt with claimed_at/deadline refreshed and the original holder refusing, reclaim-exhaustion dead-lettering with the pre-claim sweep — get_job-visible "max attempts exceeded"+died_at, cancel unconditional delete with the not-an-interrupt refusal shape plus pending/dead/missing arms), and the no-stranded-rows sweep row (both states move with "expired", unexpired/never-expiring untouched, retention TTL enforcing with the moved+deleted sum, None=forever) — each version-stamped per the suite convention (ADR-010 §1–§5, ADR-019 §3, ADR-008 §5), wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s). M-1's retention-failure pin dispositioned engine-side per the task's honest call: the storage-level DELETE failure is not injectable through the contract surface, so it lands in the SQLite substrate's trigger seam (sweep_rolls_back_the_retention_half_with_the_move — the move half rolls back with the retention half), with the pg twin verified structurally (both halves inside in_tx's frame) and the disposition recorded in the task Notes. Verified: sqlite suite 13/13, pg suite 13/13 vs harness twice (postgres/poc@:15432), substrate sweep-rollback tests 4/4, workspace build/test green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean

2026-10-10 05:50:26 +00:00

alkstore-sqlite

Contract-suite queue-depth rows (task suite-queue-depth-rows): the job-handle validity predicate row (in-window heartbeat/ack landing, late-heartbeat/post-lapse-ack/retry/fail refusals past a 1 s stamp with the row untouched, ack_batch per-id predicate live-1/lapsed-0/nonexistent-0, fail(None)→"failed" and retry-at-budget→"max attempts exceeded"), the ADR-010 depth row (reclaim consumes an attempt with claimed_at/deadline refreshed and the original holder refusing, reclaim-exhaustion dead-lettering with the pre-claim sweep — get_job-visible "max attempts exceeded"+died_at, cancel unconditional delete with the not-an-interrupt refusal shape plus pending/dead/missing arms), and the no-stranded-rows sweep row (both states move with "expired", unexpired/never-expiring untouched, retention TTL enforcing with the moved+deleted sum, None=forever) — each version-stamped per the suite convention (ADR-010 §1–§5, ADR-019 §3, ADR-008 §5), wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s). M-1's retention-failure pin dispositioned engine-side per the task's honest call: the storage-level DELETE failure is not injectable through the contract surface, so it lands in the SQLite substrate's trigger seam (sweep_rolls_back_the_retention_half_with_the_move — the move half rolls back with the retention half), with the pg twin verified structurally (both halves inside in_tx's frame) and the disposition recorded in the task Notes. Verified: sqlite suite 13/13, pg suite 13/13 vs harness twice (postgres/poc@:15432), substrate sweep-rollback tests 4/4, workspace build/test green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean

2026-10-10 05:50:26 +00:00

docs

decompose wave 5 — contract suite: audit-first split of the verification backlog (engines' columns already discharge most rows; map in review-wave-5's appendix), seven mechanism-grouped suite-row tasks (queue depth, scheduler, tx commit-atomicity, streams, locks, wakes, opts/backoff equivalence), two engine-side hardening tasks (sqlite commit-error arm, pg F-1 defense-in-depth), and the review-wave-5 gate that flips the engine specs to stable

2026-10-10 05:37:53 +00:00

tasks

Contract-suite queue-depth rows (task suite-queue-depth-rows): the job-handle validity predicate row (in-window heartbeat/ack landing, late-heartbeat/post-lapse-ack/retry/fail refusals past a 1 s stamp with the row untouched, ack_batch per-id predicate live-1/lapsed-0/nonexistent-0, fail(None)→"failed" and retry-at-budget→"max attempts exceeded"), the ADR-010 depth row (reclaim consumes an attempt with claimed_at/deadline refreshed and the original holder refusing, reclaim-exhaustion dead-lettering with the pre-claim sweep — get_job-visible "max attempts exceeded"+died_at, cancel unconditional delete with the not-an-interrupt refusal shape plus pending/dead/missing arms), and the no-stranded-rows sweep row (both states move with "expired", unexpired/never-expiring untouched, retention TTL enforcing with the moved+deleted sum, None=forever) — each version-stamped per the suite convention (ADR-010 §1–§5, ADR-019 §3, ADR-008 §5), wired into both engines' suite targets (SQLite tokio tests, pg harness_row!s). M-1's retention-failure pin dispositioned engine-side per the task's honest call: the storage-level DELETE failure is not injectable through the contract surface, so it lands in the SQLite substrate's trigger seam (sweep_rolls_back_the_retention_half_with_the_move — the move half rolls back with the retention half), with the pg twin verified structurally (both halves inside in_tx's frame) and the disposition recorded in the task Notes. Verified: sqlite suite 13/13, pg suite 13/13 vs harness twice (postgres/poc@:15432), substrate sweep-rollback tests 4/4, workspace build/test green, clippy -D warnings, fmt clean

2026-10-10 05:50:26 +00:00

.gitignore

Scaffold Cargo workspace: alkstore core + sqlite/postgres engine stubs (ADR-001)

2026-10-07 14:57:34 +00:00

AGENTS.md

Core error taxonomy + name validation (ADR-008 §4/§5, ADR-017 §3); AGENTS.md updated to Phase 1 posture

2026-10-07 15:04:04 +00:00

Cargo.lock

Postgres engine: open constructor, PgOpts, pool + listener wiring — forwarder skeleton with the POC-pinned pitfalls structurally excluded, seam error mappings, wave-3 stub surface (task pg-engine-open-opts)

2026-10-09 06:00:31 +00:00

Cargo.toml

Contract-suite scaffold: alkstore-contract-suite crate + ADR-022 (suite layout decision), engine dev-dep edges (ADR-017 §4.2 discharged, ADR-012 §2 mirror)

2026-10-07 16:03:00 +00:00

S

Description

No description provided

2.2 MiB

0 Stars 6 Watchers 0 Forks

Languages

Rust 99.4%

Python 0.5%