Files
alkstore/tasks/release-contract-window-close.md
T
glm-5.3-flash a37c2887dc Dispose the wave-6 class-1-window observations (release-contract-window-close)
The pre-release pass's last contract-text dispositions, each dated
in-place citing the 2026-10-11 close-out pass (ADR-017 §2's terminal
window):

- Publish→wake ordering tolerance: documented tolerance (decided with
  the user) — core-contract.md streams paragraph + delivery-obligations
  bullet, ADR-015 §4 companion annotation; the wake = offset-order
  ADR amendment declined (commit-ordered pg visibility; hint-shaped
  wake posture).
- ADR-023 §2: heartbeat(extend) and save_offset(offset) join the
  boundary/offset row (total — negatives well-defined), with the
  home rationale annotated; core-contract's domain paragraph
  mirrors; the backlog numeric-domain row registers the suite-duty
  follow-up.
- ADR-021 §5: EventReceiver::try_recv's closed shape pinned
  (Err(Closed), mirroring ADR-008 §3); core-contract subscribe arms
  sentence extended.
- get_job prose: core-contract queues section + queues.md's reads
  sentence now say the uniform id-global / get_job_tx-filtered split.
- Mem-arithmetic observation: no-action disposition recorded in the
  task Notes (byte-level transplants; equivalence suite-pinned
  three-way).

Suite stamps checked — no accumulation required (no cited § text
changed meaning). Docs-only; gates green: build, workspace tests,
clippy -D warnings, fmt, fuzz replay, rustdoc -D warnings,
taskgraph validate (79 tasks).
2026-10-11 00:17:48 +00:00

11 KiB
Raw Blame History

id, name, status, depends_on, scope, risk, impact, level, tags
id name status depends_on scope risk impact level tags
release-contract-window-close Class-1 window's last dispositions — the wave-6 recorded observations completed
moderate medium project implementation
wave-8
contract
adr

Description

ADR-017 §2's class-1 amend-in-place window terminates permanently at the core crate's first release — this pre-release pass is the last chance to land the contract-text dispositions the wave-6 review gate recorded for it (tasks/review-wave-6.md §Recorded findings). Land each as either contract/ADR text (a class-1 amendment, legal only now) or an explicit documented-tolerance record — no silent divergence survives into the release:

  1. Multi-thread publish→wake ordering tolerance (streams): offset allocation precedes insert+wake, so two concurrent publishes can complete out of offset-allocation order and a subscriber's cursor can skip an event whose wake fires later (the event is never lost from the log). Nothing contract-side pins wake-fire order vs offset order; the SQL engines share the shape in principle. Decide: document as a tolerated ordering (where — core-contract.md's delivery-guarantee table is the natural home) or amend as ADR text (wake order per stream = offset order — the heavier path, and one the mem engine's current-thread posture doesn't exercise). Raise the recommendation with the user before landing — this is a consumer-visible guarantee decision, exactly the class AGENTS.md says to escalate.
  2. ADR-023 §2 domain-table classifications (all three engines uniform; the table is the contract's numeric-domain record): heartbeat(extend)'s seconds-shaped argument (boundary-total today: saturating/SQL add — a negative shortens/voids the claim); save_offset's argument (negatives accepted, stored, reads resume forward; monotone no-op below the checkpoint); and pick the right home for each.
  3. EventReceiver::try_recv's closed shape: Err(Closed) (mirrors WakeReceiver::try_recv, ADR-008 §3) — mem-test-pinned today; ADR-021 §5 pins only recv()'s arms. Annotate the pinned shape.
  4. get_job id-global vs queue-scoped prose: core-contract.md's "queue-scoped" handle phrasing reads as a filter but the uniform behavior is id-global lookup (get_job_tx is queue-filtered). Fix the prose so the contract says what all three engines do.
  5. Mem-arithmetic transplant note: dispose the recorded one-owner-rule observation (the mem copies are byte-level transplants of the SQLite implementations; equivalence is suite-pinned three-way) — likely a no-action disposition recorded in the task Notes, but the record should say so explicitly.

Every landed amendment follows the ADR amendment discipline (dated in-place annotation citing this pass; the suite's stamps accumulate if a row's cited § text changes meaning). Items 2–3 may add suite stamp citations — check whether any existing row's stamp needs the accumulation.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Item 1 decided with the user (documented-tolerance vs ADR amendment), landed in the chosen home, decision recorded
  • ADR-023 §2 table carries the heartbeat(extend) and save_offset classifications (or the task records why a different home was chosen)
  • EventReceiver::try_recv's closed shape pinned in contract text
  • core-contract.md's get_job prose matches the uniform id-global/get_job_tx-filtered behavior
  • The mem-arithmetic observation's disposition recorded
  • Every landed amendment dated + cited; affected suite stamps checked for accumulation; taskgraph validate + workspace gates green (docs-only changes expected — code changes only if the user opts to amend wake-ordering into an enforced guarantee, which would be a follow-up, not this task)

References

  • docs/architecture/decisions/017-contract-versioning.md §2 (the class-1 window and its first-release termination)
  • tasks/review-wave-6.md §Recorded findings (the observations this task disposes)
  • docs/architecture/core-contract.md (delivery-guarantee table; §Verification backlog)
  • docs/architecture/decisions/023-fourth-review-round.md §2 (the domain table)
  • docs/architecture/decisions/021-tx-reads-and-value-shape-fixes.md §5 (the receiver arms text)

Notes

All five dispositions landed 2026-10-11 as dated in-place annotations citing this pass (the pre-release class-1 close-out pass, ADR-017 §2's terminating window). Docs-only — no code change (item 1's enforced-guarantee alternative was declined with the user, so no follow-up code task spawns).

  1. Publish→wake ordering tolerance — decided with the user, documented tolerance. The two candidates were raised with the user (2026-10-11) and the documented-tolerance posture was chosen over the ADR amendment (wake order per stream = offset order) — the amendment is arguably unachievable on Postgres while offsets are sequence-assigned pre-commit (commit order inverts sequence order; enforcement needs hole-filling/redesign) and contradicts the wake mechanism's hint-shaped best-effort posture. Landed: core-contract.md's streams section carries the tolerance paragraph (the full text: the mem multithreaded-runtime shape, the pg sequence/commit shape, the event-stays-in-the-log promise, the consumer recipe — lagged checkpoints or direct read_since sweeps below them), the delivery-guarantee obligations list carries the consumer-obligation bullet, and ADR-015 §4 carries the dated companion annotation (the ordering row pins read order only; wake order unpinned).
  2. heartbeat(extend) + save_offset(offset) — both join the ADR-023 §2 boundary/offset row, annotated in place with the home rationale: the duration row's rejection rationale never applies (a non-positive extend is a relative instant like delay, not a lease handout — a negative shortens/voids the claim and the uniform validity predicate governs; the three engines' arithmetic — saturating_add/SQL integer add — is total over non-positive values, and the heartbeat reports true when the row was processing and unexpired at call time), and save_offset's offset is literally an offset (negative stored, reads resume forward, regressions are the ADR-019 §6 monotone no-ops) — pinning rejection would have contradicted all three engines. core-contract.md's numeric-domain paragraph mirrors the extension. The verification-backlog numeric-domain row was extended to register the suite-duty follow-up those two classifications imply (their suite rows did not land here — docs-only task); before release-readiness, the review-wave-8 gate owns the audit.
  3. EventReceiver::try_recv's closed shape — ADR-021 §5 dated annotation: Err(Closed) (terminal; the None arm's causes), Ok(None) = idle, Database otherwise — mirroring WakeReceiver::try_recv (ADR-008 §3). Home is §5 so one normative section governs every receiver Err/close arm. Verified uniform by code read (mem stream.rs, sqlite stream.rs, pg stream.rs all map channel disconnect → Err(Closed)); core's rustdoc carried the shape from landing; the mem suite pins it.
  4. get_job prose — core-contract.md's queues section now says the uniform behavior: id-global lookup on the handle (rows in any queue), get_job_tx(queue, job_id) queue-filtered. queues.md's reads sentence — which mischaracterized both as "name-taking pure reads" — corrected in the same pass. Code read verified the uniform shapes (mem queue.rs/tx.rs's merged_get_job; SQLite substrate get_job(conn, id) vs the tx path; pg). ADR-019 §1's "queue-scoped claim/maintenance ops" phrasing stands — it names claim/maintenance ops only, and the corrected core-contract text now disambiguates the neighborhood.
  5. Mem-arithmetic observation — no-action disposition, recorded: the mem copies are byte-level transplants of the SQLite implementations (resolution.rs, scheduler.rs's @every parser and skip_forward); equivalence is suite-pinned three-way (backoff_curve_equivalence, enqueue_opts_resolution green on all three columns, re-verified this session). ADR-012 §2's one-owner rule is satisfied exactly as written (mem owns its modules; the suite is the honesty instrument) — no code or doc change warranted; the record here is the disposition.

Suite stamps checked (the task's accumulation duty): no existing row's cited § text changed meaning, so no stamp accumulates. The four rows citing ADR-023 §2 (extent_clamp_semantics, duration_refusal_on_non_positive_ttl, the enqueue-opts resolution row, the backoff row) test classifications the amendments left meaning-identical — rows were added to the §2 table and annotated, existing cells' semantics untouched; the receiver-arms row citing ADR-021 §5 tests recv()/save_offset/close arms the annotation left verbatim. The two new classified behaviors' suite rows are the registered follow-up (Notes 2).

Summary

release-contract-window-close completed 2026-10-11: all five wave-6 recorded observations disposed as contract/ADR text with dated annotations before ADR-017 §2's class-1 window terminates at first release. Item 1 decided with the user — documented tolerance for the publish→wake ordering observation, landed in core-contract.md (streams tolerance paragraph + delivery-guarantee obligations bullet) with the ADR-015 §4 companion annotation; the wake = offset-order ADR amendment was presented and declined (unachievable against commit- ordered pg visibility without redesign; contradictorily sharpen a hint-shaped mechanism). Items 2–3: ADR-023 §2's boundary/offset row gained heartbeat(extend) and save_offset(offset) (total — negatives well-defined, with the homes' rationale annotated, the core-contract domain paragraph mirrored, and the backlog numeric- domain row registering the suite-duty follow-up); ADR-021 §5 gained the EventReceiver::try_recv closed-shape annotation (Err(Closed), mirroring ADR-008 §3). Item 4: core-contract.md's get_job prose now says the uniform id-global/get_job_tx-filtered split (queues.md's mischaracterizing reads sentence corrected alongside). Item 5: the mem-arithmetic observation's no-action disposition recorded above. Suite-stamp accumulation checked — none required (no cited § text changed meaning). Verified docs-only: cargo build, workspace tests green (mem 102+25, SQLite 192+25, pg 125+25+9, core 25 — three-way equivalence rows green), clippy --all-targets -D warnings clean, cargo fmt --check clean, fuzz corpus replay green (6/6), RUSTDOCFLAGS="-D warnings" cargo doc --no-deps zero warnings, taskgraph validate green (79 tasks).