- C-05: Add flowgraph-api.md with complete public API surface - C-06: Document <Map> component in workflow-templates.md - C-07: Specify Conditional else-branch behavior - C-08: Add lifecycle/ownership section to reactive-execution.md - C-09: Add consumer-integration.md end-to-end walkthrough - W-02: Add reactive error boundary semantics (3 levels) - W-03: Complete ReactiveContext interface definition - W-04: Add template composition rules (8 rules) - W-05: Document removeChild for both HostConfigs - W-06: Document signal/effect disposal lifecycle - W-07: Add ADR-004 (no schema version field) - W-08: Add type compatibility depth/contract to analysis.md - W-11: Add performance characteristics section - S-01: Getting Started merged into consumer-integration.md - S-02: Add flow diagrams for template rendering pipeline - S-03: Add node status state machine diagram - S-04: Add testing strategy section - S-06: Validate source structure cross-references Review round 2 fixes: - Define TemplateNodeAttrs as alias for OperationNodeAttrs - Document CallEventMapValue and CallResult types in schema.md - Standardize CycleError naming (replace CircularDependencyError) - Add function form to Map.over type definition - Define Map aggregate completion/failure semantics - Fix immutability claim for fromCallEvents - Clarify edgeType storage alongside OperationEdgeAttrs - Clarify WorkflowNode.status === statusMap (same Signal) - Add component-to-tag mapping for WorkflowTag
33 KiB
status, last_updated
| status | last_updated |
|---|---|
| draft | 2026-05-20 |
Reactive Execution
Signal-driven status propagation, computed preconditions, and failure propagation for workflow template execution.
Overview
The reactive execution layer bridges workflow template structure (DAG) to runtime behavior (call execution). It uses @preact/signals-core (via ujsx's reactive layer) to create a signal-backed execution model where:
- Each
<Operation>node gets asignal<NodeStatus>tracking its lifecycle state - Preconditions are
computed<boolean>values that automatically resolve when upstream dependencies complete - Failure propagation follows dependency edges — a failed predecessor causes downstream dependents to abort, while independent branches continue running
- Conditionals can serve as error boundaries, catching failures and redirecting to fallback paths
This layer does NOT execute operations directly. It provides reactive state that the hub coordinator reads and writes. The coordinator calls registry.execute() when a node's preconditions are met, and updates the node's status signal when the call completes or fails.
ReactiveRoot for Workflows
class WorkflowReactiveRoot {
private statusMap: Map<string, Signal<NodeStatus>>;
private preconditions: Map<string, Computed<boolean>>;
private blockedByFailure: Map<string, Computed<boolean>>;
private graph: DirectedGraph;
private effectDisposers: (() => void)[];
constructor(graph: DirectedGraph) {
this.graph = graph;
this.statusMap = new Map();
this.preconditions = new Map();
this.blockedByFailure = new Map();
this.effectDisposers = [];
this.initializeSignals();
}
}
WorkflowReactiveRoot wraps the reactive state for an entire workflow execution. It takes the structural DAG (from the GraphologyHost) and creates reactive state for each operation node.
initializeSignals()
private initializeSignals(): void {
for (const node of this.graph.nodes()) {
const attrs = this.graph.getNodeAttributes(node);
if (attrs.category !== "operation") continue; // Skip structural nodes (already flattened)
const status = signal<NodeStatus>("idle");
const predecessors = this.graph.inNeighbors(node);
// Preconditions: all predecessors completed or skipped
const preconditions = computed(() => {
return predecessors.every(pred => {
const predStatus = this.statusMap.get(pred);
return predStatus && (predStatus.value === "completed" || predStatus.value === "skipped");
});
});
// Blocked by failure: any predecessor failed or aborted (uncaught)
const blockedByFailure = computed(() => {
return predecessors.some(pred => {
const predStatus = this.statusMap.get(pred);
return predStatus && (predStatus.value === "failed" || predStatus.value === "aborted");
});
});
this.statusMap.set(node, status);
this.preconditions.set(node, preconditions);
this.blockedByFailure.set(node, blockedByFailure);
}
}
For each operation node in the DAG:
- Create a
signal<NodeStatus>starting at"idle" - Create a
computed<boolean>that'struewhen all predecessor nodes have status"completed"(or"skipped"— a skipped node satisfies its dependents' preconditions) - Create a
computed<NodeStatus | null>that detects whether any predecessor has failed or been aborted, triggering a cascade - Register an abort function that cascades to all descendants
Status lifecycle
The signal-based status lifecycle mirrors CallStatus with workflow-specific additions:
┌──────┐
┌────────│ idle │────────────┐
│ └──┬───┘ │
│ │ predecessor │ (no predecessors —
│ │ starts running │ root node)
│ ▼ │
│ ┌───────┐ │
│ │waiting│ │
│ └───┬───┘ │
│ │ all preds │
│ │ completed/ │
│ ┌────┤ skipped │
│ │ │ ▼
│ │ │ ┌──────┐
│ │ └──────────►│ready │
│ │ └──┬───┘
│ │ │ hub starts call
│ │ ▼
│ │ ┌────────┐
│ │ │running │──── ──── ──── ────►
│ │ └──┬──┬──┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ call │ │ call │ call
│ │ completed │ │ failed │ aborted
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ ▼ ▼ ▼
│ │ ┌───────────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌────────┐
│ │ │ completed │ │failed│ │aborted │
│ │ └───────────┘ └──────┘ └────────┘
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ (uncaught) │
│ │ │ ▼ │
│ │ │ cascades to all │
│ │ │ downstream dependents │
│ │ │ via blockedByFailure │
│ │ │ │
└──────┼──────────────┼────────────────────────────┘
│ │
│ ┌─────────┐│
└───►│skipped ││ (Conditional branch
└─────────┘│ not taken)
│
└─── all are terminal states
Full transition rules:
idle → waiting (predecessor starts running)
idle → ready (no predecessors — root node)
waiting → ready (all predecessors completed or skipped)
waiting → aborted (predecessor failed and failure is uncaught)
ready → running (hub starts the call)
running → completed (call succeeded)
running → failed (call threw an error)
running → aborted (call cancelled externally)
failed → [terminal] (no further transitions)
aborted → [terminal] (no further transitions)
skipped → [terminal] (conditional branch not taken)
completed → [terminal] (no further transitions)
| Status | Meaning | Signal trigger |
|---|---|---|
idle |
Node just created, no predecessor activity yet | Initial state |
waiting |
At least one predecessor is running, none have completed yet | Any predecessor status change |
ready |
All predecessors completed or skipped (preconditions met) | computed resolves to true |
running |
Call executing | Hub sets status.value = "running" |
completed |
Call succeeded | Hub sets status.value = "completed" |
failed |
Call failed (uncaught error) | Hub sets status.value = "failed" |
aborted |
Call cancelled, or cascaded from failed predecessor | Hub or cascade sets status.value = "aborted" |
skipped |
Conditional branch not taken | Conditional evaluation sets this |
The key distinction between failed and aborted:
failedmeans the operation itself threw an error. The node is the source of the failure.abortedmeans the operation was cancelled or a predecessor failed. The node is a victim of failure propagation.
Computed Preconditions
The core innovation of reactive execution: each node's "can I start?" question is a computed signal that automatically resolves based on upstream states.
const preconditions = computed(() => {
const predecessors = graph.inNeighbors(node);
return predecessors.every(pred => {
const status = statusMap.get(pred)!.value;
return status === "completed" || status === "skipped";
});
});
A node's preconditions are met when all predecessors have reached a satisfying terminal state (completed or skipped). A failed or aborted predecessor does NOT satisfy preconditions — it prevents the dependent from ever becoming ready.
This means:
- Adding a new predecessor automatically includes it in the check (if the DAG changes)
- A predecessor completing automatically re-evaluates all dependent preconditions
- An aborted predecessor prevents dependents from becoming
ready - A skipped predecessor satisfies preconditions (the branch was deliberately bypassed, not broken)
- No manual event wiring or callback chains
Sequential preconditions
In a sequential group (A → B → C):
- A's preconditions:
true(no predecessors, or root-level) - B's preconditions:
A.status === "completed" - C's preconditions:
B.status === "completed"
When A completes → B's preconditions become true → hub starts B → B completes → C's preconditions become true → hub starts C. All without manual event wiring.
Parallel preconditions
In a parallel group (A starts B and C simultaneously):
- B's preconditions:
A.status === "completed"(same as any sequential dependency) - C's preconditions:
A.status === "completed"(shared predecessor)
Both B and C become ready at the same time, and the hub starts them in parallel.
Join preconditions
When a node depends on multiple predecessors (e.g., D depends on both B and C completing):
- D's preconditions:
B.status === "completed" && C.status === "completed"
D only becomes ready when all predecessors complete. This is the "join" in fork-join parallelism.
Failure Propagation
Failure propagation is the mechanism by which a failed or aborted node causes its downstream dependents to abort. The key design principle: failure follows dependency edges, not structural scope.
This means:
- In a
Sequentialgroup, failure propagates forward through the chain (B depends on A, so if A fails, B aborts) - In a
Parallelgroup, sibling branches are independent — a failure in branch A does NOT affect branch B, because there are no dependency edges between them - A node that depends on multiple predecessors (a join) aborts only when it's impossible for its preconditions to ever be met
The preconditions-failure duality
Each node has two complementary reactive computations:
preconditions(computed<boolean>) — true when all predecessors arecompletedorskipped. Node can start.blockedByFailure(computed<boolean>) — true when any predecessor isfailedorabortedand the failure is uncaught (not handled by aConditional).
const preconditions = computed(() => {
const predecessors = graph.inNeighbors(node);
return predecessors.every(pred => {
const status = statusMap.get(pred)!.value;
return status === "completed" || status === "skipped";
});
});
const blockedByFailure = computed(() => {
const predecessors = graph.inNeighbors(node);
return predecessors.some(pred => {
const status = statusMap.get(pred)!.value;
return status === "failed" || status === "aborted";
});
});
When blockedByFailure becomes true and the node hasn't started (idle or waiting), the node transitions to aborted. This happens via an effect():
effect(() => {
if (blockedByFailure.value && (status.value === "idle" || status.value === "waiting")) {
status.value = "aborted";
}
});
This cascade is automatic and reactive — when a predecessor fails, all downstream blockedByFailure computations re-evaluate, and their effects fire, aborting any waiting dependents.
Sequential failure propagation
A (failed) → B (aborted) → C (aborted)
When A fails, B's blockedByFailure becomes true. B transitions from waiting to aborted. C's blockedByFailure then becomes true (B is now aborted). C transitions to aborted. The entire downstream chain aborts.
Parallel independence
┌── B (completed) ──┐
A (completed) ├── D (ready)
└── C (failed) ─────┘
When C fails:
- C's downstream dependents see
blockedByFailure = true - B is unaffected — it's on an independent branch
- D depends on both B and C. D's
preconditionswill never be met (C isfailed, notcompleted). D'sblockedByFailureis true (C isfailed). D transitions toaborted.
But crucially, this is because D depends on C, not because they share a structural scope:
┌── B (completed) ──┐
A (completed) │ (no edge from C to E)
└── C (failed) ─────┘
└── E (completed)
E has no dependency on C. E continues running regardless of C's failure. Failure follows dependency edges, not structural boundaries.
Join semantics
When a node depends on multiple predecessors (fork-join):
┌── B (completed) ──┐
A (completed) ├── D (aborted)
└── C (failed) ─────┘
D's preconditions requires both B and C to be completed/skipped. Since C is failed, D's preconditions can never be met. D transitions to aborted.
The alternative would be "partial success" — D starts with B's output even though C failed. This is NOT supported by the precondition model. If partial execution is needed, the template author should use a Conditional to handle the failure case explicitly.
Conditional as error boundary
A Conditional can catch a failure and redirect to a fallback path:
h(Sequential, {},
h(Operation, { name: "fetch-data" }),
h(Conditional, {
test: (results) => results["fetch-data"].status !== "failed",
},
// then: proceed with data processing
h(Sequential, {},
h(Operation, { name: "transform" }),
h(Operation, { name: "store" }),
),
// else: fallback path
h(Operation, { name: "notify-error" }),
),
)
If fetch-data fails:
- The
Conditional'stestfunction receives the results map includingfetch-data's status testevaluates tofalse(the operation failed)- The
thenbranch transitions toskipped - The
elsebranch (notify-error) becomesready - Downstream nodes after the
Conditionalsee theConditionalascompleted(it resolved successfully, just on a different branch)
This makes Conditional a caught error boundary. The failure is handled — downstream nodes don't see a cascade because the Conditional resolved successfully.
Without a Conditional, the failure is uncaught. It cascades through dependency edges to all dependents, which transition to aborted.
Systemic failure: aborting the entire workflow
For failures that should cancel everything (e.g., provider outage, authentication failure), the hub coordinator can abort the entire WorkflowReactiveRoot:
workflowRoot.abortAll(); // Sets all non-terminal nodes to "aborted"
This is separate from dependency-edge failure propagation. It's for systemic failures where the workflow cannot meaningfully continue regardless of which branches are independent.
Interaction with call protocol abort
There are two abort mechanisms:
- Signal cascade (this layer) —
blockedByFailureeffects transition dependents toaborted. This is automatic and follows dependency edges. - Call protocol abort (operations layer) —
PendingRequestMap.abort(requestId)propagatescall.abortedevents through the pub/sub layer. This is network-aware and handles remote calls. - Full workflow abort —
workflowRoot.abortAll()aborts all non-terminal nodes. For systemic failures.
The hub coordinator should invoke signal cascade and protocol abort together:
// When aborting a call:
workflowRoot.abortNode(nodeId); // Signal: transition dependents to aborted
prm.abort(requestId); // Protocol: cancel the remote call
// When aborting entire workflow:
workflowRoot.abortAll(); // Signal: abort everything
prm.abortAll(pendingRequestIds); // Protocol: cancel all pending calls
Signal cascades are instant. Protocol aborts may take time to propagate. They're complementary — the signal cascade ensures local state is immediately consistent, while the protocol abort ensures remote state eventually catches up.
NodeStatus vs CallStatus
NodeStatus extends CallStatus with workflow-specific states that have no call protocol equivalent:
| NodeStatus | Meaning | CallStatus equivalent |
|---|---|---|
idle |
Not started, no preconditions evaluated | None (call doesn't exist yet) |
waiting |
Preconditions not met (upstream still running) | None |
ready |
Preconditions met, eligible to start | None |
running |
Call in progress | running |
completed |
Call succeeded | completed |
failed |
Call failed | failed |
aborted |
Call cancelled | aborted |
skipped |
Conditional branch not taken | None |
The hub coordinator maps between these:
// NodeStatus → CallStatus (when starting a call)
function nodeStatusToCallAction(status: NodeStatus): "start" | "skip" | "abort" | "none" {
switch (status) {
case "ready": return "start";
case "skipped": return "skip";
case "aborted": return "abort";
default: return "none";
}
}
// CallStatus → NodeStatus (when call event arrives)
function callStatusToNodeStatus(callStatus: CallStatus): NodeStatus {
// Direct mapping for shared states
return callStatus as NodeStatus;
}
Effect-Driven Execution
The hub coordinator uses two effect()s per node — one for starting when preconditions are met, and one for aborting when failure propagates:
for (const [nodeId, preconditions, blockedByFailure] of workflowRoot.nodes) {
// Start the call when preconditions are met
effect(() => {
if (preconditions.value) {
const status = workflowRoot.statusMap.get(nodeId)!;
if (status.value === "idle" || status.value === "waiting") {
// All preconditions satisfied — start the call
status.value = "running";
const operationId = graph.getNodeAttributes(nodeId).name;
prm.call(operationId, getInput(nodeId), { parentRequestId: parentCallId })
.then(result => { status.value = "completed"; })
.catch(error => { status.value = "failed"; });
}
}
});
// Abort when a predecessor fails (uncaught failure propagation)
effect(() => {
if (blockedByFailure.value) {
const status = workflowRoot.statusMap.get(nodeId)!;
if (status.value === "idle" || status.value === "waiting") {
// A predecessor failed and no Conditional caught it — abort
status.value = "aborted";
}
}
});
}
Both effects are reactive. When a predecessor completes, the preconditions computed re-evaluates, potentially triggering the start effect. When a predecessor fails, the blockedByFailure computed re-evaluates, potentially triggering the abort effect.
The call's promise resolution updates the node's status signal, which triggers downstream preconditions and failure propagations to re-evaluate, which triggers their effects, and so on.
Effect disposal
Each effect() returns a dispose function. The WorkflowReactiveRoot tracks all effect disposers and provides a dispose() method that tears down the entire reactive graph:
dispose(): void {
for (const disposer of this.effectDisposers) {
disposer();
}
this.statusMap.clear();
this.preconditions.clear();
this.blockedByFailure.clear();
}
This is critical for cleaning up when a workflow completes, fails, or is aborted. Without disposal, signal subscriptions leak.
Full workflow abort
For systemic failures (provider outage, authentication failure), WorkflowReactiveRoot provides abortAll():
abortAll(): void {
for (const [nodeId, status] of this.statusMap) {
if (status.value !== "completed" && status.value !== "failed") {
status.value = "aborted";
}
}
// Effects will fire and clean up any waiting/ready nodes
}
This transitions all non-terminal, non-failed nodes to aborted. It's for cases where the entire workflow should stop, regardless of which branches are independent.
Reactive Error Boundaries
The reactive execution layer has three levels of error handling, each with distinct scope and semantics:
Level 1: Signal-level errors (per-node)
When a call fails, the hub coordinator sets the node's status to "failed":
status.value = "failed"; // Individual node failure
This triggers blockedByFailure in all downstream dependents, causing them to transition to "aborted". The failure propagates through the signal graph reactively — no manual error handling is needed.
Level 2: Conditional error boundaries (branch-level)
A Conditional node catches failures and redirects to an alternative branch:
h(Conditional, {
test: (results) => results["fetch-data"].status !== "failed",
},
// then-branch (happy path)
h(Operation, { name: "process" }),
// else-branch (fallback)
h(Operation, { name: "handle-error" }),
)
When the Conditional's test function evaluates to false (because a predecessor failed), the then-branch transitions to skipped and the else-branch becomes ready. Downstream nodes after the Conditional see it as completed — the failure is contained.
This is the reactive equivalent of a try/catch block. Without a Conditional, failures cascade uncaught through dependency edges.
Level 3: Workflow abort (system-level)
For failures that should cancel everything, the hub calls workflowRoot.abortAll():
workflowRoot.abortAll(); // All non-terminal nodes → "aborted"
This is for system-level failures: provider outage, authentication failure, or any condition where the workflow cannot meaningfully continue regardless of branch independence.
WorkflowErrorBoundary (coordinator-level)
The hub coordinator wraps the entire reactive execution in a WorkflowErrorBoundary — a conceptual boundary, not a signal:
try {
// Drive the workflow
for (const [nodeId, preconditions, blockedByFailure] of workflowRoot.nodes) {
effect(() => { /* start calls when ready */ });
effect(() => { /* abort when blocked */ });
}
} catch (error) {
// Unhandled reactive error — signal graph inconsistency
// This shouldn't happen in normal operation
workflowRoot.abortAll();
prm.abortAll(pendingRequestIds);
}
The WorkflowErrorBoundary catches errors that escape the signal graph (e.g., a computed that throws, an effect that errors). These are catastrophic — the reactive state is inconsistent. The boundary's job is to:
- Abort all calls via
prm.abortAll() - Set all non-terminal nodes to
"aborted"viaworkflowRoot.abortAll() - Dispose the reactive root
- Log the error for diagnostics
Error propagation summary:
| Error type | Scope | Mechanism | Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call failure | Single node | status.value = "failed" |
Cascades to dependents via blockedByFailure |
| Caught by Conditional | Branch | Conditional.test evaluates against failed status |
Redirect to else-branch, downstream sees completed |
| Uncaught cascade | Downstream chain | blockedByFailure effects |
Downstream nodes transition to aborted |
| System failure | Entire workflow | abortAll() |
All non-terminal nodes to aborted |
| Reactive error | Signal graph | WorkflowErrorBoundary catch |
Abort everything, dispose, log |
Constraints
- Signals are in-memory —
WorkflowReactiveRootstate is not persisted. If the hub restarts, the reactive state is lost and must be reconstructed from call protocol events + template re-render. - Effect-driven execution is optional — the hub coordinator can choose not to use
effect()and instead pollpreconditions.valueandblockedByFailure.valuemanually. The reactive layer provides the building blocks; the coordinator decides how to use them. - Failure follows dependency edges, not structural scope — a failed node causes only its downstream dependents (via DAG edges) to abort. Sibling branches in a
Parallelgroup are independent and continue running. This enables partial success: one branch can fail while another completes. - Conditionals are error boundaries — a
Conditionalwhose test evaluates against a failed predecessor can redirect to an else branch, catching the failure. Without aConditional, failures cascade uncaught through dependency edges. - Abort is immediate in signals, delayed in protocol — setting
status.value = "aborted"is instant, butprm.abort(requestId)takes time to propagate through the call protocol. The hub should invoke both. skippedsatisfies preconditions — askippedpredecessor is treated as "completed for the purpose of preconditions." It means the branch was deliberately bypassed, not broken.failedandabortedblock preconditions — afailedorabortedpredecessor means the dependent's preconditions can never be met. TheblockedByFailureeffect transitions the dependent toaborted.NodeStatusandCallStatusshare terminal states —running,completed,failed,abortedmap directly.idle,waiting,ready,skippedare workflow-specific additions.
Lifecycle and Ownership
The reactive execution pipeline has a clear creation order and ownership model:
Creation Order
1. Template (UNode tree)
↓ GraphologyHostConfig
2. DAG (DirectedGraph)
↓ WorkflowReactiveRoot constructor
3. Signal graph (statusMap, preconditions, blockedByFailure)
↓ ReactiveHostConfig.render()
4. WorkflowNode tree (with effects registered)
-
Template → DAG: The consumer provides a template and renders it through
GraphologyHostConfig. This produces aDirectedGraphstored in theGraphContext. -
DAG → Signal graph: The consumer creates a
WorkflowReactiveRootfrom the DAG. The constructor iterates over all operation nodes in the DAG and createssignal<NodeStatus>,computed<boolean>(preconditions), andcomputed<boolean>(blockedByFailure) for each. -
Signal graph → WorkflowNode tree: The consumer renders the template through
ReactiveHostConfig. ThecreateInstancecall for eachOperationnode looks up the corresponding signal in theReactiveRootand wires the node's effects.
Ownership
| Object | Owned by | Disposed by |
|---|---|---|
Template (UNode tree) |
Consumer | Consumer (not a reactive resource) |
DAG (DirectedGraph) |
GraphologyHostConfig's GraphContext |
Consumer (static, no disposal needed) |
WorkflowReactiveRoot |
Consumer (typically the hub coordinator) | Consumer calls root.dispose() |
| Signal graph (statusMap, preconditions, etc.) | WorkflowReactiveRoot |
root.dispose() clears all maps |
WorkflowNode tree |
ReactiveContext (created by ReactiveHostConfig) |
Cleared when ReactiveContext is garbage collected |
| Effects | WorkflowReactiveRoot.effectDisposers |
root.dispose() calls all disposers |
Key ownership rules:
WorkflowReactiveRootowns the signal graph. It creates everysignalandcomputed, tracks everyeffectdisposer, and is responsible for cleaning them all up.ReactiveHostConfigis stateless after rendering. It createsWorkflowNodeinstances and registers effects, but the effects are tracked byWorkflowReactiveRoot, not by the HostConfig.- The consumer owns the
WorkflowReactiveRootlifecycle. It creates it, drives execution by setting status values, and disposes it when done.
Disposal
// When workflow completes or is cancelled:
workflowRoot.dispose();
dispose() performs the following in order:
- Calls every
effect()disposer, unsubscribing all reactive effects. - Clears
statusMap,preconditions, andblockedByFailuremaps, releasing signal references. - The
WorkflowNodetree becomes inert — status signals no longer exist, so no updates propagate.
When to dispose:
- Workflow completes successfully (all nodes
completed) - Workflow is aborted (consumer calls
abortAll(), thendispose()) - Template is being re-rendered (dispose the old root before creating a new one — until ujsx reconciler supports re-rendering)
What NOT to dispose:
- The DAG (
DirectedGraph) is not a reactive resource. It doesn't need disposal. - The template (
UNodetree) is plain data. It doesn't need disposal.
Interaction with ReactiveHostConfig
The ReactiveHostConfig does NOT own the reactive state. It creates WorkflowNode instances during rendering, but these nodes reference signals that belong to WorkflowReactiveRoot. The rendering flow is:
// 1. Create ReactiveRoot from DAG
const workflowRoot = new WorkflowReactiveRoot(dag);
// 2. Create ReactiveHostConfig with reference to ReactiveRoot's signals
const hostConfig = new ReactiveHostConfig(operationRegistry, workflowRoot);
// 3. Render template
const root = createRoot(hostConfig, {});
root.render(template);
// 4. Drive execution (hub coordinator sets status values)
workflowRoot.statusMap.get("architect")!.value = "ready";
// ... external code starts the call, eventually:
workflowRoot.statusMap.get("architect")!.value = "completed";
// ... which triggers downstream preconditions
// 5. Cleanup
workflowRoot.dispose();
The ReactiveContext passed to ReactiveHostConfig includes a reference to workflowRoot.statusSignals so that createInstance can look up and wire signals for each node. The context does not own these signals — it's a lookup table.
Important: WorkflowNode.status and WorkflowReactiveRoot.statusMap.get(nodeId) reference the same Signal<NodeStatus> instance. There is one signal per node, owned by WorkflowReactiveRoot, and both the WorkflowNode and the statusMap hold references to it. Setting workflowRoot.statusMap.get("architect").value = "running" and setting workflowNode.status.value = "running" (where workflowNode.key === "architect") are equivalent operations on the same signal. Similarly, WorkflowNode.preconditions and WorkflowReactiveRoot.preconditions.get(nodeId) reference the same Computed<boolean> instance.
Open Questions
-
Should preconditions support OR logic? Currently all predecessors must complete (AND logic). An
anyOfpredicate would allow "start this node as soon as any predecessor completes." This would require an edge attribute or node-level configuration. -
How are retries handled at the signal level? If an operation fails and should be retried, the status would go
running → failed → ready → running. This requires resetting the status back toready, which the current state machine doesn't support (failed is terminal). Aretriedstatus or a separateretryCountattribute may be needed. -
Should the reactive graph support partial re-rendering? If a template changes mid-execution (e.g., a step is added), the ujsx reconciler could diff the old and new trees. But the ReactiveHost only supports mount rendering. Re-rendering would require reconciler support.
-
How does
maxConcurrencyinteract with preconditions? AParallelgroup withmaxConcurrency: 3should only start 3 nodes at a time, even though all preconditions are met. This is a scheduling concern, not a structural one. The reactive layer could implement this as a semaphore signal, or it could be the coordinator's responsibility. -
Should
blockedByFailurebe a separatecomputedor derived frompreconditions? Currently the design has two separate computeds —preconditions(all predecessors completed/skipped) andblockedByFailure(any predecessor failed/aborted). An alternative is a singlecomputed<NodeReadiness>that returns"ready" | "blocked" | "failed"or similar. This reduces the number of effects but makes the readiness check less composable. -
What happens to running nodes when a predecessor fails? The current spec transitions
idleandwaitingnodes toaborted. But what about a node that's alreadyrunning? Should it be cancelled (set toabortedand callprm.abort()), or should it be allowed to complete? The answer depends on whether the running node's output is still needed — which the template author decides viaConditionalerror boundaries.
References
- ujsx reactive layer:
@alkdev/ujsx/docs/architecture/reactive-layer.md - ujsx reconciler:
@alkdev/ujsx/docs/architecture/reconciler.md - Schema: schema.md —
NodeStatus,CallStatus - Host configs: host-configs.md
- Workflow templates: workflow-templates.md
- Call protocol:
@alkdev/alkhub_ts/docs/architecture/call-graph.md