Files
hub/tasks/architecture/storage/document-system-account-email-convention.md
glm-5.1 2b63cda1c7 Setup repo: migrate architecture specs, code stubs, and tasks from alkhub_ts
Copy architecture docs, ADRs, storage domain specs, research, reviews,
and 56 storage architecture tasks from the alkhub_ts monorepo. Adapt for
standalone @alkdev/hub repo structure (src/ not packages/hub/).

Sanitize all sensitive information:
- Replace private IPs (10.0.0.1) with localhost defaults
- Remove internal server hostnames (dev1, ns528096)
- Replace /workspace/ private paths with npm package references
- Remove hardcoded credentials from examples
- Rewrite infrastructure.md without private network details

Add Deno project scaffolding: deno.json (pinned deps), .gitignore,
AGENTS.md, entry point. Migrate existing code stubs (crypto, config
types, logger) with updated import paths.
2026-05-25 10:56:32 +00:00

41 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown

---
id: document-system-account-email-convention
name: Document System Account Email Convention
status: completed
depends_on: []
scope: single
risk: trivial
impact: isolated
level: implementation
---
## Description
**S03** (reframed): System-generated accounts (LLMs, bots, services) need email addresses for attribution in git commits, audit logs, and platform identity. To prevent collision between human and system-generated accounts, deployments need a documented convention.
The email domain/pattern is **deployment-configurable** — do NOT hardcode any specific domain in architecture documentation. Example conventions: `{model}@llm.example.com`, `{model}@system.example.com`, or any pattern the deployment chooses. The key requirement is that the convention is documented so implementers know how system accounts are identified.
## Decision
See `docs/decisions/storage-spec-phase1-resolutions.md` (D6): email reservation is a deployment concern, not an architecture hardcode.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] `identity.md` documents the configurable email convention pattern for system accounts
- [ ] Documentation explicitly states that NO specific domain is hardcoded — the pattern is deployment-specific
- [ ] A note is added to the accounts table or email column description explaining the convention
- [ ] Example pattern is shown (e.g., `{model}@system.example.com`) with a clear "example only" annotation
## References
- docs/reviews/storage-architecture-review-2026-04-21.md#S03
- docs/architecture/storage/identity.md
- docs/decisions/storage-spec-phase1-resolutions.md#D6
## Notes
> To be filled by implementation agent
## Summary
> To be filled on completion